Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:00 |
 what?
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:11 |
smartpatrol wrote:
what? |
Exactly.
|
What?
|
 |
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:15 |
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:16 |
Wait, I think I get it! Oh, you Brits and your clever and confusing Englishness.
Are you wondering what I have wrong with socialism?
Edited by smartpatrol - November 07 2012 at 13:16
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:19 |
smartpatrol wrote:
Wait, I think I get it! Oh, you Brits and your clever and confusing Englishness.
Are you wondering what I have wrong with socialism?
|
Not at all.
|
What?
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:22 |
uggggh I'm confused
|
 |
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:23 |
Since Dean is being purposely opaque, I will explain that he was questioning why you think four more years of Obama would result in socialism. Since he is from an actual socialist country, he doesn't understand the contention that Obama hates capitalism and wants to see it destroyed.
Edited by thellama73 - November 07 2012 at 13:23
|
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:25 |
Well, Obama, being a socialist, wants to implement more and more socialism, and although I think socialism has it's place, I don't think it will help our country economically at this point.
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:28 |
smartpatrol wrote:
manofmystery wrote:
Barack Obama Wins a Second Term. Now What? |
4 years of civil liberties ( ), socialism ( ), and bad foreign policy ( ).
|
Everybody, can we all collectively laugh at this post?
(And since we are now OFFICIALLY a socialist country because Barack HUSSEIN Obama was re-elected, I meant "collectively" as literally and historically as possible).
Edited by stonebeard - November 07 2012 at 13:30
|
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:31 |
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy
|
 |
Icarium
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34086
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:35 |
I am a socialist,  ,
|
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:35 |
smartpatrol wrote:
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy
|
More so than I do, but not as much as Congress, not as much as the Federal Reserve, not as much as global stock markets, and so on. So actually, not really that much when you account for things that do affect the economy as their sole purpose of existing, day in and day out.
|
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:37 |
smartpatrol wrote:
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy |
And... ?
...what has President Barack Obama done, or ever will do that is socialist, and in what way is he socialist?
Edited by Dean - November 07 2012 at 13:37
|
What?
|
 |
King of Loss
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16916
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:39 |
Obama is not a socialist, not even a social democrat, he's a liberal corporatist of sorts, not exactly a socialist.
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 13:41 |
stonebeard wrote:
smartpatrol wrote:
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy
|
More so than I do, but not as much as Congress, not as much as the Federal Reserve, not as much as global stock markets, and so on. So actually, not really that much when you account for things that do affect the economy as their sole purpose of existing, day in and day out. |
Yeah, but he also has a significant influence on who gets in Congress, too.
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 14:24 |
smartpatrol wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
smartpatrol wrote:
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy
|
More so than I do, but not as much as Congress, not as much as the Federal Reserve, not as much as global stock markets, and so on. So actually, not really that much when you account for things that do affect the economy as their sole purpose of existing, day in and day out. |
Yeah, but he also has a significant influence on who gets in Congress, too.
|
How so? I suppose he could endorse candidates, but the Senate somewhat and the House especially are much more tumultuous races and there more of a community connection, and given that 50% of the country vehemently opposes Obama, his endorsement would likely not be accepted well, especially in battleground states.
Now if you're talking about the Democratic party and how their efforts fund campaigns, then that is very different.
The claim the the president influences who gets in Congress is tenuous at best.
|
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 14:45 |
Dean wrote:
smartpatrol wrote:
I'm not saying we're officially a socialist country, but the president has quite an influence on the economy |
And... ?
...what has President Barack Obama done, or ever will do that is socialist, and in what way is he socialist? |
Well, you know "socialist" sounds bad and is typically thrown around by demagogues in this country...
It is rarely understood by those who wield it as a slur.
|
 |
Gamemako
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1184
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 15:17 |
*yawn*
Barack is no socialist. Deliberate mischaracterization benefits no-one. What we really need to say is this: Barack Obama is your average liberal. He represents run-of-the-mill American Liberal views. He's far from the extreme, but he's also not a centrist. As a president, he spends a lot of time trying to build bridges with the Right, who have rolled right off the deep end and want nothing to do with him. The Right is, quite simply, a problem. There's no way around it. They've gone to such extremes that they've already begun eating their own. That is not a sustainable course. The Right cannot afford to fragment while the Left is still a unified coalition. If the Democrats were having a huge identity crisis as well, we'd already be talking about the formation of new parties, but that isn't happening. The next four years in the Republican party are going to be about working out their issues with themselves.
|
Hail Eris!
|
 |
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 15:52 |
I voted neither for the President nor for Mitt Romney. But the good things about the reelection are:
1. The media can't look at a Romney presidency and say "Well, we tried free market principles, and they didn't work."
2. No more blaming Bush. Time to stand on your own policies and record, Bar-bar. 
|
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: November 07 2012 at 16:05 |
King of Loss wrote:
Obama is not a socialist, not even a social democrat, he's a liberal corporatist of sorts, not exactly a socialist. |
I'd say Obama is more of a fascist but that's splitting authoritarian-label hairs.
Gamemako wrote:
... the Right, who have rolled right off the deep end and want nothing to do with him. The Right is, quite simply, a problem. There's no way around it. They've gone to such extremes that they've already begun eating their own. ... |
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.