Easiest way to get music put to lyrics? |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
You'll be happy to learn I never mentioned anything about being interested in money or fame. |
|||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Summon Satan and sell your soul. Otherwise plagiarism works quite well. Ask Jimmy Page :D
|
|||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17484 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If you take a look at music history ... there is more "change" in the 20th Century than any other century prior to that, and I think that the difference is "recording" ... since before that we were depending on the written music, and it did not show enough "progressive" changes of any kind, that showed anything worth while noticing ... and since the advent of the 20th Century, this has changed, and when "recording" appeared, it changed even more, and then tape appeared in the recording studios (instead of direct to the platter -- see the TOM DOWD special!!!!!!! A must!!!) ... and you could clean up and fix a few things, be it in rehearsal, or in the tape itself. Recording, also made "possible" the ability to listen to other things, and then compare ... thus, you have the very first "confusion" in your head as to how to do something, since all of a sudden ... wow ... they didn't use violins ... that's a guitar! And it likely changed the way music is heard and understood ... at least within the popular circles, because 20th Century classical music is a mess ... and its history continues to ignore the Synthesizer, even though it does "credit" the early pioneers with something ... that became a part of the music that was impossible to write down on paper, and became a sort of inspiration for a lot of new things ... the sound "experiments" all of a sudden had something in them, that was useful!
All music, has been ... in a serious critical condition in its history ... and there are a lot of stories, films, and what not that discuss this and how someone wanted to do this, and were told they couldn't ... so you end up with the proverbial Mozart at the bar, totally drunk, because the girls and the bar folks loved the fun and the far out bits that some folks in court with staves up their buttocks could not appreciate! And that was not the only example, as some folks, even in the 20th Century, were laughed at when their music was first presented ... Costs ... today, a lot of this is a lot less of a problem than before ... 75 years ago, you were a "composer" if you could write something that was more than 4 lines on a staff (as was the case in rock music!!!!! the cheapest music example of all!) ... and you could look at some opera ... with 35/40 lines on various staves of the music! Rock music and synthesizers, have simplified all this into almost nothing, and a VST, can be used these days, and many of them are free. You still need a reasonable computer and a DAW that is worth its nickels, but don't try writing something with 20 lines on a staff ... that almost everyone, specially here, will laugh and say is stupid! But then, you look at Vangelis, Sakamoto, Oldfield ... and that is way more than just 4 lines on a staff ... AND IT WORKS ... and even Mike will tell you that "music is cheap" today ... compared to the days that he had to spend in the studio to create Tubular Bells!
Poetry is, usually, at the forefront of "changes" ... and where things end up going ... I would almost say that it was the "free form" of a lot of literature, poetry included, in the 1950's that helped develop a lot of stuff, up to and including music, and even, possibly "jazz", although I of the opinion that there are more than one "source" of inspirations, and none of them are the "form", or the "final" edition of it all. The problem with the "word" (or WORD as I usually say) is the commercial attitudes, and in a time and place where there is no respect for anything except what sells, it means that the words are not being heard, and it is real easy to say ... they aren't good, and the bookstore is stupid ... and the folks that go there are even more so, because now they can get it on the net ... far easier to find, too! ... but the experience of walking around POWELL's here in Portland? .... the Internet will never come close to showing you what you can find and experience ... not even close! And this is the problem with a lot of the folks ... and I don't like to criticize the fans here, since they are all a part of the whole thing in more than one way, but in the end, I question their love and appreciation for the arts, and music, when they only want one thing ... what is weird to me, is that I am not partial to one thing in music ... there isn't anything that I have heard in the past 55 years that I have not enjoyed in some way ... I may not like some country music ... but saying that Dolly does not have the voice is like saying that some folks just won't listen ... to music and how many ways it can be done and appreciated! I may not care a whole lot for some rap, but some of it is down right very good poetry ... although we don't like to confuse the two ... but then we haven't stopped to hear folks like Gil Scott Heron, The Last Poets and others do rap in 1967 or something like it, and even have it on a movie! And that was kinda strange and weird, but it made sense ... you could see someone "stretching" poetry ... and music! AND IT WAS THE WORDS ... that mattered ... THE ONLY PROBLEM? Even today, those words are ignored and rendered meaningless! And my friend, those words are NOT meaningless, when one looks at some history since the 1960's specially in America!
|
|||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
hugo1995
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 20 2019 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 164 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
Write music, always have a melody for a vocal placeholder. Then the literal brains of the band sh*ts out lyrics and you try attach these lyrics to a song. That's how Zappa and Procol Harum did it!
|
|||
interests: Moon Safari, Gilgamesh, Egg, ELP, Soft Machine, Gong, Opeth (Everything pre watershed), Brighteye Brison, The Flower Kings
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Online Points: 65238 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Love me some Powell's ~ |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Just to add to the thread. I can't sing, I tend to sound like some kind of strangulated small mammal, so I don't even attempt it, which suits everyone, I hope.
I do write my own music, though. A few years ago, I went looking for singers (there were several internet forums around at the time). So, I put up a few threads with links to the music. Given that you have to let vocalists have their own creative input, I said "Write your own lyrics as well". The idea behind any audition process was simple, "just send me some lyrics, if they're any good, we can then co-operate over the internet, I'll send you some music and you can record yourself singing over them, I'll do all the mixing etc etc. Just for laughs, no money either way". Almost no responses.
The reason for this is that singers generally don't want to do studio stuff, they want a live audience to adore them. Either that or, for some bizarre reason, they want to be paid, despite having no more creative input than any other musicians on a project. And perhaps less. So I change tack and say "Just lyrics, please". What follows is a deluge of utter infantile crap, people rhyming "have a smoke" with "drink a Coke" / "There'll beeee no more sorrow..... tomorrow" rubbish. Ah yes, thinks I, lyric writing is a skill, and most people who think they can put simple rhymes together are somehow talented. Nope. Lyric writing is an artform, and whilst most people think they can write good lyrics, they can't. It's the same as watching the X Factor, when most people are convinced that they can sing. Well, yes, anyone can sing, but singing and singing well are two different fish of kettles. Time to change approach again. "I'll write the lyrics, you just sing." Back come responses from people who think they can just send me an mp4 of them singing into a mobile phone. "Do I have to have a microphone ? " etc. Er, well, yes, decent mic, some recording software, preferably your own home studio. Oh look, you can't actually sing in tune and your timing is crap. How surprising. Next !! It's an exercise in frustration at best, trying to find decent vocalists or lyricists. Guess what ? I just stick to instrumentals nowadays. Edited by Davesax1965 - February 04 2020 at 09:19 |
|||
|
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Just as a specific reply to Mcentra.....
Some time ago, someone with frankly not a clue decided he'd written a load of songs on piano and I was going to play sax over them (cue rustling of sheet music) in the wine bars and restaurants of Manchester.
"That's going to be a bit loud for a restaurant" says I. "O u can use a muter" comes the text reply. "You can't mute a sax", I tell him, "put a mute down the bell and the noise comes out of the sides, and besides, if you're playing, you have to play at the volume the piece requires, or it sounds awful. What key are these songs in ? " "E major" "Right, that puts me in F or C sharp, far too many sharps and flats. " "What do u mean" So he didn't know that the sax was a transposing instrument, either. Summary. "I've had an idea and now everyone else can play along with it and make it happen. Because *I* have made an idea." And, sorry, what you're saying, Mcentra, is "I've written some lyrics. Now all you musicians out there can spend weeks / months putting my idea to music. May take a very long time, but here's the words". Which gives your fellow musicians no creative input, boring, forces them to do what you want to do, not necessarily what they want to do. Playing music is fun if you play with other people and bounce creative ideas off them, everyone gets to do some of their own thing but it's best done as an artistic compromise. And you've taken that side of the compromise away. You might have lyrics. Unless they're utterly stunning and almost Biblically revelatory...... there are other lyrics available. Or none. Or "lets just play and we can think up some lyrics later". Unfortunately, lyrics tend to (not always) be an afterthought to a song, or at least play second fiddle. On occasion, lyrics can drive the song, but music is written by musicians and not lyricists, in general. If you can sing, join a band, this gives you the possibility of *contributing* lyrics on a fair and equal basis, but turning up with a few sheets of A4 and then expecting a group of musicians are going to automatically come up with a concept album involving months of work and practice is almost guaranteed not to happen. Unless you get the cheque book out and commission some music for money, of course. |
|||
|
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Another example ?
Famous UK poet says "I want someone to put my poetry to music". Fine, says I. Lyrics, please. Lyrics arrive, I do some test music. He sort of likes it, but wants a complete 30 min album done with him doing the poetry and me putting it to music. No chance says I, I don't have that kind of time to devote to it. I'm happy to do you a sample track, though. $0. Along eventually comes a 17 minute track of him reciting a dreadful poem, complete with microphone pops and crackles and mouse clicks where he's stopped the recording, yet left a click in. Example, "Shall I compare thee to a summer's day CLICK ? " Every single line needs the audio chopping, editing, and then somehow time synching to the music. He also has a voice like Latka from Taxi. We sort of agreed that I wouldn't be carrying on with it from there. Mcentra, if you're thinking of doing this yourself, you're going to require a lot of kit - expensive kit - or it'll sound amateurish. What I'd do, if I could sing and write lyrics, is look for a local band or arts project, and co-operate with them. It will mean writing a collaborative piece, but at least everyone will be happy and at least you'll produce something. Good luck, and I mean it, but really, it might be your only way forwards. Edited by Davesax1965 - February 04 2020 at 09:43 |
|||
|
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17484 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Hi,
Weird ... that I have never really felt that some lyrics are better than others ... well, I suppose that we could say that some things are banal, some are Mick and some Bowie, and then some others ... a poet/poetess that no one knows from anywhere, and you and I never heard of them. I'm not sure there is a "method" to doing this ... and I have always found two examples ... that seem to stump folks a lot, but they explain a lot of things, even though understanding them is heck for you and I ... how do you teach that, or explain it? You don't .. you have to allow it to just "live" and "be" ... because that is what its "nature" is. One example: Ginsburg ... you can read his stuff, and it does not jump off the page and get you fired up. But you listen to his 2 minutes in "Tonite We All Love In London" ... and all of a sudden, this is strong stuff ... I can not explain the difference on this ... but I like to joke ... one is live, and the other is memorex ... with a smile behind it ... because "being there" is often more important than the recording, specially when it's live and the paper book is not even available in most bookshops! Likewise, you think many prog'rs here will go listen to it, or get his little book? Example two: Peter Michael Hamel has the story of the old man playing a one string instrument on top of the mountain and he is singing ... I got it ... I got it ... I got it ... and the two students that came over for lessons looked at each other and asked ... Got what? Example three: This one is about lyrics AND a harmonica ... because they went together ... and it is about Paul Butterfield ... and his line that is spectacular that really confuses people, is ... I play one note and I play it well! Words, in Paul's case came via the harmonica, and in his last years, the harmonica was finishing up a sentence ... but this is something that is strictly for someone that sings and plays at the same time ... and both of these are/were an extension of who he was as a person ... his playing was more important than having to say anything ... Well, we can always look at MEATLOAF ... in his book ... "I can't help it ... I'm an actor that happens to sing!" ... and a lot of fans don't like this style, which is also very strong in Europe and is quite well done and used in a lot of bands. I think, eventually, this is about "YOU" and what you see and do ... but if your composition is just some more notes, or ideas that you think that these notes "represent", then, in my experience, the ability to add some lyrics gets harder ... sometimes, things match, when someone has a good feel for the music or the lyrics, and it makes things easier ... but this is probably really difficult to find ... there are a lot of "singers" in music and on the Internet ... and I like to say, not in a mean way ... that while they can do notes, they can not sing at all. And this is an issue in a lot of the pop music out there, and you have these girls trying hard to make a song come alive, and in my ears its falling apart faster than ever. Last example ... The TOSCA aria ... find Gigli's version and listen to it ... it makes you cry ... find Pavarotti's version, and your ears will hurt for a while ... he has the power for it, but lacks the finesse and smoothness. AND the hard part here is how this can hurt the music for a lot of folks ... and almost the same thing happens to CARMEN ... with Maria Callas, and you go wow ... and then someone else, and it doesn't seem to carry as strongly. I can relate to Dave's posts in reverse ... I have been told by many folks that my poetry is "musical", and while I can see that, I never really thought so, although I can turn on my Jupiter 8, find a sound that works with me, and I can create meandering words over it ... some of it just thoughts ... and some of it just poetry, and I have no idea how/when one starts and the other ends, but they go together just fine. What is weird is that I have never gotten a good chance to study music and learn an instrument (would have been piano and I would be in a synth in weeks!) ... which sometimes makes the comments I say sound a bit hollow, and they are mere "translations" of things I see and find, which music helps me do ... thus creating new things inevitably brings out a few things, and then comes the worse part .. hearing it back and figuring out what to do with it! To me, they are just "music poems". What Dave has gone through is a bummer, and it really takes the taste of "music" out of a lot of folks, and I would say it is a credit to his playing that finally said ... I know what I gotta do ... and my only comment is ... wtf Dave? Who told you that you had to sing? ... why can't you just voice ... or "comment" lightly until you get the feel for it? Do it "poetry" style! Just "tone poems" as the Germans have called it without words. And who says a tone can not have words? Or feelings? Edited by moshkito - February 05 2020 at 08:59 |
|||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
...
Edited by mcentra - February 06 2020 at 13:24 |
|||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
...
Edited by mcentra - February 06 2020 at 13:25 |
|||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
...
Edited by mcentra - February 06 2020 at 13:27 |
|||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
This is very valuable feedback... all of your posts. Thank you. You had me laughing at people's expectations as well as intrigued to learn what the other side of the process is thinking. It all makes a lot of sense and explains why a collaboration doesn't just happen. I do put a lot of work into my lyrics but that isn't always apparent when they are all ready to read. Just because I did all the hard work pre-collaboration, doesn't mean I haven't worked hard. I agree it's easier on us lyricists but some people find music creation easier and struggle with lyrics. I don't put any requirements on musicians for the music they put to my lyrics other than we understand the genre they are written for and the intensity of the song. Other than that, they can go wild and be as original as they want. I don't interfere otherwise unless a musician is asking for my input or is stuck and looking for suggestions. Yes, it can be difficult when the vocals aren't working but that can go for any collaboration and band. It can also go for any instrument performance. That's not my problem as a lyricist. That's a problem as a unit of collaborators. Great post...thank you. I still am leaning to doing it all myself but I'm always open to anyone who wants to take a shot. A finished set of concept lyrics is not the same as a song here and there by a novice, if you'll permit me. If the lyrics are good it can be a blueprint for a certain level of musical consistency that can lead to success if the musicians can just push through it. I think Rush is a great example of this. Being handed a set of music-less Neil Peart lyrics, for example, is not the same as being handed just any set of lyrics. If you know the level of care put into writing them you're not just going to discard them just because finding the right music for them might be a challenge. You're going to be inspired to figure out what music will work with them and take your time. Lastly, in regards to who is constructing the song and lyrics...I would imagine that is less of a problem when the songs have gained a certain level of popularity no matter how little of your ideas as a musician have been accepted. For example, if you're playing some unknown song written by the vocalist in your unknown band, you're going to be like "None of my ideas are getting used!" But if you're Ringo Starr of the Beatles you're going to be like "Aren't we awesome?!" even if you're having little input to the majority or any of the songs. Edited by mcentra - February 06 2020 at 13:46 |
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17484 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Hi,
This is a "test" sample of something I am working on ... and I hope that it helps some, so I can improve it. There is one thing in "music" that is a problem ... the notes/chords/scales are way too rigid for anyone to be able to form "lyrics" directly from the music ... why? You have to formulate in your mind what you think the sequence of notes and chords are about, so that the words you create have a reasonable sense of "being there", and it does not go against the flow of the notes. Now, let's take a separate example ... to show you why I say this ... An actor/actress/you/Myself ... can take one word and say it in 5 different ways ... we'll keep the example short ... and if you are trying to write music from the lyrics, besides just being "generic" about it all (this is about love so we will use strings in the background!), you have a problem ... you just said the "word" with this specific tone ... let's say "anger" ... and you sit and try to evaluate how you are going to exemplify that in the staff so everyone else can play it ... now you have an issue ... let's say you find a chord that feels fine, and you have to stretch to the next example ... one chord was not enough to fill the space before you were able to say the next word ... and the notes that you find to fill what were written before the music ... are going to define/decide what the notes should be so things can be smoother in the long run. Or the wording can be adjust some, so it is said differently. Now you check the same thing if you said the "word" in a "splendor" feel ... the notes/chords change, and the music goes at it differently. Music has done beautifully for many years to represent moods and help singers along the way. Rock music added a lot more to it, with material that had a lot more emotions than the staid and stodgy music that we have grown tired of ... because it doesn't feel quite right ... just like all of Wagner's operas for me ... I can not see that any words match anything! IF YOU CAN DEFINE your music really well, and it is not just a few notes "filling" this space to connect with that space over there (you had 4 great bits and figured out how to connect them!), your ability to find words should be easier ... thus in my way of thinking it is weird that Dave can not find words for it, and my thoughts are that he is thinking of "conventional" lala singing for it, and his music demands something else ... even someone reading a poem quietly over it, fits better than a lot of lyrics ... with one exception ... he gave that music a TITLE, that might suggest something else, that the words themselves might not have ... now we have another issue. |
|||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Hi Mcentra, glad you liked the replies and sorry, yes, that's pretty much the situation.
The problem in playing in a group, as I'm sure you know is that "everyone has to go home with a balloon". That's why (after a lot of this) I'm now a studio musician only. I started learning to play multiple instruments as I found that collaboration rarely works. When it does, it's fantastic, but being in a group is like being married to another four people, all with different expectations and different ways of doing things. If it works, great, if it doesn't, it turns very quickly into an ugly situation where friends get hurt. As a suggestion, there are a number of collaborative music sites out there, but very few are aimed at what I'd call "proper" music, it's mainly kids messing about. It could be worth you trying something collaborative over the internet, getting some basic stuff together and then seeing if someone, for example, wants to add a more professional bass or keyboard part. The problem I find with studio music is that the spontaneity of course disappears, but it can work at times. Really, you make your own luck, so the more you advertise, the more chance you have of finding someone, although I think it'll be a lot of hard work. The good thing is that when you meet likeminded musicians, they tend to stay around for multiple projects.
It might be an idea just to do one short piece to start with. Of course, this leads to the problem that other pieces may not have the same orchestration (goodbye concept album) but it might work. Another approach could be to do this, see the concept album as just another project and work on something else at the time until the opportunity to do a bigger project arises ? You get all the pleasure of creating something else in the interim. Also, starting from first principles on a project gives everyone in it the chance of some creative feedback, so that keeps people happy. You can do some work with them, and if a long term relationship comes out of it, then mention "concept album". Good luck, anyway !! Hope it works out for you. Edited by Davesax1965 - February 08 2020 at 02:53 |
|||
|
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
As for "music is dead", I think my reply would be that "commercial music is dead for the average musician" but then again, "commercial music" and "music" are two seperate entities.
I find it difficult to find musicians who can improvise and aren't interested in the money. They're a rare commodity these days. Which explains the state of the current musical landscape. I have a profile on Bandmix, https://www.bandmix.co.uk/dave365268/ - it says "Very experienced sax player, been playing since 1976. Looking to jam with musicians local to Macclesfield. Just for fun, jam sessions and studio work only. Paid session work considered. No particular style, just anything interesting. Not interested in rap, hip hop, house etc, nor am I interested in playing gigs, cover versions, tribute bands or being "famous". Just interested in playing. Evenings only." Edited by Davesax1965 - February 08 2020 at 03:05 |
|||
|
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
PS In reply to Mosh
" thus in my way of thinking it is weird that Dave can not find words for it, and my thoughts are that he is thinking of "conventional" lala singing for it, and his music demands something else ... even someone reading a poem quietly over it, fits better than a lot of lyrics ... with one exception ... he gave that music a TITLE, that might suggest something else, that the words themselves might not have ... now we have another issue." Mosh, I know what I'm doing, I've been playing for decades, I have a degree in English, I can write creatively, I just don't really want to sing and I like writing instrumentals. It's my music, I'll do what I want with it and if anyone doesn't like it, fine by me.
Perhaps a big cup of mind your own business might just do the trick. (Also regarding what I play, how I play it, how I charge for it, whether or not it should be free, and generally posts on how to build a modular synth, the history of it, technical details of relative stability of analogue synthesizers now and then general advice on playing and recording instruments and any other number of subjects which you've seen fit to tell me about for years. ) I'll very happily read your posts about music as you have a great deal of experience in *listening* to music over the years, and I do enjoy them. But. Mosh. Please. Take it that I don't need advice, eh ? We'll both be happier. Edited by Davesax1965 - February 08 2020 at 04:42 |
|||
|
|||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
just write poetry and give it to a rapper in the slam subgenre Not only are the texts brilliant, but listen to the music behind it. |
|||
Davesax1965
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 23 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 2839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I'm just imagining them doing "Tales from Topographic Oceans".....
|
|||
|
|||
mcentra
Forum Newbie Joined: January 19 2020 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Thanks for your replies, Dave. Actually, I've had several online collaborations with my lyrics which were exciting and rewarding to me. Only individual songs, not full albums but fun and rewarding no less. So I know of the successes of approaching collaborators online and, as you went into, I know of the difficulties. This thread was basically about confirming if there was a better way I could go about it to increase my success. But as I see, there is no way to guarantee success or take the struggle out of collaborating with strangers. The two are simply fused together. So, as mentioned, I'm leaning strongly to just doing everything myself. I taught myself to write lyrics so I might as well create the music for them myself. Nobody will know better than me what music I would like put to my lyrics. And I won't be fighting with myself over sound I want to use and where. Of course, my lyrics are still open for collaboration with other musicians but I just don't expect much to come from it and I'm not going to frustrate myself with a quest to force or convince others to collaborate with me on my project. Like you, I think I was turned off by the whole politics of musical collaboration from the get go. It is a Herculean task...You have to convince people to create music for your concept album! That is a huge ask. Rush of course makes it look easy because a million different instances of luck and success brought them to where they have settled on their roles and responsibilities in the band. No one online is going to commit to the kind of musical relationship that Peart had with Lee and Lifeson without a similar degree of luck and success. The thinking is probably more along the lines of "Who the hell are you and why should I give that much of my time and energy to your project?" I mean, when Peart auditioned for Rush, Alex was ready to pass on him because he looked funny...lol. The odds and the obstacles are daunting. That's probably why, even after success with a band, many songwriters go solo...they can't deal with the personalities and artistic obstacles to their work anymore. So yeah, I'm leaning to just doing everything myself because it will simply be more fun. If my experience with writing all my own lyrics is anything to go by, I think I will enjoy learning to sing and create my own music for them as well. But again, I'll always be open to collaborate but I won't be expecting a miracle. Edited by mcentra - February 08 2020 at 06:52 |
|||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |