Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The best discography?!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe best discography?!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
gerunding View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2016
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 11 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 18:15
Originally posted by Rednight Rednight wrote:

Someone shoot me.
Back to Top
TheLionOfPrague View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2011
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1063 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 18:20
Band A. EASILY.

They have THREE albums that are better than anything Band A did, and in the end we judge bands by their great material, not their worst. People will remember Jethro Tull because of Thick as a Brick, not Under Wraps, ELP because of Brain Salad, not Love Beach, Genesis because Selling England, not Calling all Stations, etc.

The best output of a band is what matters to me, not their worst. If a band makes 3 masterpieces they can make 10 awful albums for all I care, and I'd take them over a band that makes 13 OK albums.
I shook my head and smiled a whisper knowing all about the place
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17168 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 18:26
Band A for me. 

I've made no mystery of the fact that I love debuts and bands in their youth.  The early years when bands are "brothers", when they are hungry, those years have a spark and spice to the creativity that no amount of later "mature refinement" is going to best, at least not in the world of rock and roll. 


...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 21:35
This question actually leads to a kind of meta-rating. You have to keep in mind that these ratings are given by the average member of the archives. After all these average ratings for band B could mean the band is highly controversial - there are either those who hate the band or those who love it, with the corresponding ratings. On the other hand band A might have done some rather mainstream albums ("keep in mind that "mainstream" here means "mainstream in prog") which are loved by many for exactly this "mainstreaminess", if I may invent this word.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Mellotron Storm View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 27 2006
Location: The Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 13934 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2016 at 18:07
Band A for me because I would buy four of them while I might buy three from band B but probably two. I'm not a completist by any means so I'm only concerned with albums I might enjoy.
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Back to Top
BrufordFreak View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 25 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 8382 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2016 at 21:52
Originally posted by TheLionOfPrague TheLionOfPrague wrote:

Band A. EASILY.

They have THREE albums that are better than anything Band A did, and in the end we judge bands by their great material, not their worst. People will remember Jethro Tull because of Thick as a Brick, not Under Wraps, ELP because of Brain Salad, not Love Beach, Genesis because Selling England, not Calling all Stations, etc.

The best output of a band is what matters to me, not their worst. If a band makes 3 masterpieces they can make 10 awful albums for all I care, and I'd take them over a band that makes 13 OK albums.

This^
Drew Fisher
https://progisaliveandwell.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
BrufordFreak View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 25 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 8382 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2016 at 22:03
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Band A for me. 

I've made no mystery of the fact that I love debuts and bands in their youth.  The early years when bands are "brothers", when they are hungry, those years have a spark and spice to the creativity that no amount of later "mature refinement" is going to best, at least not in the world of rock and roll. 



Great attitude that I often find true and look for--especially with regards to debut albums as these are often compilations of a few years of very creative, energetic, optimistic music that has been polished by that hard-working enthusiasm of unproven youth (The Doors, Spirit, Chicago Transit Authority, Elton John, Nina Hagen Band, U2, Art in America, Babylon, Icehouse, Tears for Fears, Sade, Everything But the Girl, Swing Out Sister, Iona, Pearl Jam, Alanis Morissette, The Mars Volta, Moth Vellum, iamthemorning, Homunculus Res, etc., etc.,) . . . but not always . . . not ususally.
Drew Fisher
https://progisaliveandwell.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13184 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2016 at 22:07
I think the simplest answer is, which band do you prefer? There are any number of bands that receive high ratings which I find mystifying.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17168 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2016 at 22:29
Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Band A for me. 

I've made no mystery of the fact that I love debuts and bands in their youth.  The early years when bands are "brothers", when they are hungry, those years have a spark and spice to the creativity that no amount of later "mature refinement" is going to best, at least not in the world of rock and roll. 



Great attitude that I often find true and look for--especially with regards to debut albums as these are often compilations of a few years of very creative, energetic, optimistic music that has been polished by that hard-working enthusiasm of unproven youth (The Doors, Spirit, Chicago Transit Authority, Elton John, Nina Hagen Band, U2, Art in America, Babylon, Icehouse, Tears for Fears, Sade, Everything But the Girl, Swing Out Sister, Iona, Pearl Jam, Alanis Morissette, The Mars Volta, Moth Vellum, iamthemorning, Homunculus Res, etc., etc.,) . . . but not always . . . not ususally.



Yep, it is often true about debuts and earlies but as you say, not always....there are some where mid period is my fave.  Billy Joel would be one where I would pick mid period.  Turnstiles through 52nd Street is his best run in my opinion.  Special mention to Songs in the Attic that pulls the best live versions of his early material.  That's a GREAT live album. 
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20399 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2016 at 02:54
Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

I'd go with band A and focus my listening on the first 4 albums. I have several bands like that in my collection and typically go with A.


I'd say that 90% of the bands or artistes in the "rock realm" I listen to are that way - beit 70's or 90/00's... Most of the bands are at their most inventive early in their career, because they've got things to say... and after they've run out of r-original ideas, they go: "OK, what do we do now??" ... and it goes usually crap!!!

And if there would some case B likely to please me, I'd probably not know of the band, since I generally set them aside once & for all, once I assessed them early on. 



It's quite different for jazz though, but it won't resemble case B either.
Back to Top
Manuelmoreno View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 17 2008
Location: Barranquilla
Status: Offline
Points: 51 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2016 at 10:42
Slightly OT:

What would be two real bands who fits this question? Anyone dares to put a name to A and B?

I feel that the band "B" scenario is very rare, while we can find many bands like  "A".
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17168 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2016 at 11:04
PT might be a Band B for me personally, I prefer their 2000s albums to their 90s ones and generally think they got better over time. 
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.177 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.