Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17529
Posted: October 26 2013 at 11:05
Hi,
John for sure ... way more intuitive and fun to listen to. I find Allan, a bit too technical for my tastes. Sort of like a graduate school player ... he's better and more technical than anyone!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: October 24 2013
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Posted: October 26 2013 at 11:50
While john mclaughlin has been always changing his musical horizons; creating jazz rock with miles and , indian music with shakti and in his own with rock, taking flamenco fusion to a higher level and ewith the forth dimension mixing indian with new milenium jazz feel, allan has locked. Him self to his own great stile, without making any change, so you could say that allans biggestmistake is his lack of versatility
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7275
Posted: October 26 2013 at 12:11
Interesting comparison, as their guitar styles are rather divergent..... McLaughlin is more traditional, with an amazing command of technique, while Holdsworth charted out a new territory, approaching the guitar more as a solo instrument akin to a saxophone. McLaughlin has a better command of chord vocabulary IMO.
I love both of them, but voted for McLaughlin as my favorite of the two. Check him out in this clip....amazing!
Joined: October 24 2013
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Posted: October 26 2013 at 12:30
But the firts thing that makes them diferent is each one's technic, one plays only alternate pucking while the other only legato, to very diferent aproaches with each own posibilities
John McLaughlin is amazing and groundbreaking but Allan Holdsworth is the most ridiculous guitar player that's ever lived. There is stuff he plays that no other guitarist can really touch, and I don't mean just from the fluidity of his technique, but also his note selection and use of harmony.
The one big problem for Holdsworth in terms of acceptance and recognition is his concept of harmony is so advanced that most people can't actually hear what he's doing, it goes over a lot of people's heads.
Joined: January 09 2015
Location: Sharpsburg, ga
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Posted: July 21 2016 at 21:39
I'm not feeling Alan Holdsworth....and they blast Coryell for being too mechanical? McLaughlin seems to much more versatile in his approach to the instrument. He spent seven years studying Indian rhythms which take a lifetime to master. I just got finished watching thirty Holdsworth videos from young to old. He has great technique and nice moments but I'm not blown away.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.