Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Are RUSH actually Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Are RUSH actually Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 27>
Author
Message
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2021 at 05:06
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

OK, I'll submit.  Rush is prog!  I'd never heard this particular song before, yikes!



Your kidding right?? You have heard La Villa before or at least heard people talk about it.....no way I am calling your bluff bro!!



Never heard it once.  Back when that song was out, I was a gigging bassist in Tulsa, Oklahoma....the "Tony Levin of Tulsa."  I played with Bob Fripp's amazing Guitar Craft student Lon Jones and his band "CAVU," and also sat in with a bunch of bands.  

I don't tend to sit around and just listen to stuff, I did that in college (73-77).  Most of what I know from Rush is their AOR catalog = "Tom Sawyer" and stuff like that.  

I also really liked their message in "Closer to the Heart," we could use some of that in the Middle East. 

Peace, Brother!  I'd post some of my own music stuff, but as a sideman, I'd need copyright permission.  The 80s were a trip! 

I kind of had an inkling that somebody like you coming on so strongly with an opinion about Rush must have not heard some of their songs.  Give a listen to songs like Natural Science.  Even Trees is kinda mini-prog.  I mean it's really short but it does go through lots of transitions compared to, say, a pure hard rock/heavy metal act of their time.
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Online
Points: 7264
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cstack3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2021 at 18:15
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Yup........here from LP liner notes. As well Alex playing a bouzouki.

Yup, the notion that a group like Rush never used a mellotron, or even mandolin and bouzouki, is down to unfamiliarly with an a artist that's not one of their favorites.

OK, guilty as charged!  I need to listen more deeply.  Good conversation by the way!! 
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
Back to Top
Frenetic Zetetic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Frenetic Zetetic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 16 2021 at 00:23
This thread is always bumped to the top every time I check PA throughout the day, lmao.

"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
Back to Top
rushfan9 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar
aka SVETONIO

Joined: May 19 2021
Location: Hemispheres
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote rushfan9 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 01:52
Hello guys! I've been a huge fan since the release of their first album. I was a kid and a fan of hard-rock back then (all kids were) and hence instantly became a Rush fan as soon as I listened to the self-titled debut. Definitely, their style was pretty complex, but it was a zeitgeist and the music of many hard-rock bands of that time was complex. Rush were heavy, too heavy to be considered as a Prog Rock band at the time.









Edited by rushfan9 - May 19 2021 at 02:01
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 02:15
How would one categorise Genesis if one had only listened to their more popular stuff from the 80s?
How would one categorise Yes if one had only heard the debut?
How would one categorise Kraftwerk if one had only listened to the first couple of albums?

It reminds me of the folks that tear rap and hip hop a new one every time there’s even a mention..no matter what artist, track or instrumentation behind..because well it’s rap and they once heard half a track over the radio...just like fans of pop once heard the middle bit of Roundabout and subsequently deem all prog equal to that.
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Frenetic Zetetic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (3) Thanks(3)   Quote Frenetic Zetetic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 02:17
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

How would one categorise Genesis if one had only listened to their more popular stuff from the 80s?
How would one categorise Yes if one had only heard the debut?
How would one categorise Kraftwerk if one had only listened to the first couple of albums?

It reminds me of the folks that tear rap and hip hop a new one every time there’s even a mention..no matter what artist, track or instrumentation behind..because well it’s rap and they once heard half a track over the radio...just like fans of pop once heard the middle bit of Roundabout and subsequently deem all prog equal to that.

Wait, you mean humans default to making massively drastic assumptions via small sets of data, then project that as a hard-and-fast rule of everything?! Lol. I agree!

"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 02:22
Oh yes!
..and well in this thread it is quite easy to laugh at...but when it continues to happen in other more serious topics, it pisses me off. Just take a look at the ‘Jerusalem thread’
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
A Crimson Mellotron View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 10 2020
Location: Bulgaria
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A Crimson Mellotron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 02:24
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

How would one categorise Genesis if one had only listened to their more popular stuff from the 80s?
How would one categorise Yes if one had only heard the debut?
How would one categorise Kraftwerk if one had only listened to the first couple of albums?

It reminds me of the folks that tear rap and hip hop a new one every time there’s even a mention..no matter what artist, track or instrumentation behind..because well it’s rap and they once heard half a track over the radio...just like fans of pop once heard the middle bit of Roundabout and subsequently deem all prog equal to that.
I always enjoy tearing rap, because I find it awful LOL (That's my problem, I know)
However, I must admit that Run the Jewels is pretty badass, probably the only rap that does something to me! Definitely a stand-out act in my book.


Edited by A Crimson Mellotron - May 19 2021 at 02:25
Back to Top
DamoXt7942 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar

Joined: October 15 2008
Location: Okayama, Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote DamoXt7942 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 03:09
Hey everyone, you wonder who he is, don't you?
Back to Top
Awesoreno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Awesoreno Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 03:54
Oh no.
Back to Top
dougmcauliffe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2019
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3895
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dougmcauliffe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 05:16
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

How would one categorise Genesis if one had only listened to their more popular stuff from the 80s?
How would one categorise Yes if one had only heard the debut?
How would one categorise Kraftwerk if one had only listened to the first couple of albums?

It reminds me of the folks that tear rap and hip hop a new one every time there’s even a mention..no matter what artist, track or instrumentation behind..because well it’s rap and they once heard half a track over the radio...just like fans of pop once heard the middle bit of Roundabout and subsequently deem all prog equal to that.

This hits the nail on the head. Thread should end here
The sun has left the sky...
...Now you can close your eyes
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 05:25
Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Spaciousmind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Spaciousmind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 06:09
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.

Being generous with 1983.  Duke barely makes it and that's 1980.  Unless people think that maybe 1 out 4 or 5 songs on an album is sufficient to be prog or anything with keyboards and synth included is Prog?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 06:57
Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.

Being generous with 1983.  Duke barely makes it and that's 1980.  Unless people think that maybe 1 out 4 or 5 songs on an album is sufficient to be prog or anything with keyboards and synth included is Prog?
I agree and have developed a new subgenre for them after 1983: proto pop. Wink
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Spaciousmind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Spaciousmind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 07:57
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.

Being generous with 1983.  Duke barely makes it and that's 1980.  Unless people think that maybe 1 out 4 or 5 songs on an album is sufficient to be prog or anything with keyboards and synth included is Prog?
I agree and have developed a new subgenre for them after 1983: proto pop. Wink

Or Collins Pop Tongue
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 08:04
Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.

Being generous with 1983.  Duke barely makes it and that's 1980.  Unless people think that maybe 1 out 4 or 5 songs on an album is sufficient to be prog or anything with keyboards and synth included is Prog?
I agree and have developed a new subgenre for them after 1983: proto pop. Wink

Or Collins Pop Tongue

you should listen to Tony Banks's album from 1983. You might stop blaming Phil for the poppy sound. 


Edited by Cristi - May 19 2021 at 08:06
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13049
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 08:38
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Not so fast partner. This begs the question: were Genesis still prog after 1983? Discuss.

Being generous with 1983.  Duke barely makes it and that's 1980.  Unless people think that maybe 1 out 4 or 5 songs on an album is sufficient to be prog or anything with keyboards and synth included is Prog?
I agree and have developed a new subgenre for them after 1983: proto pop. Wink

Proto-Poop would be more indicative.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Psychedelic Paul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Offline
Points: 39906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Psychedelic Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 08:48
I don't wish to create Permanent Waves, but Rush have always been a Hard Rock band to my ears, throughout the Different Stages of their long career. Hold Your Fire though, because Hey Presto, all the Signals indicate that Rush are a Progressive Rock band too. My guess is that Rush and their Canadian Counterparts are likely to still have a strong following in 2112, if the Snakes & Arrows of outrageous fortune are still on their side. Maybe we should have a poll and then we can have A Show of Hands, although there's no Rush. It's time now for me to Exit... Stage Left. Smile

Edited by Psychedelic Paul - May 19 2021 at 08:52
Back to Top
Progishness View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 10 2020
Location: Planet Rhubarb
Status: Offline
Points: 2565
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Progishness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 09:17
Hard rock with progressive tendencies, is my assessment of Rush.
"We're going to need a bigger swear jar."

Chloë Grace Moretz as Mindy McCready aka 'Hit Girl' in Kick-Ass 2
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2021 at 09:22
Originally posted by Progishness Progishness wrote:

Hard rock with progressive tendencies, is my assessment of Rush.

you've just simply described what we call "heavy prog", the subgenre Rush are classified here on PA. LOL
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 27>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.