Humanism, Social science and Natural Science |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34055 |
Topic: Humanism, Social science and Natural Science Posted: January 02 2014 at 08:17 |
|
On the University i study there is three faculties, Humanistic faculty, the faculty of social science and and the Faculty of Natural science.
the humanistic faculty has studies such as religion, history, language (english and nordic), lector education, dancing, music, drama and reading science. the faculty of social studies have studies such as journalism, economics, nurse, administration, science of state, teacher, and hotel and tourism, the faculty of natural science studies such as physics, chemistry, bio-chemistry, environmental bio-chemistry, petroleum science, biology. Im very interested to understand the distinguished differences between the three of them, what are you really studying and for whom, what purpose, is it for the societies benefit, is it for personal benefit, is it for the communities benefit, is it scientifically beneficial . I study english so im a student of humanistic study, what am i interested in, well im interested in mythology, in language, in historical events, in music, films, and arts, im interested to understand the culture im in and also the cultures I encounter on a daily basis be it in film or news or on travel . I like to analyze the origin of words, myths, the allegories i find reading books and what outer sources is at use, but i believe first and foremost humansitic studies is for your self-interest. but is at best when you can produce something which will make the reader, viewer or interpreter, take hold of what you've came up to through your research and study, i would be so honest to say that humanistic study is in first hand not really scientific, one can have empirical ratification but studying texts from year 0 is hard to find true sources so lot is left to speculation. but im fine with humanism being an interpretive study because the society highly needs good analysts researchers of text, language and film its about nuances and to see the hidden imagination is important for humans and lot of colorful things can come out of mythology and it is students of humanistic science to read them and use it in films and series, its the study of human mind understanding of culture and society in all of humanity that is what humanism is all about, the study and understanding of human society, its culture and its products natural science is about science, of looking forward and to come up with something which in the future is beneficial to me petroleum technology is not that and (specially in Norway) its a short-lived science and it will come out of date when there is no oil or gas left on the planet, and when the environment is all wahooo , basically waste of time, and money, tech has to be beneficial to us, like cell-phone technology, nano-technology, energy-technology, petroleum is not that, when if it can be converted to other fields that will cost more money then to have begun on other fields (> this is more of a complain against Norway, who solely is fixed on petroleum, like a mania and fails to see other ways of technological progress, and development) but i believe petroleum to not be true science but faux science with no scientific beneficial value, ,
|
||
|
||
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 12 2008 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 5898 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 11:05 | |
The differentiation between the humanities and natural sciences is actually newer than people think, I think it begun in the early 19th century and didn't really set until Wilhelm Dilthey who based most of his career on establishing a separate set of premises and methodological principles for the "spiritual sciences" as he called them.
Does not help that most of the humanities and social sciences (except to some extent economics) didn't pass Karl Popper's falsifiability criterium for "real science", who completed the job from the other side of the fence. |
||
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34055 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 11:37 | |
|
||
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 12:19 | |
Simply put: no petrochemical technology = no vinyl, no acetate = no Prog. Your specific complaint against petroleum technology is a little narrow. There is more to the technology than simply exploiting the natural resource. Petroleum (and more generally, fossil fuel) is one of the most versatile and useful resources available to us, this apparently simple combination of hydrogen and carbon gives us coal, petroleum (e.g gasoline/benzine, paraffin, kerosene, diesel) , gas (for example: methane, ethane, propane and butane), polymers (ie plastics, such as polyvinyl, polyesters, polyethylene, polystyrene, synthetic rubbers), paraffin, wax, tar, asphalt, solvent, glue, ink, oils and many by-products such as fertilizer, linoleum, perfume, insecticide, petroleum jelly, soap and many medical products. Without these products we would not have the modern world - they powered the industrial revolution, the study of them produced most of the innovation we have experienced over the past 150 years. Without petroleum technology and its study we would not have the wealth to support faculties of humanist and social study, we would not have democracy, social equality, the internet and the mobile phone. Sure this not an inexhaustible resource, but without the technology and science to study the marvel of hydrocarbons we will not be able to synthesise the chemistry to replace it. We know there is methane elsewhere in the solar system, on Mars, Venus and Titan so it is more likely to be inorganically produced rather than organically - this gives us a glimpse of the future that your "faux science" can unlock by understanding the nature of petroleum and it by-products. Without the continued academic study and education in petrochemical technology when the oil runs out the modern world will come to an end. Edited by Dean - January 02 2014 at 18:52 |
||
What?
|
||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34055 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 12:46 | |
|
||
|
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 14:01 | |
I always thought prog was actually more related to another oily substance, snake oil...
Edited by The T - January 02 2014 at 14:01 |
||
|
||
refugee
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: November 20 2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 7026 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 16:12 | |
These disciplines are all linked through the "mother of science", philosophy. I think it’s a pity that many intelligent people are unable to talk together because they belong to different branches of science. One sad example is biologists and sociologists: Instead of putting their minds together to try to find new answers (or maybe new questions?), they fight against each other, violently defending their own views. That’s pretty sad.
|
||
He say nothing is quite what it seems;
I say nothing is nothing (Peter Hammill) |
||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 16:22 | |
What do they fight over exactly? The vast majority of Biology bears not even a remote relation to Sociology.
Edited by Equality 7-2521 - January 02 2014 at 16:23 |
||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 16:51 | |
Philosophy is a toothless charlatan, it is the waste of an intellect, the pastime of profligate. Those who study philosophy should be forced to do menial tasks for minimum wage while wearing name badges and baseball caps... oh wait. If biologists and sociologists got together they could call themselves Sociobiologists ... oh wait.
|
||
What?
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 17:08 | |
Reading texts will never cure disease, solve the energy crisis, feed the world, stop wars, land a probe on another planet or photograph a galaxy far far away; reading texts would not discover how a starfish can grow a new limb or how plants can take sunlight to fuse carbon from the atmosphere with hydrogen from water to make something solid like a tree or as beautiful as a rose. Reading texts has never made this world a better place to live because we are still repeating the stupidity of the past, we never learn from history, philosophy never teaches us anything and all sociology and psychology has ever done is devised new ways to sell us useless crap we never knew we could never live without. If the humanities and the social sciences want more money they should go out and earn it. Because unless they do then they are merely the entertainment for the idle by the idle. And let us be honest here, most of the humanities are exactly that: mere entertainment.
|
||
What?
|
||
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 12 2008 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 5898 |
Posted: January 02 2014 at 17:53 | |
The term paper I've just delivered electronically an hour ago kind of touches on that subject. I'll weigh in tomorrow since my opinions on the subject is very complex and I have a rather busy day tomorrow. (I have to return books to three different libraries in different cities) |
||
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
||
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 12 2008 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 5898 |
Posted: January 26 2014 at 05:31 | |
Better late than never...
The division between natural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities (or "the spiritual sciences" as they were originally called) goes back to the late 19th century which as an era represented the triumph of mathematically/logically based natural science, engineering, etc. At the very least that was the spirit of the age, and led to the attempted assimilation of the rest of academic activity under the methodology of natural science with the Positivism of Auguste Comte as a prominent example. Thing is, as Wilhelm Dilthey counter-argued the spiritual sciences' and the natural ones' fields of interest are radically different hence requiring different methodology: The former studies the internal experiences and thoughts of humans as expressed in language (defined rather loosely here), the latter studies the external world as can be measured and weighed mathematically. There are way more subjective factors at play and to much more important degrees in the humanities, and to study them from a completely naturalistic point of view would be to miss the forest for the trees. I guess that the social sciences would be where the humanities and natural science overlap because of mathematics and statistics' importance, but the exact hows and whys are rather complicated. Within the field of economics for instance, there are several radically different models to explain and predict economic activity that nonetheless all have come under fire for (no matter which set of premises lie behind) assuming humans to act in their rational self-interest all the time. Another example would be Tom Wolfe's quite hilarious essay Sorry But Your Soul Just Died about the sociobiology fad of the late 1990s. |
||
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: January 26 2014 at 06:24 | |
"Humanism" is not "the humanities" is not "Humanitarian"
|
||
What?
|
||
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 12 2008 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 5898 |
Posted: January 26 2014 at 07:24 | |
The two are conflated in the Scandinavian languages, the thread starter being Norwegian and the OP demonstrating that quite well.
|
||
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: January 26 2014 at 11:05 | |
Not entirely sure what your question is, but I think every field of study there is valuable. If we think of scientific understanding and technological advancements a skeleton for a society, then we still need culture, history, and flourishing to fill in the muscle and I guess "soul" for lack of a better word. Advancement and understanding don't mean a whole lot to us as humans without some ideology to keep us going. I suppose it's a "design flaw".
|
||
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 13 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3834 |
Posted: January 26 2014 at 12:17 | |
I like studying Humanism, but I have a deep respect and fascination for the sciences. I'm a big fan of anything involving maths.
|
||
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg |
||
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |