Reviews discussion - Progressive Rock Music Forum

Dayvenkirq wrote:

Phaolrym wrote:

kaka means: poo in Turkish, if you wanna know. LOL

So it does in Russian and Greek. But what does that have to do with the ongoing discussion here?

This is the ongoing discussion among a bunch of a cacademically minded altekackers (like myself) & The Sonia of Proctarchives.

I was just re-reading a handful of my old reviews, and have come to the conclusion that I badly overuse the word "surreal". Also, sometimes my syntax isn't as good as I think it be.

My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran

HolyMoly wrote:

I was just re-reading a handful of my old reviews, and have come to the conclusion that I badly overuse the word "surreal". Also, sometimes my syntax isn't as good as I think it be.

you're not alone, but as long as your reviews are not surreal as such ... just take it easy Smile

aapatsos wrote:

^ I am pretty sure I do the same with words such as "theatrical", "mid-tempo" (I love that!), "obvious" and so on...

Oh man i'd be embarrassed to list the words I use over and over.

"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN

tszirmay wrote:

I met a business man whose name was Richard Head, and he asked not to be ever called Dick. LOL

Priceless!

I also remember an Italian American contact called Mike Raffone. He was loud! Clown

Hey Thomas, I met a Drew Peacock once. That Sent me over the edge.

Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣

More than reporting anything wrong, this is a curiosity: the reviewer says that Bob Klose is featured on the new David Gilmour's album, but the lineup on PA doesn't mention him. Does he really play on it?

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=1467282

I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution

Hi there Luca and Steve Smile

I took the liberty of moving your posts to the 'reviews discussion' - a thread we don't use enough imo......and this is certainly where Luca's question belongs.

“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams

I checked on my copy and he is credited there.

Klose, but no "Cigar".

Trust me. I know what I'm doing.

Hi.

Recent newcomer.

I hope to do some reviews but have a question about what one should do when another

review, of the same disc, has some bad information. This particular case simply involves

stating a track was recorded live when it is a studio track. This may seem mundane but it

is one of those tracks that I will make sure is stashed with my cryogenically frozen head once

I shuffle off, If you know what I mean (this track is immaculate, in my opinion).

I actually (just now) checked the reviewer info and I see that they are still active. Review is

7 years old so I wasn't sure...

There is a "social review comments" option but I am considering a personal correspondence,

however those work, to find out if I'm greatly mistaken or to suggest a very minor edit to the

review; I assume edits can be done but I'm not certain.

This may sound unimportant--in the scheme of things it probably is (what isn't?)

I will hopefully review the disc and said song will be big focus; I want to clarify that it is a

studio track but don't want to mention other reviews or step on anyone else's toes.

I'll leave it at that as brain cramp has set it.

Wrong forum, maybe.

Crazy cookie-bomb for my first post.