Interactive poll team

This is likely not worth a new post, so editing this in:

Scheduling could be a hassle and I wouldn't want to overcomplicate ideas, but this just popped into my head while showering, so it may just be a case of water on the brain.  Not for all, but sometimes the following might help with the topic starters schedules and what not.

To get "some" faster turnaround when desired or advantageous in some way on a case by case basis and if agreed to by at least two parties,  we could have some sequential Interactive topics that do overlap -- one is still doing the voting process over a week, while the other is doing the nomination process. 

 "Interactive Poll A" might start on January 1, and still keep the nomination process for about a week and then the options are added.  "Interactive Poll B" could start with the nomination round when Poll A has its options up to vote.  Then when Poll A is done with officially voting (although people can still vote and comment if they like), Poll B will move or has just moved into the voting process.

So that way a nomination round in one poll and a voting round in another would overlap for about a week.

Maybe that will still be too onerous on some, and they would want a full two weeks to be able to listen through other peoples choices ,and comment, and just focus on one.  I can totally get why people would rather only focus one of the polls at a time.  Having read the OP, I find nominating my choices very easy, and don't give it that much thought to be honest as I just go with those I know and can mentally associate with the topic, and ones come to mind immediately and I lie it best when I just go with those.  Its the listening and commenting that becomes more of the issue (not so hard if only only listens to the nominations, but then I know people, and I do too, often want to listen to them all a few times before going with one.  That part does take more thought and effort for me, and I would guess most people.