Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Has Nationalism become a bad word?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Has Nationalism become a bad word?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 14>
Author
Message
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 08:59
Originally posted by Crane Crane wrote:

”Imagine no religion” etc. is a sentiment that most of the world’s people would never accept. Not just the fat American Evangelicals we all love to hate, but also the uncontacted tribes of the Amazon and those other completely marginal nations of the world. It’s an elitist notion. I really dislike this song.

Well, I really dislike religions and conservatorism.
Some people says that all the traditions must be preserved as they define the idenbtity of a people, a race or whatever they want to identify.

But let's not forget that cannibalism was a tradition somewhere and sometimes, as well as human sacrifices.
Do we really need to preserve all the traditions and the identities?

Lennon's view was utopistic, but the idea of "no gods, no nations" was already around at the end of 18th century. 
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:02
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:05
Off topic: as you are from Rhode Island, do you know whether Lovecraft's house is still visible in Providence?

(and a great album linked here)
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:07
Last: if you dislike Lennon's version, try this




I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
Crane View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2011
Location: Rhode Island
Status: Offline
Points: 411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Crane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:08
Originally posted by octopus-4 octopus-4 wrote:

But let's not forget that cannibalism was a tradition somewhere and sometimes, as well as human sacrifices.
Do we really need to preserve all the traditions and the identities?

Find me one actual cannibal who argues that his tradition of cannibalism needs to be preserved. Otherwise I’ll categorise yours as a strawman attack against the idea of preserving legitimate traditions.

Is illiteracy a tradition that needs to be upheld against the scourge of reading? Or hunger a tradition that needs to be upheld against the scourge of food?

YOU dislike religions and conservatism. Typical liberal intolerance masked as enlightened progress.
“Art is the recognition of the universal presence of God.” —Ernest Hello
Back to Top
Crane View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2011
Location: Rhode Island
Status: Offline
Points: 411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Crane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:10
Originally posted by octopus-4 octopus-4 wrote:


Off topic: as you are from Rhode Island, do you know whether Lovecraft's house is still visible in Providence?

It’s not, though his grave is.

And I like some of Lennon’s other material. “Imagine” is a bad, misguided song, no matter who sings it.


Edited by Crane - April 14 2021 at 09:18
“Art is the recognition of the universal presence of God.” —Ernest Hello
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10652
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:18
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ The Vietnam protest was diverse ranging from those who saw clearly the evil and futility of the war, to selfish bums only looking out for their own ass. I certainly wouldn't glorify hippies. When I was a kid they were the biggest jerks in the world and pretty much a bunch of idiot bullies.

What I was referring to was the fact that many saw through the old nationalistic rallying cries that got many to enlist in WWII, instead they stood up to a war that was far different from WWII. They knowingly challenged the rhetoric of serving without question. They questioned the nationalism that was not as much questioned in previous wars.
We are going to have to disagree and move on.
Move on if you want to, but for many, the response to the Vietnam war was a repudiation of the old knee jerk response to unquestioned service to country.
Does anyone else want to weigh in on this?
Back to Top
Ronstein View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 13 2020
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1280
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ronstein Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:35
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:


Does anyone else want to weigh in on this?

I can only give you the view from over the pond. The bulk of the international media coverage seemed to point to the Vietman protests centering around the birth of the counterculture which appears to have started in the US in the late 50's, came to Britain in the early 60's and got turbo-charged and sent back. 

In the UK 60's protests were mostly centered around Ban the Bomb, Feminism, legalising the pill,etc. We were also celebrating the end of conscription, so what was happening in America was viewed, to an extent, as thank (insert deity) it's not us.  

It's also important to remember that although America officially joined the Vietnam war in November 1963, they'd had fingers in that part of the world since March 1947 and the Truman Doctrine.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:36
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ The Vietnam protest was diverse ranging from those who saw clearly the evil and futility of the war, to selfish bums only looking out for their own ass. I certainly wouldn't glorify hippies. When I was a kid they were the biggest jerks in the world and pretty much a bunch of idiot bullies.

What I was referring to was the fact that many saw through the old nationalistic rallying cries that got many to enlist in WWII, instead they stood up to a war that was far different from WWII. They knowingly challenged the rhetoric of serving without question. They questioned the nationalism that was not as much questioned in previous wars.
We are going to have to disagree and move on.
Move on if you want to, but for many, the response to the Vietnam war was a repudiation of the old knee jerk response to unquestioned service to country.
Does anyone else want to weigh in on this?
As this can only result in tangents about nationalistic US wars before and after Vietnam, I will indeed move on as the basis in nationlism is self evident. It's amazing how nationalistic a people can get when attacked by a foriegn power.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10652
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 09:49
^ A people under attack is a far different situation than say a hollywood sourced presidential candidate spouting insincere nationalistic slogans to a sheep like populace.
I think the recent very scary four years we just survived under a 'president' who used nationalism as his favorite calling card has left a very bad taste for nationalism for me. Its dangerous stuff in the hands of a wealthy powerful nation like our own.
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13700
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote lazland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 10:48
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Originally posted by Crane Crane wrote:

”Imagine no religion” etc. is a sentiment that most of the world’s people would never accept. Not just the fat American Evangelicals we all love to hate, but also the uncontacted tribes of the Amazon and those other completely marginal nations of the world. It’s an elitist notion. I really dislike this song.


In defence of evangelicals, I must say that I have come across many who are neither excessive pie munchers or, indeed, American. I also dare say that there will be some porky American Evangelicals who it is possible to like.
A lot of my relatives and even immediate family are evangelicals. The media likes to exaggerate the more boorish ones. The media does love its easy targets. Evangelicals can be a lot more diverse and complicated than the media would have you believe. I'm sure you would not be surprised.

Erm, it was a joke, a witticism. 

Note to self. Must make more use of emoticons in future.......
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 11:57
Originally posted by Crane Crane wrote:

Originally posted by octopus-4 octopus-4 wrote:

But let's not forget that cannibalism was a tradition somewhere and sometimes, as well as human sacrifices.
Do we really need to preserve all the traditions and the identities?

Find me one actual cannibal who argues that his tradition of cannibalism needs to be preserved. Otherwise I’ll categorise yours as a strawman attack against the idea of preserving legitimate traditions.

Is illiteracy a tradition that needs to be upheld against the scourge of reading? Or hunger a tradition that needs to be upheld against the scourge of food?

YOU dislike religions and conservatism. Typical liberal intolerance masked as enlightened progress.

Cannibals:


P.S. - I'm anarchist, not liberal.  Like this:



I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
Crane View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2011
Location: Rhode Island
Status: Offline
Points: 411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Crane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 12:38

Did you read the article you linked? It says that the tribe are not cannibals. Even if they were, I’m not looking for an article about cannibals. I’m not interested in your thought experiment. I’m interested in a reasoned defense of cannibalism by a practitioner.
“Art is the recognition of the universal presence of God.” —Ernest Hello
Back to Top
Crane View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2011
Location: Rhode Island
Status: Offline
Points: 411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Crane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 12:45
“Art is the recognition of the universal presence of God.” —Ernest Hello
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 14:14
quite sofistic, isn'it?
There has been a moment in history when killing gladiators was normal, as well as sacrifying children to some deity.
Killing whoever lands on your island is normal for that tribe. Is contaminating their culture right?

You are a US citizen. Maybe in your DNA there are parts coming from various parts of Europe, mixed with natives and even tracks of neanderthals. Being born on a specific side of the ocean is a coincidence. All the rest, culture, nationality, religion, comes later. It's just conventions. Identifying ourselves into a tribe is what makes us similar to the other monkeys. And the anthropologucal reasons behind are the same. Kubrick has shown it very well in the first part of his Soace Odyssey
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
Crane View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2011
Location: Rhode Island
Status: Offline
Points: 411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Crane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 14 2021 at 14:33
Originally posted by octopus-4 octopus-4 wrote:

quite sofistic, isn'it?
There has been a moment in history when killing gladiators was normal, as well as sacrifying children to some deity.
Killing whoever lands on your island is normal for that tribe. Is contaminating their culture right?

You are a US citizen. Maybe in your DNA there are parts coming from various parts of Europe, mixed with natives and even tracks of neanderthals. Being born on a specific side of the ocean is a coincidence. All the rest, culture, nationality, religion, comes later. It's just conventions. Identifying ourselves into a tribe is what makes us similar to the other monkeys. And the anthropologucal reasons behind are the same. Kubrick has shown it very well in the first part of his Soace Odyssey


You seem to be an absolute relativist. I am not, and thus I don’t try to justify the unjust. I also would say that all that you see as arbitrary is rather full of meaning, even if we in our imperfect human knowledge fail to understand. Religion, ritual, art, music, these are the things that raise us above the level of animals.
“Art is the recognition of the universal presence of God.” —Ernest Hello
Back to Top
dodona View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 06 2020
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dodona Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2021 at 02:59
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

[QUOTE=SteveG]India wasn't a NATION before British occupation helped, perversely, to unite it.  India as a CIVILIZATION existed for millennia but that's not the same thing.  Yes, a body of land somewhat resembling modern India (obviously, Pakistan and Bangladesh are no longer a part of India) existed and was addressed as Hind by the Persians. But I think they too regarded Hind as a land rather than a nation.
please refer to the sources of your statements, otherwise they are of no value. Thanks a lot in advance.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2021 at 03:36
Originally posted by dodona dodona wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

[QUOTE=SteveG]India wasn't a NATION before British occupation helped, perversely, to unite it.  India as a CIVILIZATION existed for millennia but that's not the same thing.  Yes, a body of land somewhat resembling modern India (obviously, Pakistan and Bangladesh are no longer a part of India) existed and was addressed as Hind by the Persians. But I think they too regarded Hind as a land rather than a nation.
please refer to the sources of your statements, otherwise they are of no value. Thanks a lot in advance.

Not interested in dealing with THAT much arrogance, thanks. FYI I am Indian, as in resident Indian, not Indian living in USA/UK/Germany etc.
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2021 at 03:40
As India has been mentioned, let's think at what happens between India and Pakistan, formerly a singke nation as designed by the British: they both have atomic bombs and probably they are ready to use them, too. The reason of their clashes seems to stay (correct me from wrong) in ethnics and most of all in religion.

So, has nationalism become a bad word?

No. It has always been bad.

And religion is worse.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2021 at 03:45
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ A people under attack is a far different situation than say a hollywood sourced presidential candidate spouting insincere nationalistic slogans to a sheep like populace.
I think the recent very scary four years we just survived under a 'president' who used nationalism as his favorite calling card has left a very bad taste for nationalism for me. Its dangerous stuff in the hands of a wealthy powerful nation like our own.

This I agree with.  I don't think nationalism as a pretext to silence criticism of bad wars is justified.  It is likely what birthed the Ambrose Bierce quip that patriotism wasn't just the last refuge of the scoundrel but that it was the first. People going headlong into a war because nationalism blinded their ability to question whether their country was going into the war for the right reasons is not glorious in any way and is in fact the source of many problems. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 14>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.221 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.