Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Statues & remembering the past
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Statues & remembering the past

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Author
Message
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 04:57
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

All around the world, statues of divisive historical figures are being taken down, either by force or through locally made democratic decisions.

Should all future statues and monuments, erected to commemorate characters from the past, be restricted to sports legends and artists (including musicians) and exclude anyone known for their political, military or religious work and influence? Bearing in mind that one persons hero, is another's villain.


In Belgium, there is a wave against the Leo 2 statues and his cruelty terror reign in his private property called Congo. Statues are being soiled


As a republican and atheist, I don't care for that royal family (or any other FTM), but the Belgian one is kind of repulsive, given the very iffy conducts of most of them (changeing faith for Leo I in order to grab a throne to reign, Congo for his son, collaboration with Nazis for Leo 3, Lumumba assissination and unwilling to sign the people's laws for Bobodouin, refusal to paternity recognition for Bert 2, etc...) on top of being rabidly mean christians (Boboduin even delving into Opus Dei crap)... They can roll over and disppear for all I care, and their statues can all melted away....

However, given the context, if that unbolting of statues demanded by a small fraction of demanding ("diktats" some will say) of "foreigners" (as some will say again); if that happens, we'll the the far/extreme right parties having one more landslide victory.

People don't like seeing whatever national propaganda bullsh*t brainfed to their accepting young brains being called as pure bluff in the poker game of life.








 
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 05:57
Re Micky and Greg: Although the war did not start expressly about slavery, I do think that the fear that the slaves would be freed and that there would be chaos was definitely on the mind of the southerner. This mentality still existed there when I was young, so I am sure it was there then too. Of course the southerners were also driven by the idea of protecting the homeland from the northern invaders, so in a sense, you are both right.
As far as the north being heroic emancipators, hardly, they only used the blacks to punish the south. There was a different racism on both sides.

Edited by Easy Money - June 13 2020 at 05:58
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote micky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 06:32
that racism existed on both sides, which is no surprise as we have discussed at some length in the other thread as being racist is as much part and parcel of the species as our propensitiy for both creating great works of art.. and inflicting great horror and destruction upon each other...

both sides feared the freeing of the slaves. The north was about ecomics.. in an industrialized.. low skill labor model.. freed slaves take white jobs

the south being agarian..  it wasn't about the economics of it. Freed or not.. slaves would be working the land. The fear there was more to the social order

however...

At no point did Lincoln or the Republicans ever discuss.. much less mention freeing slaves.. for the reasons I just said... thus why would the south fear it John. The war did not start because of it.. nor did those who willingly joined their respective armies joint to either remove.. or protect it. There were higher notions which I went into last night  in play here than the over simplistic, slavery based, notion of the Civil War. 


Edited by micky - June 13 2020 at 06:34
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 06:50
^ I think many southerners knew that there were northerners calling for the end of slavery, and certainly there were sympathetic southerners who also wanted to end slavery.
Although the northern government had not yet declared itself as anti-slavery, the idea that the north might do such a thing was useful propaganda in the south. Even if it was unofficial word of mouth type gossip, although a famous speech by the second in command seems fairly official to me.
The issues of the civil war are complicated, but fear of a black plantation was part of it.

Edited by Easy Money - June 13 2020 at 06:51
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote micky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 07:03
of course it was John.  What was discussed was not ending slavery.. freeing the slaves.. but constricting it to death over decades as witnessed the pre 1860 guerrilla war in the expanding territory of the country to the west of the fab 13. The conflict not being ending slavery.. but whether it be allowed to expand westward as the country grew.

The fear of an uncertain future was no cause for war.. nor secession.. for even as young a country as we were they surely understood the here today and gone tomorrow nature of political power that is inherent in our system. Lincoln's election and the bitterly contested election of 1860 was just the final straw that brok the already fractured back of an already divided in all but the fact nation. Lincoln could do nothing about slavery.. much less freeing them so no... that is not why the southern state seceeded (note.. they did not start the war) nor did Southerners join once the Lincoln decided to fight to preserve the Union.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 07:54
As far as statues of Christopher Columbus are concerned they should take them down. Not only did he not discover the North American continent (he never set foot on it in fact) but he single-handedly sowed the seeds of destruction for the majority of indigenous inhabitants of the Americas. Some statues are raised for no other reason to foster a FALSE HISTORY.


https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 08:00
Re Micky: Well we are talking about two different things again. You are talking about the decisions of government leaders and I am talking about the fears and mindset of the general population.

My grandparents lived in Helena Arkansas, this is far different from the more cosmopolitan and modern urban south i grew up in. In Helena, the civil war was still fresh when I was young, old people would still talk about 'yankees' as if reconstruction was still happening. White people there have the money and the power, but not always the numbers. Different from the rest of the US, black people are a very large population in the deep south. Fear of a black insurrection was something that was very real to white paranoia in the 20th century, and I am sure it was far worse before the civil war.
No official declaration of war was needed from anybody. The fear was there from the get go.

Edited by Easy Money - June 13 2020 at 08:11
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote micky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 08:12
no arguments from me there.. of course there was that fear.. but is sort of pointless to the topics at hand which ..yeah.. we are sort of all over the place on.

but holding to the original.. 

why did they fight... and fears aren't why..

that fear would always remain as long as there was slavery.... and would have remained even after a southern victory. 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 08:23
There is often a disconnect as to why a country has declared war and why the common people think they want to fight a war. This is true in any war.
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 08:30
Going back to what I know first hand about that old power, deep south mind set. There is no way you will ever convince me that these people were not very concerned about black people getting the upper hand, and concerned enough to start fighting, even if they were not even clear as to why their government declared war in the first place.
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote micky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 08:31
agreed... which is why I suppose this whole tangent spouted out of Greg's post.  We know what the purpose of those statues were in post war reknitting of America.. and that is why they have to go...but I do not agree with the ascribing the sins of those that followed to those who served.  
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 09:09
Like most wars, probably everyone of any side was probably scared sh*tless and totally bewildered and disoriented as their life turned to constant misery and chaos.
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
dougmcauliffe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2019
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3895
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dougmcauliffe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 09:27
Life’s too short to get mad about some statues getting torn down. Let’s put it simple, hate people because they are dicks, not because of what they look like or how they identify. The fact of the matter is many of these confederate statues were put up during the civil rights movement as a way to sort of spite African Americans and in general, we’ve reached a point where a majority of people don’t want to rally around the leaders of a war fought over slavery and that’s fine by me. At the end of the day, wether or not a statue is there it really should have no bearing on your life.

Edited by dougmcauliffe - June 13 2020 at 09:28
The sun has left the sky...
...Now you can close your eyes
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 10:04
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

What I don't think is right is removing these statues that for sure have some negative connotations towards civil rights and such because we need these to remind us what and how not to behave. I don't think we can count on school history books and the internet to teach what happened in the past.


Statues just become bird urinals all said and done and teach us precisely nothing as far as I can see.
Given that
43% of Americans have no idea who J Edgar Hoover was (source University of Pennsylvania)
14% of Americans couldn't point to Iraq on a map of the world (source National Geographic)
25% of Americans were unable to identify the country from which America gained its independence.(source Huffington Post)
30% of Americans didn’t know what the Holocaust was (source Schoen Consulting)
45% of Americans couldn't name a single German concentration camp used in the Holocaust (source Schoen Consulting)
31% of Americans, and 41% of millennials, believe that two million or fewer Jews were killed in the Holocaust; the actual number is around six million (source Schoen Consulting)
52% of Americans wrongly think Hitler came to power through force: he was democratically elected (source New York Times)

Isn't it education, good parenting, pluralism, sensible gun laws and an ethical mass media that might be better capable of teaching us how to behave?
See, what you say I can agree with and discuss...thank you for that.

And all of that is terrible that people do not know, or is it?.....Why don't they and should they know or do we prefer to wipe all that from everyone's memory banks? 
Will not knowing about all this make us a better world/people?

So how do you educate on how not to let the Holocaust happen again, if we don't know the bad that happened? Especially when we know that there are people that believe what happened there was justified.....


I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, so forgive meConfused. I would never advocate 'airbrushing the past' and would argue the opposite i.e. we need to teach people that ignoring history condemns us to repeat past atrocities in perpetuity. It stands to reason that preventing future genocides is going to carry with it some very harrowing and upsetting study material for future generations but being able to view or not being able to view statues of historic personages would form no part of that curriculum.
I'm not stating anything here, I am merely posing questions to yours and you and I are on point. I too am against any fluffing of history or eliminating any of it, it happened and we need to develop education materials to not only teach what happened, but also study what happened and why. Then use that intelligence to do what is necessary to not let it happen again......That's what I was saying in an earlier post that the statues and what they stand for needs to be changed in a lot of cases, they not need be lauded but quite possibly detested and used to show who these people were and what they may have caused.

Several years ago when the statue issue came up and New Orleans removed some from the city, somewhere in Virginia there was one scheduled to come down. A local college professor (IIRC), was against it stating it would mean the end of these terrible wars and how people were treated and such, he would struggle telling the stories that could prevent future actions, he was against removing any statues....This was a black man saying all this, I remember the TV interview.

If people want to krapp all over them and graffiti them and post signs all over them that's fine, move some to the Smithsonian American History museum and put them next to Fonzi's leather jacket, sure.

What this has turned into, because some people cannot think outside the box, is an argument about the Civil War and how it was bad and slavery and suffrage....duh!!! We all know that. As Blacksword stated, regardless of your like or dislike of the statues, should they come down? It's not a black and white answer.....
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 10:58
Originally posted by dougmcauliffe dougmcauliffe wrote:

Life’s too short to get mad about some statues getting torn down. Let’s put it simple, hate people because they are dicks, not because of what they look like or how they identify. The fact of the matter is many of these confederate statues were put up during the civil rights movement as a way to sort of spite African Americans and in general, we’ve reached a point where a majority of people don’t want to rally around the leaders of a war fought over slavery and that’s fine by me. At the end of the day, wether or not a statue is there it really should have no bearing on your life.


Hear that. We should focus on things that really do affect our quality of life. Economics, ecological degradation etc. I don't personally care what silly statues are up or not.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Online
Points: 5706
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 11:13
I'm a noob but wait. Silly statues? Aren't the statues actually valuable works of art? I mean, why destroy someone's work? Someone took their time to make the statues. The people who made the statues expressed something. Why are people destroying valuable art?
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 12:05
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I'm a noob but wait. Silly statues? Aren't the statues actually valuable works of art? I mean, why destroy someone's work? Someone took their time to make the statues. The people who made the statues expressed something. Why are people destroying valuable art?



Sculptures from Auguste Rodin and Olivier Strebelle are art, because they are the works from an artistic design.


Sculptures that are commands from a state or a private family are not really art, IMHO.

Same thing with paintings: Klee & Monet are artistes.... Not sure the guys who painted Louis XIV or Grant can be thought of artistes.




Edited by Sean Trane - June 14 2020 at 02:56
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15344
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 12:14
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I'm a noob but wait. Silly statues? Aren't the statues actually valuable works of art? I mean, why destroy someone's work? Someone took their time to make the statues. The people who made the statues expressed something. Why are people destroying valuable art?


They have some artistic value of course but so do many things. Silly refers to the symbolism more than the aesthetics. If a public piece of art is pushing a political paradigm that was either completely false or used for propagandist purposes then it should probably be moved to a museum.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Mirakaze View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Eclectic, JRF/Canterbury, Avant/Zeuhl

Joined: December 17 2019
Location: (redacted)
Status: Offline
Points: 4234
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mirakaze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 12:31
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I'm a noob but wait. Silly statues? Aren't the statues actually valuable works of art? I mean, why destroy someone's work? Someone took their time to make the statues. The people who made the statues expressed something. Why are people destroying valuable art?


The majority of Confederate monuments were mass-produced in factories using cheap cast bronze or zinc and sold for less than a thousand dollars. That's why a lot of those monuments represent generic nameless soldiers that look exactly the same, and that's also why it takes a crowd almost no effort to topple them. Their artistic value is tantamount to your average garden gnome.
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67452
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vompatti Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2020 at 12:33
Just destroy all of them and make it illegal to produce more, problem solved. They are monuments of oppression and prejudice and have no place in a progressive society. Same applies to all works of art, architecture, engineering etc.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.402 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.