Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
|
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:24 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...."
|
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18272
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:26 |
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13056
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:48 |
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...." |
We may not agree on some things, José, but I am totally with you regarding this joker. First it's the repetitive posting about the neat little bins he makes of each tiny music genre -- bins that never touch and never mix (like Pink Floyd is only psychedelic and never prog, although every single music site on the internet says the opposite, including PA). Next it will be spamming the boards with hundreds of youtube videos of Serbian prog from the 70s.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
HolyMoly
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 20:58 |
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
|
this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective.
|
My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 21:12 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...." |
We may not agree on some things, José, but I am totally with you regarding this joker. First it's the repetitive posting about the neat little bins he makes of each tiny music genre -- bins that never touch and never mix (like Pink Floyd is only psychedelic and never prog, although every single music site on the internet says the opposite, including PA). Next it will be spamming the boards with hundreds of youtube videos of Serbian prog from the 70s. |
The only thing that matters in the world is music..........Everything else is a huge bowl of steaming elephant sh*t.
|
|
|
Sacro_Porgo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2052
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 21:27 |
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers.
|
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13056
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 22:10 |
Sacro_Porgo wrote:
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers. |
I agree with Sacro. I ignored it. Calling Tull a "one hit wonder" is rather tone deaf, as are the hit pieces on ELP and Crimson. TFTO was such a bloated bag of pus that Rick Wakeman quit the band in disgust, and the band as a whole had to make an entirely different type of album on their next release, Going for the One, just to stay relevant, Tormato was fairly mediocre and Drama was forgettable. Speaking of relevance, Genesis as a band was never relevant outside the UK until Trick of the Tail and Winds and Wuthering, but by then they got more and more commercial and eventually started releasing Phil Collins romance movie themes.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13627
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 00:39 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
Within an hour, he will have posted on the site suggesting them for Prog Folk.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 06:21 |
lazland wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
Within an hour, he will have posted on the site suggesting them for Prog Folk. |
Possibly but since Prog Folk is not part of Jazz Rock and Jazz Rock is not a form of Psychedelia which is not Progressive Rock, but a form of Space Rock and Symphonic Prog is not a part of Progressive Music so then none of it can be called Music. If u doubt me check chapter 5 of his book, My Ultimate Guide to Proggy Rock Music.......
|
|
|
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 10 2020
Location: Bulgaria
Status: Offline
Points: 4132
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 14:35 |
Well, this obviously varies between different people (and I would ask: Who cares?) But for the sake of joining the discussion here are my pics in no particular order:
Genesis Yes King Crimson Pink Floyd ELP Jethro Tull
|
|
Sacro_Porgo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2052
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 20:09 |
What about Renaissance? Are they worthy of inclusion? Certainly they have enough great albums from about the right time period and certainly they were progressive enough.
|
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18272
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 20:24 |
The old guard would include Gentle Giant like I mentioned earlier just like they would include Happy the Man in a list of greatest american prog bands. Times change though so who knows.
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 21:35 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
Implying no particular order:
1. King Crimson 2. Genesis 3. Yes 4. Jethro Tull 5. Pink Floyd 6. Frank Zappa (and the Mothers of Invention) 7. ELP 8. Rush
|
Nice list but I personally would have hard time having a list of 8 bands from the first wave that didn't include Gentle Giant. I'm not sure why so many people on here neglect them. Could it be an age thing?
| I don’t like them as many of my posts can attest, but I honestly don’t see them as top tier. Nevertheless, a very good and significant band, my tastes aside.
On another matter directed at anyone or everyone, I don’t see how Zappa can ever be left out. His albums sold well, enough, but he was also more prolific than everyone else. So, his sales have to be considered as a sum total of the whole body of his work. Zappa managed to fund not only his bands, but also multiple orchestra projects, which are not cheap to fund. So, yes he was pulling in sales. His influence is also huge and he was essentially the first Prog artist.
What’s special about the number six?
|
Frank Zappa isn't a band. I have nothing against him but he's a solo artist. If you included him you would also have to include Mike Oldfield, Rick Wakeman, Peter Gabriel and maybe a few others. Otherwise it's just a list of your personal favorites. Nothing wrong with that but I don't think that was the task requested.
As for GG they are one of the most important bands whether you think so or not. They are usually ranked just after King Crimson as far as importance goes(ie number one of the "second tier" bands). A lot of people on this site don't seem to agree(maybe it's an age thing)so you aren't the only one but that doesn't change their place in the history of prog.
|
Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention are a band. It is a band in a technical sense and in a creative sense, however hierarchically driven. If not, then Jethro Tull is also a solo artist (Ian Anderson). Concerning GG, I agreed that they are musically very significant. I liked them when I first discovered them. I tired of them and don’t like them now. I don’t like the shortness of their songs. I don’t like the merciless use of staccato notes. I don’t like Schulman’s voice or his note choice. I don’t like how the guitar takes a backseat. ... On the other hand Zappa liked them. And when judged according to their own objectives, GG was exceptional. I agree. I don’t think they were that influential, Echolyn aside, and I don’t think they were that successful. GG is mainly important on PA. I don’t know where else. My age?? I always like how young I feel on PA.
Edited by HackettFan - September 10 2020 at 21:37
|
A curse upon the heads of those who seek their fortunes in a lie. The truth is always waiting when there's nothing left to try. - Colin Henson, Jade Warrior (Now)
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 21:48 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Sacro_Porgo wrote:
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers. |
I agree with Sacro. I ignored it. Calling Tull a "one hit wonder" is rather tone deaf, as are the hit pieces on ELP and Crimson. TFTO was such a bloated bag of pus that Rick Wakeman quit the band in disgust, and the band as a whole had to make an entirely different type of album on their next release, Going for the One, just to stay relevant, Tormato was fairly mediocre and Drama was forgettable. Speaking of relevance, Genesis as a band was never relevant outside the UK until Trick of the Tail and Winds and Wuthering, but by then they got more and more commercial and eventually started releasing Phil Collins romance movie themes. |
Yeah, Tull is not a one hit wonder. And Aqualung is in actuality their best album anyway. I love Trio and the whole SaBB album with it. What’s this about too experimental? I don’t think I grasp the notion.
|
A curse upon the heads of those who seek their fortunes in a lie. The truth is always waiting when there's nothing left to try. - Colin Henson, Jade Warrior (Now)
|
|
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3036
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 23:55 |
HackettFan wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
Implying no particular order:
1. King Crimson 2. Genesis 3. Yes 4. Jethro Tull 5. Pink Floyd 6. Frank Zappa (and the Mothers of Invention) 7. ELP 8. Rush
|
Nice list but I personally would have hard time having a list of 8 bands from the first wave that didn't include Gentle Giant. I'm not sure why so many people on here neglect them. Could it be an age thing?
| I don’t like them as many of my posts can attest, but I honestly don’t see them as top tier. Nevertheless, a very good and significant band, my tastes aside.
On another matter directed at anyone or everyone, I don’t see how Zappa can ever be left out. His albums sold well, enough, but he was also more prolific than everyone else. So, his sales have to be considered as a sum total of the whole body of his work. Zappa managed to fund not only his bands, but also multiple orchestra projects, which are not cheap to fund. So, yes he was pulling in sales. His influence is also huge and he was essentially the first Prog artist.
What’s special about the number six?
|
Frank Zappa isn't a band. I have nothing against him but he's a solo artist. If you included him you would also have to include Mike Oldfield, Rick Wakeman, Peter Gabriel and maybe a few others. Otherwise it's just a list of your personal favorites. Nothing wrong with that but I don't think that was the task requested.
As for GG they are one of the most important bands whether you think so or not. They are usually ranked just after King Crimson as far as importance goes(ie number one of the "second tier" bands). A lot of people on this site don't seem to agree(maybe it's an age thing)so you aren't the only one but that doesn't change their place in the history of prog.
| Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention are a band. It is a band in a technical sense and in a creative sense, however hierarchically driven. If not, then Jethro Tull is also a solo artist (Ian Anderson).
Concerning GG, I agreed that they are musically very significant. I liked them when I first discovered them. I tired of them and don’t like them now. I don’t like the shortness of their songs. I don’t like the merciless use of staccato notes. I don’t like Schulman’s voice or his note choice. I don’t like how the guitar takes a backseat. ... On the other hand Zappa liked them. And when judged according to their own objectives, GG was exceptional. I agree. I don’t think they were that influential, Echolyn aside, and I don’t think they were that successful. GG is mainly important on PA. I don’t know where else. My age?? I always like how young I feel on PA.
|
Going to have to disagree with you on GG's influence. They've influenced plenty of bands after them. Sometimes just a couple songs (Thoughts I and II by Spock's Beard, Cockroach King by Haken), and sometimes most of a band's sound (Happy the Man, Et Cetera, Bubblemath). And plenty of artists who maybe don't really have many tunes that sound like GG on the surface claim them as influences.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28039
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 11 2020 at 00:07 |
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
|
While I understand where you are coming from , I also think that consistency is way overrated , especially around here it seems. if that was the only thing that mattered then Camel were easily the best prog band as Mirage , The Snow Goose and Moonmadness are all undoubted masterpieces. Floyd maybe matched that DSOTM to Animals but no one else in that era (IMO)
|
|
Lewian
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14733
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 11 2020 at 02:52 |
Innovation has to count to some extent and on that scale KC, PF and also ELP beat Yes and Genesis easily.
Edited by Lewian - September 11 2020 at 02:52
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 11 2020 at 04:21 |
KC Yes Floyd ELP Tull Rush (who took over from Genesis when they became a pop group)
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
TheLionOfPrague
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2011
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1063
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 11 2020 at 06:38 |
The big 6 are Floyd, ELP, Genesis, Yes, Crimson and Tull. They all started roughly at the same time, they were from the same country and made prog relevant and popular. You can have other favorites but the term refers to those bands, not just any person's 6 favorite bands. I like Moody Blues more than King Crimson (and as much as ELP and Tull, if not more as well) but they're not part of the Big 6 of prog.
And bands like Kansas, Rush or Supertramp might have been as popular as those, or even more, but they are part of a different movement. From a different time and/or place. And also not seen entirely as "prog" bands by the general population. < ="text/" async="" ="//s3.amazonaws.com/js-init/1d61f2beb014840140.js">
Edited by TheLionOfPrague - September 11 2020 at 06:39
|
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 11 2020 at 06:56 |
Lewian wrote:
Innovation has to count to some extent and on that scale KC, PF and also ELP beat Yes and Genesis easily.
|
Innovation?? None of them dressed like this on stage, shaved their head down the middle or gave birth to themselves on stage! None of them would dare to be this innovative......
Edited by Catcher10 - September 11 2020 at 06:56
|
|
|