Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - American Politics the 2016 edition
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmerican Politics the 2016 edition

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9293949596 146>
Author
Message
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 14:17
Originally posted by TeleStrat TeleStrat wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:







If you update this chart to 2016 the gap would be much wider.
The current election cycle alone has widened the gap and the results of the election will further the divide regardless of who wins.


no doubt.. Just think of all the kiddies dumped into the system that were rabid Bernie bots..  The Democratic median will just continue to shift left. I'll be curious to see how much the Republican continues to shift right.. one can only go so far before one starts goosestepping.. burning books and putting Hispanics and Muslims into camps... though I have faith in my friends in the right that they'll leave no stone unturned in their chase to get out the missing white neo-facist vote...LOL


Edited by micky - October 16 2016 at 14:18
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 14:40
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

putting Hispanics and Muslims into camps.

We already have labor camps for minorities, we just call them prisons. Ask Hillary "superpredator" Clinton about them.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 14:48
Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

putting Hispanics and Muslims into camps.

We already have labor camps for minorities, we just call them prisons.



I didn't mention blacks... the GOP had a 50 year head start on them on trying to remove them from white America ....






The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 14:55
And both parties still uphold systemic racism. Thumbs Up
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 15:01
Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

And both parties still uphold systemic racism. Thumbs Up


funny that blacks don't see it that way...  inability to change is not the same as upholding or promoting the unfortunate standards
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 15:27
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

And both parties still uphold systemic racism. Thumbs Up


funny that blacks don't see it that way...  inability to change is not the same as upholding or promoting the unfortunate standards

Who doesn't see it that way? I can assure you the people I have talked to do.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 15:36
Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

And both parties still uphold systemic racism. Thumbs Up


funny that blacks don't see it that way...  inability to change is not the same as upholding or promoting the unfortunate standards

Who doesn't see it that way? I can assure you the people I have talked to do.


I'll take my 30 odd years living and working with blacks over a few of your friends... who probably to be blunt are as ignorant of the way the world is as you sound to be my friend.

let me amend...  rational thinking blacks that understand the systematic racism.. was built over  150 years... which took 100 years just to vote without restrictions (though don't forget your ID and Birth Certificate and 1st born child if you live in a GOP held stateThumbs Up LOL)

those blacks.. that turn oiut 90-10 to vote Democratic know it is a slow process.. you don't change 150 years of racism.. in 4 years.. or 8.  So yeah.. tell me that blacks blame Democrats for systematic racism. Perhaps they wish it could be addressed quicker.. but unfortunately we haven't managed to line up a against the wall all the bigots and racists.. and their supporters and shoot them LOL


Edited by micky - October 16 2016 at 15:38
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 17:36
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

So yeah.. tell me that blacks blame Democrats for systematic racism.

I think MLK said it best, I've quoted it before but I'll quote it again:
Quote I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 17:58
LOL  and when was that written  man... 1963


the game changed in 1965..
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65417
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 18:12
^ Voting Rights Act ?   Yeah it's the one thing I can give credit to that bast*rd Johnson for.   Good god; Johnson then Nixon then Ford.   No wonder that was one of the most corrupt periods in US history.

Speaking of which --
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Corruption has been a comfortable, even integral part, of U.S. deep politics for many decades.   If Hillary has mastered it, then I don't see a problem.   Emails ?   Tip of the iceberg. 
I have this discussion with my younger coworkers all the time David...it isn't that Hillary is more corrupt.. she is seen as the face OF it and they are sick and tired of it.  If not for Trump...take my best friend at work.. He LOATHES Hillary... part of it is he more pro-gun rights than I am. Militant he is whereas I believe regulation and restrictions are not an infringement on gun owner rights .  But even he sees that a Trump presidency could be, likely would be, devastating to this country.. and world.  He'll vote Hillary..  but take his sentiment as a voice of the youth David. They are fed up with politics as usual and want change.  Old farts like us are sort of blase about it. What politician is not corrupt or beholden to money.. but the youth (god bless them) want a change.

No doubt, but some very bad people are going to have to die or retire first.

You must someday read :

430223


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 18:30
I think personally it is the delusion born of idealism myself... sure politics as usual could change.. but like many of our deeply rooted problems... it might take generation of concerted effort to eradicate.

I haven't read that... I'll put that on the read list...

and as far as Johnson...make it two things you should give him credit for.. perhaps this one was even more important than the voting rights act in charting the future course of this country.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/08/immigration-1965-law-donald-trump-gop-214179
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 18:33
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

LOL  and when was that written  man... 1963


the game changed in 1965..

The fact that we have need for the BLM movement makes me feel that it has not changed at all. The fact that black people are still vastly over represented in prison populations makes me feel that it has not changed at all.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2016 at 18:43
I'll repeat.. it took 100 years to gain the the right to vote....  I wish changes would happen overnight. However if you are half as educated on the subject as I hope you are.. and best be if you are are going to swim with the sharks... the problems affecting the black population are deeply rooted are largely systemmatic and in no small part also self inflicted....and will take many years to fully address.  What doesn't help is one party.. and fully 40% of the population could care LESS about them because ..well.. you know....

Look how long it took to change hearts and minds to gays getting simple basic rights we take for granted..  you think the socio economic problems of the black community can be changed overnight. Come on man.. it would be a tough battle even if one of the two major parties who thinks suppressing black vote out of political expediency is acceptable wasn't a barrier to improving education, opportunities and of course ...  having a national discussion and redress of the militarization of the police forces and their targeting of blacks.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2016 at 07:00
Little doubt the Democratic Part is the better vehicle for race, since the GOP has actively tried to gut voting rights, and this whole "pro police" thing is the thinnest veil ever for overt racism (hell are they even actually trying to hide it?) 

Now, it's well known I think Clinton policies have been not so great for minorities, and he can't really claim much credit for the late 90s economy that DID bring some improvement to them, while his actual policies made extreme poverty (for all who suffer) worse. Not to mention his, and Hillary's, support for our FTAs. This all has hurt lower income people, thus unfortunately disproportionately hurt minorities.

BUT the alternative is clearly worse. Sad this is the choice we make, and a good number of minorities do not like Clinton, but guess this is why we have to keep the pressure on her and the Democratic Party. It just can't be the GOP especially in it's current form. Clinton went with welfare reform that hurt minorities and the poor, but sh*t imagine if we get a Repub President with a Tea Party infested congress??? Point being: It's good to criticize the Dems, but we gotta be realistic, can't compare em to the GOP in regards to racial issues. 


Edited by JJLehto - October 17 2016 at 07:24
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2016 at 07:17
In response to Micky, but also my general thoughts:

Much has been made about the, absolutely true, gap growing in politics. However, I think it's largely been because of the Republican's rightward drift. They used to (the mainstream) support New Deal policies, many were supportive of civil rights. 
They've increasingly strayed from that, Democrats have not. Heck if anything they've drifted towards the center themselves economically, before this recent jog back left. I recall an article showing how today's liberal republicans are more conservative than the average conservative from decades ago. So yeah, seems clear to me who's driven most of this gapLOL

Part is also a natural tendency perhaps for that to happen with parties, but also the Democrats have become increasingly socially liberal as well. Isn't this good? Don't we all believe this is good? So the gap in politics can be lamented on, but what do you want?
And yeah us dumb youngin Bernie bots...but again I don't get it. He represent Democratic ideas: social liberalism, dedication to environment, pro labor/working/middle class. Aren't these good things?? Aren't these what the Democratic Party is ya know, supposed to be about?

Basically: The gap seems like the two parties are just returning to their roots. The GOP has embraced limited government, the Democrats are drifting back towards labor/middle class roots. If anything the Dems aren't going more left per se...just regaining their old spot. 
And since you always talk about the "culture war" I say...loss of the middle ground? Good riddance. If the Dems going farther left means fighting for abortion, gay, civil and environmental rights, I say good. Fight on. 




Edited by JJLehto - October 17 2016 at 23:33
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2016 at 15:03
McCain has just joined DeLay in calling for perpetual obstruction of Supreme Court appointments. Apparently believes that the GOP can make an eventual comeback to the White House. Tongue
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2016 at 15:07
^Talk about a party who gives three f**ks about the future of their country, the same people who masturbate to army uniforms and call themselves patriotic for wearing the US flag in their underwear. This same people want a Supreme Court perennially short one person. 

Revolting. 
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2016 at 23:59
Wow. 
Anyone remember pre 2008 John McCain? My oh my, how far down the hole has he dug himself. 

OK, I'll be fair, that comment, like this entire Supreme Court debacle, is a voter drive attempt. They want to get people out in November, since they are likely to lose the Senate. McCain said this in Pennsylvania, where Pat Toomey is currently behind in the polls. It's all just a "get out and vote" tactic. 
If the Republicans lose the WH and Senate as expected, I believe they will nominate Garland in the lame duck session. 
He's a moderate with previous GOP support. Since the alternative is a blue PotUS and Senate, they'd have no real choice. 

And nah, they can't actually try this. The Dems could always threaten the nuclear option. Besides, McCain is already backtracking: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/301391-mccain-walks-back-pledge-to-block-clinton-supreme-court-nominee
I am a little shocked though this was even considered OK/acceptable. Like, we've gotten to this point and McCain of all people is leading the chargeCry


Edited by JJLehto - October 18 2016 at 00:10
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2016 at 16:04
ahhh... 3 weeks to go... just placed my order for a kilo of coke.. a case of Jack... a bevy of blond strippers with collective IQ only slightly higher than the average Trump supporter.. .and of course .. a couple of muscular meatheads for Raff so that she can drink champagne dripping off their bulging biceps...

so the McPredictions...

1)  Clinton wins.  no sh*t.. but how much.  I've seen some chatter that current polls are not underselling Trump.. but are underselling Clinton..   Makes some sense... then there is the large.. much larger than in normal years undecided vote.  Rational thought would indicate most will break for Clinton.  Those that hate her.. and/or love him are already cooked into the polls. That is why he has the ceiling he has.. he is not likely to surpass it.  Figure given a choice between someone they don't like but at least will be politics as usual.. or someone they REALLY don't like.. who might (would haha) take the country off the cliff.. my money is that 2/3'rds of the undecided break Clinton.

So my prediction...

http://www.270towin.com/maps/3n8VN

Clinton does pass 400 and does take Texas...  it is close already.. do think my talking points are whey she takes it.. narrowly but does... also registering the first double digit popular vote win we've had since 1984..  ancient times and a different country ago.... in terms of the hyper partisan tribal country we've become.


2) Senate... Democrats end up with 52 seats and control

3) the House?  Hard to say.. we have seen some wild swings in the last few years so it is not impossible.. nor even improbable considering the state of politics 2016 and the idiocy of the last Congress. However I think Trump needs at least one more bad news cycle for the down ballot disaster to swing the house. I think they hold on to it.. very narrowly... and likely to fully swing back to the Democrats in 2018.. as the Senate goes back to the Republicans (chock out the docket for the 2018 midterm elections.. brutal)




Edited by micky - October 18 2016 at 16:25
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2016 at 16:35
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

In response to Micky, but also my general thoughts:

Much has been made about the, absolutely true, gap growing in politics. However, I think it's largely been because of the Republican's rightward drift. They used to (the mainstream) support New Deal policies, many were supportive of civil rights. 
They've increasingly strayed from that, Democrats have not. Heck if anything they've drifted towards the center themselves economically, before this recent jog back left. I recall an article showing how today's liberal republicans are more conservative than the average conservative from decades ago. So yeah, seems clear to me who's driven most of this gapLOL

Part is also a natural tendency perhaps for that to happen with parties, but also the Democrats have become increasingly socially liberal as well. Isn't this good? Don't we all believe this is good? So the gap in politics can be lamented on, but what do you want?
And yeah us dumb youngin Bernie bots...but again I don't get it. He represent Democratic ideas: social liberalism, dedication to environment, pro labor/working/middle class. Aren't these good things?? Aren't these what the Democratic Party is ya know, supposed to be about?

Basically: The gap seems like the two parties are just returning to their roots. The GOP has embraced limited government, the Democrats are drifting back towards labor/middle class roots. If anything the Dems aren't going more left per se...just regaining their old spot. 
And since you always talk about the "culture war" I say...loss of the middle ground? Good riddance. If the Dems going farther left means fighting for abortion, gay, civil and environmental rights, I say good. Fight on. 




ahhh... Brian...  I think the chart was VERY clear.... the Democratic Party... those OF the Party are moving left.  Look at just how much of the Democratic segement is OFF the map to the left.. compared to earlier years...  no doube it is moving left. They have a lot of room to move... question is...  the GOP has to move left to remain viable in today's (and especially tomorrows) reality.. do they continue to trend right.. or simply stand put.

oh nevermind my Bernie shots.. LOL. I really liked the guy.. liked what what he stood for... LOVE the enthusiam he generated....while the Democratic Party was ready for him... America was not. As I said earlier... he was ahead of his time.. by an election cycle or two.... I had thought early onTrump would have beaten him... and though obviously not as certain of that today... I do think things could have turned out differently if it had Bernie rather than Hillary as his opponent. The best the GOP had against her . .were her f**king emails..  they would tarred and feathered him like ONLY the GOP attack machine could have to where average American Joe 6-Pack would have voted for a serial misogynst over a goddamend COMMUNIST LOL  As I said earlier in the thread Brian... Bernie might be a nice guy.. he had NO idea.. Vermont politics was no preperation for what the GOP would have thrown at him.. little of it true.. none of it real... but it would have stuck.  Fear is page 1 of the GOP playbook...along with the politics of personal destruction... Hillary was immune because they have tried to destroy her for 30 years and shot their bolt already.... Bernie likely would have wilted.. and lost an election the Democratic should have NEVER lost.  That is why I couldn't support him.. the stakes were too high to dream or live on idealism....


Edited by micky - October 18 2016 at 16:40
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9293949596 146>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.352 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.