Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: March 26 2015 at 03:44
Kati wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Kati wrote:
found another so-called proto song, certainly not helping me in liking what I still cannot tell what it is, except thinking so far all songs the notes are sharp, lack warmth, lacking bass guitar tunes etc, all very blunt and not nice clear in my opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKroSJti39I
That style was called Freakbeat, a genre what I mentioned earlier in this thread.
By the way, Rick Davies is great as always....
And slightly off the topic - Kati, do you think that The Steve Miller Band would be in Prog Archives' Proto Prog section - as per PA' definition of *proto-prog*, of course - due to their first two albums from 1968?
Aww my sweet Sventonio, this time I think I am the last person here to answer your question. I am clueless here still as to proto actually stands for
I however I do think Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) certainly has prog elements i.e. sitar and B3 organ, plus the moozik has a groovy sexy vibe Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdB9lTUyshM hugs
Oh Kati, please forget just for a moment that awesome Fly Like An Eagle the crossover prog song and that proggy album and especially this amazing prog song which is my fav from Fly Like An Eagle and pleeease take a time to listening to The Steve Miller Band's Song For Our Ancestors from Sailor.
You'll enjoy in the song, I'm sure, and also you'll hear how Pink Floyd was ripped off from The Steve Miller Band's album from 1968 ... Well, okay, it was just in favor of making Shine On You Crazy Diamond more nice, isn't?
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Posted: March 26 2015 at 03:53
Svetonio wrote:
Kati wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Kati wrote:
found another so-called proto song, certainly not helping me in liking what I still cannot tell what it is, except thinking so far all songs the notes are sharp, lack warmth, lacking bass guitar tunes etc, all very blunt and not nice clear in my opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKroSJti39I
That style was called Freakbeat, a genre what I mentioned earlier in this thread.
By the way, Rick Davies is great as always....
And slightly off the topic - Kati, do you think that The Steve Miller Band would be in Prog Archives' Proto Prog section - as per PA' definition of *proto-prog*, of course - due to their first two albums from 1968?
Aww my sweet Sventonio, this time I think I am the last person here to answer your question. I am clueless here still as to proto actually stands for
I however I do think Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) certainly has prog elements i.e. sitar and B3 organ, plus the moozik has a groovy sexy vibe Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdB9lTUyshM hugs
Oh Kati, please forget just for a moment that awesome Fly Like An Eagle the crossover prog song and that proggy album and especially this amazing prog song which is my fav from Fly Like An Eagle and pleeease take a time to listening to The Steve Miller Band's Song For Our Ancestors from Sailor.
You'll enjoy in the song, I'm sure, and also you'll hear how Pink Floyd was ripped off from The Steve Miller Band's album from 1968 ... Well, okay, it was just in favor of making Shine On You Crazy Diamond more nice, isn't?
this is oh frickin' brilliant! I am so happy right now! Thank you very much, Sventonio!!!! Now why the heck is this not considered prog? Flippin fantastic this is!!!! Going to replay yay again now !!!
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: March 26 2015 at 03:54
^ It was an amusing distraction nothing more.
This is far more representative of the original Nirvana:
Nirvana (UK) were Baroque Pop - this genre of music was another important precursor to Progressive Rock and gives an indication of where the classical/symphonic elements of Prog had their pop/rock musical origins, unlike Freakbeat (which links beat music to psychedelic pop), Baroque Pop has more direct contact with Prog through bands like Procol Harum and The Moody Blues. Bowie's début album has elements of Baroque Pop.
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Posted: March 26 2015 at 04:02
Dean wrote:
^ It was an amusing distraction nothing more.
This is far more representative of the original Nirvana:
Nirvana (UK) were Baroque Pop - this genre of music was another important precursor to Progressive Rock and gives an indication of where the classical/symphonic elements of Prog had their pop/rock musical origins, unlike Freakbeat (which links beat music to psychedelic pop), Baroque Pop has more direct contact with Prog through bands like Procol Harum and The Moody Blues. Bowie's début album has elements of Baroque Pop.
hahahaha today is a great day I love this so much! The vocalist reminds me so much of Paul McCartney really! I love him and love this too! God this is just so flippin' fab!!!! love love love!!!! Instrumentals too! I have no idea how I never came across them, now I want to go search more moozik they made!!!!!! Dean, you are just too fantastic, thank you!!!!!!!!!!
Proto Prog is very much "of it's time" - these bands had to be producing music at a time (and location) to be influential in the evolution of Progressive Rock as we know it.
Finding later bands that seem to "fit the bill" is the major problem of trying to define Proto Prog as a style of music (which it isn't), it is a classification not a genre.
Genre = style of music
Classification = bunch of unrelated styles (psychedelic pop/rock, baroque pop, folk rock, jazz rock, etc.)
It gets even more complicated than that. Two 1968 band can be playing an identical style of music - one is recognised as Proto Prog and the other is not. The reason for that is simply one of influence - the first band may have been better known at the time, or playing on the same tours as some of those emergent Prog bands. It would be very unusual to classify a completely unknown band as Proto Prog.
Proto Prog is very much "of it's time" - these bands had to be producing music at a time (and location) to be influential in the evolution of Progressive Rock as we know it.
Finding later bands that seem to "fit the bill" is the major problem of trying to define Proto Prog as a style of music (which it isn't), it is a classification not a genre.
Genre = style of music
Classification = bunch of unrelated styles (psychedelic pop/rock, baroque pop, folk rock, jazz rock, etc.)
It gets even more complicated than that. Two 1968 band can be playing identical style of music - one is
Ok fair enough, however I love this song a lot also Bowie wrote that song for them and I adore him (except his 80's albums I must admit bah those are awful)
Mott btw rejected Bowie's first song written for them, called Suffragette City hugs
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: March 26 2015 at 04:32
Kati wrote:
Ok fair enough, however I love this song a lot also Bowie wrote that song for them and I adore him (except his 80's albums I must admit bah those are awful)
Mott btw rejected Bowie's first song written for them, called Suffragette City hugs
Mott were an established band with four albums under their belt when Bowie approached them (he was a "fan" and heard they were thinking of splitting up). Prior to his involvement they were very much a blues Heavy Rock band as their début single from 1969 shows:
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: March 26 2015 at 04:38
Kati wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Kati wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Kati wrote:
found another so-called proto song, certainly not helping me in liking what I still cannot tell what it is, except thinking so far all songs the notes are sharp, lack warmth, lacking bass guitar tunes etc, all very blunt and not nice clear in my opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKroSJti39I
That style was called Freakbeat, a genre what I mentioned earlier in this thread.
By the way, Rick Davies is great as always....
And slightly off the topic - Kati, do you think that The Steve Miller Band would be in Prog Archives' Proto Prog section - as per PA' definition of *proto-prog*, of course - due to their first two albums from 1968?
Aww my sweet Sventonio, this time I think I am the last person here to answer your question. I am clueless here still as to proto actually stands for
I however I do think Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) certainly has prog elements i.e. sitar and B3 organ, plus the moozik has a groovy sexy vibe Steve Miller Band - Fly Like An Eagle (1976) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdB9lTUyshM hugs
Oh Kati, please forget just for a moment that awesome Fly Like An Eagle the crossover prog song and that proggy album and especially this amazing prog song which is my fav from Fly Like An Eagle and pleeease take a time to listening to The Steve Miller Band's Song For Our Ancestors from Sailor.
You'll enjoy in the song, I'm sure, and also you'll hear how Pink Floyd was ripped off from The Steve Miller Band's album from 1968 ... Well, okay, it was just in favor of making Shine On You Crazy Diamond more nice, isn't?
this is oh frickin' brilliant! I am so happy right now! Thank you very much, Sventonio!!!! Now why the heck is this not considered prog? Flippin fantastic this is!!!! Going to replay yay again now !!!
I'm flattered with your positive comment, Kati!!
Of course that The Steve Miller Band first two albums were / are considered prog! For example, well know British rock journalist Nick Logan wrote on those albums in The illustrated New Musical Express Encyclopedia of Rock ( Salamander Books, London, 1977) as "the cornerstones of progressive rock" as well. I had Yugoslav version of that great book, in fact the most comprehensive rock-publishing effort in the seventies
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Posted: March 26 2015 at 04:40
Dean wrote:
Kati wrote:
Ok fair enough, however I love this song a lot also Bowie wrote that song for them and I adore him (except his 80's albums I must admit bah those are awful)
Mott btw rejected Bowie's first song written for them, called Suffragette City hugs
Mott were an established band with four albums under their belt when Bowie approached them (he was a "fan" and heard they were thinking of splitting up). Prior to his involvement they were very much a blues Heavy Rock band as their début single from 1969 shows:
Yep that was very common at the time blues music, I personally am not of fan. hugs
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Posted: March 26 2015 at 05:03
Dean wrote:
Kati wrote:
Ok fair enough, however I love this song a lot also Bowie wrote that song for them and I adore him (except his 80's albums I must admit bah those are awful)
Mott btw rejected Bowie's first song written for them, called Suffragette City hugs
Mott were an established band with four albums under their belt when Bowie approached them (he was a "fan" and heard they were thinking of splitting up). Prior to his involvement they were very much a blues Heavy Rock band as their début single from 1969 shows:
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: March 26 2015 at 05:09
Kati wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Oh Kati, please forget just for a moment that awesome Fly Like An Eagle the crossover prog song and that proggy album and especially this amazing prog song which is my fav from Fly Like An Eagle and pleeease take a time to listening to The Steve Miller Band's Song For Our Ancestors from Sailor.
You'll enjoy in the song, I'm sure, and also you'll hear how Pink Floyd was ripped off from The Steve Miller Band's album from 1968 ... Well, okay, it was just in favor of making Shine On You Crazy Diamond more nice, isn't?
this is oh frickin' brilliant! I am so happy right now! Thank you very much, Sventonio!!!! Now why the heck is this not considered prog? Flippin fantastic this is!!!! Going to replay yay again now !!!
Well, for a start the track is not Progressive Rock - it's blues rock. Other tracks from their early albums were blues rock/acid rock which leads some people to consider them to be "psychedelic rock" (I do not). There is a certain "Englishness" to their first two albums that was inspired/influenced by the blues revival happening in London at that time (Cream, John Mayall, TYA, etc.). The first album was recorded in London, the second in LA and both were produced by English producer Glyn Johns, who also produced an early Prog album - Family Entertainment by Family. That Miller would be influenced by the psychedelic scene in London at that time is hardly surprising - what little Psych that can be detected in those early Miller Band albums is more English than American. For Miller to be considered Proto Prog on this site he has to be an influence into the scene that gave rise to Progressive Rock.
Gilmour and Miller are "mates" and I think that they influenced each other's playing to some extent - both are gifted guitarists with a bluesy feel to their playing. Song for our Ancestors was not "ripped off" by Pink Floyd but it there is a strong possibility that it influenced the opening few minutes of the 26 minute song.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: March 26 2015 at 06:22
akamaisondufromage wrote:
posting videos tsk tsk
Guilty as charged. I use videos as illustration by way of example and admit to being heavy-handed this morning but only in the endeavour of "Educating Sonia"
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: March 26 2015 at 06:50
Svetonio wrote:
I'm flattered with your positive comment, Kati!!
Of course that The Steve Miller Band first two albums were / are considered prog! For example, well know British rock journalist Nick Logan wrote on those albums in The illustrated New Musical Express Encyclopedia of Rock ( Salamander Books, London, 1977) as "the cornerstones of progressive rock" as well. I had Yugoslav version of that great book, in fact the most comprehensive rock-publishing effort in the seventies
I tire of your misquoting from that (inadequate) book. He does NOT call the first two albums "cornerstones of progressive rock" he says (and I quote verbatim from an original 1977 English print) "two albums which are still regarded as milestones." (note the full-stop/period at the end of that quote).
1. Cornerstone is NOT a synonym of Milestone - two different words, two different meanings.
2. The quote does NOT say they were milestones of progressive rock, it just says they were milestones (period). That could imply lots of things, for example: they were a milestone in rock (unlikely since they were not particularly successful on release) or the were a milestone in Miller's career (more likely).
He does say that Children of the Future was (and I quote verbatim again) "...regarded as probably the best example of progressive rock from 1968" - and he says that without qualification and without citing who or where that regarding comes from - in other words it is his opinion NOT fact.
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13232
Posted: March 26 2015 at 07:22
Dean wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
I'm flattered with your positive comment, Kati!!
Of course that The Steve Miller Band first two albums were / are considered prog! For example, well know British rock journalist Nick Logan wrote on those albums in The illustrated New Musical Express Encyclopedia of Rock ( Salamander Books, London, 1977) as "the cornerstones of progressive rock" as well. I had Yugoslav version of that great book, in fact the most comprehensive rock-publishing effort in the seventies
I tire of your misquoting from that (inadequate) book. He does NOT call the first two albums "cornerstones of progressive rock" he says (and I quote verbatim from an original 1977 English print) "two albums which are still regarded as milestones." (note the full-stop/period at the end of that quote).
1. Cornerstone is NOT a synonym of Milestone - two different words, two different meanings.
2. The quote does NOT say they were milestones of progressive rock, it just says they were milestones (period). That could imply lots of things, for example: they were a milestone in rock (unlikely since they were not particularly successful on release) or the were a milestone in Miller's career (more likely).
He does say that Children of the Future was (and I quote verbatim again) "...regarded as probably the best example of progressive rock from 1968" - and he says that without qualification and without citing who or where that regarding comes from - in other words it is his opinion NOT fact.
Dean, I have it on very good authority that Nick Logan was told by a record reseller at a Bricklane flea market in 1976 that Steve Miller's Children of the Future was a cutting-edge progressive rock album, but that eventually The Steve Miller Band was to become proto-prog by the mid-70s. He then showed Logan his Proto-prog bins, and sure enough, there was Fly Like an Eagle.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Posted: March 26 2015 at 10:14
Dean wrote:
Kati wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Svetonio, you have to follow the protocols and post Steve Miller in the Psych Lounge first. After approximately 50 years it will be considered for inclusion in the proto-prog category.
SteveG,
Now you just confused me more hahahaha ... I was told by Dean that proto was before prog, the music term was invented (this finally started to make sense to me) thus prior to prog, bands can be proto thereafter none can be considered that hugs xxxx
Steve is being sarcastic.
No sarcasm intended. In fifty years times, revisionist history will declare PunkRock as the past's truly progressive rock music, JohnnyRotten will be declared an retroactive genius after dethroning the formally retro activated GaryGlitter and PA will be changed to the politically correct PunkArchives.
We will all be gone except for a lone retired admin who will haunt this site still munching on his popcorn and complaining about spam.
Now, you know that this last paragraph will be true.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.723 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.