| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Vompatti 
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67407
|
 Posted: January 29 2015 at 20:57 |
 Man With Hat wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
I only listen to someone read the review as I listen to someone reading the liner notes of the album. |
i like reading the album while i listen to the liner notes
|
 |
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 21:21 |
Vompatti wrote:
Man With Hat wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
I only listen to someone read the review as I listen to someone reading the liner notes of the album. |
i like reading the album while i listen to the liner notes
|
I've inserted many discs into my body but I don't have the processors needed. 
|
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
|
earlyprog
Collaborator
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 02:41 |
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album 
(Dare I say, you are probably right.)
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 02:46 |
earlyprog wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album
(Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
hahahaha earlyprog, that's cheeky and naughty too  It's your opinion, luckily not everyone's. By actually reading the 15 reviews by PA Collaborators not mentioning others, one can clearly see and feel they did listen to the album  maybe you can't but I can tell yes ahum yep they did 
Edited by Kati - January 30 2015 at 02:51
|
|
earlyprog
Collaborator
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 03:01 |
^I was going to say that. Just glimpsed through the reviews and yes it seems they did in fact listen to the album.
I'll sleep on the couch... |
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 03:03 |
earlyprog wrote:
^I was going to say that. Just glimpsed through the reviews and yes it seems they did in fact listen to the album.
I'll sleep on the couch... |
hahahaha no you are too funny and sweet really, EarlyProg hahaha
|
|
Vompatti
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67407
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 03:21 |
earlyprog wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album
(Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
i actually did assume that 
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 03:25 |
Vompatti wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
would you blieve if i told hyou i agree that revieiwers should listen to the albusm they review .q.m.
|
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album
(Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
i actually did assume that
|
hahahaha! Vompatti I give up hahaha! Also sending you to the naughty corner will be of no use, you are immune already know this
|
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 04:13 |
Kati wrote:
Obviously what I read must have influenced me by posting this topic. However it clearly was not because of a CS review, their last review was on 28 December 2014 and this topic I started on the 23rd of January 2015.
|
Perhaps not so clearly. Indeed that review was on 28 December. You commented about it on 6 January
Kati wrote:
I have to point out some silly things that have been said on some band's reviews:1. 79 mins total. The album is too long even if you like most tracks on there. 2. Needs a female vocalist 3. (Instrumental album) the song titles do not relate to the tracks. 4. A band uses the album cover for peeps to buy the album and the cover is a sin to humanity and human decency, especially if the album cover has a women wearing French knickers and her boobs are covered. This is just a few of the negative comments made by so called "prog aficionados" this is the silly reality one has to deal with, yes we are very silly lol   |
and on 28 January you posted again referencing to that review
Kati wrote:
This band has had their share of negative reviews, some negative ones seem fair and others are blatant lies and I have to say that one is from one of your fellow brethren collab's. The band did not report it because they told me that this happens in the music industry and one should rather focus on the positive. I know (this is my point of view and thinking) they thought it would be pointless and make it worse as it obviously would bring a negative backlash to them. I can see why they would think such thing. Collabs make mistakes too, they should know better compared to a person who is a new member and wrote one single review with a real profile also is allowed to be overlooked in this case.  |
So it's not like that review and your thoughts about it are things from months ago, so I don't think I can be blamed for guessing that this thread was still an afterthought coming from there (you deny so but when I asked you which other review was the trigger you can not give me any concrete answer).
I will not apologise again. Full stop.
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 04:43 |
Gerinski wrote:
Kati wrote:
Obviously what I read must have influenced me by posting this topic. However it clearly was not because of a CS review, their last review was on 28 December 2014 and this topic I started on the 23rd of January 2015.
|
Perhaps not so clearly. Indeed that review was on 28 December. You commented about it on 6 January
Kati wrote:
I have to point out some silly things that have been said on some band's reviews:1. 79 mins total. The album is too long even if you like most tracks on there. 2. Needs a female vocalist 3. (Instrumental album) the song titles do not relate to the tracks. 4. A band uses the album cover for peeps to buy the album and the cover is a sin to humanity and human decency, especially if the album cover has a women wearing French knickers and her boobs are covered. This is just a few of the negative comments made by so called "prog aficionados" this is the silly reality one has to deal with, yes we are very silly lol |
2.
Needs a female vocalist, show me any CS review that says this? I said this on
the 6th of January, yes true. And as you quoted me above of course I am
influenced by what I read and see, this is natural.
and on 28 January you posted again referencing to that review
Referencing to what
review? I am lost here. This below was as a reply to a review reporting thread and me coming to the
defense of someone who made a review.
Kati wrote:
This band has had their share of negative reviews, some negative ones seem fair and others are blatant lies and I have to say that one is from one of your fellow brethren collab's. The band did not report it because they told me that this happens in the music industry and one should rather focus on the positive. I know (this is my point of view and thinking) they thought it would be pointless and make it worse as it obviously would bring a negative backlash to them. I can see why they would think such thing. Collabs make mistakes too, they should know better compared to a person who is a new member and wrote one single review with a real profile also is allowed to be overlooked in this case. |
Again the above was in
response to a review made by someone and me coming to their defense there, in the
review reporting thread. Quite the contrary to what you accuse me of doing.
So it's not like that review and your thoughts about it are things from months ago, so I don't think I can be blamed for guessing that this thread was still an afterthought coming from there (you deny so but when I asked you which other review was the trigger you can not give me any concrete answer).
I will not apologise again. Full stop.
|
Is this all you got? You still have not responded to what I requested from you by showing me the proof of what you said I have said which is unfounded and not true.
|
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:04 |
Kati wrote:
Gerinski wrote:
and on 28 January you posted again referencing to that review
Kati wrote:
This band has had their share of negative reviews, some negative ones seem fair and others are blatant lies and I have to say that one is from one of your fellow brethren collab's. The band did not report it because they told me that this happens in the music industry and one should rather focus on the positive. I know (this is my point of view and thinking) they thought it would be pointless and make it worse as it obviously would bring a negative backlash to them. I can see why they would think such thing. Collabs make mistakes too, they should know better compared to a person who is a new member and wrote one single review with a real profile also is allowed to be overlooked in this case. |
|
Referencing to what
review? I am lost here.
|
[/QUOTE]
You tell me. There are only 2 collab reviews with less than 3 stars for that album, and I don't think you can accuse one of them of being a "blatant lie". That leaves only one possibility in my book, but please enlighten me (and actually I don't think you can accuse that last one of being a "blatant lie" either anyway, please clarify what exactly is a blatant lie in that review, rather than a personal opinion, or clarify which other review you were referring to as being a blatant lie).
In any case I have responded enough, more than you to me, which on my question on which review(s) prompted you to start this thread you can only reply "I'm influenced by what I read".
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:11 |
Gerinski wrote:
Kati wrote:
Gerinski wrote:
and on 28 January you posted again referencing to that review
Kati wrote:
This band has had their share of negative reviews, some negative ones seem fair and others are blatant lies and I have to say that one is from one of your fellow brethren collab's. The band did not report it because they told me that this happens in the music industry and one should rather focus on the positive. I know (this is my point of view and thinking) they thought it would be pointless and make it worse as it obviously would bring a negative backlash to them. I can see why they would think such thing. Collabs make mistakes too, they should know better compared to a person who is a new member and wrote one single review with a real profile also is allowed to be overlooked in this case. |
|
Referencing to what
review? I am lost here.
|
|
You tell me. There are only 2 collab reviews with less than 3 stars for that album, and I don't think you can accuse one of them of being a "blatant lie". That leaves only one possibility in my book, but please enlighten me (and actually I don't think you can accuse that last one of being a "blatant lie" either anyway, please clarify what exactly is a blatant lie in that review, rather than a personal opinion, or clarify which other review you were referring to as being a blatant lie).
In any case I have responded enough, more than you to me, which on my question on which review(s) prompted you to start this thread you can only reply "I'm influenced by what I read". [/QUOTE]
So far I have replied to all your questions. I asked you a question first yet have got no reply from you. You stated things that I said which are not true. Stop going around in circles.
|
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:24 |
Kati wrote:
So far I have replied to all your questions. |
No you have not. Please answer which collab review about CS you were referring to as a blatant lie. It's a plain simple question to answer, if you accuse a collab review of being a blatant lie I think it's no big deal to ask which one were you referring to.
Kati wrote:
I asked you a question first yet have got no reply from you. You stated things that I said which are not true. Stop going around in circles.
|
I did reply, I said that you have before reacted on negative reviews on CS and when you asked me to clarify I just gave you the 2 recent examples why I assumed that this thread was an afterthought from that review.
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:29 |
Gerinski wrote:
Kati wrote:
So far I have replied to all your questions. |
No you have not. Please answer which collab review about CS you were referring to as a blatant lie. It's a plain simple question to answer, if you accuse a collab review of being a blatant lie I think it's no big deal to ask which one were you referring to.
Kati wrote:
I asked you a question first yet have got no reply from you. You stated things that I said which are not true. Stop going around in circles.
|
I did reply, I said that you have before reacted on negative reviews on CS and when you asked me to clarify I just gave you the 2 recent examples why I assumed that this thread was an afterthought from that review. |
I asked you to show me where did I have a go at a reviewer for posting a negative review??? Do not quote reviews reporting thread as I did not mention anyone and was defending a review from someone who made a review for CS. The dates are very conflicting too from the date I posted the forum topic. This came after.
Edited by Kati - January 30 2015 at 05:29
|
|
Argonaught
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 04 2012
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 1413
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:56 |
earlyprog wrote:
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album (Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
It depends on what one considers to be "a high rating". For some albums I can think of even 2 stars would be very magnanimous.
|
|
Thank you, Fripp, for our daily Prog (Red 39:54)
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 05:58 |
Argonaught wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album (Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
It depends on what one considers to be "a high rating". For some albums I can think of even 2 stars would be very magnanimous. |
lol Argonaught, 3 stars and above are good ratings  beyond 3 is candy really.
|
|
earlyprog
Collaborator
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 06:05 |
Argonaught wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album (Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
It depends on what one considers to be "a high rating". For some albums I can think of even 2 stars would be very magnanimous. |
By which you imply 2 stars is too high a rating for CS II
I love albums that come with a great story and this thread has just raised my rating from 3 to 4 stars for CSII. Excellent addition to my prog rock music collection. 
Edited by earlyprog - January 30 2015 at 06:59
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 06:34 |
earlyprog wrote:
Argonaught wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album (Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
It depends on what one considers to be "a high rating". For some albums I can think of even 2 stars would be very magnanimous. |
By which you imply 2 stars is too high a rating for CV II
I love albums that come with a story and this thread has just raised my rating of 3 stars to 4 stars for CV II. Excellent addition to my prog rock music collection. |
Seconded, my eyes always trump my ears when it comes to music
|
|
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 06:43 |
|
|
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
|
earlyprog
Collaborator
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2133
|
Posted: January 30 2015 at 06:46 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
Argonaught wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
...by which you insinuate that the reviewers granting Corvus Stone II a high rating did not listen to the album (Dare I say, you are probably right.) |
It depends on what one considers to be "a high rating". For some albums I can think of even 2 stars would be very magnanimous. |
By which you imply 2 stars is too high a rating for CV II
I love albums that come with a story and this thread has just raised my rating of 3 stars to 4 stars for CV II. Excellent addition to my prog rock music collection. |
Seconded, my eyes always trump my ears when it comes to music
|
Yeah, I like the cover too
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Reviewers should be judged too.
