![]() |
Top 50 of the 2010s as rated on RYM and PA |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | ||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes, but when I worked out this list, I didn't find this album to be in line with the Prog Rock definition, I used as basis for making it. |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
PhideauxFan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 14 2007 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 4579 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thank you for that list !
![]() I've got 23 of these albums.
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Aallriight, then your collection certainly includes some of the most appreciated 2010's albums - which I in general am fond of concerning my collection. And thanks!
![]() Edited by David_D - May 13 2022 at 03:54 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12425 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
When working out a list like this one, many decisions about what to include must be taken, as RYM's definition of Progressive Rock is very different from PA's. On RYM for instance, To Be Kind is not considered to be Prog.
|
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12425 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Edited by Saperlipopette! - May 13 2022 at 06:41 |
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's not that simple, as I see it, because the number of ratings on PA was very small comparing to the one on RYM, so To Be Kind would absolutely not come on this top list if only counting PA ratings. |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12425 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Lol, really feels that simple to me, but you just don't want Swans on your list, do you:) Or did it factually not "qualify"?
Edited by Saperlipopette! - May 13 2022 at 07:30 |
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37257 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
^^ The point of this is that it's about combined chart lists, though isn't it? So I would have thought that "To Be Kind would absolutely not come on this top list if only counting PA ratings" was not a particularly relevant comment. I find it interesting seeing the differences between the two sites and have done topics on that before. I know, David, from your comment in your Eclectic Prog themed topic that you don't consider Swans to be Prog according to your definition, and from this topic that you don't consider To Be Kind to be a Prog album.
Have you listened to To Be Kind in full and all the albums in your top 50 to see how well they fit your definition? I would think that this would be a better exercise if you tried your best to limit your personal biases when making the list, but I am interested in the specifics of why this album does not meet your criteria as well (even if I think it should be more of an aside and I would rather approach such things in a way that is more inclusive and not exclusive according to my biases). I understand that because RYM does not list Swans as Prog it may have been missed for the list, not that you have this is a reason -- they use Experimental Rock/ Post Rock for the album, but experimental post-rock comes under the Prog umbrella at PA and it has relations with other music deemed Prog in PA -- and especially easy to miss because PA does not list the album nearly as high. That said, if I were making such lists I would like to be updating and amending them and taking on suggestions (I mentioned before that I love synthesis). I suggest calculating that album from the PA and RYM ratings and seeing how it fits in the list, and maybe adding it. To me it would be applicable to the list. That said, I am interested in the details of why you or another don't think a specific album applicable to a Prog list. Debating what is and isn't Prog has been a lifeblood of PA even if it can get tiresome after all these years as it seems there is rarely much progress and we don't as a community achieve consensus. Late edit for bad typo. Edited by Logan - May 13 2022 at 16:36 |
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Regarding To Be Kind, there're many very relevant questions to relate to, and it would be too complicated and difficult for me to describe how I look at it. But let me just tell that I consider this list to be a historical document, one can't just change. Edited by David_D - May 14 2022 at 01:07 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37257 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
^ Then maybe this "historical document" made in January 2020 should have remained in the past. Just a thought.
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By "historical document" I mean, among other things, that this list is made on basis of the ratings in January 2020, and if it should be "corrected", it should be on basis of these ratings. - I can tell that the number of the ratings on RYM increases with much higher speed than the one on PA, so the number of ratings in January 2020 was much smaller than the one today. How much smaller, it varies very much for different bands and different albums, so what it was for To Be Kind can be a very good question. - But anyway, it's still just one of many questions, when talking about adding To Be Kind to the list today - which by the way makes me curious and wanting to give this album a new listen, even the cover alone already predicts problems.
Edited by David_D - May 14 2022 at 03:29 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
My general method for deciding which albums to include was as the first thing RYM's and PA's classifications. If both sites agreed to consider an album as Progressive Rock, I very rarely, if at all, opposed. If only PA did, I decided it on the basis of my definition and knowledge of the album in question. In general, I can tell that my definition is much more including than RYM's but less including than what has become a part of PA's database.
Edited by David_D - May 15 2022 at 14:27 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But what is your opinion, Greg, would you say that To Be Kind meets the requirements of my Prog definition?
|
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
Saperlipopette! ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12425 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Btw: I'm quite certain Vektor - Terminal Redux with their 3:82 average from 5505 ratings, 86 reviews and Progressive Metal-tag on RYM (16th for 2014, all genres included) + 3:93 from 142 ratings and 9 reviews on PA is missing from your list as well.
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes, that must have been a miss, but RYM's main label for the band and for this album is Technical Trash Metal which can be the explanation for the miss, as it wasn't on PA's top list. I'll mention it at the end of the list.
Edited by David_D - May 17 2022 at 08:47 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
regretted Edited by David_D - December 11 2022 at 09:47 |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
David_D ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
refresh |
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
![]() |
||
DreamTechPlus ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 12 2015 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 165 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Precisely to avoid that which you fear. Some artists have greater clout and exposure and, by limiting it to one per artist, we're better able to highlight works and not just prop up some artist's whole discography. Love, DreamTechPlus.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |