Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Topic: America - Wheres Your Empire? Posted: December 31 2004 at 07:50 |
Britain had one, France had one, so did Spain, Portugal, Germany and Holland. Hell, even Belgium had one.
You can't say Hawaii, Alaska or the moon, that doesn't count. And you can't claim Canada either.
Great Britain still presides over the mighty Falkland Islands and a two large rocks in the Pacific somewhere which may have a seal or an albatross on it from time to time.
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Pixel Pirate
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 07:55 |
The American empire is not an empire of geography but of minds. That's why it's impossible to put up any resistance and why it's destined to be victorious beyond the wildest dream of Napoleon and Hitler combined.
|
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 07:58 |
Pixel Pirate wrote:
The American empire is not an empire of geography but of minds. That's why it's impossible to put up any resistance and why it's destined to be victorious beyond the wildest dream of Napoleon and Hitler combined. |
But on the upside, America has given us the atomic bomb, Hollywood, Dr Pepper and cheerleaders...
Edited by sigod
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
nancyrowina
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 29 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 49
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 08:32 |
And Donny Osmond
Cheers for that America.
|
Confusion will be my epitaph, as I crawl a cracked and broken path, if we make it we can all sit back and laugh, but I fear tomorrow I'll be crying.
|
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 10:28 |
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short.
|
|
Sweetnighter
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 11:20 |
What the United States has done in terms of gaining power is in a sense
revolutionary... previously in history, empires were forged by armies
marching far and wide, taking control of everything that came in their
way.... from Rome to the Soviet Union. The major flaw behind this type
of empire is that each had a territorial breaking point... once to far
outstretched, the empire couldn't hold itself together. The United
States built an empire on wealth and commerce unparalleled in human
history. Great example is when Reagan took office in 1980 and asked his
secretary of defense how they were going to beat the Soviets. The
conversation went something like this:
"Do we have more weapons?"
"No Mr.President"
"Do we have more troops?"
"No Mr.President"
"Planes? Tanks?"
"No Mr.President"
"Well.... what can we beat them with then?"
"Well we have more money Mr.President..."
"Then we'll beat them with that."
And, by 1990, that victory was indeed made with money... the US just
had to sit it out and watch the Soviets suffocate themselves.
...The US gave Jazz too, without which prog would suffer
|
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 12:59 |
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short.
|
Maybe, maybe not. How many lives might have been saved if America had joined sooner?
|
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:10 |
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:17 |
gdub411 wrote:
Do we REALLY need another America bashing thread? Also, for Ivan's sake..Let's just call this a USA bashing thread.
|
Oh shut up,you know you love the opportunity to demonstrate your ignorance of all things academic!
|
|
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator
Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:32 |
All:
I would have to agree (at least in part) with Sweetnighter here, in the sense that the "definition" of "empire" may have changed over the years.
As Sweetnighter notes, an "empire" used to be, at least primarily, the ownership and control of "real estate" (and economies of those countries it held), usually by force or threat of force. However, I think the operative word is no longer "real estate" but "control" - in any sense, by any means.
In that regard, it is not simply money that determines the "American" empire. Consider:
-Culture. American "culture" has become globally predominant. American "exports" re music, fashion, film, etc. have spread to - and, in a figurative if not literal sense, predominate in - almost every country. Think of Coca-Cola, McDonald's (in all but two of the sovereign nations of the world), Disney, etc. Yes, there are other centers for fashion (Milan, London, Paris et al), music (England, Germany, Italy et al), film (India, Italy, England et al), etc., and other "global" "brands" (e.g., Virgin). But America is without question the "cultural leader" of the world. This creates a sort of "hegemony" all by itself. As an aside, the U.S. TV media "stole" most of its "reality TV" ideas from British programs. Yet the British were unable to "sell" them to the rest of the world, while the U.S. has been successfully selling them throughout the globe (and thereby continuing to "dumb down" the cultures of other countries...).
-Language. More people speak English than any other language (except perhaps Chinese, but that is simply due to sheer numbers). True, the British started this during the creation of their empire. But the U.S. influence in "forcing" English on almost every other nation cannot be questioned. Somehow, Americans don't think they should have to learn to speak a second language; yet they believe everyone in the whole world should speak theirs. And more people in more countries speak English than any other language other than their native tongue (i.e., as a second language). If this is not a global "hegemony" of sorts - as well as one definition of "empire" - I don't know what is.
-Money. Whether up or down, the dollar still determines the remainder of the world's financial markets. And the U.S. economy, even at its worst, is still bigger - by far - than the economy of any other country, or even group of countries. Indeed, the creation of a "United States of Europe" - and the development of the euro, etc. - is a direct reflection of just how powerful the American economy really is: i.e., that it takes over a dozen major countries joining together to simply create a relative "parity" of economies.
This is just a very quick, simplistic look at the global scene. I know there are many more examples of America's "empire," as "newly" defined. However, I am in a hurry. If I think of more, I will post them.
Peace.
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:32 |
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the
other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral
countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi
empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is
very short.
|
Just because they came in at the end when things were looking bad
doesn't make their contribution any greater; I respect the American
soldiers who fought in the Alliance, but just as the other Allied
countries would quite possibly have lost the War (or wars) without the
US, if Britain (or several other important countries*) hadn't fought
and the US had I'm sure an equally unfortunate outcome would have been
reached.
*read: my history is somewhat weak
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:34 |
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short. |
Well said, Fitz.
Some of the smugly anti-American folk on this forum would do well to bear the above in mind. Having been born free, they too often seem to take that freedom for granted, and forget the thousands of young Americans (Canadians, Newfoundlanders, Aussies, and New Zealanders too) who lie far from home in European graves, having laid down their lives to overthrow an evil, genocidal tyranny for the greater good of all. All that you enjoy most about your rights and freedom has been dearly paid for in blood. You might want to ponder upon that as you sip your coffee and listen to your music today.
Yes, America is now the most powerful nation in the world (as Greece, Rome, the Mongol Empire, France & England were before), but it is not the most evil nation in the world -- far from it. That is our reality -- get over it.
Global history and politics is a complex, organic, ever-evolving thing. I hate to see people simplify it along the lines of: "America is powerful. Power is bad. American culture is spreading everywhere (even into good old, student-crushing communist China) Wah."
No, I certainly don't applaud everything America does or represents on the global stage, but I ask you: what other country would have served as a better counterweight to the murderous global-domination agenda of the Nazis, Japanese, & Soviets? At any given period in history, one country has to be the most powerful. If not America, who exactly would you rather it was?
Besides bitching about the ebb and flow of great nations and political systems, and throwing up your hands in despair at your seeming insignificance and powerlessness, what are YOU doing to make the world immediately around you better? What values are you teaching your children? Are you a part of the problem, or of the solution?
Some people here seem to want this forum of (mostly) like-minded music fans to disintegrate into mutually intolerant, prejudiced factions. When they have little to say, they try to stir things up, and pick a fight with people that they do not know. You probably have a neighbour who is wealthier/more powerful than you are -- why not go throw a brick through his window instead?
What an inane thread. Baiting others because they don't live where you do.
The boy across the street/block/city/ocean is bad....
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:43 |
Peter:
We all recognise that there is too much generalisation on this forum.
If one thinks back to the different "Most Powerful" nations over the millenia most of them have had many bad points.
However, they have all been a force for progress:learning, advancement of science and mathematics,social systems, legal systems,innovation,Indistrial Revolutions etc.
The good ole USA has been great for "mod cons" but very little else that one could think of (space/weapons etc being achieved through European no-how.)
To paraphrase the oft-quoted "Life Of Brian": "what have the Americans ever done for us?"
|
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:45 |
Peter wrote:
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short. |
Well said, Fitz.
Some of the smugly anti-American folk on this forum would do well to bear the above in mind. Having been born free, they too often seem to take that freedom for granted, and forget the thousands of young Americans (Canadians, Newfoundlanders, Aussies, and New Zealanders too) who lie far from home in European graves, having laid down their lives to overthrow an evil, genocidal tyranny for the greater good of all. All that you enjoy most about your rights and freedom has been dearly paid for in blood. You might want to ponder upon that as you sip your coffee and listen to your music today.
Yes, America is now the most powerful nation in the world (as Greece, Rome, the Mongol Empire, France & England were before), but it is not the most evil nation in the world -- far from it. That is our reality -- get over it.
Global history and politics is a complex, organic, ever-evolving thing. I hate to see people simplify it along the lines of: "America is powerful. Power is bad. American culture is spreading everywhere (even into good old, student-crushing communist China) Wah."
No, I certainly don't applaud everything America does or represents on the global stage, but I ask you: what other country would have served as a better counterweight to the murderous global-domination agenda of the Nazis, Japanese, & Soviets? At any given period in history, one country has to be the most powerful. If not America, who exactly would you rather it was?
Besides bitching about the ebb and flow of great nations and political systems, and throwing up your hands in despair at your seeming insignificance and powerlessness, what are YOU doing to make the world immediately around you better? What values are you teaching your children? Are you a part of the problem, or of the solution?
Some people here seem to want this forum of (mostly) like-minded music fans to disintegrate into mutually intolerant, prejudiced factions. When they have little to say, they try to stir things up, and pick a fight with people that they do not know. You probably have a neighbour who is wealthier/more powerful than you are -- why not go throw a brick through his window instead?
What an inane thread. Baiting others because they don't live where you do.
The boy across the street/block/city/ocean is bad....
|
.....I think Reed lover has more money than me....can I toss a brick through his window?
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:50 |
gdub411 wrote:
Peter wrote:
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short. |
Well said, Fitz.
Some of the smugly anti-American folk on this forum would do well to bear the above in mind. Having been born free, they too often seem to take that freedom for granted, and forget the thousands of young Americans (Canadians, Newfoundlanders, Aussies, and New Zealanders too) who lie far from home in European graves, having laid down their lives to overthrow an evil, genocidal tyranny for the greater good of all. All that you enjoy most about your rights and freedom has been dearly paid for in blood. You might want to ponder upon that as you sip your coffee and listen to your music today.
Yes, America is now the most powerful nation in the world (as Greece, Rome, the Mongol Empire, France & England were before), but it is not the most evil nation in the world -- far from it. That is our reality -- get over it.
Global history and politics is a complex, organic, ever-evolving thing. I hate to see people simplify it along the lines of: "America is powerful. Power is bad. American culture is spreading everywhere (even into good old, student-crushing communist China) Wah."
No, I certainly don't applaud everything America does or represents on the global stage, but I ask you: what other country would have served as a better counterweight to the murderous global-domination agenda of the Nazis, Japanese, & Soviets? At any given period in history, one country has to be the most powerful. If not America, who exactly would you rather it was?
Besides bitching about the ebb and flow of great nations and political systems, and throwing up your hands in despair at your seeming insignificance and powerlessness, what are YOU doing to make the world immediately around you better? What values are you teaching your children? Are you a part of the problem, or of the solution?
Some people here seem to want this forum of (mostly) like-minded music fans to disintegrate into mutually intolerant, prejudiced factions. When they have little to say, they try to stir things up, and pick a fight with people that they do not know. You probably have a neighbour who is wealthier/more powerful than you are -- why not go throw a brick through his window instead?
What an inane thread. Baiting others because they don't live where you do.
The boy across the street/block/city/ocean is bad....
|
.....I think Reed lover has more money than me....can I toss a brick through his window?
|
You're not tossing anything near my window!
|
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:57 |
Reed Lover wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
Peter wrote:
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short. |
Well said, Fitz.
Some of the smugly anti-American folk on this forum would do well to bear the above in mind. Having been born free, they too often seem to take that freedom for granted, and forget the thousands of young Americans (Canadians, Newfoundlanders, Aussies, and New Zealanders too) who lie far from home in European graves, having laid down their lives to overthrow an evil, genocidal tyranny for the greater good of all. All that you enjoy most about your rights and freedom has been dearly paid for in blood. You might want to ponder upon that as you sip your coffee and listen to your music today.
Yes, America is now the most powerful nation in the world (as Greece, Rome, the Mongol Empire, France & England were before), but it is not the most evil nation in the world -- far from it. That is our reality -- get over it.
Global history and politics is a complex, organic, ever-evolving thing. I hate to see people simplify it along the lines of: "America is powerful. Power is bad. American culture is spreading everywhere (even into good old, student-crushing communist China) Wah."
No, I certainly don't applaud everything America does or represents on the global stage, but I ask you: what other country would have served as a better counterweight to the murderous global-domination agenda of the Nazis, Japanese, & Soviets? At any given period in history, one country has to be the most powerful. If not America, who exactly would you rather it was?
Besides bitching about the ebb and flow of great nations and political systems, and throwing up your hands in despair at your seeming insignificance and powerlessness, what are YOU doing to make the world immediately around you better? What values are you teaching your children? Are you a part of the problem, or of the solution?
Some people here seem to want this forum of (mostly) like-minded music fans to disintegrate into mutually intolerant, prejudiced factions. When they have little to say, they try to stir things up, and pick a fight with people that they do not know. You probably have a neighbour who is wealthier/more powerful than you are -- why not go throw a brick through his window instead?
What an inane thread. Baiting others because they don't live where you do.
The boy across the street/block/city/ocean is bad....
|
.....I think Reed lover has more money than me....can I toss a brick through his window?
|
You're not tossing anything near my window!
|
That's not what you're telling me last night Big Boy!
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 13:59 |
You're not tossing anything near my window!
[/QUOTE]
That's not what you're telling me last night Big Boy!
[/QUOTE]
Actually I told I'd sue if you kept sending me butt plugs through the post!
|
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 14:01 |
This post is going to be very difficult to understand; I'm finding it difficult to phrase my thoughts. Basically, because
of the power of the States, the bad things about it become much more
obvious. If there were companies in Luxembourg exploiting thirrd world
workers (and I'm not saying there aren't), nobody would notice! People
who want to make a change concentrate on the most obvious threat, and
with the US being the most powerful country, it is seen as the most
obvious threat. There are more rich Americans that can do bad things,
and so more bad things are done by Americans than most other countries.
Look at celebrities: whenever they do something "wrong", the press
hound them, and people get upset. If you or I were to do something
scandalous, it would hardly reach national news and make as hated
figures (well, it depends on how scandalous, I suppose).
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 14:04 |
Reed Lover wrote:
You're not tossing anything near my window!
|
That's not what you're telling me last night Big Boy!
[/QUOTE]
Actually I told I'd sue if you kept sending me butt plugs through the post!
[/QUOTE]
Tomorrow I set out on my quest for the Holy Golden Buttplug of Anok. It should be wrought with peril and anventure but in the end the reward will be truly satisfying...with a little KY that is
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: December 31 2004 at 14:07 |
Reedy: See Thomas Paine -- The Rights of Man, for one positive American contribution.
See a democratic Germany and Japan for two more.
Hopefully soon, we will also see an American-initiated (& largely funded) global tsunami warning system.
See Jayne Mansfield, Racquel Welch, Marilyn Monroe , country, folk, bluegrass, blues, jazz, rock and roll, and Echolyn for more.
(No excuse for Stynx, though....)
BTW: Happy New Year, chum!
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|