Are RUSH actually Prog? |
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 27> |
Author | ||||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17846 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|||
Not really, but I appreciate your expressing your thoughts on what is prog/progressive, again its just way to generalized....which is not progressive thinking. You should really, if you have not, read up on the definitions of prog/progressive sub-genres here on PA, they are very specific and ground level. Remember, Progressive Rock music is the umbrella and all the sub-genres fall under it. Both Rush and JTull fall under a specific sub-genre of Progressive Rock music.
|
||||
|
||||
Un Amico
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's fine, I do not have anything against Rush and Tull are one of my favorite bands. I am surprised Todd Rundgren does not come up more often here. He is the embodiment of the Prog spirit (the way I see it) in many ways.
I ran away from home at age 13 to go and see Gentle Giant open for EL&P...I was at the Lyceum in London in 1976 for a Colosseum II gig at 3am.. and I never stopped listening since. I do have a fairly selective approach to 'Progressive' music, in my mind not all of the stuff on this page qualifies, but I do not try to stop people enjoying what they like. Guidelines are fine as every club has its rules. I understand that. |
||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18269 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Music that is just labelled rock and doesn't have terms like progressive attached to it.
|
||||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
...and you do also realize that JTull APP was a #1 album in the US on Billboard Pop Albums, as well only reaching #16 on UK Album Charts?? So being that APP was a commercial success not make it prog now? Rush Moving Pictures only reached #3 in US on Billboard 200.
|
||||
|
||||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Thick as a Brick also went to #1 in the States. Every Yes album from Fragile to Tormato was in the top ten both in the States and the UK. Yes were way too poppy in that period.
Edited by The Dark Elf - May 04 2021 at 11:06 |
||||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||||
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 07 2019 Location: Culver City, CA Status: Offline Points: 3036 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I'd prefer The Dan and Chicago in Prog Related.
|
||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
To make things easier, give examples of music that you listen to that you consider to be prog rock. That might help your arguments. I think that you are in the classic symphonic prog fan base.
Edited by SteveG - May 03 2021 at 21:40 |
||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||||
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 07 2019 Location: Culver City, CA Status: Offline Points: 3036 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Right, but now we're veering into "how come PA doesn't label albums by genre as opposed to artists by genre?" territory. This is a near-identical argument. I'll let you in on the secret: despite the fact that a decent portion of members want this, it'll never happen.
|
||||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28028 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
and that was 'prog' in the seventies but then people were not so obsessed with labels ELP and Yes (71-77) because of popularity were very much up there in people's minds as 'prog'. After that certainly Genesis, Tull and Crimson were as well. The interesting case was always Pink Floyd. They were a lot less technical than those other bands to the point that I believe there was in actuality a 'Big Five' and then Floyd were just tagged on later because of lazy thinking. Rush were never called 'prog' it's true, from what I recollect, but there was an understanding that they were filling a bit of a hole left by many bands that packed up around the time of punk. I suspect that Rush were not keen to be called 'prog' anyway and were quick to divert away from it when it stopped being 'cool'! |
||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
|
||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 43626 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No. Expand boundaries - sounds vague, but yes. Take risks - yes. Most bands were successful, thank God. A lot of prog albums charted. It was not underground. You forgot the two basic components of progressive music - experimentation and going way beyond the "verse-chorus-verse" pattern.
|
||||
cstack3
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: July 20 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ USA Status: Offline Points: 7264 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Jeez, we should just rename this thing "Rush Archives!"
OK, they are a very good band, but I don't hear one thing from Rush that rivals "The Revealing Science of God," where Squire emulates a concert tympani by playing his fretless Guild bass guitar with a plectrum, or "Gates of Delerium," where Howe destroys his modified Telecaster for nearly 30 minutes. I could go on.
|
||||
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
|
||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
|||
|
||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||||
cstack3
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: July 20 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ USA Status: Offline Points: 7264 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
OK, what exactly is progressive about Rush? I just don't hear it. An AOR band like Journey has more prog cred IMHO. Check out Schon's guitar in this song from their debut, featuring former Zappa drummer Aynsley Dunbar. Edited by cstack3 - May 04 2021 at 06:54 |
||||
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
|
||||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 43626 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
you call Journey AOR and then post a song from their early period, first album, when they were not poppy.
|
||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18269 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^If you added conga drums to that and closed your eyes the first few minutes would sound exactly like Santana.
|
||||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20030 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Caress Of Steel and 2112 both have side long suites. A Farewell to Kings has Xanadu - that's about as prog as it gets Hemisphere has another side long suite and it has La Villa Strangiato - if that ain't prog I dunno what is. Admittedly from after Moving Pictures things changed, but I would definitely consider the Caress of Steel to Permanent Waves period prog.
|
||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- cstack3 wrote: OK, what exactly is progressive about Rush? I just don't hear it. An AOR band like Journey has more prog cred IMHO. Check out Schon's guitar in this song from their debut, featuring former Zappa drummer Aynsley Dunbar.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Again, your opinion is based on unfamiliarity, like the OP. You don't like Rush, so you're not going to investigate songs like this not found on the radio. This 20 minute epic is prog Charles, as good as Journey, Yes, whatever.
Edited by SteveG - May 04 2021 at 09:30 |
||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||||
Argo2112
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2017 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 4462 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
As many have already stated here, in the 70's Rush produced several albums that most people would consider to be prog rock ( 2112, AFTK, Hemispheres) In the early 80's they started to streamline their music like many other prog bands,( Yes, Genesis, ELP...) The songs became shorter & more accessible but still had prog rock components like time signature changes (Freewill, Tom Sawyer...) or feel changes and different movements within the song ( The Camera Eye, Natural Science...)
In short they changed over the years but always incorporated elements of prog rock in their music. |
||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
It amazes how cstack3 makes the same early prog argument for Journey as others have done for Rush but can't see the parallels.
|
||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 27> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |