Yowie |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Conor Fynes
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 11 2009 Location: Vancouver, CA Status: Offline Points: 3196 |
Topic: Yowie Posted: August 31 2013 at 04:16 |
In
all of my musical listening, I can think of few bands that have had the same
baffling effect on me as Yowie. They- perhaps moreso than any band I’ve ever
heard in the canon of rock music- take the concept of dissonance directly to
heart. It’s weird enough to challenge the foundation of what makes music good
or not; initial impressions may overwhelm the listener with the matter-of-fact,
barebones production and sporadic compositions, but the more familiar listener
might begin to notice method to the madness Yowie are pushing here. Tis’ music for
the musically adventurous indeed, and the band were kind enough to offer some
insight into this chaos. First
of all, what’s in the name Yowie? An interesting origin story, perhaps? Not really that interesting. It had to do with a
discussion about the prevalence of pseudoscientific ideas- which is a topic I
think and talk about way too much- and it was mentioned that so many different
cultures have something like a sasquatch/bigfoot/abominable snowman. The name
“yowie” was mentioned, the Australian Bigfoot, and seemed so perfect for us-
esoteric, surreal, angry. How
might you describe yourselves and your sound to someone that has never
experienced your work before? I usually say, “It’s weird stuff and you wouldn’t like
it.” I could probably work on my marketing skills. But if I don’t have some
indication that the person I’m talking to has adventurous tastes or at least an
unusually open mind, I don’t bother. Sometimes, I just say “it’s prog rock.”
But of course, that is a terrible label for us, because even thought it is
basically correct, the popular connotation with that term is Dream Theater or
Rush, which we have really no relation to; we are a different species
altogether. I could talk on and on about it, but people don’t want a
dissertation; they want at most a couple of sentences. So, I will say that we intentionally
disregard musical conventions a great deal, and so if you like conventional
music, we are not for you. We play around a lot with meter, and are highly
rhythmic as opposed to melodic, often trying to maximize the layers of
interactions that we can have at one time. Our music is about girth and
intensity; there is basically no extra room, no space in our music, we tend to
repeat very little and play to the limits of our abilities on every level we
can, with speed, with polyrhythms, with uncomfortable tones, and we pack a hell
of a punch, with often dramatic swells and crescendos…I am not sure if this is
really communicating much. I think I will just go back to saying we play weird
sh*t. There is a segment of people who are musically trained or at least
somewhat astute, and they are interested by the compositions, and then there is
a segment of people who are not so much into those things but find it
compelling on an emotional level (which I appreciate). And then there are
groups of people, astute or not, who just hate it, hate the rules we break,
whether they are aware of them or not. In Yowie
have one of the most unique and unsettling sounds I think I’ve ever heard in
rock music. How did your style come together; was it a matter of discussing
musical direction, or did it converge naturally as a result of jamming? We do not jam; it’s just not something we do. And
honestly, we never discussed musical direction much either. We started this
band and immediately began pushing ourselves, forcing ourselves to play things
that we could imagine, but could not play at all. And we started writing pieces
that became an extreme reaction, the antithesis of what we disliked in
composition. For instance, in traditional progressive rock, a lot of times
there are amazing parts that are embedded in what are honestly mediocre
compositions overall; it’s like the composers have all this ability and vision,
and they have great ideas, and they stick them in the middle of sort of boring
parts, because the good parts have to be hidden within more “accessible” (i.e.,
repetitive, simplistic, bland) compositions, or else not enough people would
listen. And so we said f**k that, let’s make songs that are almost nothing but
those parts; we want to get right to the point, to the climax, and then keep
that going, even if that makes us take years and years to write an album and
learn to play what we write. We still do that- push ourselves to the point of
absurdity, and then keep doing it until it becomes something we can pull off
consistently. And this is maybe why the previously referenced composers do what
they do; it can be exhausting to play- and to listen to- songs that are
composed of nothing but those intricately crafted parts. At least for most. Listening
to Yowie, I’m very interested as to how these compositions come together.
Although it comes across as incredibly chaotic, the common rhythmic tightness
shared between band members gives the music the impression of begin something
meticulously crafted. What’s Yowie’s songwriting process? Well if it is chaotic, it is definitely meticulously
crafted chaos, if that makes any sense. The song writing process is really hard
to describe, which is part of the reason it takes us so long to write new
material. We often start off with a barebones element, usually a basic rhythm.
And then we start to map it out, how each player will start to interact with
it. We record it, we critique it, we argue about it (a lot sometimes), and we
refine it. We don’t start off with a concept for the composition; we start off
with a riff or a rhythm, and we develop it until it has its own identity and
voice. And then we start a new one, do it again, and again, and we let the
parts start to cluster together- different ones will seem related, and we will
start to assemble them. In the process, making them work with one another, they
sometimes lose some of the character of the way we composed them, and then that
can be a process of grief and compromise and more arguing. So it’s like we make
dozens and dozens of small compositions, and then let them start to take on
their own character, and then we try to relate them to one another, by changing
and changing them again so that they start to coexist. Then we assess, record,
argue, and repeat, making the object of the scrutiny larger and larger. It is
an extremely time consuming way to do things, and in some ways horribly
inefficient, but it is what produces Yowie jams. We are notorious for not
repeating things terribly much, and that has even been taken to the point where
some of these mini-compositions don’t even make it through once. That is, we
have a riff someone loves, but due to the demands of the larger piece, not only
is it not repeated, it actually never even makes it into the song one whole
time; it’s just a sad fraction, a remnant of its former self. Our pieces are
strewn with these disappointing sacrifices and unrealized potentials (and
interpersonal conflicts). One
of the most distinctive elements of your sound is the notable absence of
effects and embellishment. Although the sounds are strange as anything, it
seems far more a result of the musicianship, rather than the sort of
post-production magic many avant-garde bands use to get their ‘weirdness’
across. What’s behind the decision to go for this ‘barebones’ sort of sound? It wasn’t a conscious decision, a part of our ethos. We
were extremely poor when we created this band and had no decent equipment, and
so fancy effects pedals or other accoutrements weren’t even an option. If we
wanted weird sounds (and we did), we needed to make them with what we had. I
was in grad school, Jeremiah worked in social services, and so did Lil Pumpkin.
We were dirt poor. Like no climate control, stealing toilet paper from public
bathrooms, house infested with brown recluses but couldn’t afford an
exterminator poor. We recorded our first album for under $400, and mixed and
mastered it ourselves, teaching ourselves to use free software along the way.
That album was done with no resources but dedication. So it wasn’t really a
decision, to utilize a barebones sound. On the other hand, we weren’t ever
saying “I wish I could afford an awesome flanger pedal,” either. One
clarification though- Lil Pumpkin did put a rubber band on his guitar on one
part in “Slowly but Surly.” So that was an effect of sorts; pretty hi-tech
sh*t. I guess then, our rule is that effects must be worth one penny or less.
And now Chris plays that part au naturale. So our effects phase is over. In the
future, no doubt countless pundits will debate which phase of Yowie’s body of
work had more merit. Pick a side. Between
“Cryptooology” and the second album “Damning With Faint Praise”, the latter
seems to be a little more hook-oriented and focused than its chaotic
predecessor. What were the differences in making these two albums; were there
different challenges you came across? This marks the first time Yowie’s music was described
as “hook -oriented,” and I am thankful that this has finally come to pass. But
earlier, we were “unsettling” and our sounds were “strange.” Maybe that’s what
I can say when someone asks us what we are like- we are a band that creates
strange, unsettling hooks. Cryptooology was extreme, no doubt. We wanted it to be harsh,
and we fully appreciated that this harshness was pushed to absurd levels, but
it was meticulously harsh. We wanted the songs to be balls out, all the time, without
concern for smoothing out edges, making things easier to consume- we wanted to
let the parts exist and flow on their own terms and found strange ways to make
them have to work with one another. But just doing that, over and over, seemed
like it would get old. So on “Damning with Faint Praise” I was very insistent
on finding a way to take the essence of what Yowie is, the odd times, the
impenetrably thick rhythms and harsh tones, but also make them flow. The idea
for me was to not lose the complexity and girth while also having a sense that,
within its own rule set, the songs flowed somewhat intuitively. And the ladies
clearly prefer Damning with Faint Praise, so I must’ve been onto something. That
is what it was really all about. This band is all about impressing the women.
They love polyrhythmic microtones. Yowie
marks one of the few times I’ve been expressly interested in terms of
equipment, particularly due to the risky ‘barebones’ approach you take to your
recordings. What equipment does the band use; are there certain brands
better-suited to this sort of music? Ha. Nope. Man, you have been saving up your gear
question all this time, so I am sorry to disappoint, but we are possibly the
least gear focused band on earth. Jeremiah doesn’t even have his own guitar or
his own amp; his head is held together with tape. He borrowed a guitar years
ago, and still plays on a cabinet that someone left in a practice space of one
of my old bands, when they tried out and never came back for it. So again, I
think the necessity of poverty is part of what drove the sound. We make the
most of what we have. I am not sure he would be able to do what he does with a
non-defective guitar though, so maybe there is something special in it. But
again, not by design. Maybe us getting a unique and coherent sound out of all
this pedestrian equipment is a testament to our ingenuity, or maybe it is just
plain dumb luck. Glad no one left a Gorilla Amp and a Series 10 in that space. I
can only imagine what your live shows would be like. What’s the live experience
with Yowie like? Any particularly notable shows? Any particularly shocked
concertgoers? You’re invited anytime. The live experience is usually
intense; we assault people with what we do. If we are playing in front of a
Yowie-naïve crowd, usually a lot of them stand there confused for the first
song or two, and then start talking amongst themselves, and then we lose a few
people to natural selection, and once the herd is sufficiently thinned, the
remaining superior specimens usually start to get excited. For this reason, we
wonder whether we should start off with our harshest material or our least
harsh. In between songs, I am usually encouraging people to dance, and even though
that may seem like I am trying to be ironic because everything is odd meter and
constantly changing, it is quite sincere. One of my favourite things in my
entire musical life is that when we finally toured Europe last year, we had
many people take us up on that. This basically does not occur in the US. Concert-goers are often kind of saying “what the f**k
is going on” but in a way that entices them to listen again. It is very common
for people to say something like, “I saw you live and I didn’t know what the
hell that was but I was curious, and so I bought the album and after the 20th
listen these songs are starting to make some sense.” And I think there is some
truth to that; it’s usually too much for people to take in during a single
sitting. I recommend to people that they listen to one song, just once, and
then wait a bit. Listen to it again later. Don’t try to devour the whole album
in one sitting; it will make most get indigestion. But back to the shows, it is very common for people to
ask us how in the hell we write our music. I wish I had a concise answer for
this, but as you have already seen, I don’t. The other thing we hear a lot is
that people want to know how we improv so well with one another- like how is it
that we all are farting around, playing unrelated parts, but then somehow stop
on a dime without looking at one another…this is something that used to really
piss me the f**k off, since we have never improvised even one note, and since
the music takes such a herculean effort to compose and pull off (and also, I
honestly can’t musically relate to anyone who might conceive of the idea that
this music is improvised)….but now my anger has been eroded by the sheer
repetition of this question, and so I usually just answer about how intuitive
we are or how the key is to smoke lots of herb, brah, or how we have known each
other for years so we have a psychic link. But yeah, there are plenty of
shocked people; some are dumbfounded, some are disgusted, some are angry, some
are blown away, some are ecstatic. We generally provoke strong reactions, be they
good or bad, which I am very glad of. It’s most commonly a mix of befuddlement
and excitement, usually. Particularly notable shows- well I was stoked to play
the Skin Graft Homecoming show recently, with Lovely Little Girls and Xaddax.
That was a blast. We loved playing with Melt Banana a year or 2 ago. We played
Gaffer Records Festival in Lyon, France with some amazing bands-particularly
Staer and Poino, and that was fantastic. And then we played with Korekyojinn on
their first ever tour in Geneva, and that was pretty damned cool. Over the
years, we have played with some truly great ones- Ahleuchatistas, Flying
Luttenbachers, Ruins, Boredoms, Hella, US Maple, Marnie Stern, Peter Brotzman,
Child Abuse, Cheer-Accident. One
thing I’ve noticed (and forgive me if I’m reading too far into it) is Yowie’s
fascination with animals as a visual motif, particularly primordial,
‘monstrous’ creatures. Disregarding the fact that Pterodactyls are objectively
more impressive than gerbils and house cats, is there an intention behind this
pairing of animalistic imagery with the music? Sure, don’t we sound like an enormous, lumbering
creature crashing through the woods and howling? Also, if you are referring to
the pterodactyl looking thing on the cover of Cryptooology, I think that is
supposed to be a chupacabra (but almost no one thinks that). That is probably
because you have not studied up on the contemporary scientific findings on
chupacabras. Really should’ve prepared more for this interview, dude. What
advice might you give to other musicians, or otherwise yet-undiscovered artists
wanting to create some good work? If you yourself don’t think your band is that great
yet, don’t tour, don’t record and try to put it out, and don’t even play shows.
Stay in your basement and keep working on it until you can be proud of what you
have and then nail it. There are way too many f**king bands on this planet; 98%
of them suck ass. Don’t be one of them. There are so many who don’t even really
believe in what they are doing but they go through the motions because that’s
what the band lifestyle is like, and that makes for a very large chance that if
someone goes out to hear a band they will hear rehashed half-assed mediocre
stuff. If you think that about your own music, keep it to yourself. There is no
shame in being halfway there- but don’t put it out there until you feel like
you are ready to nail it- performance wise and compositionally. What
lies in the future of Yowie? Another album... a tour? Yes to both. I’m very excited to be writing with Chris
Trull. None of our recorded material so far has anything with him playing or
composing on it, and playing with him adds a totally new element to the band.
So the next Yowie album will be significantly different, both in terms of
technique and overall composition. I think Chris and I are very musically
compatible (although he declined to be interviewed for this, possibly because
he secretly disagrees with everything I say); we tend to hear things the same
way and agree on what needs to be changed, which wasn’t always the case with
the old line-up. That’s part of why we seem to be writing much more quickly,
and so that’s exciting. There is a sense of momentum that is sort of
exhilarating for me. We have had to write
2 songs with minimal input from Jeremiah so far, as he lives a few hours
away and hasn’t been able to be as active (but that is changing next week),
which might have brought us to a standstill if Chris and I didn’t work well
together. We are absolutely going back to Europe; that is our main
priority after the album is complete (or maybe ever before). We had so much fun
there, and met so many truly fantastic people, who are really into music, it’s
really spoiled us. It was incredibly rewarding, and they inspired us to write
more efficiently so we can get back there more quickly. We will probably tour
the US again someday too, but there really is no comparison. We miss you, in
particular Czech Republic, France, and Italy (but lots of others). What
have you been listening to lately; anything you can recommend? Guerilla Toss, Normal Love, Die Antwoord, Ni, Poil,
Staer, Mary Havorlson, Loincloth, Gigan, Bad Plus. Do
you like cheeseburgers? Yes but only half as much as double cheeseburgers. Words
of wisdom for a rainy day? Nope. Yowie's PA profile may be found here. |
|
MusicForSpeedin
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 22 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 613 |
Posted: September 06 2013 at 11:41 |
such a good band
|
|
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 12 2008 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 5898 |
Posted: September 09 2013 at 08:53 |
Cryptozoology-themed avant-prog? Sign me up, please.
|
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
|
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |