Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Zappa: Was he For or Far from the People?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedZappa: Was he For or Far from the People?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
Author
Message
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Zappa: Was he For or Far from the People?
    Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:20
In Barry Miles 2003 book on the relationship between the sixtie's counter culture and rock music titled Hippie, Miles simply reproduces an ad for Mothers of Invention's 1966 debut album Freak Out!  in the LA Free Press, and I quote:
 
"This is about the Mothers of Invention. We have watched them grow, and with their growth, we hopefully have grown. Their honesty has offended some and been provocative to many, their performances have had a real effect on their audiences.
 
The Mothers' music is very new, and as their music is new, so is the intention of their music. As much as the Mothers put into music, we must bring to it. The Mothers and what they represent as a group has attracted all of the outcasts, the pariahs, the people who are angry and afraid and contemptuous  of existing social structure. The danger lies in the  'Freak Out' becoming an excuse instead of a reason. An excuse implies an end, a reason a beginning.
 
(Parenthesis is mine.) Being that the easiest way is constantly more attractive than the harder way, the essential thing that makes 'Freak Out' audiences different constitutes their sameness. a freak is not a freak if ALL are freaks. 'Freaking Out'  should presuppose an active freedom, freedom meaning a liberation from  the control  of some other person or persons. Unfortunately, reaction seems to have taken place of reaction. We SHOULD be satisfied listening to the Mothers perform from a concert stage. If we could channel expended in 'Freaking Out' physically  into 'Freaking Out'  intellectually, we might possibly be able to create something concrete out of the ideological twilight of bizarre costumes and being seen being bizarre. Do we really listen? And if we really, do we really think? freedom of thought, conversely, brings an awesome responsibility. Looking and acting eccentric is NOT ENOUGH.
 
A mad tea party is valid only as satire, commenting ironically, and ending in its beginning, in that it is only a trick of interpretation. It is not creation and it IS NOT ENOUGH.
 
What we must try to do then, is not only comment satirically on what's wrong, but try to CHANGE what's wrong. The Mothers are trying."
 
For politically active people of my generation, Zappa's anti hippie "you are nothing but sheep" stance did not go down well. In the sixties, it would have been impossible for a single individual to protest against social atrocities such as racism and an immoral and illegal war.
 
If Zappa's emphasis on the individual was only concerned with art, such as pop music, then the album "Freak Out" would have been more widely received as that of Zappa himself. The result was that the album was not and he was not .
 
I respect and have come to appreciate Zappa as a great musician and composer, and I appreciate his musical output. I am a prog fan, after all. However, Zappa's political commentary  and satires will always leave me cold. Was he laughing with us, or simply at us? Was he a man FOR  the people or a man FAR from the people?


Edited by SteveG - February 19 2015 at 10:24
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:31
Zappa, it seems, liked to fire both barrels at everybody.

Going through We're Only In It For The Money, he hits both American political parties of the time, The Beatles, and hippies again.

Being all about free thought, he hit hippies in his worry that a lot of them were sheep following trendy things - as the name would originally imply, as well - but at the expense of honest members, who, like in most subcultures, are actually the majority.

His misfire on the album makes sense in light of how poorly he interpreted The Beatles's integrity; the title of the album is the first salvo he fired at them.

He meant well, it's just that on his early albums, amongst his all time greats as they are, he didn't yet have the best marksmanship.
Back to Top
Walton Street View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:31
I don't know about his politics but I always thought that what he chose to portray of the human condition was childish.
 
his smug tone and juvenile approach to anything to do with sex always turned me off .. Satirical or not - he just kept hitting that same note over and over again ... like a 14 year old boy who would joke about sex because he didn't understand it.
 
I know he was an intelligent man, and I also respected his abilities but I can only ever take him a tiny bit at a time .. It did sound to me like he was mocking everything and everybody whenever he opened his mouth, like he didn't care for his own audience, and only his musician buddies were in on the joke.
 
my personal opinion from listening to about 20 of his albums, I have no scientific proof to back any of this up.
 
 
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"

- SpongeBob Socrates
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:45
Originally posted by Walton Street Walton Street wrote:

I don't know about his politics but I always thought that what he chose to portray of the human condition was childish.
 
his smug tone and juvenile approach to anything to do with sex always turned me off .. Satirical or not - he just kept hitting that same note over and over again ... like a 14 year old boy who would joke about sex because he didn't understand it.
 
I know he was an intelligent man, and I also respected his abilities but I can only ever take him a tiny bit at a time .. It did sound to me like he was mocking everything and everybody whenever he opened his mouth, like he didn't care for his own audience, and only his musician buddies were in on the joke.
 
my personal opinion from listening to about 20 of his albums, I have no scientific proof to back any of this up.
 
 
 
No, that's not true. He had all of this Disco garbage around him saturated with the promotion of sex, how to dress in order to attract the right person to have sex with and beyond that, the phony people in America who used tactics to flaunt the importance of sex...so that every teenager in America would be attracted to that mentality and be defenseless when it came down to thinking for themselves. The same deal with "Flower Power" in the 60's. Beads, robes, expressions, ...I mean...just fall in line and don't be yourself? No wonder Zappa preached his gospel? Joe's Garage with it's sarcastic entry into sex. "Here's your 50 bucks Mary, isn't this what life is all about?" You must get that right? Every flippin' place I traveled to in the 70's was in fact all about cheapness and being a phony person out for sex. Zappa told his kids that there was nothing wrong with sex, but warned them about T.V. commercials with a little phone number up in the right hand corner of the screen.
 
I believe he thought the way sex was being promoted in America was revolting and moronic. I also believe that he felt everyone had the right to explore what they wanted to in life, but in the same token he had the right to ridicule it and based on the evident knowledge that it was all from an industry of trend mongers.
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:50
Overall...he was trying to warn people that they COULD think for themselves as opposed to following a media driven marketing concept created by an industry of trend mongers.  
Back to Top
Walton Street View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 09:54
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by Walton Street Walton Street wrote:

I don't know about his politics but I always thought that what he chose to portray of the human condition was childish.
 
his smug tone and juvenile approach to anything to do with sex always turned me off .. Satirical or not - he just kept hitting that same note over and over again ... like a 14 year old boy who would joke about sex because he didn't understand it.
 
I know he was an intelligent man, and I also respected his abilities but I can only ever take him a tiny bit at a time .. It did sound to me like he was mocking everything and everybody whenever he opened his mouth, like he didn't care for his own audience, and only his musician buddies were in on the joke.
 
my personal opinion from listening to about 20 of his albums, I have no scientific proof to back any of this up.
 
 
 
No, that's not true. He had all of this Disco garbage around him saturated with the promotion of sex, how to dress in order to attract the right person to have sex with and beyond that, the phony people in America who used tactics to flaunt the importance of sex...so that every teenager in America would be attracted to that mentality and be defenseless when it came down to thinking for themselves. The same deal with "Flower Power" in the 60's. Beads, robes, expressions, ...I mean...just fall in line and don't be yourself? No wonder Zappa preached his gospel? Joe's Garage with it's sarcastic entry into sex. "Here's your 50 bucks Mary, isn't this what life is all about?" You must get that right? Every flippin' place I traveled to in the 70's was in fact all about cheapness and being a phony person out for sex. Zappa told his kids that there was nothing wrong with sex, but warned them about T.V. commercials with a little phone number up in the right hand corner of the screen.
 
I believe he thought the way sex was being promoted in America was revolting and moronic. I also believe that he felt everyone had the right to explore what they wanted to in life, but in the same token he had the right to ridicule it and based on the evident knowledge that it was all from an industry of trend mongers.
 
of course I get it - but it was just over and over again with great zeal and funny little words for naughty things ... and not just Joe's Garage ...   I guess when you're preaching something that simplistic, the people who already get it, get it.  the people who don't think Zappa is down with their way of thinking.


Edited by Walton Street - February 19 2015 at 09:55
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"

- SpongeBob Socrates
Back to Top
TeleStrat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 11:10
I don't (and didn't) blame Frank one bit for making fun of things in those early days. There was a lot to make fun of.
Sex was the biggest product selling tool that the Madison Ave. crowd had and they used it to the fullest extent.
He simply pointed out that people were stupid for buying into the scam that this product or that product would help you get laid.
The hippie culture, movement, fad was a very short lived phase that was over almost as soon as it got started and was basically a group of followers looking for a leader. 
Only the name remained (for many years) as a way to describe guys with long hair. 
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30850
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 11:53
He was laughing at you, me and him.

The guy was a real fighter, free and uncorrupted. He will always have my respect for that even if I often disagree with his approach and attitude.
Back to Top
TradeMark0 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 26 2014
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 12:12
From what I know about Zappa, I can tell that he was a cynical and skeptical person, so I'm not surprised that he criticized the hippies. He was also against drugs and rightfully so in my opinion. I kind of agree with his views on hippies, not because I have anything against hippies, but because of the consequences of some of the hippie ideologies. The focus on sex and drugs in society is largely due to the hippies. The former was a bad idea from the start, the latter has had consequences as well. All of the "love" and "peace" ideas from the hippie movement are largely absent from society nowadays. Hippies are good people but it's unreasonable to assume that their actions won't have consequences on the following generations.
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 12:15
Originally posted by Walton Street Walton Street wrote:

Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by Walton Street Walton Street wrote:

I don't know about his politics but I always thought that what he chose to portray of the human condition was childish.
 
his smug tone and juvenile approach to anything to do with sex always turned me off .. Satirical or not - he just kept hitting that same note over and over again ... like a 14 year old boy who would joke about sex because he didn't understand it.
 
I know he was an intelligent man, and I also respected his abilities but I can only ever take him a tiny bit at a time .. It did sound to me like he was mocking everything and everybody whenever he opened his mouth, like he didn't care for his own audience, and only his musician buddies were in on the joke.
 
my personal opinion from listening to about 20 of his albums, I have no scientific proof to back any of this up.
 
 
 
No, that's not true. He had all of this Disco garbage around him saturated with the promotion of sex, how to dress in order to attract the right person to have sex with and beyond that, the phony people in America who used tactics to flaunt the importance of sex...so that every teenager in America would be attracted to that mentality and be defenseless when it came down to thinking for themselves. The same deal with "Flower Power" in the 60's. Beads, robes, expressions, ...I mean...just fall in line and don't be yourself? No wonder Zappa preached his gospel? Joe's Garage with it's sarcastic entry into sex. "Here's your 50 bucks Mary, isn't this what life is all about?" You must get that right? Every flippin' place I traveled to in the 70's was in fact all about cheapness and being a phony person out for sex. Zappa told his kids that there was nothing wrong with sex, but warned them about T.V. commercials with a little phone number up in the right hand corner of the screen.
 
I believe he thought the way sex was being promoted in America was revolting and moronic. I also believe that he felt everyone had the right to explore what they wanted to in life, but in the same token he had the right to ridicule it and based on the evident knowledge that it was all from an industry of trend mongers.
 
of course I get it - but it was just over and over again with great zeal and funny little words for naughty things ... and not just Joe's Garage ...
That's because society in America was getting progressively worse and as much as Zappa sarcastically complained about it in his songs, it became more of an abundance of annoyance for him because it continued to grow stronger in the world. The little words for naughty things were already being said by people in the world. The world that annoyed the hell out of him. MTV annoyed him and he was not impressed that they were doing a program on Progressive Rock after realizing what was on their agenda for the music world in general. Rock videos actually helped Americans to develop short attention span for music. After someone would watch a video 5 or 6 times, they would be jaded and move on to the next one in line. After a while, it became that way for music listening and we ended up with a damaging result of short attention span. Which is why a majority of people enjoying the sound of notes being played on an instrument is now very much..a past event.   
 
 
   I guess when you're preaching something that simplistic, the people who already get it, get it.  the people who don't think Zappa is down with their way of thinking.
 
He was sometimes so sarcastic with his approach to the subject matter of sex, that he sounded to some people like he was actually personally in to it and further promoting the mentality of it that he was against. He hated commercialism. So do I. It is often formed in music by observing what would be defined as a catchy grouping of notes. It can later be observed in the areas of chord changes and repeated lines of the lyrics. The last insulting thing on earth that  a true musician wants to experience is to have a record executive stand over their shoulders and dictate what notes they should play and what specific parts they should leave out.


Edited by TODDLER - February 19 2015 at 12:18
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 12:22
This is just speculation, but I think Money came about partially due to genuine resentment towards the Beatles, and not just the petty kind you see from your average talentless prima donna.

IIRC, Sgt. Pepper was hailed as a groundbreaking concept album by the rock community. Meanwhile you have Zappa who not only beat The Beatles to the punch with not one, but two albums (Freak Out! and Absolutely Free), but those two album showed was more than capable in keeping up with the Fab Four. I think it might have been slightly upsetting that he had this groundbreaking music and no one was listening.

However, I think Zappa had too strong a personality to just fire wildly in the dark at whatever group that irked him while playing the martyr. With Money (and Freak Out! and Absolutely Free for that matter), he knew what his targets were and hit the mark with near pinpoint accuracy. I think a good chunk of the points that he made in those three albums - mostly the ones that deal with conformity - still hold up toady, even when those albums are pushing 50 years. 


Edited by KingCrInuYasha - February 19 2015 at 12:24
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 13:57
From what I recall, the Beatles freely admitted being inspired by Zappa.  I doubt he hadn't heard about that.
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 14:25
I think Frank Zappa liked some of the proclaimed ideals of the counterculture as he recognized most of the things they reacted against as genuine problems with the mainstream culture, but found other aspects of its ideology naïve or even downright dangerous like the promotion of substance abuse, and he disliked how easily it could and did become commodified by the culture industry. A lot of his lyrics from he 1960s have a "real freaks vs. fake ones" theme to it, not just We're Only in It for the Money, but also Plastic People in particular.

Doesn't he go into detail about this in his autobiography? Of course, that's something he wrote many years later. I think Peter Doggett's insanely long book about the rise and fall of the hippie movement, There's a Riot Going On, does touch on Frank Zappa's conflicted relationship to it right down to digging up old interviews but it's a really long book which doesn't spend much time on Zappa specifically. (I think it's like 700 pages or so?) Anyway Zappa didn't get anywhere as much "voice of the generation" hype as someone like Bob Dylan, but enough to reject it in interviews cited in Doggett's book. Doggett does make a similar judgement on the as I described Zappa doing in the previous paragraph, but he comes from a more traditional Old Left perspective whereas Zappa ended up on the libertarian right.


Edited by Toaster Mantis - February 19 2015 at 14:49
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 15:55
Originally posted by TeleStrat TeleStrat wrote:

I don't (and didn't) blame Frank one bit for making fun of things in those early days. There was a lot to make fun of.
Sex was the biggest product selling tool that the Madison Ave. crowd had and they used it to the fullest extent.
He simply pointed out that people were stupid for buying into the scam that this product or that product would help you get laid.
The hippie culture, movement, fad was a very short lived phase that was over almost as soon as it got started and was basically a group of followers looking for a leader. 
Only the name remained (for many years) as a way to describe guys with long hair. 
I get slightly (yes, only slightly) annoyed at this kind of response at times as to the hippie movement being brief. What does that have to do with anything?
 
It only takes a second to fire a handgun and kill someone. Should the killer tell the judge "Look, I didn't shoot for long you know, so let me go free!" LOL
 
Now for part 2 of which I'm more serious. The idea of the counter culture was to NOT blindly follow people and ideologies like sheep. Was it fool proof and always successful? Of course not as nothing of this type ever is.
 
Where do people get these bizarre ideas from? Shocked Especially people as old as you are.Wink


Edited by SteveG - February 19 2015 at 18:05
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
TeleStrat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 19:17
The hippie movement was a short period in the mid sixties that happened between the British Pop period and the demonstration period. It peaked during the summer of love in '67 and never came near that level again.
Six months later the NVA and VC launched the Tet Offensive and the war protest period became the center of interest. No one paid much attention to hippies after that.
When Bob Hope and Phyliss Diller dress up like hippies on TV and do a skit about smoking bananas you can pretty much assume that the movement was over.
So what are we talking here, a year and a half to two years? The beat generation lasted longer than that.
Now, if you're referring to what the hippies tried to stand for, things like peace and love, well I guess society wasn't ready for that because it just didn't catch on.
So the psychedelic bands move out of Haight Ashbury and all that remained were drug addicts and lost people who had spent their last dollar coming out to the coast. The head shops were gone from Sunset Blvd 
because people quickly lost interest in black light posters, love beads and incense. 
Young men were worrying about how to avoid the draft and groups of students were taking over campus administration buildings.
So yeah, it was over.
I get my bizarre ideas from facts. I was right here in L.A. and I was seventeen during the summer of love and was very aware of what was going on.



Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 19:26
^American "hippie" movement circa 1966-1971. It wasn't really that short of time now, was it when you look at it from a nationwide perspective and not just what happened in LA.
And I was in LA two months before Altamont in 1969, so I'm not sure where you obtained your facts because the scene looked a lot different to me.

Edited by SteveG - February 19 2015 at 19:32
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 19:49
Frank Zappa wasn't pleased with ex-revolutionaries taking over positions as record executives for huge record companies. He was disappointed in the hippie culture wearing suits and grooming themselves ...because they took on a role to shorten songs and dispose of Progressive Rock. I agree that the idea of counter culture was to NOT blindly follow people and ideologies like sheep....  I also believe there was a lot of money being made in the 60's with all the many bands being signed and "Flower Power" itself. Grateful Dead members had stated in the past that in the late 60's, record company representatives would show up in the streets with the attitude...."Sign!, Sign!, sign anybody! Sign that girl on the street shaking the tambourine! The government had control over the entertainment industry and I recall Zappa saying that this "Flower Power" scene was phony and commercial and had mostly to do with the industry profiting. He seemed to develop an attitude after witnessing it all and continued to mock it for that reason.

 
He seriously disliked drugs and sometimes disliked the people who took them. He fired Henry Vestine from the MOTHERS for that reason. He walked out on Alice Cooper during a session ...and supposedly because they began smoking Pot. He didn't have faith in the mixture of drugs and music ...unlike The Beatles who had experimented with LSD and produced several interesting albums while under the influence. Zappa was known to have fired anyone in his various line ups ..if he caught them doing drugs and especially if they sabotaged his works during a live performance. He may have opposed the hippie culture based on these experiences. His dislike or sarcastic attitude toward the hippie movement may have been based on his personal dislike for the situations it created in HIS life, but he additionally expressed disappointment in the local police force and the government.
Back to Top
TeleStrat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 19:55
Regardless of the time frame that history puts on the hippie movement after very early '68 no one even noticed them anymore. The Vietnam war dominated American society for the next five years and far overshadowed any other social concerns.
I base all of my opinions on where I was and what I saw and how my friends and I (all draft age) felt. 
I cannot, and never have spoken for the rest of the state or the rest of the country.
I was at the Palm Springs Pop Festival in the summer of '68 listening to Procol Harum sing A Whiter Shade Of Pale and it was a whole different scene.
Then we drove back home and it was business as usual.
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 21:38
^ So the first rainbow gathering at Granby, Colorado in 1972, what was it a gathering of dentists or maybe a gathering of hippies?
Back to Top
TeleStrat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 19 2015 at 21:58
^^ I have no idea who gathered there or why they gathered. 
I have already stated that my opinions are based on living in L.A. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.