Ratings of Bruce Springsteen & Radiohead albums |
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Author | ||
Kotro
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 16 2004 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 2815 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've only heard one entire Springsteen album (Born to Run), but I like it better than the 4 albums by Radiohead I know (The Bends, Ok Computer, Kid A, In Rainbows).
|
||
Bigger on the inside.
|
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14753 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Radiohead - they're great. Lorenzo has made me appreciate Springsteen's live attitude, and I really like some of his live videos. Also he wrote Because The Night and some of the songs Manfred Mann's Earth Band has done versions of that I really love. Still Springsteen's studio material, as far as I took the time to listen to it, has never convinced me. Nice polemic by the way by Saperlipopette! I can identify with much of it. Edited by Lewian - May 31 2023 at 04:28 |
||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 43731 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
All the MMEB covers of Sprigsteen are great, amazing, more fun & entertaining than the original (IMO).
|
||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
@Logan (Greg) It seems to me that everything you write confirms what I am arguing. The ranking you get on RYM has no inherent value with the quality of the music. It's just a ranking that mirrors the fan groups on RYM. There are a lot of fans of Radiohead and Bowie and Pink Floyd - these groups have a lot of reviews, these groups lead the charts with a large number of albums. And all the most important artists in rock history of XX century (Springsteen, Reed, Young, Who, Doors, Waits, Stones etc), and even commercially important, are found beyond the 100th place (Dylan is at 55th) . The Rolling Stones, the most important and long-lived rock music group is at ( I dont remember.... ) place. U2, probably the most famous rock bands of the last 30 years, are even in 2552 place. Another site like RYM might have instead of the aforementioned groups U2, Springsteen and the Rolling Stones (I have named artists of equal or greater global fame than Radiohead, Bowie and Pink Floyd) and have the highest rated album by Radiohead (for example OK Computer ) at 2552 place, as happens on RYM in The Joshua Tree. It all depends on how busy a site is with fans of various bands. If instead of young fans, linked to more modern and crossover/alternative/psychedelic rock, there were older fans, more linked to classic rock, we would have a ranking similar to that of Rolling Stones magazine, where Pink Floyd do not even appear in the Top 100 and where the importance of Radiohead and Bowie (not to mention Lamar) would be very marginal. That being the case, it should be clear why I consider RYM's chart to be of no artistic value. If anything, it has sociological value. A ranking of this type, therefore, is the height of subjectivity. It's completely unpredictable. The ranking of the Rolling Stones magazine, however, despite all the political influences it undergoes (the influence of Black Lives Matter), is much more serious and competent than that of RYM. because it is made by an editorial team that tries to balance attendance. 1) Gaye - What's going home 2) Beach Boys - Pet Sounds 3) J Miotchell - Blue 4) S Wonder - Songs in the key... 5) Beatles - Abbey Road 6) Nirvana - Nevermind 7) F Mac - Rumors 8) Prince - Purple Rain 9) Dylan - Blood 10) Lauryn Hill - The Miseducation 11) Beatles - Revolver 12) M Jackson - Thriller 13) Aretha Franklin - I never 14) Stones - Exile 15) Public Enemy - It Takes 16) Clash - London Calling 17) K West - My Beautiful 18) Dylan - Highway 61 19) Lamar - To Pimp 20) Radiohead - Kid A In this chart, Reed, Young, Springsteen, Waits, Who etc are in a good place. Not over 100 or 300. But this team doesn't decide a priori to place just one album per artist in the Top 10 or Top 20, it doesn't set itself limitations of this type, it simply votes albums based on a composite jury that in the end gives results without too many exaggerations (in the past they used to exaggerate the Beatles' presence in the Top 10, now they exaggerate a little in the presence of black music). There is a coherence in this ranking, and there is a clear trend, the one that favors classic rock, linked to the origins (progressive is not in the top positions). Obviously, there is even better than this Rolling Stones ranking, which is conditioned by the aforementioned trends. Each classification will always be subjective (just as music critics have different opinions), but a quality classification, if made with precise criteria by an editorial team of connoisseurs who listen to all the albums and then vote, obtains results that are less subjective, less linked to personal tastes and more linked to precise criteria, beauty is usually looked at, in the arts, and therefore also in music (Merlin's ranking is based on the criterion of innovation.). Then, obviously, if the classifications are divided by genre and by decades, information of a certain aesthetic (critical) value can already be given. For example, the classification made by the Italian editorial staff of Ondarock is, in my opinion, a serious and competent classification. For example: The classification of Scaruffi is very coherent with the beauty of the albums (he completely refused their commercial impact and popularity), but it si more subjective than a chart made of a collettive of persons.
Edited by jamesbaldwin - May 31 2023 at 18:21 |
||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The ranking reflects on the users who rate at RYM. If the rankings are incorrect at RYM then the algorithm is incorrect.
As I've said, I don't think it's a best list or a most important list, it's the result of a program calculating the number of ratings and rating values of those who rated albums at the site. If contemplating the seriousness or competency of the results, then that requires seeing if the algorithm and system works or is flawed according to what it attempts to do -- not what, say, you want it to do or the results that you would want. If those results (the output) are not what one would expect from the data (the input of ratings) then there likely was some incompetence in the implementation of the algorithm. If it's a good, competent and serious list depends on if it is a true representation of the ratings of the users, because that's what it's supposed to represent. To me it's just not important that those big classic names are not in the top 100 all-time, all-categories list of RYM. I use RYM mostly to discover and look into the discographies of acts and clicking on the albums to read the reviews for more modern artists. It has its utility to me for searching using various fields such as multiple genres, years, attributes etc. If those are not as popular as others there, fine by me. Not sure why it should bother one. Most of what you have listed I don't care much for so I would not rate those even if they are of importance to the history of music. I am a lover of kinds of music; not a music historian. I like the idea of rating music depending on how much we like it rather than our perceptions of its global, or perceived I should say, significance. Many rate and rank (often pros or wanna-be pros) depending on how they think it should be rated based on what they have heard about it, rather than based on how much they just plain enjoy it. If more people like and therefore rate Radiohead and Bowie there than Springsteen and The Rolling Stones, I don't see a problem with that. I am with them.. I respect the Stones significance more than I like the music (well, I do like some of the Stones music very much, but that's not important), and I just haven't liked Springsteen period (that said, you did introduce me to music of his that I did enjoy). My dad loathed the Stones and would have said they don't hold a candle to Bach and Brahms, but apples and oranges. I expect that Rolling Stone magazine list is fine for what is is, which is not what RYM's is. It may well be a regurgitation of the kinds of albums, or the actual albums, and names that they have highlighted in the past past rather than fresh interpretations or fresh perspectives (even if it is a blacker list). It tends to be a pretty conservative publication despite any potential progressive pandering (black artist/musicians are very significant, and I'm not diminishing that). It looks like the kind of list I would expect from them, no real surprises. Pretty safe and calculated. I'd be more interested to see most people's lists in our community. It' doesn't excite or surprise me. There are only two albums I have really liked on that list, which are Joni Mitchell's Blue and Kid A (not heard the Lamar except in part). As for that ondarock one, that actually has a significant number of my 2022 favourites on the page it took me to, or would have. Your link was missing a colon so not working, but here it is in workable form https://www.ondarock.it/classifiche/# 5 to 8, Beach House, Weyes Blood, The Smile (which is pretty much Radiohead, god bless 'em), and Black Midi (took a while for me) are particular favourites of mine. I also like Black Country, New Road. Funnily enough, I got into some of these because they were well rated (and ranked) for the year at RYM, and there's an influence from people at PA whose tastes I dig. And in the next list from the year, there is that Anna von Hausswolff live album, which was the top ranked live album of the year at RYM and that's how I discovered it. I can appreciate different lists that come about in different ways. I like that at RYM so many raters there seem to like the same kinds of music I do and I was surprised to see how much there is there that is highly ranked that aligns so well with my tastes. I would not expect rate your music top of the charts to be a representation of the greatest (problematic term that that can be) all-time albums. It's about rating album in your collection/ albums you know, choosing so-called greatest would involve buying into a narrative of what's canonically been held as great to a large extent. And those canons often do change over time. A lot of music once held by the arbiters of what's good has fallen out of favour and fashion, but this is rather a digression. Since lots of people there rate the kinds of music I like there, it is a particularly good resource for me. If I liked Heartland USA rock, then... well, I shudder to think, but I could see an interesting horror movie that involves people turning overnight into Heartland loving musicos, a sort of Stepford Wives meets invasion of Body Snatchers scenario only more boring. And I could be dealing with those heartland rock loving zombies Ash from Evil Dead style to spice things up else the audience all falls asleep aside from that weird kid from Deliverance. Edited by Logan - May 31 2023 at 23:04 |
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Online Points: 11675 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Rolling Stone magazine has force fed us with the same predictable lists for
decades. I like many of the classics, so lots of great music to find
there too of course. Plenty of flat out boring music that means very
little to most non-Americans as well. RS never really cared for or
understood jazz, prog - or any of the wonderful music made outside the
anglosphere. The Ramones were always more essential than Coltrane, Can
and King Crimson by default. Why should I care about them? Whenever
they’ve included music from outside their comfort zone, they always
struck me as musical tourists picking a common denominator from the very
basic starters kit of a certain genre, scene or artist. Not because
they wanted to, but because they felt like they had to.
What music listeners actually rate highly and treasure is so much more interesting than their desperate attempts to stay relevant. For curated lists that actually have a clue about both the zeitgeist, the rest of the world and the music of our near past, I’d rather look at the decade and year-lists at Pitchfork. Edited by Saperlipopette! - June 01 2023 at 01:32 |
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28070 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Springsteen is a big personality with great 'guns' and clearly thrives in a live stadium arena where he can whip the natives up into a frenzy. Not many people can go on a stage and own it they way he has always done. He is also very 'American' and his lyrics display his patriotism boldly with no shame. All power to his elbow but I will always appreciate a lot more the anally retentive, almost painfully introspective English indie band over a big bold personality like Springsteen. I could say its like comparing Apples and Oranges but its more like Beef Burgers/ Fish and Chips
|
||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I try to write my top 20
1) Robert Wyatt- Rock Bottom 2) Van der Graaf - From H to He 3) The Doors 4) Velvet Underground 5) The Rolling Stones - Sticky Fingers 6) Bruce Springsteen - Born To Run 7) Van der Graaf - Pawn Hearts 8) Soft Machine Third 9)Area - Arbeit Mach Fre 10) Talk Talk - Spirit of Eden 11) The Who - Quadro phenia 12) Beatles - Abbey Road 13) In The Court of KC 14) Pink Floyd - The Piper 15) Bob Dylan Highway 16) Television Marquee Moon 17) Cave - No More Shall We Part 18) Radiohead - Ok computed 19) Buckley - Starsailor 20) Zappa - Uncle Meat Edited by jamesbaldwin - June 01 2023 at 06:16 |
||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
||
Pekka
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 03 2006 Location: Espoo, Finland Status: Offline Points: 6442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think (maybe excluding some very latest Bruce albums) I've got pretty much the whole discographies from both on my shelves. Both have some really great albums (OK, Kid, Rainbows / pretty much everything from Born to Run to Born in the USA) and some that I barely ever listen to (Pablo, Bends, Moon / pretty much everything from the 90s onwards).
OK Computer is my favorite album from the entire bunch but there's a lot more good stuff to listen to from Bruce. So it's all very even! But if I have to choose I'll go with Springsteen because of the longevity and live work.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Interesting that Springsteen has more votes. I knew that Radiohead does have many detractors (as one person memorably had put it, music to slit your wrists too).
Yours is a particularly interesting post to me especially in the context of how this poll came to be based on a conversation in another topic. For those that didn't notice the genesis of this, it was over concerns that Radiohead albums ranked higher at RateYourMusic than various classic artists, and in fact until not that long ago OK Computer was the number one ranked album in the Rate Your Music charts (now number two) with a 4.26 rating, 89,734 ratings and 1,671 reviews. As that is your favourite album of the bunch, were you to rate say on the right scale then that would get the highest rating for you. I actually had thought about phrasing this poll as which of these artists has the higher ranked album, or some such thing but the issue raised was not just that OK Computer is ranked over these classic artists at a site for rating albums you know and like, but that Radiohead and others have, I think this is a fair summation, too many in the top 100 or so to take the list seriously, or something.... And the classics which may have 15,000 to going on 25, 000 ratings or so for certain albums (I did the stats earlier) are being ignored by not ranking higher (the ranking being based on the number of ratings as well as the average of the ratings) than they do I have a very different take and angle on this, which is why this has been discussed with a few of us participating over many thousands of words in this thread and others. Bruce Springsteen's top rated album there, Born to Run has a 3.95 rating, 15,715 ratings by the way. His next most popular, Nebraska, has 11,538 ratings, Born in the USA has 10,045 ratings. Those all would be very high numbers at PA, but RYM of course is much bigger. By comparison, Close to the Edge at PA has 4, 944 ratings. Springsteen has six albums at RYM with considerably higher numbers of ratings than Close to The Edge here, and another that has almost as many ratings. So not ignored, just a smaller number of fan raters than various others at RYM. |
||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I must admit a fact: if I observe the charts for decade, RYM is not so bad. The main problem is the Top albums of all time: in that case some popular artists of the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties find place in the at the back because only a few artists have very high ratings, and so these artists occupy the top positions with many albums. Tonight I will try to make comparisons per decade between RYM and Italian Ondarock, and you will see the similarities and differences. |
||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks Lorenzo, I have a strange interest in these kinds of statistics and their implications/ what one can infer from them. This conversation has been getting my brain to work a little better, I think. I've been taking meds for a serious case of shingles (a kind of herpes, but not the kind born of any fun). Your top 20 does seem great to me and shows to me how much we value the same music highly (that could mostly be my own list). I will listen to Born to Run by the way, as other than the BS I have heard and liked from you, I just had this bad feeling from the radio hits I grew up with. I did quite like Cheech's Born in East LA.
Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 10:50 |
||
Jared
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Offline Points: 19327 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A really easy one for me.... Bruce all the way... Asbury Park, Born To Run, Darkness, the starkness of Nebraska, the more commercial rockiness of USA... generally excellent stuff, although like Steve Earle and Jackson Browne, he doesn't get a listen these days....
Simply can't stand Radiohead I'm afraid...
|
||
Jared
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Offline Points: 19327 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yep, I think that was me...
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Could well be, it was years ago but it stuck with me. I was no Radiohead fan for many years, but little things started to turn me around. I really liked 2016's A Moon Shaped Pool, and this sequence from Westworld got to me. Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 14:42 |
||
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Offline Points: 20866 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
OK Computer 14
In Rainbows 13 The King Of Limbs 13 Kid A 12 Bruce - I got nothing |
||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Let's take the era of progressive, the Seventies:
RYM top 38 1) PF: Wish 2) PF: Dark 3) Bowie: Ziggy 4) BS: Paranoid 5) KC: Red 6) PF: Animals 7) Drake: Pink 8) S. Wonder: Songs 9) Joy Division: Unknown 10) M. Davis: Bitches ---- 11) Bowie: Low 12) Yes: Close 13) Television: Marquee 14) M Gaye : Whats 15) Led Zepp IV 16) BS: Masters 17) Dylan: Blood 18) Bowie: Station 19) Can: Future Days 20) S Wonder: innvervisions 21) Black Sabbath 22) Can: Tago Mago 23) Nascimento: Clube 24) Stooges: Fun 25) Young: After 26) Bowie: Hunk 27) Steve Reich 28) Clash: London Calling 29) F Mac Rumors 30) Young: On The Beach 31) Harrison: All Things 32) A. Coltrane: Journey... 33) J Micthell: Blue 34) Eno: Another 35) KC: Larks 36) Cohen: Songs of... 37) Can: Ege 38) TH: Fear of Music In black the albums of RYM also present on Ondarock. In green those of RYM absent on Ondarock. What can we notice? 1) Bowie: 4 albums 2) PF: 3 albums (in the Top 10)! Black Sabbat and Can: 3 albums!!! 4) KC, Wonder, Young, 2 albums. Ondarock: 1) Bowie: Low 2) Joy Division: Unknown 3) Television: Marquee 4) Bowie: Ziggy 5) Suicide: Suicide 6) KC: Red 7) Wyatt: Rock Bottom 8) PF: Dark 9) Led Zepp IV 10) Kraftwerk - The Man... --------- 11) BS: Paranoid 12) Can: Tago Mago 13) Yes: Close 14) Clash: London Calling 15) M. Davis: Bitches 16) Rolling Stones: Sticky Fingers 17) Pere Ubu: Modern Dance 18) Young: On The Beach 19) Roxy Music: For Your Pleasure 20) stooges: Fun 21) Reed: Berlin 22) Reed: Transformer 23) Drake: pink Moon 24) Neu 25) Kraftwerk: Trans... 26) Soft Machine 3 27) Genesis: The Lamb 28) Nico: Desert Shore 29) Faust I 30) M. Gaye: Whats... 31) Gang of Four: Entertainment 32) Genesis: Selling 33) Sex Pistols: Never Mind... 34) Young: Harvest 35) PF: Wish You... 36) Bowie: Heroes 37) Van der Graaf: Pawn Hearts 38) Residents: Not Avalaible In black the albums of Ondarock also present on RYM. In red those of Ondarock absent on RYM. Discover - similarities - differences.
Edited by jamesbaldwin - June 01 2023 at 18:03 |
||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's easy to spot the differences in albums covered with your highlights, but I think to highlight much more it is important to understand the differences in how the lists are derived, the contributors and how the sites operate. As you have specifically referenced rateyourmusic having multiple albums and I see thsat Ondarock has a maximum of two, this is a translation of what it says at Ondarock that I found the 70s list page
So they limit the number of albums that can be in the list, whereas rateyourmusic has no such restrictions. RYM's charts are just based on users ratings (average value of rating and number of ratings), and of course if many people like and rate one album by a band, it is likely that they will like and rate more albums by the band, thus multiple albums will be in the charts. I don't know how many contributors there are to Ondarock (how many people that list was derived from) but that is something I would wish to evaluate when making comparisons. It's a different thing being a rater just rating lots of albums you like, then a program computes all that those ratings for the ranking, than it is to be contributor to such lists because that becomes much more considered. So while there are similarities in the albums, the charts are rather apples and oranges because of the differences in how they are derived. Edited by Logan - June 01 2023 at 21:07 |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just out of non-interest probably, I did a series of 23 polls last year covering albums in RYM charts that are also in PA while focusing on one album per artist. On album per artist not throughout the whole series of polls, but at least only one album by an artist in each poll, and these first two polls only had one per artist. This list from the first two polls only includes the ones included in Prog categories at Prog Archives. The numbers on the right indicate what were the rankings at RYM in the general music all-time chart at the time. I had neglected Spiderland before even though I know the album well. I might not have thought that it was in PA at the time. I made a mistake on it being out of PA recently, which was pointed out.
This series was a time-consuming exercise, but I had considerable time on my hands and a lot of insomnia. I had hoped that this might complement David's list as mine was compiled differently which was based on RYM's progressive rock chart instead of the general list -- I know so much in PA from my years here that that was fairly easy even if I missed more than one, or two.... If in doubt I did check PA to see if it was in. Miles Davis' In a Silent Way actually is not the top ranked Miles Davis album there, it is Kind of Blue, but I could not bring myself to include it in the list. The much more appropriate In a Silent Way was the second highest-rated Davis album. Radiohead - OK Computer (1) Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here (3) King Crimson - In the Court of the Crimson King (4) Godspeed You Black Emperor! - Lift Yr. Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven! (21) Slint - Spiderland (28) Miles Davis - In a Silent Way* (33) Kate Bush - Hounds of Love (38) Björk - Vespertine (40) Yes - Close to the Edge (52) Swans - Soundtracks for the Blind (66) Talk Talk - Laughing Stock (72) Can - Future Days (77) Sigur Rós - Ágætis byrjun (92) Death - Symbolic (102) Frank Zappa - Hot Rats (103) Eno - Another Green World (131) Genesis - Selling England by the Pound (166) Comus - First Utterance (178) Jethro Tull - Thick as a Brick (187) Tool - Lateralus (206) Kraftwerk - Die Mensch-Maschine (218) Herbie Hancock - Head Hunters (228) Opeth - Blackwater Park (249) This Heat - Deceit (268) black midi - Hellfire (285) Camel - Mirage (302) Invisible - El jardín de los presentes (329) Rush - Moving Pictures (333) Coil - The Ape of Naples (344) The Mahavishnu Orchestra with John McLaughlin - The Inner Mounting Flame (386) Gorguts - Obscura (392) Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile (403) Van der Graaf Generator - Pawn Hearts (408) Robert Wyatt - Rock Bottom (427) Magma - Rétrospective Vol. 1 & 2 (428) Neurosis - Through Silver in Blood (431)* Electric Masada - At the Mountains of Madness (433) Agalloch - Ashes Against the Grain (437) Tim Buckley - Dream Letter: Live in London 1968 (441) Mastodon - Crack the Skye (458) Soft Machine - Third (464) Santana - Abraxas (466) Captain Beefheart & The Magic Band (480) Mr. Bungle - California (487) Ulver - Bergtatt: Et eeventyr i 5 capitler (499) Isis - Panopticon (511) Caravan - In the Land of Grey and Pink (513) Boredoms - Vision Creation Newsun (519) NEU! - NEU! '75 (524) Weakling - Dead as Dreams (534) Peter Gabriel - Peter Gabriel 3 (aka "Arrgh, My Face Is Melting!", at least that's how I like to call it) (546) *whenever I see Coil - The Ape of Naples, I misread it as The Age of Nipples. I wonder what Freud would say about that (I have a feeling I know). After the first two polls, I made it that I could repeat bands/artists for the series as long as it was no more than one album per act per poll. And I started to include Prog Related and Proto-Prog (I had one nor two polls dedicated to that). For any Italian comrades who may be reading this... While there is a Prog Related Italian album in the fifth poll, the top ranked Italian album from one of our Prog categories, Museo Rosenbach - Zarathustra (1514) did not come until the 12th poll. Then in Poll 13 we had Premiata Forneria Marconi - Storia di un minuto (1601) and Banco del Mutuo Soccorso - Darwin! (1675). Radiohead also features in that poll with Hail to the Thief (1739). Then in Poll 14 of the series we get PFM again, this time with Per un amico (1602), and we get Franco Battiato with La voce del padrone (1812), additionally we get BdMS again in Poll 14 with the self-titled debut (1813). In poll 23 we had Biglietto per l'Inferno - Biglietto per l'Inferno (3284) and Il Balletto di Bronzo - Ys (3350). I remember wanting to get to Area at RYM, and I did, but I gave up on putting up the polls in PA before then as I then got busy with work and really bored with the exercise. Unfortunately. I did not save the lists behind what I posted here, so gave up on the rather fatuous, perhaps, project even though I might have returned to it otherwise (I should have posted all of it in David's topic for posterity or in my last poll). One not surprising thing was that when a band with multiple lauded albums amongst the Prognoscenti started appearing in the list like with PFM and BdMS, it was common for another album or albums by the same band to appear in the ranking soon. This happened with Gentle Giant and some others. This happens often because when fans of a band rate one album by a band high, they commonly also rate other "respected" albums by that band highly. So you do get these kinds of clusters and one who rates PFM albums, and rates them highly, is more likely than most to also rate BdSM album highly (shared audiences) and so those often will cluster into the rankings not too far apart. PFM had an album ranking at 1601 and at 1602 of all album in RYM. BdSM had a fair distance between the rankings of its albums with 1675 and 1814, when dealing with so many albums, and only including the ones included in Prog Archives, that number does not seem very much. It probably seems a much bigger difference in ranking for those types who only focus on the top 100 or so of the general music lists, but I went through significantly more than 5000 albums even though my polls stopped before then. EDIT: I was looking through my polls again and I did miss it there as it was in poll 16: Area - Arbeit macht frei (2183) I had remembered it doing quite well at RYM. 2183 may seem low a ranking to some, but that's a very good score when looking at the overall numbers and what it is higher than -- when you're talking the kind of numbers of RYM and how little it can take in terms of average rating to significantly change the chart position. I love Area (one of my very favourites), so I had been anticipating that when I went down the charts. I know, Lorenzo, that is a band you too hold in high regard (of course you being my number one Italian comrade). Edited by Logan - June 03 2023 at 00:57 |
||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They were one of the most popular bands in the 70's, and are one of the most popular bands now, so this is a pretty good argument in favor of RYM.
Keep in mind that some artists are more known for their singles and are popular radio artists, while other bands are either just more album oriented (PF), or are less likely to attract real devotees. RYM is mostly about albums. That is reflected in RYM's amount of ratings, but the average ratings of, say Michael Jackson's classic albums are still very high. So ultimately, this is a non-issue. Just because the amount of ratings doesn't line up with what you'd expect based on album or ticket sales from when these albums were made, doesn't mean the ratings themselves are invalid, and like Logan pointed out, the artists you call "almost ignored" have very good ratings. Also, Loveless is highly regarded both on RYM and outside.How is that "devoid of any logic"? Because it doesn't line up with your expectations? Because it's not what Rolling Stone would say? There's a lot of highly regarded and popular hip-hop albums on RYM. I wouldn't have been able to guess what they would be before seeing what they are, because that's not my kind of music. But that doesn't mean they're invalid choices. Before I ever started using RYM I was already aware of Loveless as a highly popular album, so if anything, it would be "devoid of any logic" if RYM didn't reflect that. if it was mostly fan groups pumping up ratings, why didn't they do the same to the other 2 MBV albums? You could say the same about Yes on PA. RYM has its issues for sure, but the reviews show that most people who rate albums do so because they have an interest in the genre. You wouldn't find enough hip-hop fans who hate prog review-bombing Yes albums, for instance, to make any difference.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |