Who is your favourite revolutionary?

Triceratopsoil wrote: ISIL is not a state, Princip was a terrorist, and there's absolutely no need to copy and paste that massive post

Not an internationaly recognized state, of course, but they call themselfs a state (same as Albanian terrorists from KLA, who were at an official and published  CIA's terrorist groups list untill 1997,  in 2008 just proclaimed that they are the state of Kosovo and USA, UK, Germany and other powerful NATO countries recognized them as a state) and kill the people for the religion believes same as Austro-Hungarian officers were killing Ortodox Christian peasants if they didn't accepted to turn themself into Roman-Catholics, after annexation of Bosnia. So Autro-Hungaria, as per your pretzel logic, was terrorist state as ISIL now as well, or at least the state who officially, as per documents and photos, was supported the terrorism on civilans only due to their different religion believes. And therefore, Gavrilo was a hero who just killed Archduke of an terrorist state.

Edited by Svetonio - September 18 2015 at 03:06

I'd like just to inform the readers of this thread that i ignore what  Dean is posting here since long time ago, actually since he started to insult me at this forums, for example here. I'm just avoid to chat with such characters.

Edited by Svetonio - September 18 2015 at 05:18

Svetonio wrote: I'd like just to inform the readers of this thread that i ignore what  Dean is posting here since long time ago, actually since he started to insult me at this forums, for example here. I'm just avoid to chat with such characters.   p.s. Dean knows it very well, but I'm always being quoted by him, because he wants to use my non-answer and silence that he tries to create an illusion that his tragicomic "arguments" (adressed to me) are compelling; he adressed so many post to me (although he knows that will be no reply from my side) at so many threads just in favor that you think that I'm flattered by his posts.

For those who think, and expressed such opinion at this thread, that Tito was a mass murderer (only because he was a communist) the question is: would you ever thought that Winston Churchill would hosted the festive welcome for a "mass murderer"?

 

 

 

Prime Minister of the Great Britain Sir Winston Churchill and Foreign Secretary Sir Anthony Eden welcomed Marshal Tito in London.

Guldb, you are not at my level when it comes to politics; you can only turn out funny.

Edited by Svetonio - September 18 2015 at 06:34

Guldbamsen wrote: It's alright, you didn't get my point anyway (as per usual).

Svetonio wrote: Guldbamsen wrote: It's alright, you didn't get my point anyway (as per usual). Just be glad that I answered to one of Dean's "lawyers".

Triceratopsoil wrote: Svetonio has already shown how incomprehensible his political beliefs are, he could say he likes Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, Netanyahu, Mao Zedong, and Kim Jong-Il and I still wouldn't be surprised.

Stalin and Hitler can not be in the same line. Do you have been in school? Perhaps you don't know who was Hitler and / or who defeated Hitler. Actually, Stalin defeated Hitler.

Guldbamsen wrote:  or is that ? Edit: Joseph Stalin was every bit as horrible as Hitler was. They are both tainted in innocent blood. Stalin may have helped defeat fascism, but he did so not out of mercy but out of political opportunity. The very same that lead into the 'iron curtain'.

Well, I know who you are and what drive you crazy....So, one nice pic more for you:

Svetonio wrote: Guldbamsen wrote:  or is that ? Edit: Joseph Stalin was every bit as horrible as Hitler was. They are both tainted in innocent blood. Stalin may have helped defeat fascism, but he did so not out of mercy but out of political opportunity. The very same that lead into the 'iron curtain'. Well, I know who you are and what drive you crazy....So, one nice pic more for you: