Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 16 2014 at 13:08
^ What is your 5 over 7? Is it ...
1) where you play one part in 5/smth and another in 7/smth, they are both played at the same time and running at the same tempo?
... or ...
2) you take the part in 5/smth and try to "fit it into" the part in 7/smth (as in, they run at different tempi, but a measure of one part lasts the same amount of time as a measure of the other part) ?
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 16 2014 at 13:19
The Pessimist wrote:
Here's my band's condensed EPK. Here you can see us talk to an imaginary interviewer in a really awkward fashion. I think we play quite well though so we have that at least I suppose.
The interview looks good.
1) I googled EPK, and it gave me "electronic press kit". What EPK did you mean? Also, ...
2) What is the most challenging piece you've ever written? Do you have a link to that? And ...
3) What makes your band stand out as a jazz music act? (Emphasis on/messing around with certain musical elements, influences from other styles, etc.)
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Posted: July 16 2014 at 15:18
RE your first post, the 5/7 I'm referring to is a 5/8 phrase running over a 7/4 phrase.
1. Electronic Press Kit would be the one. Basically something to send out to promoters so they have an idea of what we sound like.
2. The most challenging piece I've ever written is Mosaic, featured in the video. Here's a live recording: https://soundcloud.com/zeitgeist575/mosaic
3. I think we stand out because we are constantly pushing the complexity of our music whilst still trying to make it flow as musically as possible. We aim to challenge our audience, test their threshold on what is entertaining and what isn't. In regards to influences, we try and bring in elements of Metal, Prog Rock, Indian Classical Music and Western Classical Music to the mix. The musical element we mess around with the most is probably rhythm, although harmony also gets its fair share of meddling too.
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Posted: July 17 2014 at 22:51
Dayvenkirq wrote:
@ Polymorphia: When you or your mate write the lyrics, how do you avoid that holier-than-thou attitude (preachiness) and self-pity?
There is no moral idea or personal problem that is inherently preachy or self-pitying, but examining writers you consider preachy or self-pitying is helpful. An example, for me, would be Morrissey circa Meat is Murder. The lyric for "That Joke Isn't Funny Anymore" doesn't have a bad concept. But Morrissey talks about somebody laughing at suicidal people without mentioning the joke. He says that this somebody "kicks them when they fall down" several times and tries to enforce his point with assertions instead of examples. Now, part of the preachiness has to do with Morrissey's persona and delivery. There's always the right music and delivery you can give to a bad lyric to turn it into a good one. (The Queen is Dead was much better both in terms of lyrics and delivery).
So mainly I avoid making assertions without backing them up first. If I were to say "I hate cookies" I'd want to back it up with reasons, examples, or experiences first. The purpose of a lyric is not to display an idea or emotion, but to show how the writer's mind processes certain ideas and emotions and by doing so prove the idea or emotion.
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 18 2014 at 00:02
^ Brute force? With no thought involved?
Polymorphia wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
@ Polymorphia: When you or your mate write the lyrics, how do you avoid that holier-than-thou attitude (preachiness) and self-pity?
There is no moral idea or personal problem that is inherently preachy or self-pitying, but examining writers you consider preachy or self-pitying is helpful. An example, for me, would be Morrissey circa Meat is Murder. The lyric for "That Joke Isn't Funny Anymore" doesn't have a bad concept. But Morrissey talks about somebody laughing at suicidal people without mentioning the joke. He says that this somebody "kicks them when they fall down" several times and tries to enforce his point with assertions instead of examples. Now, part of the preachiness has to do with Morrissey's persona and delivery. There's always the right music and delivery you can give to a bad lyric to turn it into a good one. (The Queen is Dead was much better both in terms of lyrics and delivery).
So mainly I avoid making assertions without backing them up first. If I were to say "I hate cookies" I'd want to back it up with reasons, examples, or experiences first. The purpose of a lyric is not to display an idea or emotion, but to show how the writer's mind processes certain ideas and emotions and by doing so prove the idea or emotion.
Thanks. I'll follow your advice and see what happens.
Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Funky Town
Status: Offline
Points: 12794
Posted: July 18 2014 at 00:08
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ Brute force? With no thought involved?
(For me) Music isn't about thinking. It's an art. Passion, emotions, and feelings are abundant while thoughts and calculations are scarce. If I'm writing something every day, it's something that's from my heart which is what I'm going for. f**k yes, you should revise and change things up, but if you're thinking about what you're writing down before you do so, you've lost the point of it.
Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Funky Town
Status: Offline
Points: 12794
Posted: July 18 2014 at 00:13
Lyrics to my only completed song with lyrics:
I didn't see you yesterday I don't think I'll have the chance
Maybe next time I'll say-
No I won't
I didn't see you (X a lot)
I'm not gonna see you anymore
I just think it's for the best
But I don't think, I don't think
etc
I didn't see you (X a lot)
[Breakdown]
I didn't see you January 19th
I didn't see you December 27th
I didn't see you November 21st
I didn't see you October 14th
I didn't see you
It's crude, it's simplistic, but I create a voice through the lyrics which imply I'm talking to the listener: not going over their heads and it adds a sense of genuineness.
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 18 2014 at 00:35
^ Reminds me an awful lot of Syd Barrett but with a more punky vocal approach to it. Now that I've heard it, I think arrangement-wise the track is fine. No need to embellish it with more instruments.
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 18 2014 at 01:11
Certainly repetition helps with this sort of thing, but to me personally repetition as a lyric-writing device makes songwriting too easy, effortless. I like challenging myself (not bragging), I just do. But I guess that for now I could use "too easy", given that I haven't written a single full-fledged song that I'd be proud of.
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Posted: July 18 2014 at 08:06
Repetition is a useful device. You just have to find a line worth repeating.
Also, it is essential to write a lot. You do need to think in some stages of the writing, but the more you write, the more you'll know which stages in which you need to do the thinking. You do want to have some kind of thinking in the first draft, or at least I do, but it doesn't have to be critical thinking directly related to the poem. You don't have to write a lyric feeling like you absolutely can't be preachy. Just write and then address whatever problems are there.
Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Posted: July 18 2014 at 08:14
Luna wrote:
Lyrics to my only completed song with lyrics:
I didn't see you yesterday I don't think I'll have the chance
Maybe next time I'll say-
No I won't
I didn't see you (X a lot)
I'm not gonna see you anymore
I just think it's for the best
But I don't think, I don't think
etc
I didn't see you (X a lot)
[Breakdown]
I didn't see you January 19th
I didn't see you December 27th
I didn't see you November 21st
I didn't see you October 14th
I didn't see you
It's crude, it's simplistic, but I create a voice through the lyrics which imply I'm talking to the listener: not going over their heads and it adds a sense of genuineness.
I especially like the last few lines where you imply that at least four years have passed since you saw this person. How fast is the vocal delivery for this song? It seems like the first stanza would not work if it were sung too fast. I also want to ask what the "But I don't think" line means in relation to the others. Overall, though, .
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 18 2014 at 12:50
Polymorphia wrote:
Also, it is essential to write a lot. You do need to think in some stages of the writing, but the more you write, the more you'll know which stages in which you need to do the thinking. You do want to have some kind of thinking in the first draft, or at least I do, but it doesn't have to be critical thinking directly related to the poem. You don't have to write a lyric feeling like you absolutely can't be preachy. Just write and then address whatever problems are there.
... which is the backbone to lyric-writing. Creativity comes with time. It's not an immediate thing.
If only I heard this advice six years ago, I wouldn't be stuck in my bulls$%t.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.