Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Best Progressive Rock Band of The '60s?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The Best Progressive Rock Band of The '60s?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Best Progressive Rock Band of The '60s?
    Posted: January 03 2023 at 21:55

Inspired by Drew's poll, I certainly find this question interesting and very well suited for a thorough discussion.

So, what is your answer to it, and why?

And I hope you'll enjoy it, and happy New Year! Tongue




Edited by David_D - January 10 2023 at 13:01
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2023 at 22:18
I'd have to say Tull, as they were the only fully shaped & functioning, album-producing 'prog rock' band that existed pre 1969... though, like all English rock bands, they initially started as blues/folk-rock.   Floyd maybe, but they were closer to Cabaret than prog, like the Doors were.   Probably Zappa for the states.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27956
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 04:46
^ Both Procol Harum and The Nice were such.

King Crimson is the obvious answer but rock music was moving towards a more art rock direction after Revolver. The Who, Led Zep and The Doors were all equally important in this regards. It was a general mind set change.
Back to Top
enigmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2007
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote enigmatic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 07:03
I guess it depends on your own definition of progressive rock.
IMO, first full blown progressive rock album was ITCOTCK. It means that everything released before October 10th 1969 cannot be considered as progressive rock. The bands like the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues were progressive (innovative, moving forward), but I personally wouldn't called them progressive rock bands. They definitely influenced many other bands that follow their steps.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 12:51
Moody Blues
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 16:32
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

I guess it depends on your own definition of progressive rock.
IMO, first full blown progressive rock album was ITCOTCK. It means that everything released before October 10th 1969 cannot be considered as progressive rock. The bands like the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues were progressive (innovative, moving forward), but I personally wouldn't called them progressive rock bands. They definitely influenced many other bands that follow their steps.

On the one hand, this point of view seems quite plausible to me, but on the other, I see this problem that it's like no Progressive Rock band existed before October 1969, and then suddenly from that month, it did - unless, King Crimson did.


Edited by David_D - January 04 2023 at 16:39
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 17:06
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

I guess it depends on your own definition of progressive rock.
IMO, first full blown progressive rock album was ITCOTCK. It means that everything released before October 10th 1969 cannot be considered as progressive rock. The bands like the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues were progressive (innovative, moving forward), but I personally wouldn't called them progressive rock bands. They definitely influenced many other bands that follow their steps.


Not true. Many albums that came before ITCOTCK are considered full blown prog.
KC was the one who popularized prog and turned it into a serious genre.

Examples:

Hansson & Karlsson "Monument" 1967
The Electric Prunes' "Mass In F Minor" 1967 and "Release Of An Oath" 1968
Caravan debut 1968
East of Eden - Mercator Projected  Febr 1969
Colosseum - Those Who Are About to Die Salute You Mar 1969
Ekseption - s/t July 1969
Zappa & Mothers - Uncle Meat Apr 1969
Van Der Graaf Generator - The Aerosol Grey Machine Sept 1969
High Tide - Sea Shanties also Oct 1969

Probably others but these are the ones i can think of on the spot :)






https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
enigmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2007
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote enigmatic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 19:09
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

I guess it depends on your own definition of progressive rock.
IMO, first full blown progressive rock album was ITCOTCK. It means that everything released before October 10th 1969 cannot be considered as progressive rock. The bands like the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues were progressive (innovative, moving forward), but I personally wouldn't called them progressive rock bands. They definitely influenced many other bands that follow their steps.


On the one hand, this point of view seems quite plausible to me, but on the other, I see this problem that it's like no Progressive Rock band existed before October 1969, and then suddenly from that month, it did - unless, King Crimson did.


Exactly, no progressive rock bands existed before October 1969. Who would you have in mind? The Beatles, the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues? They were not progressive rock bands. They were definitely proto-prog bands, but not prog-rock bands. One or two prog-rock infused songs don't make entire albums FULL BLOWN PROGRESSIVE ROCK ALBUM.
Back to Top
enigmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2007
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote enigmatic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 19:16
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:


Not true. Many albums that came before ITCOTCK are considered full blown prog.
KC was the one who popularized prog and turned it into a serious genre.

Examples:

Hansson & Karlsson "Monument" 1967
The Electric Prunes' "Mass In F Minor" 1967 and "Release Of An Oath" 1968
Caravan debut 1968
East of Eden - Mercator Projected  Febr 1969
Colosseum - Those Who Are About to Die Salute You Mar 1969
Ekseption - s/t July 1969
Zappa & Mothers - Uncle Meat Apr 1969
Van Der Graaf Generator - The Aerosol Grey Machine Sept 1969
High Tide - Sea Shanties also Oct 1969

Probably others but these are the ones i can think of on the spot.

With all do respect, siLLy puPPy, none of them are full blown progressive rock albums in my book. Just my very subjective opinion. And don't get me wrong, I simply love few of them you mentioned. Do you know what they are missing? Those moments that lift you to fifth dimension.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 19:22
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:


Not true. Many albums that came before ITCOTCK are considered full blown prog.
KC was the one who popularized prog and turned it into a serious genre.

Examples:

Hansson & Karlsson "Monument" 1967
The Electric Prunes' "Mass In F Minor" 1967 and "Release Of An Oath" 1968
Caravan debut 1968
East of Eden - Mercator Projected  Febr 1969
Colosseum - Those Who Are About to Die Salute You Mar 1969
Ekseption - s/t July 1969
Zappa & Mothers - Uncle Meat Apr 1969
Van Der Graaf Generator - The Aerosol Grey Machine Sept 1969
High Tide - Sea Shanties also Oct 1969

Probably others but these are the ones i can think of on the spot.

With all do respect, siLLy puPPy, none of them are full blown progressive rock albums in my book. Just my very subjective opinion. And don't get me wrong, I simply love few of them you mentioned. Do you know what they are missing? Those moments that lift you to fifth dimension.


Which track on Mercator Projected for example don't you find progressive?

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Argentinfonico View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 05 2021
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Argentinfonico Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2023 at 19:49
The Mothers of Invention without a doubt
-Will I see you tonight?
-I never make plans that far ahead.

Casablanca (1942)
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 00:33
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Floyd maybe, but they were closer to Cabaret than prog, like the Doors were.   

Can you say some more about it, Atavachron?

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ Both Procol Harum and The Nice were such.

or Richardh?

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 00:39
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

King Crimson is the obvious answer but rock music was moving towards a more art rock direction after Revolver. The Who, Led Zep and The Doors were all equally important in this regards. It was a general mind set change.

Does that mean you don't see Progressive Rock as a real, separate movement in the 60s, Richardh?


Edited by David_D - January 05 2023 at 04:31
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 00:46
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

I guess it depends on your own definition of progressive rock.
IMO, first full blown progressive rock album was ITCOTCK. It means that everything released before October 10th 1969 cannot be considered as progressive rock. The bands like the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues were progressive (innovative, moving forward), but I personally wouldn't called them progressive rock bands. They definitely influenced many other bands that follow their steps.
On the one hand, this point of view seems quite plausible to me, but on the other, I see this problem that it's like no Progressive Rock band existed before October 1969, and then suddenly from that month, it did - unless, King Crimson did.


Exactly, no progressive rock bands existed before October 1969. Who would you have in mind? The Beatles, the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues? They were not progressive rock bands. They were definitely proto-prog bands, but not prog-rock bands. One or two prog-rock infused songs don't make entire albums FULL BLOWN PROGRESSIVE ROCK ALBUM.

Still, what about King Crimson?

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 02:59
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

Exactly, no progressive rock bands existed before October 1969. Who would you have in mind? The Beatles, the Nice, Procol Harum, Moody Blues? They were not progressive rock bands. They were definitely proto-prog bands, but not prog-rock bands. One or two prog-rock infused songs don't make entire albums FULL BLOWN PROGRESSIVE ROCK ALBUM.

According to the liner notes of Caravan's debut LP, released October 1968, Progressive Rock bands (and movement) did exist in the late 60s.
The notes say:
"Caravan belong to a new breed of progressive rock groups - freeing themselves from the restricting conventions of pop music by using unusual time signatures and sophisticated harmonies. Their arrangements involve variations of tempo and dynamics of almost symphonic complexity".


Edited by David_D - January 05 2023 at 04:30
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 03:09
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Not true. Many albums that came before ITCOTCK are considered full blown prog.  KC was the one who popularized prog and turned it into a serious genre.
Examples:
Hansson & Karlsson "Monument" 1967
The Electric Prunes' "Mass In F Minor" 1967 and "Release Of An Oath" 1968
Caravan debut 1968
East of Eden - Mercator Projected  Febr 1969
Colosseum - Those Who Are About to Die Salute You Mar 1969
Ekseption - s/t July 1969
Zappa & Mothers - Uncle Meat Apr 1969
Van Der Graaf Generator - The Aerosol Grey Machine Sept 1969
High Tide - Sea Shanties also Oct 1969
With all do respect, siLLy puPPy, none of them are full blown progressive rock albums in my book. Just my very subjective opinion. And don't get me wrong, I simply love few of them you mentioned. Do you know what they are missing?  Those moments that lift you to fifth dimension.

It's a fair point, almost like progressive rock was in the process of progressing rock but hadn't quite managed it yet.   In fact of those listed, I think the High Tide has the most 'fifth dimension moments'.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
PhideauxFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 14 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 4579
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PhideauxFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 03:10
King Crimson (1969) and before that, The Moody Blues.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 03:18
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Floyd maybe, but they were closer to Cabaret than prog, like the Doors were.
Can you say some more about it, Atavachron?

Well both the Doors and early Floyd were acts as much as they were rock bands ... it was a good way to attract attention.  Hendrix, Zeppelin, ELP too and the Nice before them, all superb but well aware of the realities of Show Biz.  Spectacle Rock is not necessarily Prog Rock, just like Glam Rock is not necessarily Arena Rock.

I happen to think The Thougts of Emerlist Davjack displays the first evidence of true prog rock, but it isn't necessarily the first prog album and certainly isn't the most effective or influential or successful one.   It's a matter of context.



Edited by Atavachron - January 05 2023 at 03:21
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 05:11
Originally posted by enigmatic enigmatic wrote:

With all do respect, siLLy puPPy, none of them are full blown progressive rock albums in my book. Just my very subjective opinion. And don't get me wrong, I simply love few of them you mentioned. Do you know what they are missing? Those moments that lift you to fifth dimension.

But I surely like this ambition in your understanding of Progresssive Rock, Enigmatic. Tongue
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
enigmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2007
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote enigmatic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2023 at 06:53
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:


According to the liner notes of Caravan's debut LP, released October 1968, Progressive Rock bands (and movement) did exist in the late 60s.
The notes say:
"Caravan belong to a new breed of progressive rock groups - freeing themselves from the restricting conventions of pop music by using unusual time signatures and sophisticated harmonies. Their arrangements involve variations of tempo and dynamics of almost symphonic complexity".


I have a bad news David, this text is from 1972, not 1968. No one would write that in 1968. Progressive rock as a label/term wasn't defined in 1968. This is from 1972 MGM reissue of Caravan's debut. Liner notes were written by David Hughes who used to write for some independent UK magazines. Plenty of his interviews were with progressive rock artists / bands. The original liner notes from 1968 Verve release are completely different, written in typical 1960s style. Look in discogs.com. Find the LP, download the image of back cover to your PC, zoom it. There are some references to Hendrix and Jefferson Airplane, but nothing about progressive rock. "I think Caravan like Hendrix..(..) they work in the Airplane direction of overall sound, John Coltrane's sheets of sound, each tune constructed, built up with layers of sound."
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.