Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 09:58 |
dr wu23 wrote:
And I'm a bit confused about Miles Davis as far as what specific prog rock bands he influenced. I can see jazz fusion of course but prog rock..? |
Reading the poll question+opening post usually helps
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 09:17 |
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 09:12 |
Eh, the proper form of the idiom you used is that one can take horses to water but can't teach them to drink. Either which way, it's a pretty condescending exit route that you've lined up, but if that's the best you can manage, sure. Your insults are pretty meaningless and insignificant in the extreme to me anyway.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 09:04 |
rogerthat wrote:
Yes, because unlike typical carriage horses in this part of the world, I am not blindfolded so I know what opinions I'd like to 'drink' or not drink. Thank you. |
Who said anything about horses drinking?
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20623
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 08:58 |
Raff wrote:
I think there is an obvious omission in the above list - The Beatles. Like them or not, they were hugely influential in the development of progressive rock as we know it, and their influence remains to this day.
|
That's certainly true.....but are we talking about bands that influenced the development of prog rock specifically or just rock in general? The 'big 6' prog bans who are in the list above influenced more prog bands at the time and later than anyone else from that point on. The Beatles were a vey early influence and some of the others were later than the others. And I'm a bit confused about Miles Davis as far as what specific prog rock bands he influenced. I can see jazz fusion of course but prog rock..?
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 08:58 |
Yes, because unlike typical carriage horses in this part of the world, I am not blindfolded so I know what opinions I'd like to 'drink' or not drink. Thank you.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 08:56 |
rogerthat wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Now who's shifting goal posts?
Let's get get back to influence vs imitation, because without understanding the difference all of your above exposition is useless. There are many cliched explanations of influence but I'll give you a real life one that's easier to understand.
When I was working as a second engineer recording for an American metal band that had 'ghoulish' overtones to their music I was given the task of recording a piano intro for one song. Their keyboardist tried to record a creepy piano intro to one song that kept coming out sounding cliched or cartoonish. It just didn't have any gravitas. We knocked off for the night and would try again the next day.
The following day's sessions produced any almost similar intro but was slightly different at points and really had the gravitas that the music called for. The keyboard player said that he was listening to Floyd records the night before and decided to incorporate Rick Wright's use of D minor with a major 7th as well G major 7th suspended second to his verse chords.
The resulting creepy intro sounded nothing like Pink Floyd, or Rick Wright for that matter.
That was influence without being imitative. The keyboard player and his composition still sounded and was original.
Please think on this for a while, RT, before you shoot back another post to me.
|
Your above post actually does nothing to address the issue. Because if you are going to claim that influence that is imitative is not influence at all, then you cannot also claim that the so called Genesis clones were influenced by Genesis because imitation (of some aspects of Genesis) is a big part of the reason they get called that. As has been pointed out to you, you want to have it both ways and you can't. You know what, I am just going to call you out on this one. I am pretty sure you haven't heard Mother or The Wall album at all in a very long time and have only a vague recollection of it. Your vague allusion to Kamen and 'recording tricks' already gave it away but I decided to wait one more comment before bringing this up. So you have no idea what exactly I am talking about with reference to that example and still want to just bluff your way through. Get back when you have the slightest inclination for an honest discussion. |
As the native American saying goes 'you can lead a horse to water but you can't throw it in'. I tried. Your loss, RT. Not this has any bearing on your argumemt, The Wall is one of two later Floyd albums that I still spin from time to time, the other being Wish You Were Hear.
Edited by SteveG - October 27 2014 at 09:02
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 08:47 |
richardh wrote:
micky wrote:
when talking prog bands and influence it is an important distinction between just what they are influencing. I think I did confuse myself in my last post. It is easy to flip between talking prog influence and wider influence. I was obviously talking of Genesis's influence within prog, yeah they likely have very very little outside it as most prog bands do no.
Yeah, I agree that many of the prog bands had very little impact outside the world of prog. That is why I would say, and believe strongly as it is no-brainer to me, that Floyd has had the greatest impact outside the world of prog. Perhaps because they were the least typcially prog and their music was able to impact and influence a much wider range of musicians.
Now within prog things would be quite different and where I would have Genesis much higher and would rank ELP as #1 not for inspiring copy cats, but for being the primary influence on some of the most defining aspects of what prog became. Ensemble virtuosity, emphasis on classical/rock merging, and of course taking keyboards out of a supporting role and making them on par with the lead guitar in driving the music.
|
the second comment is what I was trying to say but wasn't able to express it as clearly as you have. Pink Floyds music is more universal and crosses more genre boundaries compared to Genesis who were perhaps along with Yes the most important bands of symphonic prog. I tend to lose sight of ELP's influence because their reputation has been largely destroyed.
One thing that confuses me about the whole discussion is the distinction between imitation and influence. Isn't imitation just a form of influence? Some bands develop along these lines. Best example I can think of is Big Big Train. They are very strongly influenced by Genesis in their early days but then have been around for a long time and so have developed something of their own as well. How do you just dump music into one of 2 categories like this? There are more grey areas than black and white. |
As the old native American saying goes "you can lead a horse to water but you can't throw it in'. I tried. Your loss, RT.
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 04:12 |
Amen, thank you. Imitation is just an obvious and poorly masked form of influence. The distinction Steve came up with is just a desperate strawman.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 03:47 |
richardh wrote:
One thing that confuses me about the whole discussion is the distinction between imitation and influence. Isn't imitation just a form of influence?
| Indeed. Its absurd trying to separate imitiation completely and disqualify it as influence. Most, if not all bands start out imitating their idols in one way or another. Imo the ones worth our time evolve and find their own voice, but the influence remains.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28059
|
Posted: October 27 2014 at 02:42 |
micky wrote:
when talking prog bands and influence it is an important distinction between just what they are influencing. I think I did confuse myself in my last post. It is easy to flip between talking prog influence and wider influence. I was obviously talking of Genesis's influence within prog, yeah they likely have very very little outside it as most prog bands do no.
Yeah, I agree that many of the prog bands had very little impact outside the world of prog. That is why I would say, and believe strongly as it is no-brainer to me, that Floyd has had the greatest impact outside the world of prog. Perhaps because they were the least typcially prog and their music was able to impact and influence a much wider range of musicians.
Now within prog things would be quite different and where I would have Genesis much higher and would rank ELP as #1 not for inspiring copy cats, but for being the primary influence on some of the most defining aspects of what prog became. Ensemble virtuosity, emphasis on classical/rock merging, and of course taking keyboards out of a supporting role and making them on par with the lead guitar in driving the music.
|
the second comment is what I was trying to say but wasn't able to express it as clearly as you have. Pink Floyds music is more universal and crosses more genre boundaries compared to Genesis who were perhaps along with Yes the most important bands of symphonic prog. I tend to lose sight of ELP's influence because their reputation has been largely destroyed.
One thing that confuses me about the whole discussion is the distinction between imitation and influence. Isn't imitation just a form of influence? Some bands develop along these lines. Best example I can think of is Big Big Train. They are very strongly influenced by Genesis in their early days but then have been around for a long time and so have developed something of their own as well. How do you just dump music into one of 2 categories like this? There are more grey areas than black and white.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 19:32 |
SteveG wrote:
Now who's shifting goal posts?
Let's get get back to influence vs imitation, because without understanding the difference all of your above exposition is useless. There are many cliched explanations of influence but I'll give you a real life one that's easier to understand.
When I was working as a second engineer recording for an American metal band that had 'ghoulish' overtones to their music I was given the task of recording a piano intro for one song. Their keyboardist tried to record a creepy piano intro to one song that kept coming out sounding cliched or cartoonish. It just didn't have any gravitas. We knocked off for the night and would try again the next day.
The following day's sessions produced any almost similar intro but was slightly different at points and really had the gravitas that the music called for. The keyboard player said that he was listening to Floyd records the night before and decided to incorporate Rick Wright's use of D minor with a major 7th as well G major 7th suspended second to his verse chords.
The resulting creepy intro sounded nothing like Pink Floyd, or Rick Wright for that matter.
That was influence without being imitative. The keyboard player and his composition still sounded and was original.
Please think on this for a while, RT, before you shoot back another post to me.
|
Your above post actually does nothing to address the issue. Because if you are going to claim that influence that is imitative is not influence at all, then you cannot also claim that the so called Genesis clones were influenced by Genesis because imitation (of some aspects of Genesis) is a big part of the reason they get called that. As has been pointed out to you, you want to have it both ways and you can't. You know what, I am just going to call you out on this one. I am pretty sure you haven't heard Mother or The Wall album at all in a very long time and have only a vague recollection of it. Your vague allusion to Kamen and 'recording tricks' already gave it away but I decided to wait one more comment before bringing this up. So you have no idea what exactly I am talking about with reference to that example and still want to just bluff your way through. Get back when you have the slightest inclination for an honest discussion.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 16:10 |
when talking prog bands and influence it is an important distinction between just what they are influencing. I think I did confuse myself in my last post. It is easy to flip between talking prog influence and wider influence. I was obviously talking of Genesis's influence within prog, yeah they likely have very very little outside it as most prog bands do no.
Yeah, I agree that many of the prog bands had very little impact outside the world of prog. That is why I would say, and believe strongly as it is no-brainer to me, that Floyd has had the greatest impact outside the world of prog. Perhaps because they were the least typcially prog and their music was able to impact and influence a much wider range of musicians.
Now within prog things would be quite different and where I would have Genesis much higher and would rank ELP as #1 not for inspiring copy cats, but for being the primary influence on some of the most defining aspects of what prog became. Ensemble virtuosity, emphasis on classical/rock merging, and of course taking keyboards out of a supporting role and making them on par with the lead guitar in driving the music.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 15:58 |
Perhaps you're right, Micky. But whether the bands in question are able to pull it off or not, KC (most often in combination with electric Miles and selected Krautrock) are being namedropped everywhere and all the time as an influence where I live. And KC's influence goes way beyond the prog clique. Really. While prog era Genesis (and Yes) seemingly influenced (or influences) more of a closed circuit of bands operating in a spesific "prog-preservation society".
Regarding ELP I don't think they've had much influence on other artists after the mid-70's at all. And I must admit that I suspect the reason a band once as obscure as VdGG are now a much bigger influence than ELP, has less to do with skills and all the more to do with how the listening experience resonates with the younger generations of prognerds. Dark, gloomy, existential stuff (although sometimes just as cringeworthy lyricwise) usually wins over showmanship and show offy virtuosity in the long run.
BTW: If prog was a complexity contest I would think it would be more of a challenge to pull off or replicate some of the stuff Gentle Giant did than ELP.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 14:37 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
micky wrote:
remember the extinct species known as the PA's DT fanclub.. good times! You used to not be able to take a step here without tripping over a DT thread. I'm not sure if it was us.. or the group itself that killed them off. Genesis would be a tougher task to erradicate.. at least Genesis could do a good pop song.
| Just like the Osmonds, New Kids on The Block, Spice Girls, and Justin Bieber-fangirls most DT-fanboys simply grow out of that phase. The latter group discovered better prog through the PA-board while the former groups just grew older. There's no hope for the Genesís fanboys who's generally far too old to change (I love Genesis myself btw. I just don't consider them to be among the ten most influential bands in prog) |
I do think DT likely ran off a bunch of their own fans, I'd like to think those fans have grown up are sitting around diggin' RPI and all the cool modern (crossover) groups that have been the leading edge of progressive rock in this second decade of the 21st century. However I think it was metal not the prog that was the base appeal to those fans, I'm sure they are digging whatever flavor of the month prog-metal band is popular now or just left the prog out and gone full metal. Funny. I have the exact opposite view of Genesis. I think they were FAR superior as pop musicians than they ever were as prog musicians and I think history and public tastes bear that out. Sure prog fan will sit in their ivory towers and scoff at the inferior tastes of the unwashed masses but it is what it is. Being a complete progressive and complex monster did not stop ELP from being one of the world's top bands, nor Yes. Genesis did not have IT whatever it was, and didn't find it till they turned to pop music. I love their pop stuff always have, but find very very little of interest in their prog attempts. However disregarding personal tastes and opinions on their actual music.. I can't with a straight face not say they were not extremely influential. Not to the 1st generation but to later generation. Face it, most groups do not have the skill to pull off what KC did, nor YES, nor ESPECIALLY ELP which needs a complete master like Emerson to work which is why there are so few ELP knock-offs. HOwever Genesis is an easy band for the less skilled to enjoy and emulate, thus giving rise to easy-listening pub prog that was neo. IMO they have to be in the top 5 of any prog infuence list, but definitely a step below the real innovators and influential groups. all my two cents of course.
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11666
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 14:23 |
micky wrote:
remember the extinct species known as the PA's DT fanclub.. good times! You used to not be able to take a step here without tripping over a DT thread. I'm not sure if it was us.. or the group itself that killed them off. Genesis would be a tougher task to erradicate.. at least Genesis could do a good pop song.
| Just like the Osmonds, New Kids on The Block, Spice Girls, and Justin Bieber-fangirls most DT-fanboys simply grow out of that phase. The latter group discovered better prog through the PA-board while the former groups just grew older. There's no hope for the Genesís fanboys who's generally far too old to change (I love Genesis myself btw. I just don't consider them to be among the ten most influential bands in prog)
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 13:56 |
rogerthat wrote:
micky wrote:
the most interesting polls are those with the most obvious left out. Then again, I would think Floyd would be the most obvious of the options here, yet I forgot about the substantial Genesis bobble-head fanclub that resides here.
|
Ha ha, PA needs a micky to take the mickey out of the Genesis fanboys. |
remember the extinct species known as the PA's DT fanclub.. good times! You used to not be able to take a step here without tripping over a DT thread. I'm not sure if it was us.. or the group itself that killed them off. Genesis would be a tougher task to erradicate.. at least Genesis could do a good pop song.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 12:33 |
rogerthat wrote:
SteveG wrote:
I knew this was coming as I said that I've been at this for a while. First off, like most people, you confuse influence with imitation. They are not the same thing. Silent Lucidity is a facsimile of a Pink Floyd song, and that is not influence. Michael Kaman's score should helped to give that away along with the myriad of Floyd recording tricks. The rest of the album, btw, owes no 'influence' to Floyd. The following song's are Queensryche's alone: Best that I Can, The Thin Line, Jet City Woman, Della Brown, Another Rainy Night, Empire, Resistance and Hand On Heart. Are your starting to realize the difference between influence and imitation?
|
Confusion? No, I don't think there is any confusion, neither from
your side nor mine. What I am quite sure of is you are pretty adept at
shifting the goalposts as per your convenience. If it's just influence you are
interested in, I have already established that a few pages now. I believe
it was you who introduced the wrinkle that there are no Floyd-clones like
Genesis-neo prog (I will come to this point a bit later). And it was in
this context I pointed out slabs of music that are very Floyd-like even in
songs of bands that would not count Floyd as a dominant influence. Er, I
am afraid you first need to decide whether your original question was really
one of sincere inquiry or are you just trying to manufacture arguments that
'help' you conclude that no influence is significant as long as the source is
Floyd?
Anyhow, we'll start with Silent Lucidity. First off, no, it's not
a facsimile. The song actually has metal riffs in the background during
the spoken voice bit so that's not like Floyd at all. And Tate's delivery
is pure metal again, especially once he gets out of the low pitched intro.
A facsimile would have to be an exact or near exact facsimile. You don’t have to take my word for it as far
as the meaning of the word goes. According
to the Merriam Webster dictionary as well, facsimile is “an exact copy”. You may shift goal posts if you wish (though
that makes the discussion process much more difficult) but you cannot change
the plain meaning of English words.
Secondly, it has nothing to do with Kamen’s arrangements or Floyd’s
recording tricks. I cited the VOCAL
MELODY of the opening verse, which is very similar in places to Mother. As far as I know, note-similarity in vocal
melodies cannot be attributed to arrangements or recording tricks. I am also aware that the band as such is not
strongly influenced by Floyd and, though Empire is a pretty boring album, I too
do not recall any Floyd like moments in say Jet City Woman. Here’s the thing. Nearly everybody has heard a Floyd album at
one point or the other. With the result
that there is a deeply embedded Floyd influence that creeps in at some point or
the other in the work of many, many bands.
My friend is a prog rock musician and not a particularly big fan of
Floyd though he does respect them and he has, by self admission, been
influenced by Floyd in writing some guitar parts.
Prog rockers, I find, think influence is just structure or
arrangements. That is a very prog, and
narrow, point of view. There’s also the
meat: the vocal melodies, the riffs, the chords, that is, the parts. While Floyd may not have stuck to definite
patterns in the way they develop music owing to their flexibility, there are
definite patterns in their melodies, riffs and chords that Floyd fans can certainly
recognise immediately as the signature of their band. Some such Floyd fans, serious or casual, go
on to become musicians and traces of Floyd can be found in their music. To argue that such influence is insignificant
would be disingenuous in the extreme because that would tantamount to saying
that significant influence of Beatles is measured only by those bands that
cloned them and not by those who were inspired by them to make music. And by the way, to reiterate, Silent Lucidity
is not a one off. I can go on with many,
many such examples of various bands from a variety of genres. You may pretend that is not influence if it
suits you, but I shall recognise it quickly for what it is: a pretence and no
more.
Moving on to the question of what genres Floyd spawned, I think it would
take a strong case of musical blindness to deny their role in the development
of pyschedelic and space rock and, through their Barrett albums, on Krautrock
as well. Sure, they share that honour
with Doors, Jefferson Airplane and to a lesser extent Beatles (Revolver),
Hawkwind following a bit later. It is
not exclusive, but they are one of the most significant influences on a vast
majority of bands in these genres. And
this is where I return to neo prog and Genesis.
I am quite familiar with Marillion, IQ and Twelfth Night, three of the most important neo prog bands. None of these bands would count only Genesis
as their source material. Twelfth Night
actually have a bit of NWOBHM (which can also be heard in Marillion’s Garden
Party track) going on. Marillion and IQ
are both also influenced by Rush. Pink
Floyd also rears its ugly head again when it comes to Marillion and not just in
the form of Gilmour leads. The riffs of
Brick in the Wall are evoked when guitar takes over in Assassing. So the claim that each and every neo prog
band is just a Genesis clone is mostly a figment of the fertile imagination of
Genesis fanatics and little more. One Grendel does not a Genesis clone make.
Again, that was just one example with respect to Marillion. So don’t
rush to pretend you’ve got to just refute that to negate the argument. I cannot and will not spend time enumerating
each and every such instance, so do not insult my intelligence. As it is you who wish to claim that Floyd ‘s
influence is not so significant, going against conventional wisdom which holds
that Floyd is one of the most influential rock bands of all times, it is really
up to you to explain why. And if you don’t
have any interest in doing so, that is your choice. But in that case do remember that when you point
fingers at people saying they only hear what they want to hear, three of your
own point right back at you. Such claims
are neither very convincing nor very pleasant. As far as I am concerned, Floyd's influence on music as a whole is far deeper than that of any prog rock band save Kraftwerk. Um, Miles Davis isn't really a prog ROCK artist but yeah, him too. And I would go so far as to state that only prog rock fans could possibly believe that is not the case.
|
Now who's shifting goal posts? Let's get get back to influence vs imitation, because without understanding the difference all of your above exposition is useless. There are many cliched explanations of influence but I'll give you a real life one that's easier to understand. When I was working as a second engineer recording for an American metal band that had 'ghoulish' overtones to their music I was given the task of recording a piano intro for one song. Their keyboardist tried to record a creepy piano intro to one song that kept coming out sounding cliched or cartoonish. It just didn't have any gravitas. We knocked off for the night and would try again the next day. The following day's sessions produced any almost similar intro but was slightly different at points and really had the gravitas that the music called for. The keyboard player said that he was listening to Floyd records the night before and decided to incorporate Rick Wright's use of D minor with a major 7th as well G major 7th suspended second to his verse chords. The resulting creepy intro sounded nothing like Pink Floyd, or Rick Wright for that matter. That was influence without being imitative. The keyboard player and his composition still sounded and was original. Please think on this for a while, RT, before you shoot back another post to me.
Edited by SteveG - October 26 2014 at 13:41
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 10:49 |
micky wrote:
the most interesting polls are those with the most obvious left out. Then again, I would think Floyd would be the most obvious of the options here, yet I forgot about the substantial Genesis bobble-head fanclub that resides here.
|
Ha ha, PA needs a micky to take the mickey out of the Genesis fanboys.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: October 26 2014 at 08:24 |
the most interesting polls are those with the most obvious left out. Then again, I would think Floyd would be the most obvious of the options here, yet I forgot about the substantial Genesis bobble-head fanclub that resides here.
|
|