Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13740
Posted: April 27 2020 at 13:42
Atavachron wrote:
^^ Great balanced, centered post.
Wasn’t it. A joy to read.
I might also point out that you, Steve G, and Jose in particular have also displayed admirable balance, and a complete absence of hysteria.
(And before anybody else jumps in with a streak of virtue signalling, no none of the three have slavishly agreed with me. All have made balanced and reasonable points, as Jonesy did).
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65417
Posted: April 27 2020 at 15:01
^ Hard not to be interpreted as callous, or as comparing this to influenza which it clearly is not. I'm just glad there's been some progress.
Interesting study from China suggesting the primary sources of infection are in the home and on public transportation. That is both a daunting problem and yet very important information.
Edited by Atavachron - April 27 2020 at 15:15
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14934
Posted: April 28 2020 at 06:37
CosmicVibration wrote:
Lewian wrote:
CosmicVibration wrote:
Flattening the curve:thesame number of
people ultimately get infectedbut
over a longer period of time.
This of course assumes that there will be no vaccine and that the virus doesn't mutate into something less harmful (which has happened in history many times, e.g., Spanish flu). It's unknown whether and when these will happen but that doesn't mean predictions from a model that assumes they won't are to be believed.
Furthermore, even if these things don't happen, we may get better at treatment over time (which we in all likelihood already do). So there are many reasons to slow things down other than not to overload the health system at any given time.
Vaccine development takes an awful long time.Even if corners are cut and rushed it will be
over 1 year.
Well then it should help to slow things down considerably, shouldn't it? Which is my point.
There’s still no treatment for the common cold so I wouldn’t
hold my breath for a treatment.
That depends on what you mean by "treatment". I don't see any effective drug curing that thing reliably any time soon, however for flattening the curve to make sense it already helps to bring down the mortality rate a bit. Even some research into which mistakes to avoid (like putting the "wrong" people on respirators; I've read about what has been learnt on this in the meantime) can mean some progress and more survivors.
And last one thing I forgot. There's another major reason for flattening the curve, which is that the more overstretched the hospitals, the higher the death rate. Evidence on this is everywhere to be found (look at Wuhan vs. rest of China for a start), and differences are striking. Having hospitals that can cope is the best medicine we currently have.
Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14934
Posted: April 28 2020 at 06:50
lazland: You can bang on about numbers being meaningless as long as you want. In fact there are many ways in which we can learn, for example data and mortality from the Diamond Princess where everyone was tested (which of course needs to be age-adjusted - not that this is something that cannot be done), relating known fatality to know positive cases knowing the percentage of population tested in certain areas, comparing percentages of positive test results among non-symptomatic people (which do exist) with those of symptomatic people etc. All mathematical modelling can be criticised, but if humankind believed that every model that can be legitimately criticised is in effect worthless, we'd still believe the earth is flat. People have estimated very generous intervals for mortality of Covid-19 compared with flu, based on the available information and taking into account uncertainties, and these range from Covid-19 being five times more deadly to a factor of 100 and more (I have actually linked to and commented on such results, without a response from you). That's the thing with science, we don't know things precisely, there are large uncertainties, we try to find out better and take into account uncertainty. There's always something to criticise and something to improve, true, but ignore science at your peril.
Any thought that the true fatality rate is in the region of 0.5% or
lower is clearly wrong based on the Korean and Diamond Princess data.
Even if there are no further deaths from the cruise ship, the implied
fatality rate adjusted to match the UK population matches the 0.9% used
by Ferguson’s team, and any error here is likely to be on the upside.
Joined: February 26 2014
Location: Milky Way
Status: Offline
Points: 1396
Posted: April 28 2020 at 08:06
Lewian wrote:
CosmicVibration wrote:
Lewian wrote:
CosmicVibration wrote:
Flattening the curve:thesame number of
people ultimately get infectedbut
over a longer period of time.
This of course assumes that there will be no vaccine and that the virus doesn't mutate into something less harmful (which has happened in history many times, e.g., Spanish flu). It's unknown whether and when these will happen but that doesn't mean predictions from a model that assumes they won't are to be believed.
Furthermore, even if these things don't happen, we may get better at treatment over time (which we in all likelihood already do). So there are many reasons to slow things down other than not to overload the health system at any given time.
Vaccine development takes an awful long time.Even if corners are cut and rushed it will be
over 1 year.
Well then it should help to slow things down considerably, shouldn't it? Which is my point.
There’s still no treatment for the common cold so I wouldn’t
hold my breath for a treatment.
That depends on what you mean by "treatment". I don't see any effective drug curing that thing reliably any time soon, however for flattening the curve to make sense it already helps to bring down the mortality rate a bit. Even some research into which mistakes to avoid (like putting the "wrong" people on respirators; I've read about what has been learnt on this in the meantime) can mean some progress and more survivors.
And last one thing I forgot. There's another major reason for flattening the curve, which is that the more overstretched the hospitals, the higher the death rate. Evidence on this is everywhere to be found (look at Wuhan vs. rest of China for a start), and differences are striking. Having hospitals that can cope is the best medicine we currently have.
So how long do you shut down?No country can sustain a 1 year shut
down.For some 1 month is not
sustainable.
“If all we do is flatten the curve, you don’t prevent deaths,
you just change the dates.”- World
class risk modelers
A brief shut down may be beneficial as phase 1.. I don’t
know.
Building immunity seems to be the key.
I’ll post this vid again; Dr. Katz makes a lot of sense to
me.
Ok I’m out… Grabbing my mask and venturing out for some more
food supplies and then going to enjoy my time off.
Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14934
Posted: April 28 2020 at 08:47
CosmicVibration wrote:
So how long do you shut down?No country can sustain a 1 year shut
down.For some 1 month is not
sustainable.
I'm not a politician, I don't have to decide that, and I do think the side effects of shutting down are severe. Why does everyone who makes the legitimate point that lockdown leads to big problems also need to make some kind of nonsense point about it probably not helping (much)? Isn't it possible to accept that there are very good reasons for and against lockdown?
“If all we do is flatten the curve, you don’t prevent deaths,
you just change the dates.”- World
class risk modelers
Show me somebody who says this and I show you somebody who is surely not a "world class risk modeller".
Well, actually I've got to change my mind on that and say, of course this is so. All we ever do when surviving is just changing the date of our death. Except you'd still not expect your risk modeller of choice to make that point.
PS: By the way your Dr. Katz does a lot of boasting about "world class", "who is who" etc. Later he says that he thinks what Sweden is doing is too liberal in his opinion, and that it seems they have more deaths than necessary. Which runs counter to his earlier catchy "we only change the date" message. (Except that in fact we indeed only change the date, but that doesn't mean anything. ) Oh, he also says "98-99% of all cases are mild", which is nonsense. At the very best he can say we don't have a clue about that, those who have good reasons to think they do rather say that something like 98-99% don't die, see above.
my curves (muscles ) are also flattening but my jogging regiment have increased during collectiv quarentine time.
Our province will start opening business May 11th, but unfortunately the gym are not part of business who can open. Despite having more death cases than everyone else in Canada we decided to take the risk to get out of our confinement. We're going to serve as a guinea pig for the rest of Canada.
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.
It was just a matter of time before the anti lockdown rhetoric started to seep in. I enjoy the Fox/Hannity crowd praising North Dakota for opening back up and being held up as a model for the rest of the country, forgetting that ND has a fraction of the population of East and West coast states and that the virus has had little impact there with only 19 deaths so far. Talk about a bubble.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Posted: April 29 2020 at 04:21
npjnpj wrote:
In a way both of you are correct.
Too many people have gone undiagnosed and recovered, and too many people have died without proper diagnosis. Even now, the numbers are accounted on differing criteria in different areas. Some countries record the cause of death as non-corona related if another underlying illness exists, and some don’t, etc.
Just for statistical purposes, correct and complete testing will not supply the data required for comprehensive results; that time has passed and can't be corrected.
Even if you have some isolated area that you could analyse from scratch (a cruise ship or something similar), the study group would probably be too small for the data to be applied to the whole pandemic. Close, but not close enough.
So in a way, we probably won’t know the exact numbers, but then again, we don’t have the exact numbers for seasonal flu either. Does it matter? Probably not. At least not for statistical purposes alone.
So we don’t really have a choice but to make do with estimates and work with them. Not ideal, but not a deal-breaker either.
What worries me a bit is that the numbers we have at the moment are (still) vague enough so that they can be interpreted and (mis)used for differing purposes. Open everything up again? Sure,why not; look at the numbers. Stay shut down? Sure, why not; look at the numbers.
That is only one way to look at it. The safest way to protect life and limb is still by quarantining at thisjuncture.
The lesssafe way is to open back up without all of the necessary testing that's needed to insure that we have a firm handle on the amount of infected people and that is still a ways off. Don't be fooled by the lessening amount of infections and deaths. Those initial estimates were arrived at without the country ever being quarantined, something that was thought impossible at the onslaught of C-19.
Think about it. The entire US almost shutdown? It had never been done before and there was no plan in place to do it.
Edited by SteveG - April 29 2020 at 04:27
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
It was just a matter of time before the anti lockdown rhetoric started to seep in. I enjoy the Fox/Hannity crowd praising North Dakota for opening back up and being held up as a model for the rest of the country, forgetting that ND has a fraction of the population of East and West coast states and that the virus has had little impact there with only 19 deaths so far. Talk about a bubble.
Well as much as I agree with you, it may be a bit early to "open back up". But ND is not the problem, again since you mention a political plug....Have you seen what Calif and Washington have allowed, the Dem capitols of the west coast?
All So Cal beaches were populated this past weekend, people were out in droves basking in the sun and frolicking in the ocean. Here in WA state, parks were opened back up and people were again out in numbers hanging out, as well a very popular farmers market near Seattle was open this past weekend. The messages these states are sending to the public is highly confusing..........So based on what these two large populated states are allowing, how can you blame ND?
It was just a matter of time before the anti lockdown rhetoric started to seep in. I enjoy the Fox/Hannity crowd praising North Dakota for opening back up and being held up as a model for the rest of the country, forgetting that ND has a fraction of the population of East and West coast states and that the virus has had little impact there with only 19 deaths so far. Talk about a bubble.
Well as much as I agree with you, it may be a bit early to "open back up". But ND is not the problem, again since you mention a political plug....Have you seen what Calif and Washington have allowed, the Dem capitols of the west coast?
All So Cal beaches were populated this past weekend, people were out in droves basking in the sun and frolicking in the ocean. Here in WA state, parks were opened back up and people were again out in numbers hanging out, as well a very popular farmers market near Seattle was open this past weekend. The messages these states are sending to the public is highly confusing..........So based on what these two large populated states are allowing, how can you blame ND?
Two wrongs never make a right. However, ND did not get the inspiration to open from California and Washington state, that came from the Republican's crying for their freedom. Just like the old Revolutionary war slogan " Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death!". And Republicans always take things literally, so...
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 17796
Posted: April 29 2020 at 10:20
Catcher10 wrote:
Well as much as I agree with you, it may be a bit early to "open back up". But ND is not the problem, again since you mention a political plug....Have you seen what Calif and Washington have allowed, the Dem capitols of the west coast?
All So Cal beaches were populated this past weekend, people were out in droves basking in the sun and frolicking in the ocean. Here in WA state, parks were opened back up and people were again out in numbers hanging out, as well a very popular farmers market near Seattle was open this past weekend. The messages these states are sending to the public is highly confusing..........So based on what these two large populated states are allowing, how can you blame ND?
Only Newport Beach and Huntington Beach (in Orange County) opened, so everyone flocked there. San Diego County is only beginning to open their beaches, slowly, as of Monday. Los Angeles County has yet to follow suit.
Sorry, but this is a badly-written allegory. And some jackass referring to a policeman/woman (who is referred to as "obese" -- I guess to show she is inefficient and useless) as "non-essential" is asinine (I can see the taser coming out any minute). And to top it off, the dolt is walking to a store without even knowing it's open? And he is angry at the cop for not informing him of his own ignorance earlier on?
On another level, does anyone actually walk to a store to buy a record player? Is this an actual turntable, or is this guy getting one of those old-school record players that looks fine and antique-y up on a shelf but which would tear up expensive vinyl? This story could be cut to a couple sentences by the cop stating, "order your record player online and have it delivered like everyone else, and get your whiny butt effing home before I cuff you."
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Online
Points: 17909
Posted: April 29 2020 at 22:38
verslibre wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
Well as much as I agree with you, it may be a bit early to "open back up". But ND is not the problem, again since you mention a political plug....Have you seen what Calif and Washington have allowed, the Dem capitols of the west coast?
All So Cal beaches were populated this past weekend, people were out in droves basking in the sun and frolicking in the ocean. Here in WA state, parks were opened back up and people were again out in numbers hanging out, as well a very popular farmers market near Seattle was open this past weekend. The messages these states are sending to the public is highly confusing..........So based on what these two large populated states are allowing, how can you blame ND?
Only Newport Beach and Huntington Beach (in Orange County) opened, so everyone flocked there. San Diego County is only beginning to open their beaches, slowly, as of Monday. Los Angeles County has yet to follow suit.
I grew up in So Cal and Huntington Beach was it, we did all our surfing there. I guess to me a beach just goes on into another one...but I agree with your correction, thanks.
Also not sure of the validity but I heard on news less than 10 people were arrested, probably for disorderly conduct .
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.