Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - American Politics the 2016 edition
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmerican Politics the 2016 edition

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 6566676869 146>
Author
Message
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 05:31
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

So what's PA's take on Hilary's running mate?  I hear a lot of persuasive assurance from mainstream press but at the same time I wonder if Tim Kaine wouldn't sort of help prove Trump's point that the Democratic party is pro-establishment.  I mean, it would appear that this election is more about symbolism than substance.  

It's a very Clinton-esque pick. Safe, boring, moderate, and an absolute Clinton devotee

Not really a fan. I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. He was an early advocate for the $15 min wage, created the new rule that would expand OT pay to millions of workers, and has pretty liberal credentials, but is quiet, safe and clearly experienced. Has ties to Obama, obviously, and would not cost the Democrats a senate seat. It would be a move that makes the liberal base happy, while Kaine is clearly an attempt to reach out to moderates and a more national base.

I can't fault the move, with Trump alienating most sane people I get wanting to grab as many as you can. really I just don't think the VP means very much to people. To me it's more a look into the candidate's psyche, as you say it's symbolic. 

My only real beef is he's been a supporter of TPP and banking deregulation. So not feeling it, but also not surprised, nor am I particularly upset about it...but deff not happy.LOL


Edited by JJLehto - July 26 2016 at 06:08
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 05:46
I did rewatch Bernie's speech, really it was great. Yeah he lacks polish sometimes, he's certainly not lawyer-esque and airtight like Clinton  nor Obama-esque with his perfect speaking demeanor and skills, but damn it Sanders is a great orator and stirrer of passion. I guess all that stuff he lacks, makes up for with an honest ability to work a crowd and install anything from anger to hope to love. 

It reminded me of his campaign and all the huge issues he brought to attention. What this was all about. 
We must remember, especially Sanders fans, the Presidency is not a monarch. We need Congress, so he will still be there (with greatly improved name recognition) and we all gotta push good candidates and keep pressure on for these policies. 

I did also watch Warren's speech, was great as expected. While Sanders throws out the 0.1% owning 90% and millions and billions hers was much more generic, thus "warm and cozy". The whole "guess I'm just the daughter of a janitor who became a teacher, professor, then US senator" and how America is a land of opportunity, but it's now slipping away. Great stuff 

Still gotta get to Booker's and Michelle's and does anyone when/if(?) Jerry Brown will speak? I have a permanent soft spot for the guy due to his 1992 campaign, and his eccentric nature. Also just kinda curious what on Earth he'll say being he's a bit of a doom and gloom cold hard facts type guy but social progressiveLOL




Edited by JJLehto - July 26 2016 at 06:05
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 07:14
Don't rate the content of Booker's speech (thought it was pretty clichéd) but maybe he was there to provide the emotion quotient. Warren brought a lot of substance. Didn't get to hear Sanders.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 08:50
After watching the three (four) main speeches last night and comparing to even the most reasonable one from last week, it's even more unbelievable that a country not populated just by chimpanzees can even have doubts choosing between the two parties.

Alas, IQ is a band here in PA but is sorely missing in much of 'Murica

Edited by The T - July 26 2016 at 08:51
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 11:50
I'm writing in a vote for Bernie anyway! Tongue
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 12:45
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

I'm writing in a vote for Bernie anyway! Tongue
Come on, even the nice dog in your avatar would know better Tongue
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 15:15
Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

I was so absolutely completely peeved with the content of Michelle Obama's speech




still feeling that a day later...  LOL I thought it was a HELL of a speech and seems a great many do as well.

It wasn't her place to go policy wonk on us.. it was hers to reinspire.. to reaffirm what it means... or still does at least to Democratic voters LOLWink.. to be an American and what is still great about it and what the other side has lost sight of.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 15:29
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

So what's PA's take on Hilary's running mate?  I hear a lot of persuasive assurance from mainstream press but at the same time I wonder if Tim Kaine wouldn't sort of help prove Trump's point that the Democratic party is pro-establishment.  I mean, it would appear that this election is more about symbolism than substance.  

It's a very Clinton-esque pick. Safe, boring, moderate, and an absolute Clinton devotee

Not really a fan. I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. He was an early advocate for the $15 min wage, created the new rule that would expand OT pay to millions of workers, and has pretty liberal credentials, but is quiet, safe and clearly experienced. Has ties to Obama, obviously, and would not cost the Democrats a senate seat. It would be a move that makes the liberal base happy, while Kaine is clearly an attempt to reach out to moderates and a more national base.

I can't fault the move, with Trump alienating most sane people I get wanting to grab as many as you can. really I just don't think the VP means very much to people. To me it's more a look into the candidate's psyche, as you say it's symbolic. 

My only real beef is he's been a supporter of TPP and banking deregulation. So not feeling it, but also not surprised, nor am I particularly upset about it...but deff not happy.LOL


he is the VP candidate... once again. He will not be setting policy (unless we will be living in Trump's political universe haha). only helping the President as a means to and end.  I can't help but admire Hillary's long view in making the choice. Yes she could have thrown a political bone to the left but from I understand she decided the others were not up to it, experienced or qualified.  One can hope the Senate will turn Democratic.. dream that Trump and GOP implode and the House turns as well.  If not however.. she will still have to navigate a hostile Congress and there was no SINGLE VP candidate that can help her like Kaine.

If is one thing to get elected... it is another to do anything once elected. One reason some of us simply couldn't feel the Bern... he was a election cycle or two ahead of his time but still could go down as a cataylst in the Warren (progressive) revolution.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 19:58
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

So what's PA's take on Hilary's running mate?  I hear a lot of persuasive assurance from mainstream press but at the same time I wonder if Tim Kaine wouldn't sort of help prove Trump's point that the Democratic party is pro-establishment.  I mean, it would appear that this election is more about symbolism than substance.  

It's a very Clinton-esque pick. Safe, boring, moderate, and an absolute Clinton devotee

Not really a fan. I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. He was an early advocate for the $15 min wage, created the new rule that would expand OT pay to millions of workers, and has pretty liberal credentials, but is quiet, safe and clearly experienced. Has ties to Obama, obviously, and would not cost the Democrats a senate seat. It would be a move that makes the liberal base happy, while Kaine is clearly an attempt to reach out to moderates and a more national base.

I can't fault the move, with Trump alienating most sane people I get wanting to grab as many as you can. really I just don't think the VP means very much to people. To me it's more a look into the candidate's psyche, as you say it's symbolic. 

My only real beef is he's been a supporter of TPP and banking deregulation. So not feeling it, but also not surprised, nor am I particularly upset about it...but deff not happy.LOL


he is the VP candidate... once again. He will not be setting policy (unless we will be living in Trump's political universe haha). only helping the President as a means to and end.  I can't help but admire Hillary's long view in making the choice. Yes she could have thrown a political bone to the left but from I understand she decided the others were not up to it, experienced or qualified.  One can hope the Senate will turn Democratic.. dream that Trump and GOP implode and the House turns as well.  If not however.. she will still have to navigate a hostile Congress and there was no SINGLE VP candidate that can help her like Kaine.

If is one thing to get elected... it is another to do anything once elected. One reason some of us simply couldn't feel the Bern... he was a election cycle or two ahead of his time but still could go down as a cataylst in the Warren (progressive) revolution.

That is a good point.  She needs someone who will help her get business done in Congress.  Yeah, I was thinking maybe a more Left leaning appointee to make sure the Bernie votes stay and also to blunt what is likely to be Trump's first line of attack.  
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 20:54
we still love you Bill...

what a speech... ClapHeart
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65442
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 21:03
^ Of course we still love him, debauched philanderer and all.   You can't argue with eight fairly good years.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 21:08
LOLThumbs Up
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 21:19
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

So what's PA's take on Hilary's running mate?  I hear a lot of persuasive assurance from mainstream press but at the same time I wonder if Tim Kaine wouldn't sort of help prove Trump's point that the Democratic party is pro-establishment.  I mean, it would appear that this election is more about symbolism than substance.  

It's a very Clinton-esque pick. Safe, boring, moderate, and an absolute Clinton devotee

Not really a fan. I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. He was an early advocate for the $15 min wage, created the new rule that would expand OT pay to millions of workers, and has pretty liberal credentials, but is quiet, safe and clearly experienced. Has ties to Obama, obviously, and would not cost the Democrats a senate seat. It would be a move that makes the liberal base happy, while Kaine is clearly an attempt to reach out to moderates and a more national base.

I can't fault the move, with Trump alienating most sane people I get wanting to grab as many as you can. really I just don't think the VP means very much to people. To me it's more a look into the candidate's psyche, as you say it's symbolic. 

My only real beef is he's been a supporter of TPP and banking deregulation. So not feeling it, but also not surprised, nor am I particularly upset about it...but deff not happy.LOL


he is the VP candidate... once again. He will not be setting policy (unless we will be living in Trump's political universe haha). only helping the President as a means to and end.  I can't help but admire Hillary's long view in making the choice. Yes she could have thrown a political bone to the left but from I understand she decided the others were not up to it, experienced or qualified.  One can hope the Senate will turn Democratic.. dream that Trump and GOP implode and the House turns as well.  If not however.. she will still have to navigate a hostile Congress and there was no SINGLE VP candidate that can help her like Kaine.

If is one thing to get elected... it is another to do anything once elected. One reason some of us simply couldn't feel the Bern... he was a election cycle or two ahead of his time but still could go down as a cataylst in the Warren (progressive) revolution.

That is a good point.  She needs someone who will help her get business done in Congress.  Yeah, I was thinking maybe a more Left leaning appointee to make sure the Bernie votes stay and also to blunt what is likely to be Trump's first line of attack.  


Time will tell if it as the right decision or not. It was the smart one but still a risky one.  IMO the only way she loses this election is if she fails to get out the Democratic vote.

I admire her for not thinking short term gain... yperhaps getting a window shade for a VP who will likely do little to help her once elected. She thought long term. Responsible governing. Kaine is highly respected by both Democrats AND republicans and I'll tell you one thing.. that is rare today.  He is the bridge builder, consensus builder that Hillary would need to work with GOP houses of Congress. Not to mention he is well qualified, god forbid to make that next step if he had to.  It was a safe, unsexy, responsible, and extremely smart decision.. in short.. it was classic Hillary.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 22:28
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Don't rate the content of Booker's speech (thought it was pretty clichéd) but maybe he was there to provide the emotion quotient. Warren brought a lot of substance. Didn't get to hear Sanders.

Booker is a good guy, but yeah does speak in cliches and generalities. I think he's one of those people that have pretty much spent their whole career as one giant build up to run for President some day.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 22:44
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

So what's PA's take on Hilary's running mate?  I hear a lot of persuasive assurance from mainstream press but at the same time I wonder if Tim Kaine wouldn't sort of help prove Trump's point that the Democratic party is pro-establishment.  I mean, it would appear that this election is more about symbolism than substance.  

It's a very Clinton-esque pick. Safe, boring, moderate, and an absolute Clinton devotee

Not really a fan. I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. He was an early advocate for the $15 min wage, created the new rule that would expand OT pay to millions of workers, and has pretty liberal credentials, but is quiet, safe and clearly experienced. Has ties to Obama, obviously, and would not cost the Democrats a senate seat. It would be a move that makes the liberal base happy, while Kaine is clearly an attempt to reach out to moderates and a more national base.

I can't fault the move, with Trump alienating most sane people I get wanting to grab as many as you can. really I just don't think the VP means very much to people. To me it's more a look into the candidate's psyche, as you say it's symbolic. 

My only real beef is he's been a supporter of TPP and banking deregulation. So not feeling it, but also not surprised, nor am I particularly upset about it...but deff not happy.LOL


he is the VP candidate... once again. He will not be setting policy (unless we will be living in Trump's political universe haha). only helping the President as a means to and end.  I can't help but admire Hillary's long view in making the choice. Yes she could have thrown a political bone to the left but from I understand she decided the others were not up to it, experienced or qualified.  One can hope the Senate will turn Democratic.. dream that Trump and GOP implode and the House turns as well.  If not however.. she will still have to navigate a hostile Congress and there was no SINGLE VP candidate that can help her like Kaine.

If is one thing to get elected... it is another to do anything once elected. One reason some of us simply couldn't feel the Bern... he was a election cycle or two ahead of his time but still could go down as a cataylst in the Warren (progressive) revolution.

Well I DID say the VP isn't really a big dealWink and that "Im not particularly upset about it" And that I can't fault the move. Was just opining that I personally would've preferred Tom Perez. 
I just feel the people don't super care about VP, so the playing safe/strategy thing I just don't know if it matters. Seems to me VP's from critical swing states or for balance etc etc don't really seem to sway people much is all. But yeah it's not a big deal. 

Well no doubt about all that, what the Sanders movement needs to do is elect progressives to congress, and support policies vocally to keep the pressure on. The President isn't a monarch, Congress is honestly perhaps more important so absolutely what Sanders has always said "regardless of outcome it wont end in November" is 100% spot on. 

And well...maybe to some. Most of the reasons I heard for not feeling the Bern were generally weak/crap and basically boiled down to a lot of wrong ideas. However, since he has done absolutely everything right the last 2 days I've been trying to do the same. Basically starting to wind down and accepting the time to move on. I hope Clinton supporters do the same I'm still seeing many condescending, often jab like comments, and that sh*t better end. I applaud Biden for his words to Clintonites...to treat the Sanders crowd with dignity and basically allow us time and space to grieve and move on...an oh so subtle reminder to 2008 where the Clinton crowd was hotter that boiling, but with time they were able to cool off and move forward with Obama. 

Seeing and hearing Sanders again, and the actual moment finally arriving, has gotten me to cool off and I am now strongly reconsidering my vote for Jill Stein. Now that the anger is settling I came to realize what  I said above: we need a congress, and this movement has only just begun...and trying to squeeze through a small hole, is better than trying to squeeze through a solid wall. For the sole purpose of achieving a progressive agenda, Clinton is the better option, even if it results in nada, better than regression. Also if he went through all this, but still had the ability to continue on praising and backing Clinton, even calling out the "bernie or bust" crowd and begging we vote Clinton, if he is able to move on I am ready to do so too. So Clinton people, the DNC and etc really should continue to give us peace and hold up their end, because I'm still quite wobbly as I climb onto the fence and can tip back over to the Green sideLOL 


Edited by JJLehto - July 26 2016 at 22:49
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 23:21
Needless to say: It's official official. 
Clinton is the Democratic nominee. Capped off with Sanders gesture to nominate Clinton, it was all show, but it's a big move for healing. It's what Hillary did in 2008. 

This was a beautiful moment btw, did bring a tear to my eye, and if anyone ever doubted the sincerity behind any of this, or questioned Sanders' motives I'd ask them to remember his face at the end of this video...


To end with some levity, Howard Dean (early political hero of mine) made fun of his infamous "Dean Scream" speech, which I gotta say...major kudos. I personally am STILL bitter about thatLOL 


Edited by JJLehto - July 26 2016 at 23:33
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65442
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2016 at 23:29
BTW Mike, love the pantsuits-- which is your favorite?; I quite like the medium greys on the far right, and that olive-phlegm green in the middle is rather nice.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2016 at 03:54
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

I'm writing in a vote for Bernie anyway! Tongue
Come on, even the nice dog in your avatar would know better Tongue
Well, the dog is a stray picked up by grand daughter and deposited at my place. I don't think he's partial to democrats as he barks at my Latino neighbors and growls at my African American mailman, which causes me great embarrassment. We're not sure of his name but he answers to simple two syllable words that end on with the letter o. Trumpo seems to be his new favorite, so no write in votes for Bernie or votes for Hilary, I would think.
 
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2016 at 03:58
For the record, policies aside, I think that Kaine balances out the blandness of Pence superbly. The Bland vote is vitally important! LOL
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2016 at 10:24
Trump just said he likes Russia hacking Hillary's emails. 

Trump just said he hopes the geo-political rival of the United States meddles in US internal politics 

Trump just said he likes that Putin hacks the former Secretary of State of the US. 


"Make America Great Again" 

Yet the brilliant voters actually think he's the one always putting America first 

Color blinds people. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 6566676869 146>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.469 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.