Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 21:48 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Sacro_Porgo wrote:
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers. |
I agree with Sacro. I ignored it. Calling Tull a "one hit wonder" is rather tone deaf, as are the hit pieces on ELP and Crimson. TFTO was such a bloated bag of pus that Rick Wakeman quit the band in disgust, and the band as a whole had to make an entirely different type of album on their next release, Going for the One, just to stay relevant, Tormato was fairly mediocre and Drama was forgettable. Speaking of relevance, Genesis as a band was never relevant outside the UK until Trick of the Tail and Winds and Wuthering, but by then they got more and more commercial and eventually started releasing Phil Collins romance movie themes. |
Yeah, Tull is not a one hit wonder. And Aqualung is in actuality their best album anyway. I love Trio and the whole SaBB album with it. What’s this about too experimental? I don’t think I grasp the notion.
|
A curse upon the heads of those who seek their fortunes in a lie. The truth is always waiting when there's nothing left to try. - Colin Henson, Jade Warrior (Now)
|
 |
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 21:35 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
HackettFan wrote:
Implying no particular order:
1. King Crimson 2. Genesis 3. Yes 4. Jethro Tull 5. Pink Floyd 6. Frank Zappa (and the Mothers of Invention) 7. ELP 8. Rush
|
Nice list but I personally would have hard time having a list of 8 bands from the first wave that didn't include Gentle Giant. I'm not sure why so many people on here neglect them. Could it be an age thing?
| I don’t like them as many of my posts can attest, but I honestly don’t see them as top tier. Nevertheless, a very good and significant band, my tastes aside.
On another matter directed at anyone or everyone, I don’t see how Zappa can ever be left out. His albums sold well, enough, but he was also more prolific than everyone else. So, his sales have to be considered as a sum total of the whole body of his work. Zappa managed to fund not only his bands, but also multiple orchestra projects, which are not cheap to fund. So, yes he was pulling in sales. His influence is also huge and he was essentially the first Prog artist.
What’s special about the number six?
|
Frank Zappa isn't a band. I have nothing against him but he's a solo artist. If you included him you would also have to include Mike Oldfield, Rick Wakeman, Peter Gabriel and maybe a few others. Otherwise it's just a list of your personal favorites. Nothing wrong with that but I don't think that was the task requested.
As for GG they are one of the most important bands whether you think so or not. They are usually ranked just after King Crimson as far as importance goes(ie number one of the "second tier" bands). A lot of people on this site don't seem to agree(maybe it's an age thing)so you aren't the only one but that doesn't change their place in the history of prog.
|
Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention are a band. It is a band in a technical sense and in a creative sense, however hierarchically driven. If not, then Jethro Tull is also a solo artist (Ian Anderson). Concerning GG, I agreed that they are musically very significant. I liked them when I first discovered them. I tired of them and don’t like them now. I don’t like the shortness of their songs. I don’t like the merciless use of staccato notes. I don’t like Schulman’s voice or his note choice. I don’t like how the guitar takes a backseat. ... On the other hand Zappa liked them. And when judged according to their own objectives, GG was exceptional. I agree. I don’t think they were that influential, Echolyn aside, and I don’t think they were that successful. GG is mainly important on PA. I don’t know where else. My age?? I always like how young I feel on PA.
Edited by HackettFan - September 10 2020 at 21:37
|
A curse upon the heads of those who seek their fortunes in a lie. The truth is always waiting when there's nothing left to try. - Colin Henson, Jade Warrior (Now)
|
 |
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 19048
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 20:24 |
The old guard would include Gentle Giant like I mentioned earlier just like they would include Happy the Man in a list of greatest american prog bands. Times change though so who knows.
|
 |
Sacro_Porgo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 20:09 |
What about Renaissance? Are they worthy of inclusion? Certainly they have enough great albums from about the right time period and certainly they were progressive enough.
|
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
 |
A Crimson Mellotron
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 10 2020
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Status: Offline
Points: 5713
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 14:35 |
Well, this obviously varies between different people (and I would ask: Who cares?) But for the sake of joining the discussion here are my pics in no particular order:
Genesis Yes King Crimson Pink Floyd ELP Jethro Tull
|
 |
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17993
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 06:21 |
lazland wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
Within an hour, he will have posted on the site suggesting them for Prog Folk. |
Possibly but since Prog Folk is not part of Jazz Rock and Jazz Rock is not a form of Psychedelia which is not Progressive Rock, but a form of Space Rock and Symphonic Prog is not a part of Progressive Music so then none of it can be called Music. If u doubt me check chapter 5 of his book, My Ultimate Guide to Proggy Rock Music.......
|
|
 |
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13811
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 10 2020 at 00:39 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
Within an hour, he will have posted on the site suggesting them for Prog Folk.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
 |
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 22:10 |
Sacro_Porgo wrote:
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers. |
I agree with Sacro. I ignored it. Calling Tull a "one hit wonder" is rather tone deaf, as are the hit pieces on ELP and Crimson. TFTO was such a bloated bag of pus that Rick Wakeman quit the band in disgust, and the band as a whole had to make an entirely different type of album on their next release, Going for the One, just to stay relevant, Tormato was fairly mediocre and Drama was forgettable. Speaking of relevance, Genesis as a band was never relevant outside the UK until Trick of the Tail and Winds and Wuthering, but by then they got more and more commercial and eventually started releasing Phil Collins romance movie themes.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
 |
Sacro_Porgo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 21:27 |
HolyMoly wrote:
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
| this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective. |
I left it behind for a reason, lol. Very strongly disagree with these takes on KC and Jethro Tull, and I think ELP isn't as wildly inconsistent as they're made out to be, even if they are a bit less consistent than their peers.
|
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
 |
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17993
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 21:12 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...." |
We may not agree on some things, José, but I am totally with you regarding this joker. First it's the repetitive posting about the neat little bins he makes of each tiny music genre -- bins that never touch and never mix (like Pink Floyd is only psychedelic and never prog, although every single music site on the internet says the opposite, including PA). Next it will be spamming the boards with hundreds of youtube videos of Serbian prog from the 70s.  |
The only thing that matters in the world is music..........Everything else is a huge bowl of steaming elephant sh*t.
|
|
 |
HolyMoly
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 20:58 |
ClosetothSupperBrick wrote:
In my humble opinion it really is 3 bands that pushed 70s prog to its absolute brilliance: Yes, Genesis and Pink Floyd. They could do no wrong in their heyday. Every single album collectively by them post 1970 and ending in the late 70s (not sure there's a specific year to cap it) is stunning, no bad songs on every album.
I cannot say the same for the other so-called "Big Six", KC ELP and Jethro Tull. It always puzzled me how bands that released the dregs/non-genre defining songs such as "Trio", "Toccata" and "A Passion Play" could be regarded in the same group as the other three.
King Crimson was just not good and way too experimental in the albums in between In the Wake of Poseidon and Starless and Bible Black. So many lineup changes, the albums in this transitional phase honestly only had one or two good songs per album, "Lizard", "Cirkus", "Islands", "Exiles" and I guess the for some reason popular LTIA.
ELP was also wildly inconsistent. If they had more than one monster of a song per album I think they would be up there. As it is, just having "Take A Pebble"/"Tarkus"/"Karn Evil 9" as the masterpiece of the album doesn't cut it. I don't even need to explain Tull, quite the one song wonder... I can't believe how massive a downfall the band had from one album to the next. Some great stuff on albums before and after TAAB but why couldn't they do something else equally as amazing as TAAB? "Aqualung" and "Baker Street Muse" are great but if those are their numbers 2 and 3 in the "masterpiece list", they pale in comparison to Yes/Gen/Pink.
When Yes's worst songs in their heyday (the songs not named "The Revealing Science of God" in Tales) are still pretty amazing, and many a Yes fan appreciates what they tried to do, it shows me that band was a giant step ahead of everyone else.
|
this thoughtful post kind of got left behind in the maelstrom that followed, but I want to call attention back to it as it gives an interesting perspective.
|
My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
|
 |
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:48 |
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...." |
We may not agree on some things, José, but I am totally with you regarding this joker. First it's the repetitive posting about the neat little bins he makes of each tiny music genre -- bins that never touch and never mix (like Pink Floyd is only psychedelic and never prog, although every single music site on the internet says the opposite, including PA). Next it will be spamming the boards with hundreds of youtube videos of Serbian prog from the 70s. 
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
 |
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 19048
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:26 |
|
 |
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17993
|
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:24 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours? |
That's too easy........make him listen to Pink Floyd with a red flashing sign that says "Its Prog Rock-Its Prog Rock-It's Prog Rock...."
|
|
 |
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 19048
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:10 |
Catcher10 wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be. |
Ok, I stand corrected then. Why not just have him locked in a room and have him listen to Justin Beiber and Brittany Spears songs for a few hours?
|
 |
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17993
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 18:02 |
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
|
It's him....He did the same thing over at Hoffman Forums in the music section on a prog thread, trying to spread his delusional theories about music. Ask him to give you his thoughts on Dream Theater.......basically called them the greatest prog band ever. Then u get sucked into his diatribe about what is prog and progressive and proggy and psych and symphonic and what bands fit where and since they don't fit in one they can't be another. I don't think he is trolling....YET. But it will happen, for now he exists for my comedic relief, so hope the admins leave him be.
|
|
 |
Spaciousmind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 17:48 |
Awesoreno wrote:
If I'm remembering what I've read correctly, GG were much more popular in the US than in their native Britain. Same for JT at first I believe. |
Here is what Phil Shulman wrote when asked about why they were not more popular in England:
The fact is in Europe we were very popular as well but you have to remember there was something else holding us back here (England) my brothers and I were very much remembered as what was called a POP group (S.Dupree) and its very hard to discard those old clothes and people were very suspect of the fact that we would get pissed off at what we were it changed things radically.
Edited by Spaciousmind - September 09 2020 at 17:49
|
 |
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 19048
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 16:40 |
You are wrong. Everyone else is right. And you are Svetonio about to banned again as eventually as you were the last ten times.
Regarding Boboulo, he might be Svetonio and he might not be. If he admit's it then he is and even if he doesn't he still might be but unless you have his ip address it could be difficult to prove. To paraphrase Forest Gump trolling is as trolling does. If he doesn't actually engage in trolling or inappropriate behavior then no reason to sound the alarm(imo).
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - September 09 2020 at 16:43
|
 |
Sacro_Porgo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 16:29 |
Boboulo wrote:
Sacro_Porgo wrote:
If we're considering trying to establish a new, more agreeable version of the big six...
What are the odds anyone knows some good candidates who aren't 100% white dudes?
I'm ashamed to say off the top of my head I don't, though I'm sure there must be quite a few and I've just never looked into them. | Return to Forever.
Why not? The Big Four are Jethro Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis and we can add what we want to meet the Big Six requirement. |
RTF is a decent start, though I believe that's still all dudes. Does anyone know some good female artists or other artists from non-european cultures which could round out the list?
|
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
|
 |
Hercules
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 09 2020 at 16:09 |
Spaciousmind wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
As far as Black Sabbath, ........ Everyone was listening to Paranoid, Master of Reality and Vol. 4 right along with Aqualung, Thick as a Brick, Fragile, CTTE, Trilogy and Brain Salad Surgery. They were also listening to Deep Purple because Rainbow wasn't a band yet |
You know what is funny is that I can't exactly remember us calling it Progressive Rock... i think we were just fans of Progressive music... anything that was different to the norm. And yes Black Sabbath was also part of the must have collection.
Wow adding Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple and Black Sabbath does give the big 6 question a totally different outlook :).... just missing Tommy from the Who... regards.
Rainbow only took shape after Richie Blackmore left DP. |
You know what is funny is that I can't exactly remember us calling it Progressive Rock
Correct. In the late 60s/early 70s, it was just "prog" or "progressive music".
|
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
|
 |