Edited by The Anders - July 09 2021 at 17:32

siLLy puPPy wrote: ^ limbo. Don't think anyone thinks they are quite prog enough for inclusion. Soooooo, don't anyone get their hopes up

Logan wrote: So I won't be a torchbearer. My flame died. Better that one much more knowledgeable than I, both in the music and knowing details about the band and band member's history, presents the case to Admin (an SC by PM if one is passionate about it) to argue for it. I hear a Prog relation in certain music (albums), but I wouldn't be comfortable with that being my sole case. I lack the deep knowledge about the band and band members to make a solid case for it myself that I would be comfortable with for PR. And I don't know enough for Proto Prog.

They're certainly on Proggnosis (categorised there as Early Progressive).

IMO Savage Rose are eligible for a full band inclusion at PA but at the same time wonder if the concept album 'Dødens Triumf' would fit the genre

VARIOUS ARTISTS (CONCEPT ALBUMS & THEMED COMPILATIONS)

The topic was put in the wrong part of the forum (The Prog lounge) and I moved this to General Music Discussions for some of the reasons that I stated in my first post in this topic. It was checked by Crossover team members (I saw what was written in the team thread), was not accepted there, and they passed it to the Admin team to check (wasn't part of it then, but I read the comments) where it was not accepted. Even had this never been checked, this topic does not meet the standards as highlighted here for creating a Suggest New Bands topic http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=122381 (not that I would expect that from the OP as that person didn't do this Suggest new Bands).

If someone wants to resubmit it to Crossover, then I suggest PMing a Crossover team member and asking them about it, or if a collab, mentioning it directly in their thread. EarlyProg is not that comfortable with Crossover and one can see what he says.

I'd be open to re-checking it for Proto-Prog or Prog-Related, but would rather it be done the formal way now according to the policies presented here for the reasons I stated. http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=73146

If another admin wishes to move this, that's up to them. I'm not comfortable doing that and grew uncomfortable with this topic (seems to be a bit of pressure and misunderstanding). I plan to take a break from this site, so if Admin check it in my absence for PR/PP, I will abstain (I'm okay with it in if they think it fits the criteria and support the arguments that are presented).

This will be my last post in this thread, though.

Edited by Logan - July 21 2021 at 11:49

That biography only really describes the music of their later day work. I have to get my Danish rock encyclopedia.

Sorry, I know I said I wouldn't post again in this topic (never say never).  I have a frustrating delay in my work.

Edited by Logan - July 22 2021 at 13:41

^ It’s hardly your fault that I get confused, David, and I know that I confuse others. I’m not a sarcastic individual, well mostly, if you read it that way. Maybe it reactivated when it was brought back, or you didn’t search in the way I would.   I don’t know, I haven’t used progfreak in about a decade, that I recall. Even before leaving the Eclectic team, we had switched to making our own lists in the team thread. Follow your bliss,, I think. I should do more of the same. I’m only here cause I like the community, of which you are part, and enjoy interacting with others usually. I think I remember those ones that I really cared about enough to argue for, and discussed, but you might have argued for more in your years here, and I may just have a better memory than most, though not as good as it was a few years ago. I don’t know of it will or won’t be included, and am pretty dispassionate about such things these days despite the fact the I posted so much in this topic to try to explain the history and expectations. If none of that was helpful, well, there are more important things in life.