Are RUSH actually Prog? |
Post Reply | Page <1 1516171819 27> |
Author | |||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13049 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
^ As I've stated before numerous times, there was no "prog" in the 70s. It was not a word used at the time. Never heard the term, and I was in bands. You listened to Yes, Floyd, Sabbath, Zeppelin, Tull, The Who, Bowie, Crimson, The Allman Brothers, Traffic, Santana, Deep Purple, The Beatles, The Stones, etc. interchangeably. There was no weird-ass delineation into little genre bins.
It was not until probably the late 70s, or more likely the 80s when such parceling and partitions of music became important. You had punk which sneered at dinosaur rock and corporate rock and arena rock. You had new wave (which punks also sneered at because the new wavers could actually sell albums after the initial punk period petered out). You had new age. You had new country (and country/western all but disappeared). And you had prog. Everything had to be neatly compartmentalized so that record execs and radio stations could properly disseminate their garbage (of course, this is when the term "classic rock" came in vogue for albums you bought new only 5 years or so previously).
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
jude111
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 20 2009 Location: Not Here Status: Offline Points: 1754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I grew up listening to Rush on my radio stations in the US in the late 70s and early 80s. These radio stations called themselves "AOR" (album oriented rock), and then in the 80s, "classic rock." The music these radio stations played side-by-side with Rush were tunes by Pink Floyd, Yes, Supertramp, Jethro Tull, Kansas, Led Zeppelin, Styx, Queen, Jimi Hendrix, early Sabbath, the Doors, Jefferson Airplane, Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan. Rush's genre was 'album-oriented rock.' That was the industry term; that's how they were marketed, to radio stations that played music by 'album-oriented rock bands like Pink Floyd, Yes, and Led Zeppelin. Rush's big breakthrough was when the Cleveland radio station WMMS played "Working Man" on their station, and championed the band on air. WMMS also played David Bowie and Bruce Springsteen, helping them attain wider attention in the US. WMMS played Rush tunes side-by-side to tunes by King Crimson, Soft Machine, MC5, the Velvet Underground, and glam band the New York Dolls (whom Rush performed with). From Wikipedia: "WMMS during this period would play a key role in breaking several major acts in the U.S., including: Rush, Roxy Music, Bruce Springsteen, Southside Johnny, Fleetwood Mac, Meat Loaf, The Pretenders, the New York Dolls, Lou Reed, Mott the Hoople, Boston, and The Sensational Alex Harvey Band. Of special note was the early support of Bruce Springsteen by Kid Leo and others, prior to the release of the Born to Run album. For the station's tenth anniversary in 1978, WMMS hosted and broadcast a live Springsteen concert at the Agora Ballroom independent of his concert tour." Here's an interview with singer/bassist Geddy Lee in 1979 during their Hemispheres tour, a year before Permanent Waves came out. The interviewer asks Geddy who he listens to, who he's influenced by. Geddy Lee answers, "Right now, I'm really in love with Bill Bruford; he used to be with Yes and Genesis." (Bruford was the drummer of Yes, then joined King Crimson, then joined Genesis briefly on tour; then released a fusion album with guitarist Alan Holdsworth (who played in Gong and Soft Machine), which was Geddy's favorite music at this time. [It's at the 8 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDZUqwlu-7Q] I remember Rush was on the cover of Circus Magazine a few times in the late 70s and 80s. Other Circus covers included Hall & Oates, Rolling Stones, Jethro Tull, Elton John, Jimi Page, Yoko & John Lennon, Queen, Carly Simon, David Bowie, Kiss, etc. Rush a "hard rock band"? No. They were certainly marketed to people who enjoyed 'hard rock." But they were mainly marketed to people who listened to AOR rock (much of it what we call prog today). And Rush themselves were influenced by fellow prog acts, particularly Genesis, Yes, and King Crimson.
Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 14:39 |
|||
jude111
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 20 2009 Location: Not Here Status: Offline Points: 1754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The notion of genre wasn't invented in the 1980s, Aristotle was writing about it over two thousand years ago in his Poetics, the earliest surviving work of dramatic theory and first to focus on literary theory. I used to listen to my parents argue who was better, Elvis or the Beatles - American rockabilly versus doowop; the merits of Merseybeat and the British Invasion; they'd talk about different 50s dance styles that were associated with different genres and regional scenes (the bop, the jitterbug, the twist, etc). The first British Invasion gave way to psychedelic music, electric folk rock, surf rock in the US, etc etc. From its inception rock was changing rapidly and going off in many different directions, birthing many different new genres and dance styles.
Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 22:52 |
|||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13049 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
I never said that genres didn't exist prior to the 70s. Of course they did. I don't know how old you are, but I would suggest that the importance and marketing of compartmentalized genres and the hyper-compartmentalization of music occurred in the late 70s/early 80s due to consolidation of corporate record companies and the emasculation of FM radio to fit very rigid marketing demographics based on ad buys. If you listened to a FM rock station in the early 70s, you heard literally everything. It was radio without borders, so to speak, and often quite radical in airplay (you could hear the MC5, War, P-Funk, Gentle Giant, early Genesis, Iggy, Neil Young, Mott the Hoople, Stevie Wonder, T.Rex, Alice Cooper and Bowie all on one station, interspersed with the Led Zeppelins, Doors, Hendrixes, Stones and Beatles of the world). Hell, even AM radio would play at least the hits of bands like Deep Purple, Yes, Tull, The Allman Brothers and Uriah Heep. That really changed later, and drastically. AOR rock made way for corporatization. It came to a point that you could hear a deejay announce they were going to play a certain band next, and with the utmost certainty you could predict that it would be one of two or three songs played in endless rotation. Ah, the endless drone of Boston, Foreigner, Styx, Kansas, REO, Bad Company, Bob Seger and John Cougar Mellonhead in a monotonous loop! We had a radio station in Detroit that started in 1980 with the call letters WLLZ -- and the running joke was that it stood for Whole Lotta Led Zeppelin, and then other stations adopted "classic rock" or "new wave", etc. Every station became a stratified, stultified niche and MTV became its own niche. And creativity died.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
Un Amico
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Brilliant. Some food for thought, folks...
Edited by Un Amico - May 09 2021 at 21:38 |
|||
Un Amico
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The classic Power-trio formation Guitar, Bass and Vocals, Drums seems to suggest Rush were/are a Hard Rock group with a penchant for long pieces of music. Mountain were similar, and Cream (live) as well as Mahogany Rush, also from Canada (I love them). There is not a violin or a flute anywhere, no cello or oboe, nothing. There is some synth here and there. I may be wrong here though because I do not know the whole Rush output. Does all of this really matter? Only as far as future listeners are concerned I guess. We need to make sure that what we pass on to them is the correct information. Most of us, we just enjoy the music. When I play a record, I don't think ' oh, I want to play some Prog now'...I just think 'I want to play In The Wake Of Poseidon' I have been thinking about it since this morning! That's it.
|
|||
jude111
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 20 2009 Location: Not Here Status: Offline Points: 1754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ah, now I see where you're coming from. I agree, radio got really bad especially in the 80s, at least in the US. (I have the impression UK radio was much more interesting.) The point I was trying to make is that Rush emerged during this period, and they definitely benefited from this corporatization of the radio that you mention: "Radio consultants Kent Burkhart and Lee Abrams had a significant impact on AOR programming. Beginning in the mid-1970s they began contracting with what would become over 100 stations by the 1980s. Abrams had developed a format called SuperStars, pioneering it at WQDR, and had been very successful in delivering high ratings." Lee Abrams was a fan of Rush; thanks to him, they got national airplay across the US on AOR stations. He wrote about Rush: "I repect those guys. Been around forever and still crankin it out. They’re pretty normal guys too. Whatever “Wave” we go through…Rush will be there…delivering. Pink Floyd are kind of like that too, but more on a grandiose and global scale…of course Pink Floyd have their share of internal drama…they have musical stability at least. Pisses me off about Yes. They had it all during the early 70’s…but screwed it up in every imaginable way. Individually brilliant…they get on stage and they can still blow you away…but if they only had the stability and consitancy of Rush!" Straight from the horse's mouth so to speak: Rush aligned with Pink Floyd and Yes, and were crucial to AOR radio formatting along with said bands. If there was a genre they were thought to be a part of, I submit the said genre was "album oriented rock," which was created in part by prog bands (and a few others like Led Zeppelin, who also benefited greatly from American AOR radio stations - that's why they were far bigger in the US than the UK). Rush, Floyd, Yes, and Zeppelin weren't hit machines like Elton John, Stevie Wonder, Paul McCartney, or the Bee Gees. Their bread-and-butter was album sales based on radio programming at AOR stations, and their songs were all over AOR radio: Working Man, Fly by Night, Temples of Syrinx, Closer to the Heart, The Trees, Spirit of Radio, Freewill, Tom Sawyer, Limelight, A Passage to Bangkok, New World Man, Subdivisions...
Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 22:45 |
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nope.....you can't simply go by a rock magazine or a music critic who both usually have an agenda. Rush has been described as being hard rock, heavy metal, acid, progressive and prog rock......bands like them are able to cover many rock based genres. So how do you explain that EMI categorized DSOtM as Popular: Pop Groups? |
|||
|
|||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There is none in UK either. There's lots of synth but it clearly leans on the jazz/fusion side of things. Further, this website, like elsewhere in the progosphere, recognises progressive metal as a part of the larger prog rock universe. Prog metal again doesn't have wood wind or string instruments nor mellotron. So Rush fits in neatly in that basket. Rush is the bridge band between the old prog and the new prog. |
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Since you admit you don't know the whole Rush output you are not qualified to pass on the correct information to future listeners. And BTW, there is a violin on the 1982 Rush album Signals.
|
|||
|
|||
Frenetic Zetetic
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 09 2017 Location: Now Status: Offline Points: 9233 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
This thread has been going on so long, RUSH is no longer prog and reverted to a shoe gaze band with progressive elements.
|
|||
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021 |
|||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Un Amico
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
If you are talking about UK the band, Eddie Jobson plays keyboards and violin.
|
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
|
|||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13049 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It's rather like Johnny Winters' Progressive Blues Experiment (1968). Great album, but it's neither progressive nor very experimental.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20029 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
||
As far as I remember there was a term "progressive rock" in the 70s (when I was at school with a lot of people who liked Yes and Genesis etc) but I never heard it called "prog" till much later.
At time like these I normally refer to my trusty 1978 NME Encyclopedia of Rock, in which ELP and Yes are labelled "techno-rock" but there is no mention of "progressive rock" in the entries for them or KC or Genesis. In the entry for Tull it says they gained a devoted following on the "progressive rock" circuit alongside others such as Ten Years After, Fleetwood Mac, Pink Floyd and The Nice, so the term existed in 1978 but not as we know it today.
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Deidre, he gone....again!
|
|||
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Growing up in Los Angeles area in the early 70s the FM station KMET 94.7 would play a lot of obscure hard rock and progressive rock and the DJs would use the term "progressive music" or "progressive rock". That is the station where I first heard Genesis, it was the Cinema Show from Seconds Out. Only played at night since it was a 11 minute song. I only heard/read the term "prog" maybe in the last 25yrs.
|
|||
|
|||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 17055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
KLOS (95.5 FM) did, too. KLOS aired Greg Stone's Stone Trek, all the way into the '90s, which was an hour of pure prog. That's where I first heard Camel! |
|||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 17055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
LOTS of synth on the '80s albums — LOTS. Mellotron (M400, owned by Hugh Syme, played by Geddy) on "Tears" from 2112 and four songs on Snakes & Arrows. Violin (played by Ben Mink) on "Losing It" from Signals. Acoustic piano (played by Hugh Syme) on "Different Strings" from Permanent Waves. And you know what? A violin, oboe, cello or flute automatically make something "prog" about as much as a food mixer does. Just ask Rick Wakeman.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 1516171819 27> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |