Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: April 20 2016 at 11:52 |
I think they should be here but so many have said nay, that I really don't give a crap anymore. Having said that. I am reading Complicated Game. It's a great read and I highly recommend it
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20623
|
Posted: April 20 2016 at 12:08 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
I think they should be here but so many have said nay, that I really don't give a crap anymore. Having said that. I am reading Complicated Game. It's a great read and I highly recommend it |
Thanks for mentioning that book...did not know about it......I'll be ordering it for sure. Oh....and I agree about the inclusion here at PA.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: April 20 2016 at 12:19 |
Dean wrote:
moshkito wrote:
[QUOTE=moshkito] It all becomes ... I like it therefore it's good, and the rest is not up to snuff. I (STILL) do not like Gentle Giant, but I will never EVER, not appreciate the amazing and incredible musicianship in them, and what they did with it! |
Relevancy? Nothing here is about good or bad music, or whether you like something or not. If you think that is how this site and its members operate then you will never understand anything here. |
This is absolutely correct. As a former genre teamer I can assure you we do not base our votes on whether we like the music. Not at all. I voted Yes on stuff I thought sucked. I voted No on some stuff I really loved. It boils down to trying one's best to decide whether the music fits the genre definition collaboratively arrived at by multiple members, past and present. The definitions are broad in most cases and occasionally can be revised. I can't really speak much about the PR and PP categories as I have little experience in those areas but I can tell you that in most if not all genre categories, members go out of their way to be inclusive and if involved in a very difficult eval, to error on the side of the band. Sorry, I guess that wasn't much help about XTC, but I want to make sure you don't have the impression we simply "vote for the bands we like". That's false.
Edited by Finnforest - April 20 2016 at 12:59
|
|
Guy Guden
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 07 2014
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 2617
|
Posted: April 20 2016 at 21:27 |
Well, Dean thank you for that complete explanation on how you have this feature of PA set up. When I came here, I was only aware of the boards for discussion, news and opinion. I was not aware of PA being a tool in this way. I think I will probably still be more likely to read, digest, comment and share in the areas I feel most comfortable. It sounds like you all have put a lot of work into this operation and at my age, I know I wouldn't have the energy. I'm jealous of your stamina. Personally, I wasn't a fan of early XTC. The Dukes of Stratosphere, however continue to delight and they have provided wonderful moments on so many SPACE PIRATE RADIO shows, especially mixed with the original artists they so lovingly parody. NONSUCH was my personal favourite XTC album. Songs like "Wrapped in Grey," "War Dance" and "The Smartest Monkeys" seemed to pop up on air at the most appropriate times. Prior to that, 2 or 3 songs from THE BIG EXPRESS got the most airplay. I too saw Random Hold open for Peter Gabriel in Santa Barbara at the Arlington Theatre. Random Hold got airplay, more often on the non SPR shows I did on other nights. Thank you again for the information. cheers!
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17516
|
Posted: April 21 2016 at 11:48 |
Finnforest wrote:
Dean wrote:
moshkito wrote:
[QUOTE=moshkito] It all becomes ... I like it therefore it's good, and the rest is not up to snuff. I (STILL) do not like Gentle Giant, but I will never EVER, not appreciate the amazing and incredible musicianship in them, and what they did with it! |
Relevancy? Nothing here is about good or bad music, or whether you like something or not. If you think that is how this site and its members operate then you will never understand anything here. |
This is absolutely correct. As a former genre teamer I can assure you we do not base our votes on whether we like the music. Not at all. I voted Yes on stuff I thought sucked. I voted No on some stuff I really loved. It boils down to trying one's best to decide whether the music fits the genre definition collaboratively arrived at by multiple members, past and present. The definitions are broad in most cases and occasionally can be revised. ...
|
Finn ... my example is exactly what you said ... and I meant! Sorry for the misinterpretation.
I do believe, that PA's ideas and thoughts on choices are fairly good, and I'm OK with it ... even if one or two probably should be there, and we ALL, have a small list in our hands. What I find strange is some folks thinking that I am against that process, which would make the example I put out ... weird!
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 21 2016 at 12:11 |
moshkito wrote:
Finnforest wrote:
Dean wrote:
moshkito wrote:
[QUOTE=moshkito] It all becomes ... I like it therefore it's good, and the rest is not up to snuff. I (STILL) do not like Gentle Giant, but I will never EVER, not appreciate the amazing and incredible musicianship in them, and what they did with it! |
Relevancy? Nothing here is about good or bad music, or whether you like something or not. If you think that is how this site and its members operate then you will never understand anything here. |
This is absolutely correct. As a former genre teamer I can assure you we do not base our votes on whether we like the music. Not at all. I voted Yes on stuff I thought sucked. I voted No on some stuff I really loved. It boils down to trying one's best to decide whether the music fits the genre definition collaboratively arrived at by multiple members, past and present. The definitions are broad in most cases and occasionally can be revised. ...
|
Finn ... my example is exactly what you said ... and I meant! Sorry for the misinterpretation.
I do believe, that PA's ideas and thoughts on choices are fairly good, and I'm OK with it ... even if one or two probably should be there, and we ALL, have a small list in our hands. What I find strange is some folks thinking that I am against that process, which would make the example I put out ... weird!
|
Ah, no. What we are getting at is not that YOU don't do this, it's your insinuation and/or presumption that people here don't.
|
What?
|
|
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2029
|
Posted: April 22 2016 at 20:30 |
dr wu23 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I think they should be here but so many have said nay, that I really don't give a crap anymore. Having said that. I am reading Complicated Game. It's a great read and I highly recommend it |
Thanks for mentioning that book...did not know about it......I'll be ordering it for sure. Oh....and I agree about the inclusion here at PA. |
I'm on the last few pages myself. Excellent read. Song Stories was more complete but this one goes into such great depth about just a select few songs. Andy's way of describing the creative process is riveting. This could be Volume 1 of several hundred and I'd read them all.
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: April 23 2016 at 03:02 |
So, at the risk of being on topic, are XTC to be included on PA?
|
|
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: April 23 2016 at 03:14 |
uduwudu wrote:
So, at the risk of being on topic, are XTC to be included on PA?
| They haven't been suggested for prog related (as far as I know), which would be their only real shot. For that to happen a special collaborator needs to suggest them for inclusion to the admin team. The admin team will then listen intently to the music and subsequently decide whether or not XTC should be here.
Edited by Guldbamsen - April 23 2016 at 03:21
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 23 2016 at 03:47 |
Guldbamsen wrote:
uduwudu wrote:
So, at the risk of being on topic, are XTC to be included on PA?
|
They haven't been suggested for prog related (as far as I know), which would be their only real shot. For that to happen a special collaborator needs to suggest them for inclusion to the admin team. The admin team will then listen intently to the music and subsequently decide whether or not XTC should be here.
|
I've yet to see compelling case made that would convince an SC to suggest them.
dr wu23 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I think they should be here but so many have said nay, that I really don't give a crap anymore. ::snip:: |
:: snip:: Oh....and I agree about the inclusion here at PA. |
It doesn't matter how many people think they should or should not be here, additions are not by a poll or popular-vote and PR suggestions to the Admin are not by majority-vote. It is only when the Admins evaluate a PR suggestion from an SC that a vote is taken, and since there are 4 Admins who would vote on PR additions then a 3 yes votes are required... So basically you need to convince 4 people (1 SC and 3 Admins) that XTC should be here, and that requires presenting a case for why they should be here that goes way beyond "I think they should be here" and "Well, Talking Heads are here...".
|
What?
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: April 23 2016 at 03:50 |
^ Or an SC can spontaneously decide to submit an artist for ProgRelated evaluation. But that hasn't occurred since the Carter administration.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
miamiscot
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 23 2014
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 3574
|
Posted: April 26 2016 at 19:35 |
Politics.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 27 2016 at 00:44 |
miamiscot wrote:
Politics. |
Bollocks. I've gone to extraordinary lengths to explain everything here and all you've got is a snarky one-word response that is not only wrong, it's unhelpful and frankly, disappointing. If it is that difficult to present a good case for XTCs inclusion here then there is little hope for them.
Metallicaca lost the popular vote here and if we took a poll today I'm fairly confident they'd lose it again. They are here because three people made a convincing case for their addition. It wasn't easy: the initial discussions ran for 14 pages, an SC proposed them to the Admin Team but the site-owner vetoed the addition (as is his right ). Then followed further threads and discussions that pushed the total page count to over 50 (which at 20 posts per page is over 1,000 posts) that lasted over a year. They were proposed again, the Admin Team voted in favour and they convinced the site-owner. Metallicaca were added, the site didn't implode, the world didn't end and sales of ice-skates in Hell didn't suddenly pick up, moreover no one tried to shoehorn in Megadeth or Slayer on the back of them.
|
What?
|
|
hellogoodbye
Forum Senior Member
VIP member
Joined: August 29 2011
Location: Troy
Status: Offline
Points: 7251
|
Posted: April 27 2016 at 03:03 |
The History of Rock 'n' Roll
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF3Rzdb1O8w
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: April 27 2016 at 05:31 |
Dean wrote:
Guldbamsen wrote:
uduwudu wrote:
So, at the risk of being on topic, are XTC to be included on PA?
|
They haven't been suggested for prog related (as far as I know), which would be their only real shot. For that to happen a special collaborator needs to suggest them for inclusion to the admin team. The admin team will then listen intently to the music and subsequently decide whether or not XTC should be here.
|
I've yet to see compelling case made that would convince an SC to suggest them.
dr wu23 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I think they should be here but so many have said nay, that I really don't give a crap anymore. ::snip:: |
:: snip:: Oh....and I agree about the inclusion here at PA. |
It doesn't matter how many people think they should or should not be here, additions are not by a poll or popular-vote and PR suggestions to the Admin are not by majority-vote. It is only when the Admins evaluate a PR suggestion from an SC that a vote is taken, and since there are 4 Admins who would vote on PR additions then a 3 yes votes are required... So basically you need to convince 4 people (1 SC and 3 Admins) that XTC should be here, and that requires presenting a case for why they should be here that goes way beyond "I think they should be here" and "Well, Talking Heads are here...".
|
Oh, thanks. It's no bother really if XTC are here or not (I can always hoof off to the All Music Guide). But the compelling case would be interesting. Prog bands like ELP and XTC... now we are getting slightly bizarre... ;) Heh, it'd be amusing if the Dukes Of Stratophear were included but not XTC.
|
|
miamiscot
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 23 2014
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 3574
|
Posted: April 28 2016 at 19:41 |
Dean wrote:
miamiscot wrote:
Politics. |
Bollocks. I've gone to extraordinary lengths to explain everything here and all you've got is a snarky one-word response that is not only wrong, it's unhelpful and frankly, disappointing. If it is that difficult to present a good case for XTCs inclusion here then there is little hope for them.
|
I didn't mean that in a snarky fashion. Far from it, actually. Politics is the art of pulling people, persuading people, convincing people that your point of view is correct or prudent. Politics exists everywhere there are people. Just a fact. Not a condemnation. And yes, you have been VERY courteous and informative about the process. I'm sure you tire of explaining things to people like me so I appreciate your patience and apologize for the one word comment. I thought it summed things up nicely.
|
|
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2029
|
Posted: May 01 2016 at 20:08 |
Interesting side note - in the book "Complicated Game", when the author/interviewer tells Andy Partridge that the guitar solo on "2 Rainbeau Melt" (Fuzzy Warbles Vol. 7) reminds him of Robert Fripp, he admits he has maybe heard half a dozen songs with Robert Fripp on them. He doesn't own a King Crimson album or any album with Fripp on it. He didn't know that Fripp played on Bowie's Heroes or Scary Monsters. He does love the solo on 21st Century Schizoid Man though.
On the other hand, one of his biggest influences was Be-Bop Deluxe.
Just some interesting facts that may or may not influence one's opinion as to whether they are Prog or not.
Personally, the last time this was discussed I was all in for their inclusion. Now I say no way. I don't want all my favorites to be considered Prog! I would feel so one-dimensional!
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20623
|
Posted: May 03 2016 at 10:57 |
^ It surprises me a little that Partridge doesn't own any KC or any album with Fripp......I would think he would be an audiophile and into a lot of Brit music styles (apparently influenced by Bill Nelson and Be Bop) based on his great songwriting and his apparent knowledge of pop styles.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.