The Atheist - Agnostic - Non religious thread - Progressive Rock Music Forum

A Person wrote:

^ As far as I remember from my Core Humanities class (CH201, I believe), that first line became popular with incorrect translation. In Latin, "imago" means "a vision for, a blueprint, a mental design", not "an image". But it f$%king stuck. And there are plenty of other ridiculous misconceptions about the Bible, like ... things that are even not in the Bible.

By the way, excellent post, Slarti.

Anyways, it's not even about anything I've said above here.

It is in my nature to question a lot of things. We don't know anything about God. At first I thought "he isn't there" because that idea makes sense (hint: I went through a Greg Lake (you can ask me) / George Carlin phase). But I don't know. What if God is a [you think of something here] ? I believe that makes me an agnostic.

Edited by Dayvenkirq - January 29 2014 at 23:31

Is Neil DeGrase Tyson really considered a condom defying homophobic paedophile in the Vatican? Confused

What?

The face of anything has a tendency to look like an arse, Ralphism is no exception.

What?

I don't think there's much of a trimmer, razor or pair of scissors in the Ralph - Face of Atheism's house...

The T wrote:

The first things atheists have to do is stop acting like religious fanatics. I'm certainly an agnostic but I'm disappointed when I see so many troll atheists turning a lack of belief into a movement. One of the points of atheism is NOT belonging to a movement, isn't it?

Also that guy in that big pic above... "Ralph." He better learn to spell before he tries to be the face of anything...

I agree with you.

I'm anti-fanatic....No matter if atheist or religious.

Guys like Ralph feel more intelligent and developed because they are atheists.

I don't care about the religion (or lack of it) in the persons, I care about the persons.

Guys like Ralph justify fanatics like Fred Phelps.

And worst, retarded morons as the guys from the National Atheist Party, are doing what they criticized in religiouis people....Making the religious belief (or disbelief), part of the National agenda.

They want a separation between state and religion, but want to impose an atheist state like USSR, Kampuchea or Mao's China.

Iván

BTW: Did science gave us life?

Unless your father is a scientific, I don't see how.

Science is a discipline that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.

Or God or nature created life, not science

Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - January 30 2014 at 10:50

@Ivan:

My sentiments exactly. Clap

Well put!

Edited by HemispheresOfXanadu - January 30 2014 at 10:45

@ProgFollower on Twitter. Tweet me muzak.

Luna wrote:

YOUR MOVE, SHEEPLE

This is also a moronic reductio ad absurdum.

If God exists (As we believe), he created HUMAN SOUL at his image, not the body.

As far as I know, God is a spirit, not flesh and blood being.

Iván

Equality 7-2521 wrote:

What does that have to do with anything? Of course the human discipline of science does not account for the initial abiogenesis on Earth.

Science did create life as you know it though.

That's not what he says, he said:

As intellectuals we must refuse to live in a word governed by brain dead neanderthols who deny the very same SCIENCE THAT GAVE THEM LIFE in the first place

He says that SCIENCE GAVE US LIFE.

This is as false as a 20 dollar bill with the face of Che Guevara.

Sounds more like a very limited nerd writing incoherence after incoherence from mom's basement and making terrible grammatical mistakes that not even guys like T or myself (Who are nor mainly English speakers) make.

Iván

Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - January 30 2014 at 11:11