Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: September 21 2016
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 578
Topic: Whitesnake or ZZ Top? Posted: February 23 2017 at 12:49
What is your choice between these two bands?
I really like pre-1987 period of Whitesnake(bluesy hard rock stuff) and the 70's period of ZZ Top. But I am going with WS over ZZ Top, because I think 80's commercial stuff by Whitesnake is easily better than 80's ZZ Top stuff as Eliminator and Afterburner, though I'm not a big fan of that their period.
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Posted: February 23 2017 at 14:10
ZZ top if forced to choose.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Joined: July 01 2015
Location: Out East
Status: Offline
Points: 6777
Posted: February 23 2017 at 18:43
Yeah, ZZ Top for me. Not only did they nail Texas blues rock, they're simply one of the most iconic bands on the planet. The beards! The car! The spinning guitars! What's not to love?
Whitesnake always struck me as pretty generic hair metal, though I did enjoy the material Steve Vai did with them.
when i was a kid a doller was worth ten dollers - now a doller couldnt even buy you fifty cents
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Posted: February 24 2017 at 03:15
Whitesnake by a mile, although only pre 1987. When Coverdale sacked the British band and reformed with a load of Scandinavian hair metal poodles they nosedived in quality so f***ing fast, when they hit the ground they were identifiable only through DNA analysis of their splattered remains. Their music was stripped of all emotion and originality. Awful terrible rubbish.
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Posted: March 04 2018 at 05:36
Blacksword wrote:
Whitesnake by a mile, although only pre 1987. When Coverdale sacked the British band and reformed with a load of Scandinavian hair metal poodles they nosedived in quality so f***ing fast, when they hit the ground they were identifiable only through DNA analysis of their splattered remains. Their music was stripped of all emotion and originality. Awful terrible rubbish.
Never liked ZZ Top.
Couldn't agree more. Pre-1987 Whitesnake were a great hard rock-blues band, as witnessed by their outstanding live album Live... In the Heart of the City. The original versions of "Here I Go Again" and "Crying in the Rain" smoke those pitiful excuses for songs that were released in the late Eighties. Incidentally, I saw Whitesnake and ZZ Top on stage on the same day, at the 1983 edition of the Monsters of Rock festival in Castle Donington. Whitesnake (who headlined) were great, with Cozy Powell on drums and Jon Lord on keyboards - but ZZ Top almost put me to sleep, playing more or less the same song for 40 minutes.
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Posted: March 04 2018 at 05:43
ahhh... one of the very few things you and I disagree with. They ain't bad darling... pretty good actually...but to these ears compared to authentic blues-rock like ZZtop... they are what they sound.. 2nd rate... whose only real concept of the blues and hard living...is having to go to tax exile because their f**king gov't is having to take their bread man.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.586 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.