Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: November 29 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 557
Posted: November 13 2014 at 01:47
A phenomenal song, used to be my favourite of all time, but a late romantic piano solo inserted into the middle of song does not prog make, not that it doesn't have some influences.
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28368
Posted: November 15 2014 at 02:02
Yep its actually a massive 27 seconds shorter although the missing piano just seems to be a few seconds going into the instrumental break. It is slightly different but not by a lot.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: November 15 2014 at 02:38
Horizons wrote:
Why are they always one of the first bands mentioned when discussing modern progressive rock? Or at least the popular ones.
Well, possibly because there aren't any POPULAR prog rock bands as such? Certainly none with Muse-levels of popularity. Radiohead used to be popular but have kind of levelled off in recent years. I don't think there's anything bad with that because Muse are influenced enough by prog to be classified where they are here: prog related. They are not prog outright, but they have something to do with it. At least this way more people may get to know of this genre called prog rock. Better than having 70s bands like Pink Floyd as the gateway to prog, I think, from the point of view of maintaining relevance with the younger generation.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.477 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.