Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rate: King Crimson - ITCOTCK
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Rate: King Crimson - ITCOTCK

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: How do you rate this album?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [2.74%]
1 [1.37%]
1 [1.37%]
6 [8.22%]
18 [24.66%]
22 [30.14%]
23 [31.51%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2020 at 18:35
Hi,

Considering that it is way more than just an "album" of music, and in particular, it fits as an incredible snapshot of the time and place ... it means that the 10 is a must. 

Sadly, because folks do not "see" or "relate" to the events at the time, that helped bring about the music in the album ... specially things like "Epitaph" being about losing your friends to bombs or in Vietnam gives it an edge that is really hard to not relate to for many of us that were "there" at the time, and know the harshness that so many of these artistic events faced. But everyone seems to think that it was all just fun and games and pop music.

"I talk to the Wind" has a poetic meaning, that I believe is misunderstood and it stands for a lot of GREAT WORK in music at the time that was ignored, WITH or WITHOUT words ... no one seems to have heard anything, and no one gave a damn after it all ... the comments and the dislikes for the song, is sad ... it is a very honest expression, and deserves a lot better ... and of course ... it wasn't heard because the wind carried away the words from your ears!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29108
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 02:26
8/10

for importance and impact - 10/10
deducted a couple of points for the weak production and also for the tedium that is Moonchild (life is way too short)

Back to Top
Frenetic Zetetic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Frenetic Zetetic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 02:34
8/10.

"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BaldJean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 03:17
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

8/10

for importance and impact - 10/10
deducted a couple of points for the weak production and also for the tedium that is Moonchild (life is way too short)


I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=97438&KW=Moonchild&PID=4954031#4954031

since the link I gave to "Moonchild" no longer works in that post here a new link:


the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album


Edited by BaldJean - June 21 2020 at 03:24


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7401
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cstack3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 06:40
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Exceptional. 9 out of 10 for me. After all these years, I still get a frisson of emotion when spinning Epitaph especially.

As usual, I agree with my Welsh friend!
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
Back to Top
Enchant X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 31 2014
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 871
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Enchant X Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 07:23
I do have a problem with moonchild , for me it drags the album down to an 8 Shocked
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BaldJean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 07:26
Originally posted by Enchant X Enchant X wrote:

I do have a problem with moonchild , for me it drags the album down to an 8 Shocked

if ones listens to "Moonchild" with the right attitude one can't help but loving it. once again: the best track of the album! and I am absolutely serious about this


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
VianaProghead View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2015
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 3045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VianaProghead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 10:46
Definitely 10/10.
"PROG IS MY FERRARI".
Jem Godfrey (Frost*)
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Offline
Points: 9044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 14:36
while I think moonchild is overly long, I still think that the album is 10/10 because it is part of the whole picture.  They were basically scattering a half dozen or more new genres of popular music to the 4 winds.  So bold, and often beautiful
Back to Top
I prophesy disaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 4908
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote I prophesy disaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 14:49
Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.
 
 
the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album
 
It's an interesting analysis, but it doesn't change how I feel about the track because it doesn't connect with me in the way it needs to connect with me, regardless of how clever it is.
 
 
No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 21:40
Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.
 
 
the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album
 
It's an interesting analysis, but it doesn't change how I feel about the track because it doesn't connect with me in the way it needs to connect with me, regardless of how clever it is.
 
 

Hi,

So, you're saying that Tchaikovsky has to change his music so it can connect with you, or Beethoven, or The Beatles, or JackWhoGivesaJunk .... because it "needs" to connect with you.

One thing about art history, for ALL MUSIC, PAINTING AND LITERATURE ... IT'S ABOUT YOU connecting to it, not the other way around ... you are making a point that people need to change so you can "connect" to them ... pretty soon you are going to hit the proverbial brick wall ... no artist is going to give a darn about you ... why? Can you imagine the Beatles have to give a darn about so many people ... who are you in the end? 

You are using the very words that commercial music likes ... so it can sell more and take your money ... 

And it isn't about being "clever" ... a lot of times when things like "Moonchild" are written, a lot of it is intuitive, and not exactly "pre-thought" ... and I agree with the ladies ... but I might not see exactly the same details that they did, but it's close, though I would not consider it a game.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Sacro_Porgo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sacro_Porgo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 22:12
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.
 
 
the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album
 
It's an interesting analysis, but it doesn't change how I feel about the track because it doesn't connect with me in the way it needs to connect with me, regardless of how clever it is.
 
 

Hi,

So, you're saying that Tchaikovsky has to change his music so it can connect with you, or Beethoven, or The Beatles, or JackWhoGivesaJunk .... because it "needs" to connect with you.

One thing about art history, for ALL MUSIC, PAINTING AND LITERATURE ... IT'S ABOUT YOU connecting to it, not the other way around ... you are making a point that people need to change so you can "connect" to them ... pretty soon you are going to hit the proverbial brick wall ... no artist is going to give a darn about you ... why? Can you imagine the Beatles have to give a darn about so many people ... who are you in the end? 

You are using the very words that commercial music likes ... so it can sell more and take your money ... 

And it isn't about being "clever" ... a lot of times when things like "Moonchild" are written, a lot of it is intuitive, and not exactly "pre-thought" ... and I agree with the ladies ... but I might not see exactly the same details that they did, but it's close, though I would not consider it a game.

I really don't think I prophesy disaster was making a claim that artists need to go out of their way to connect with their audience. It doesn't make you a bad person or listener for feeling like any piece of art, even a masterpiece, doesn't quite connect for you. If it did, then the world would be nothing but bad listeners who can't find it in themselves to like every work of art they encounter. 

Also, Prog is commercial music. If you can buy it, stream it, go see it live, get a t-shirt with the band's name on it, or anything of the sort, it's commercial.
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
Back to Top
Sacro_Porgo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sacro_Porgo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2020 at 22:14
Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

Originally posted by Enchant X Enchant X wrote:

I do have a problem with moonchild , for me it drags the album down to an 8 Shocked

if ones listens to "Moonchild" with the right attitude one can't help but loving it. once again: the best track of the album! and I am absolutely serious about this

No one is guaranteed to love any given work of art. If they were then life and music would be very boring indeed.
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
Back to Top
I prophesy disaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 4908
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote I prophesy disaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 06:18
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.
 
 
the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album
 
It's an interesting analysis, but it doesn't change how I feel about the track because it doesn't connect with me in the way it needs to connect with me, regardless of how clever it is.

Hi,

So, you're saying that Tchaikovsky has to change his music so it can connect with you, or Beethoven, or The Beatles, or JackWhoGivesaJunk .... because it "needs" to connect with you.

One thing about art history, for ALL MUSIC, PAINTING AND LITERATURE ... IT'S ABOUT YOU connecting to it, not the other way around ... you are making a point that people need to change so you can "connect" to them ... pretty soon you are going to hit the proverbial brick wall ... no artist is going to give a darn about you ... why? Can you imagine the Beatles have to give a darn about so many people ... who are you in the end? 

You are using the very words that commercial music likes ... so it can sell more and take your money ... 

And it isn't about being "clever" ... a lot of times when things like "Moonchild" are written, a lot of it is intuitive, and not exactly "pre-thought" ... and I agree with the ladies ... but I might not see exactly the same details that they did, but it's close, though I would not consider it a game.
 
It was Sacro_Porgo's reply to you that led me to realise that my reply to BaldJean was open to misinterpretation. It's not clear to me whether or not you misinterpreted what I said, but no, I firmly believe that an artist should be free to produce whatever music they want. But if an artist is free to produce whatever music they want, then it is only natural that a listener should be free to accept or reject whatever music that artist has produced.
 
I'm not obligated to like Moonchild, or even to try to understand it. And I'm free to express my opinion about it on a forum such as this. But the point I was making in my reply to BaldJean was that if a piece of music doesn't resonate with me in a way that I enjoy, then understanding it at a purely intellectual level isn't going to make it enjoyable.
 
When it comes to experimentalism in music, I do not think that it itself makes music worthy. If a piece of music is experimental, then the experiment has to work musically beyond its own terms for it to succeed in appealing to me. In other words, while I do like weird music, there is a limit to how weird music can be for me to accept it.
 
 
No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote M27Barney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 06:44
Its a long while since I spun the official 1st proper prog release. But like more fool me. It has a couple of SKIP tracks. I am not going to bother with their names as there are obviously two crap tracks in amongst the good ones...
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20031
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 07:13
Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I have explained many times that "Moonchild" is anything but a tedium.
 
 
the explanation I gave is the reason why "Moonchild" is my favorite track from that album
 
It's an interesting analysis, but it doesn't change how I feel about the track because it doesn't connect with me in the way it needs to connect with me, regardless of how clever it is.

Hi,

So, you're saying that Tchaikovsky has to change his music so it can connect with you, or Beethoven, or The Beatles, or JackWhoGivesaJunk .... because it "needs" to connect with you.

One thing about art history, for ALL MUSIC, PAINTING AND LITERATURE ... IT'S ABOUT YOU connecting to it, not the other way around ... you are making a point that people need to change so you can "connect" to them ... pretty soon you are going to hit the proverbial brick wall ... no artist is going to give a darn about you ... why? Can you imagine the Beatles have to give a darn about so many people ... who are you in the end? 

You are using the very words that commercial music likes ... so it can sell more and take your money ... 

And it isn't about being "clever" ... a lot of times when things like "Moonchild" are written, a lot of it is intuitive, and not exactly "pre-thought" ... and I agree with the ladies ... but I might not see exactly the same details that they did, but it's close, though I would not consider it a game.
 
It was Sacro_Porgo's reply to you that led me to realise that my reply to BaldJean was open to misinterpretation. It's not clear to me whether or not you misinterpreted what I said, but no, I firmly believe that an artist should be free to produce whatever music they want. But if an artist is free to produce whatever music they want, then it is only natural that a listener should be free to accept or reject whatever music that artist has produced.
 
I'm not obligated to like Moonchild, or even to try to understand it. And I'm free to express my opinion about it on a forum such as this. But the point I was making in my reply to BaldJean was that if a piece of music doesn't resonate with me in a way that I enjoy, then understanding it at a purely intellectual level isn't going to make it enjoyable.
 
When it comes to experimentalism in music, I do not think that it itself makes music worthy. If a piece of music is experimental, then the experiment has to work musically beyond its own terms for it to succeed in appealing to me. In other words, while I do like weird music, there is a limit to how weird music can be for me to accept it.
 
 
Great response and I wouldn't worry about misinterpretation, I knew what you meant, Mosh just grabbed another opportunity to have a rant.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 07:20
Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

... 
I'm not obligated to like Moonchild, or even to try to understand it. And I'm free to express my opinion about it on a forum such as this. But the point I was making in my reply to BaldJean was that if a piece of music doesn't resonate with me in a way that I enjoy, then understanding it at a purely intellectual level isn't going to make it enjoyable.
 ...

Hi,

This changes over time ... sometimes something that didn't click before, clicks later ... and it would be too easy to say that a more mature look would be different, but I think that there are a lot of things that go into that equation, many of which are hard to distinguish.

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

...
When it comes to experimentalism in music, I do not think that it itself makes music worthy. If a piece of music is experimental, then the experiment has to work musically beyond its own terms for it to succeed in appealing to me. In other words, while I do like weird music, there is a limit to how weird music can be for me to accept it.

Experimentation in music is something that is an acquired taste and it does not go well with folks that like to have things "in the right order" in their heads. I think, after a lot of work with actors and actresses, that "experimentation" is something that you can work on, until it breaks what I call the "last wall" of your senses ... so that when you are rehearsing, you can pick up the maximum attention possible, to give your ability to respond a much better focus and atmosphere.

This can be done in music, but there are too many folks that believe that it is all notes, and nothing else matters ... (it's why they listen for a "sound", right? ... BS ... ) and I have had the chance to do this with a couple of musicians and it works, but the ones that lean on knowing which chord you are playing, usually fall out of the equation really fast ... what matters is your "listening" and how fast your response is, to the music in the air ... not your idea, or the easiest chord you can play.

In listening to AD2, for example, try "Yeti" (the title cut) and then the "MM thing" on Dance of the Lemmings. You could say the guitar dominates "Yeti" but almost no other instrument is "there" to create a song, or a thread to go by, which suggests that John W probably said ... I'll just do this and continue, and you guys try to fit in as you can ... and it goes all over the place, and this, in theater, is called a "controlled improvisation" in that you are depending on someone to give you some space, but you don't know what that is, and will not see it, until AFTER ... the whole thing, IF YOU RECORDED IT. I recommend doing these at first without recording, so you only worry about listening, and not how you sound or don't sound, and then, after you feel more comfortable, try to record it once ... but you must look at it apart from it ... meaning a few days later, so you allow the playing feeling to grow inside, and then next week (so to speak) you finally listen to it and are more capable of comparing what you DID, to what you THOUGHT ... two very different things, that help your ability to work with someone else on stage, music or theater!

When you hear the MM thing" in DotL, you will find really quick that no one is trying to create a riff, or a piece of song at all, and specially listening to Lothar Meid, who seems to be the one "leading" the whole thing, but his bass playing is all over, and never breaks into something that would make ... a part of a song ... it comes and goes, and sometimes it thinks Michelangelo ... so to speak.

Improvisation is hard for most listeners ... because what is in front of you is NOT ORGANIZED ... and IT SHOULD NOT EVER BE ... so it can grow on its own two feet. Too much of the stuff you hear nowadays, is riff related, or solo related or simply sound related, and has nothing to do with improvisation as a natural process in music making ... and I don't even enjoy listening to these things ... and the difference, for example, check out some of the early jazz stuff by Jan Garbarek, and then go listen to Miles live somewhere ... the folks playing with Miles had no idea where he was going ... but none of them ever complained and they knew that the trick was to listen to him, and adjust the flow of what he was doing ... not a riff like something, or a splash on the drums, or something that would be "asking" to return to a normal "SONG" like process, which is way easier to do ... and you don't have to listen ... you just count! To me, this defines a "drummer" from the majority of nothing hitters.

You got to remember that RF is well aware of a lot of these things I am saying, based on his Gurdjieff studies and readings ... and his detail on rehearsal, includes a lot of these things, and it is something that is really hard to describe and even discuss, because it is a "feeling" thing, and not a "word" thing, and this is where folks get lost and (probably) 90 out of 100 musicians fall out ... and my saying this has had a couple of comments from Berklee folks, that think all music is just a mechanical exercise, and they are afraid to even consider "improvisation", unless it is based on a chord or riff, something much easier to teach .. you can go here and there in this moment since it is a related chord and so on ... and sometimes, this tends to intimidate your ability to completely free form, without being tied up to a "process" that you will have to unlearn later.

sorry about the long bit


Edited by moshkito - June 22 2020 at 20:13
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Sacro_Porgo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sacro_Porgo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 10:29
Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Its a long while since I spun the official 1st proper prog release. But like more fool me. It has a couple of SKIP tracks. I am not going to bother with their names as there are obviously two crap tracks in amongst the good ones...

Moonchild and...surely you don't mean I Talk To The Wind? But Then what else could you be referring to...?
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
Back to Top
Sacro_Porgo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2019
Location: Cygnus
Status: Offline
Points: 2062
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sacro_Porgo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 10:37
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

... 
I'm not obligated to like Moonchild, or even to try to understand it. And I'm free to express my opinion about it on a forum such as this. But the point I was making in my reply to BaldJean was that if a piece of music doesn't resonate with me in a way that I enjoy, then understanding it at a purely intellectual level isn't going to make it enjoyable.
 ...

Hi,

This changes over time ... sometimes something that didn't click before, clicks later ... and it would be too easy to say that a more mature look would be different, but I think that there are a lot of things that go into that equation, many of which are hard to distinguish.

Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

...
When it comes to experimentalism in music, I do not think that it itself makes music worthy. If a piece of music is experimental, then the experiment has to work musically beyond its own terms for it to succeed in appealing to me. In other words, while I do like weird music, there is a limit to how weird music can be for me to accept it.

Experimentation in music is something that is an acquired taste and it does not go well with folks that like to have things "in the right order" in their heads. I think, after a lot of work with actors and actresses, that "experimentation" is something that you can work on, until it breaks what I fall the "last wall" of your senses ... so that when you are rehearsing, you can pick up the maximum attention possible, to give your ability to respond a much better focus and atmosphere.

This can be done in music, but there are too many folks that believe that it is all notes, and nothing else matters ... (it's why they listen for a "sound", right? ... BS ... ) and I have had the chance to do this with a couple of musicians and it works, but the ones that lean on knowing which chord you are playing, usually fall out of the equation really fast ... what matters is your "listening" and how fast your response is, to the music in the air ... not your idea, or the easiest chord you can play.

In listening to AD2, for example, try "Yeti" (the title cut) and then the "MM thing" on Dance of the Lemmings. You could say the guitar dominates "Yeti" but almost no other instrument is "there" to create a song, or a thread to go by, which suggests that John W probably said ... I'll just do this and continue, and you guys try to fit in as you can ... and it goes all over the place, and this, in theater, is called a "controlled improvisation" in that you are depending on someone to give you some space, but you don't know what that is, and will not see it, until AFTER ... the whole thing, IF YOU RECORDED IT. I recommend doing these at first without recording, so you only worry about listening, and not how you sound or don't sound, and then, after you feel more comfortable, try to record it once ... but you must look at it apart from it ... meaning a few days later, so you allow the playing feeling to grow inside, and then next week (so to speak) you finally listen to it and are more capable of comparing what you DID, to what you THOUGHT ... two very different things, that help your ability to work with someone else on stage, music or theater!

When you hear the MM thing" in DotL, you will find really quick that no one is trying to create a riff, or a piece of song at all, and specially listening to Lothar Meid, who seems to be the one "leading" the whole thing, but his bass playing is all over, and never breaks into something that would make ... a part of a song ... it comes and goes, and sometimes it thinks Michelangelo ... so to speak.

Improvisation is hard for most listeners ... because what is in front of you is NOT ORGANIZED ... and IT SHOULD NOT EVER BE ... so it can grow on its own two feet. Too much of the stuff you hear nowadays, is riff related, or solo related or simply sound related, and has nothing to do with improvisation as a natural process in music making ... and I don't even enjoy listening to these things ... and the difference, for example, check out some of the early jazz stuff by Jan Garbarek, and then go listen to Miles live somewhere ... the folks playing with Miles had no idea where he was going ... but none of them ever complained and they knew that the trick was to listen to him, and adjust the flow of what he was doing ... not a riff like something, or a splash on the drums, or something that would be "asking" to return to a normal "SONG" like process, which is way easier to do ... and you don't have to listen ... you just count!

You got to remember that RF is well aware of a lot of these things I am saying, based on his Gurdjieff studies and readings ... and his detail on rehearsal, included a lot of these things, and it is something that is really hard to describe and even discuss, because it is a "feeling" thing, and not a "word" thing, and this is where folks get lost and (probably) 90 out of 100 musicians fall out ... and my saying this has had a couple of comments from Berklee folks, that think all music is just a mechanical exercise, and they are afraid to even consider "improvisation", unless it is based on a chord or riff, something much easier to teach .. you can go here and there in this moment since it is a related chord and so on ... and sometimes, this tends to intimidate your ability to completely free form, without being tied up to a "process" that you will have to unlearn later.

sorry about the long bit

That's certainly interesting. If it doesn't connect with you though, then it doesn't connect you, no matter how hard or interesting it is. As a musician, if you can't bring yourself to play Moonchild and improvise with the other musicians in your group during the improv section (and have it work), then sure you have room to improve as a musician. However as a listener, if you can't bring yourself to enjoy the sound of musicians improvising without any idea where the song is going or what the chord is or where the beat is, you're not deficient. You just don't like the taste of that kind of experimental passage.
Porg for short. My love of music doesn't end with prog! Feel free to discuss all sorts of music with me. Odds are I'll give it a chance if I haven't already! :)
Back to Top
cemego View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2010
Location: Philadelphia PA
Status: Offline
Points: 515
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cemego Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2020 at 11:36
LOVE King Crimson.  Have them all.   But ITCOTCK isn't really in the top of those at all..... I'm more a Larks and Starless fan.
listen to streaming stuff! no commercials!

http://wmom.servemp3.com:8000/listen.pls
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.