Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10672
|
Posted: December 26 2018 at 21:48 |
IVNORD wrote:
Easy Money wrote:
I couldn't find any pro-impeachment posts, but if you go to the middle of page 109 of this thread you can see posts from trump detractors who think impeachment is a bad idea for several reasons. |
Do Advanced Search and select a one year period. I'm sure you'll find a couple | Nope, nothing there.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: December 26 2018 at 21:51 |
Easy Money wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
Easy Money wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
[QUOTE=Atavachron] And if it is treason, it is possible Mueller, however unlikely, has in fact already informed the Justice Dept. |
If it's treason and the DOJ has been informed why would they keep it secret? President of the United States is a traitor, the Attorney General is aware of it and keeps quiet? Be serious. Trump is an arrogant jackass who probably is guilty of something like illegal hush paments or something, but treason.... | I have no idea what trump may be accused of if anything, but lets suppose a case was being made for treason. This is not going be made public to us or the media until the case against him is airtight, that's how law enforcement is supposed to work. Ideally they are not supposed to be revealing everything they are looking at until they are ready to make a decisive move. |
I don't want to repeat myself. Just re-read the above. I wasn't talking about due process
| I re-read your post and you say why would the AG "keep quiet". Because hopefully they are professional law enforcement officials and they don't broadcast the details of a case they are working on until they are certain they are ready to move ahead. |
OK
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: December 27 2018 at 12:15 |
I think that it doesn’t matter at all if the AG comes forward with any proof or not. Fact ist that with the democrats taking over the house the next few days, either Trump or Jesus-Boy are going to be checked at every point, and that’s the important thing.
Impeachment or not, who cares? As long as all those gruesome policies can be stopped, it just doesn’t matter.
Everything Mueller comes up with from this point onwards can just be considered an added bonus. Mueller’s conclusions have become irrelevant, at least considered from the viewpoint of what’s good for the US.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20649
|
Posted: December 28 2018 at 12:49 |
^This......... The fact that the public actually voted this doofus in is simply mind boggling....it shows imho just how fed up the public is with politics in Washington that they would let someone like that be in charge. btw, I'm not a Trump 'hater'..but this guy has far too many 'issues' to be the POTUS.
Edited by dr wu23 - December 28 2018 at 12:50
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: December 29 2018 at 12:24 |
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't. Then let's remove Trumphole and Penice and the whole rotten regime in 2020...
Edited by Slartibartfast - January 01 2019 at 06:08
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: December 29 2018 at 17:28 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't.
|
What is Trump's impeachable offence?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10672
|
Posted: December 29 2018 at 18:50 |
IVNORD wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't.
|
What is Trump's impeachable offence? |
The weirdest, tackiest comb-over ever.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: December 29 2018 at 19:02 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't. Then let's remove Trumphole and Penice and the whole rotten regime in 2020...
[Picture Censured]
|
Removed the pic from your post because for God's sake, I don't have to see that. Politics are disgusting enough as it is.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Snicolette
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 6048
|
Posted: December 29 2018 at 19:16 |
Easy Money wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't.
|
What is Trump's impeachable offence? | The weirdest, tackiest comb-over ever. |
What is it with these dictatorial guys and weird hair?
|
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Chaser
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 18 2018
Location: Nottingham
Status: Offline
Points: 1202
|
Posted: December 30 2018 at 05:09 |
Snicolette wrote:
What is it with these dictatorial guys and weird hair? |
Just be grateful you're not in North Korea or everyone would have a Trump style haircut
|
Songs cast a light on you
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Snicolette
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 6048
|
Posted: December 30 2018 at 07:16 |
Good point!
|
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: December 31 2018 at 09:08 |
I liked that picture. I could see the soles of the GOP sticking out of it.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: December 31 2018 at 09:39 |
npjnpj wrote:
I think that it doesn’t matter at all if the AG comes forward with any proof or not. Fact ist that with the democrats taking over the house the next few days, either Trump or Jesus-Boy are going to be checked at every point, and that’s the important thing.
Impeachment or not, who cares? As long as all those gruesome policies can be stopped, it just doesn’t matter.
Everything Mueller comes up with from this point onwards can just be considered an added bonus. Mueller’s conclusions have become irrelevant, at least considered from the viewpoint of what’s good for the US.
|
The least of Trump's problems are political now.. he is facing the very real possibility of being charged and tried for crimes once he is out of office.
By the time the Democratic House pries out of the Justice Department what they Mueller did report (remember the report goes directly to the AG, who will be a Trump stooge, and is not public domain especialy with all the nat. security implications Mueller is likely to get into) quite frankly it will too late for any political games with impeachment with an election campaign now about about a year away..... but any details of wrongdoing.. or worse.. any further additional beyond what we know already hinting as we got from the Cohen info... that Trump himself is going to be indicted once he is out of office will again likely be the final nails in any chance he has to win reelection.
Edited by micky - December 31 2018 at 09:42
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: December 31 2018 at 10:37 |
Hm. With the right people now in place, we might be seeing weird things happening to the Statutes of Limitations.
Silvio Berlusconi for instance was a wizard at that sort of thing.
Edited by npjnpj - December 31 2018 at 10:39
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 04:47 |
^ the statue of limiitations will never come into play here. IIRC correctly it is 5 years and Trump will be indicted long before that ever approaches. Even winning a 2nd term won't save him, Mueller already has scores of sealed indictments in Federal Courts. They can remain sealed for years if need be and for a special case like a sitting President.
Who knows perhaps some of them have Trump's name already on them for the Conspiracy and the highly likely one of perjury, coming out of what the Fed's nailed Cohen for. However while that is enough to put him in jail the more serious charges are likely still being investigated. No one, outside of those with heads in their sand, doesn't think Trump has committed obstruction of justice and collusion with a (hostile) foreign power. Proving those though.. will be tough.. even for the pro's at the Justice Department. Again no statue of limitation on that is plausible man...
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 08:13 |
historian9 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't. Then let's remove Trumphole and Penice and the whole rotten regime in 2020...
[Picture Censured]
|
Removed the pic from your post because for God's sake, I don't have to see that. Politics are disgusting enough as it is.
|
Does freedom of expression have any value on this forum? or it's up to the admin to decide? What's wrong with the picture?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 08:34 |
micky wrote:
No one, outside of those with heads in their sand, doesn't think Trump has committed obstruction of justice and collusion with a (hostile) foreign power.
|
I appreciate your careful choice of words but doesn't 'collusion with a (hostile) foreign power' equate to treason?
And lots of people thought Clinton was up to his neck in Whitewater, so what?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 10:39 |
IVNORD wrote:
historian9 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't. Then let's remove Trumphole and Penice and the whole rotten regime in 2020...
[Picture Censured]
|
Removed the pic from your post because for God's sake, I don't have to see that. Politics are disgusting enough as it is.
|
Does freedom of expression have any value on this forum? or it's up to the admin to decide? What's wrong with the picture? |
It's very obviously up to the admin's to decide, as it always has been and it always will be. Everything is up to the decision of the moderators and it will always will subjective up to a degree and up for us to edit or warn even if I don't see malice in it like in this case. I removed it cause it partially contained a photograph of an anus.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 10:46 |
Not partial, it was full frontal and in close up; a very clean one that seems to have been well washed and hygienic. Tasteful and artistic, and I never want to see that again. Ever. Thank you to the admin.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
|
Posted: January 01 2019 at 16:47 |
historian9 wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
historian9 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I support impeachment although the likelihood of Senate removal isn't. Then let's remove Trumphole and Penice and the whole rotten regime in 2020...
[Picture Censured]
|
Removed the pic from your post because for God's sake, I don't have to see that. Politics are disgusting enough as it is.
|
Does freedom of expression have any value on this forum? or it's up to the admin to decide? What's wrong with the picture? |
It's very obviously up to the admin's to decide, as it always has been and it always will be. Everything is up to the decision of the moderators and it will always will subjective up to a degree and up for us to edit or warn even if I don't see malice in it like in this case. I removed it cause it partially contained a photograph of an anus.
|
An anus, and a butthole.
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.