Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Deppth of the Pitt - An Actors Poll
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The Deppth of the Pitt - An Actors Poll

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Which one is the better actor for you?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
7 [58.33%]
5 [41.67%]
0 [0.00%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Deppth of the Pitt - An Actors Poll
    Posted: September 30 2021 at 16:50
Yup. Simple as that.

I'll go wtih Brad Pitt, who is among my favourite actors. Yet this doesn't mean that I don't also like Johnny Depp.

Who is your pick?

images-1
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2021 at 19:07
Though Depp has fallen from grace and become somewhat bizarre, you can't tell me he wasn't one of the great actors of his time.   Pitt's okay but I haven't seen him do anything outside his comfort zone.





Edited by Atavachron - September 30 2021 at 19:10
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Man With Hat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2021 at 21:52
pitt
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34055
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Icarium Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 01:05
Both are very layerd actors and excellent metamorphical actors, they are able to change their 'skin' on demand for the role. Both can go from the fantastical to realistic, frantic and dozile both have the Dean/Brando ability to take a scene juat for their presence. But my favorite role ever is Jack Sparrow, that role transformation is a piece of art and a school in cemdic timiing. Depp wins for also have a wider pallet, that he is also a natural comedian also.
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 03:00
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Though Depp has fallen from grace and become somewhat bizarre, you can't tell me he wasn't one of the great actors of his time.   Pitt's okay but I haven't seen him do anything outside his comfort zone.




I think Depp generally played contemplative characters, whereas Pitt acted rather manic depressively. Pitt is just "okay"? I don't see any other Hollywood actor handling his roles in 12 Monkeys or Snatch.
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 05:14
No, Brad Pitt is a very good actor, but his acting is very much within the mainstream Hollywood conventions. Also in 12 Monkeys he could be replaced with a couple of other good Hollywood actors and it wouldn't change the quality of the film. It is just that he is more bankable than the others (which hasn't necessarily have to do with talent/acting skills). But again, he's very good in what he does, between comedy (e.g. Read After Burning), the stupid American (Inglorious b*****ds), action (the Ocean Eleven films, a.o.), or more serious roles (e.g. Benjamin Button)... A great Hollywood actor.
Johnny Depp, however, has shown much more versatility in his acting and roles they gave to him, be it by Jim Jarmush or by Tim Burton or by others still. He moves much less within those Hollywood conventions, imho. So, I'll go with Depp.


Edited by suitkees - October 01 2021 at 05:15

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 05:26
Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

No

Oh?.. Anyway, I cannot disagree more. Pitt's crazy role in 12 Monkeys is UNMATCHED. So is his gypsy role in Snatch.

I think Depp is the less versatile actor. Actually his works with Burton are like copycats of one another...

I like Depp in Secret Window a lot, but other than that, he was just okay for me.
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 05:47
^ Then we agree to disagree (and I think you haven't really assessed Depp's quite different roles in Burton's films...).

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2021 at 05:49
^ I've watched nearly all of them. The make-up artist(s) should have been more money for their work in them.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 02:49
I'd have to agree Pitt's performance in 12Ms is unsubtle and superficial.   He improved over time and is better when he plays against type like in The Big Short or Moneyball.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 04:23
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I'd have to agree Pitt's performance in 12Ms is unsubtle and superficial.   He improved over time and is better when he plays against type like in The Big Short or Moneyball.



What you probably see as "subtle" in Depp's acting is actually related to his "mysterious" personality, which can even be sensed in his regular photos. So subtlety in his acting is not an achievement for him. 

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

you can't tell me he wasn't one of the great actors of his time.

Yes, I can tell you, and already more than hinted that, previously. We don't have to agree though.

I was always saying that there's a problem in Robert De Niro's acting, since my adolescence, but I didn't possess the terminology to put it into words. Then, during my M.A. education, my American professor teacher who was a drama and Italian neorealism expert, stated that De Niro is very focused and convincing, but always acts with his ego. I was happy that I was not wrong in my take on him. He "wears" the roles like shirts, and you always watch a De Niro in a different outfit. On the other hand, Al Pacino can "convince" that he is a Jewish merchant, the devil etc. That's what I call incredible acting.

Back on topic, I always see a contemplative and mysterious Depp, in differnt roles (and with different make-ups, lol). I'm not trying to liken his acting to De Niro's, only drawing a parallel from my perspective. Pitt, conversely, really convinces that he is a freak in 12 Monkeys, or an Irish gypsy in Snatch.


Edited by Shadowyzard - October 02 2021 at 04:40
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 04:47
Originally posted by Shadowyzard Shadowyzard wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I'd have to agree Pitt's performance in 12Ms is unsubtle and superficial.   He improved over time and is better when he plays against type like in The Big Short or Moneyball.
What you probably see as "subtle" in Depp's acting is actually related to his "mysterious" personality, which can even be sensed in his regular photos. So subtlety in his acting is not an achievement for him.
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

you can't tell me he wasn't one of the great actors of his time.
Yes, I can tell you, and already more than hinted that, previously. We don't have to agree though.

I was always saying that there's a problem in Robert De Niro's acting, since my adolescence, but I didn't possess the terminology to put it into words. Then, during my M.A. education, my American professor teacher who was a drama and Italian neorealism expert, stated that De Niro is very focused and convincing, but always acts with his ego. I was happy that I was not wrong in my take on him. He "wears" the roles like shirts, and you always watch a De Niro in a different outfit. On the other hand, Al Pacino can "convince" that he is a Jewish merchant, the devil etc. That's what I call incredible acting.

We certainly can disagree about Depp vs. Pitt but when it comes to DeNiro & Pacino, that's a different argument.   If we look at more than those actor's famous roles, like say DeNiro as the monster in Frankenstein, the boxer in Raging Bull, moron in King of Comedy, patient in Awakenings, crazy Louis Gara in Jackie Brown and on and on.   Pacino has had some great moments but not compared to that legacy, especially as the years have worn on.




Edited by Atavachron - October 02 2021 at 04:48
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 04:51
^ Well, I haven't wathced most of those movies. But my very old teacher probably watched them and assessed him that way with also considering those films.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17516
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 07:55
Hi,

I'm not sure if anything I say is gonna matter. I think that both actors go for the Hollywood Sidewalk Hall of names rather than the actual acting. In many ways, I think that they both are not great actors, and are simply a great name to have on the marquee that will sell a lot of tickets for the new show!

If one of them was not "known", I think this poll would be so one sided as to be sad. But right now, we've created something that I'm not sure can be described or defined as "their talent" , instead of their fame!

I think BP has done a lot more difficult material than JD ... but you can easily say that watching him as a pirate was a lot of fun ... but is that all that acting is about?
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Psychedelic Paul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 40187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Psychedelic Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:07
I'm making a Pitt-stop to plump for Brad instead of plumbing the Deppths for Johnny. Smile

Edited by Psychedelic Paul - October 02 2021 at 08:38
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:10
I like the enclosed sphere of the Hollywood. At least, there are stuff inside it that I like. So, I'm not in the "Hollywood is wholly crap" camp; but, to an extent, I agree with that notion. I just can enjoy stuff, irregardless of where they come from. Entertainment is entertainment for me. I can feed and enrich my intellect from other things too. So, watching intelligent films doesn't necessarily make a person intellectual or cultured, and vice versa. "Temporary suspension of disbelief" is great and makes the life worth living for.

In literature, it is the same. I can enjoy great classics, sophisticated and deeply intellectual & stylistic literature; but I also enjoy fantasy books, most of wich tremendously or even almost totally lack that which is called literariness. Sometimes being adventurous, amusing etc. is enough for me to enjoy cultural products.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35883
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:17
Originally posted by Shadowyzard Shadowyzard wrote:

Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

No

Oh?.. Anyway, I cannot disagree more. Pitt's crazy role in 12 Monkeys is UNMATCHED....

Different kinds of crazy roles, but I think another Brad, Brad Dourif, was much more compelling in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest than Brad Pitt in 12 Monkeys.
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:21
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Shadowyzard Shadowyzard wrote:

Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

No

Oh?.. Anyway, I cannot disagree more. Pitt's crazy role in 12 Monkeys is UNMATCHED....

Different kinds of crazy roles, but I think another Brad, Brad Dourif, was much more compelling in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest than Brad Pitt in 12 Monkeys.

Not comparable, for me. The movie and Dourif's acting in that were spectacular, but Pitt's character is much different. You, as a person that worked with the mentally ill, should know that they (the lunatics) have their peculiar and drastic differences in their personalities. Wink To be more explicit, Dourif's character is more of an "ill" type of the mentally unstable, whereas Brad Pitt's is more of a lunatic sort.

Edited by Shadowyzard - October 02 2021 at 08:27
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:48
Brad Pitt's wild Traveller accent in Snatch is reason enough to vote for him. Hilarious movie and great part for Pitt.




...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35883
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2021 at 08:48
Originally posted by Shadowyzard Shadowyzard wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Shadowyzard Shadowyzard wrote:

Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

No

Oh?.. Anyway, I cannot disagree more. Pitt's crazy role in 12 Monkeys is UNMATCHED....

Different kinds of crazy roles, but I think another Brad, Brad Dourif, was much more compelling in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest than Brad Pitt in 12 Monkeys.

Not comparable, for me. The movie and Dourif's acting in that were spectacular, but Pitt's character is much different. You, as a person that worked with the mentally ill, should know that they (the lunatics) have their peculiar and drastic differences in their personalities. Wink To be more explicit, Dourif's character is more of an "ill" type of the mentally unstable, whereas Brad Pitt's is more of a lunatic sort.

For me everything is comparable in one sense at least, but I know what you mean.   It's the Brady-y Bunch, part of the Brad pack one might say.

Indeed, I agree and well said, which is why I call them different.  Actually, I wouldn't even call Dourif "crazy' in the role, but rather having a mental illness; whereas, Brad Pitt's role in 12 Monkeys is more having a crazy mental illness (a fun crazy compared to Dourif's moe pitiable character).  Pitt's is more the over-the-top lunatic character.

Brad Dourif's kind of eccentric crazy in Alien Resurrection might be closer to Pitt's role in the other as it is more fun.  He's very good at eccentric.  It might be insensitive but a people acting kind of crazy or having mental illnesses in films would be an interesting topic for me.  I'd like to do Jack Nicholson in the Shining, although he was having fun in that, whereas Shelly Duvall as Wendy was going through a nervous breakdown in real life. I rather think Nicholson pretending to be crazy in Cuckoo's Nest came closer to Pitt's.

My problem with Pitt in 12 Moneys is that I never bought into the performance and I think that's a reason why that was never one of my favourite Gilliam films (much prefer Brazil and Time Bandits for instance).

My favourite Pitt roles are in the Tarantino films.  My favourite Depp film is The Ninth Gate.  An issue I have with Depp again is that I often am too aware that he is acting. I find it hard to suspend my disbelief.

And I just want to mention Peter Weller just because.

John Lithgow is another that can do crazy well/


Edited by Logan - October 02 2021 at 08:54
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.