Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 17:56 |
I have traveled to Europe a few times and nothing I've seen has made me think any less of America. The opposite, actually. (Not trying to put down Europe. It's lovely, but I like my own country better.)
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 18:37 |
thellama73 wrote:
I have traveled to Europe a few times and nothing I've seen has made me think any less of America. The opposite, actually. (Not trying to put down Europe. It's lovely, but I like my own country better.) |
Seen one MacDonalds/Starbucks/Walmart you've seen them all, but it's always easier when you can understand the menu and the ¢urren¢y eh?.
I've been offered employment positions in the USA and turned them down - an okay place to visit (briefly) but I really don't want to live there. Most of us really are content in our native countries,
|
What?
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 18:39 |
I have traveled to Europe twice (having a sister that lives there helps make it quite more afffordable). I love Germany and its culture. I love Switzerland. I think France is pretty, as are other countries in the continent. I love many things about those countries, especifically the first two. I would love if, in a cultural (artistic, better said) sense, the US would be closer to Germany; I'd love if other cultural aspects in general would be more similar. But I wouldn't like to make the US a copy of Europe. What makes the US what it is, and so attractive to millions living outside of it, especially in less developed countries, is unique to it. America is great, and of course could be better. Europe is far from perfect. Far far far from it.
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65513
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 18:42 |
Dean wrote:
I've been offered employment positions in the USA and turned them down - an okay place to visit (briefly) but I really don't want to live there. Most of us really are content in our native countries, |
No I'd move to England, it reminds me of my favorite place: the US Pacific Northwest.
|
|
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 18:44 |
I like western Pennsylvania.
|
Time always wins.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 18:50 |
manofmystery wrote:
I like western Pennsylvania. | I would never move to Pennsylvania. Your alcohol laws terrify me.
|
|
|
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 19:00 |
They are insane. Makes me glad I don't drink.
|
Time always wins.
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 19:23 |
Dean wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
I have traveled to Europe a few times and nothing I've seen has made me think any less of America. The opposite, actually. (Not trying to put down Europe. It's lovely, but I like my own country better.) |
Seen one MacDonalds/Starbucks/Walmart you've seen them all, but it's always easier when you can understand the menu and the ¢urren¢y eh?.
I've been offered employment positions in the USA and turned them down - an okay place to visit (briefly) but I really don't want to live there. Most of us really are content in our native countries, |
I'll have you know, good sir, that I always make a point of learning at least enough to get by of the language of any country I visit. It's just good manners, I think. Also, I would move to England as well because I really like it. Especially if this country continues to elect presidents like Obama.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 20:02 |
thellama73 wrote:
Dean wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
I have traveled to Europe a few times and nothing I've seen has made me think any less of America. The opposite, actually. (Not trying to put down Europe. It's lovely, but I like my own country better.) |
Seen one MacDonalds/Starbucks/Walmart you've seen them all, but it's always easier when you can understand the menu and the ¢urren¢y eh?.
I've been offered employment positions in the USA and turned them down - an okay place to visit (briefly) but I really don't want to live there. Most of us really are content in our native countries, |
I'll have you know, good sir, that I always make a point of learning at least enough to get by of the language of any country I visit. It's just good manners, I think.
Also, I would move to England as well because I really like it. Especially if this country continues to elect presidents like Obama.
| See, that's why I am not really critical of England's laws. That people here use the NHS for evidence the US should adopt such a thing moves me none. Ditto gun laws. The English are a different culture from us. What works for them, let them have it. It'll be useless here.
But we have a Constitution, and that should direct or dismiss any laws Congress puts up. Unfortunately, we have lawmakers who are ignorant of the Constitution.
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 20:42 |
thellama73 wrote:
Dean wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
I have traveled to Europe a few times and nothing I've seen has made me think any less of America. The opposite, actually. (Not trying to put down Europe. It's lovely, but I like my own country better.) |
Seen one MacDonalds/Starbucks/Walmart you've seen them all, but it's always easier when you can understand the menu and the ¢urren¢y eh?.
I've been offered employment positions in the USA and turned them down - an okay place to visit (briefly) but I really don't want to live there. Most of us really are content in our native countries, |
I'll have you know, good sir, that I always make a point of learning at least enough to get by of the language of any country I visit. It's just good manners, I think. |
So do I. Especially in English speaking countries like the USA and Scotland, if only for expediency and avoiding any embarrassing misunderstandings.
thellama73 wrote:
Also, I would move to England as well because I really like it. Especially if this country continues to elect presidents like Obama.
|
Our Prime Ministers past and present (Blair, Brown and Call-me-Dave and his glove-puppet Clegg) like Obama. Our Conservatives are closer to your Democrats than they are to your Republicans.
Epignosis wrote:
See, that's why I am not really critical of England's laws. That people here use the NHS for evidence the US should adopt such a thing moves me none. Ditto gun laws. The English are a different culture from us. What works for them, let them have it. It'll be useless here. |
It's not just Britain's culture, it's the whole of Europe's culture (and many other parts of the world) that provides national healthcare and enforces strict gun laws. It not only works for us, it works for them too.
Epignosis wrote:
But we have a Constitution, and that should direct or dismiss any laws Congress puts up. Unfortunately, we have lawmakers who are ignorant of the Constitution.
|
Isn't that what your supreme court is supposed to do under judicial review?
While I suport the general principle of our constitution (Magna Carta etc. etc) I'm not so sure that a 800 year old document is capable of dealing with every situation that the 21st Century can throw up.
|
What?
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 20:50 |
Dean wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Also, I would move to England as well because I really like it. Especially if this country continues to elect presidents like Obama.
|
Our Prime Ministers past and present (Blair, Brown and Call-me-Dave and his glove-puppet Clegg) like Obama. Our Conservatives are closer to your Democrats than they are to your Republicans. |
I'm aware of that. I'm just saying that I like a lot of things about England and if our politicians start to become similar to yours, then there's no reason why I wouldn't enjoy living there.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 20:55 |
Epignosis wrote:
But we have a Constitution, and that should direct or dismiss any laws Congress puts up. Unfortunately, we have lawmakers who are ignorant of the Constitution.
|
Dean wrote:
Isn't that what your supreme court is supposed to do under judicial review?
While I suport the general principle of our constitution (Magna Carta etc. etc) I'm not so sure that a 800 year old document is capable of dealing with every situation that the 21st Century can throw up. | Our Supreme Court is crafted by the two other branches of government, which makes it a conflict of interest, does it not?
As for whether or not a document is capable of dealing with new situations, the solution is quite simple: Amend it. We've amended ours about two dozen times. But my opinion is this: While it stands, that is the law of the land and should not be breached.
All this said, I'm sure I would have been a bootlegger in 1921, so accuse me of hypocrisy this one time if you must.
Edited by Epignosis - September 07 2012 at 20:56
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 07 2012 at 20:57 |
Logan, I responded to you in The Christian Thread if you wanted to respond yourself. Didn't know if you saw it.
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 05:23 |
I'm not so sure that size or ethnic diversity plays that big a role, though if you think that the reason we have strict gun control is because we are less multicultural or you need unrestricted access to small arms because you are more multicultural then that's the poorest argument I've ever read on the issue. The USA is a large land mass with a proportionally smaller overall population density than Europe. Europe is 50 countries covering more or less the same land area as the USA with 2.3 times the population, but if you looked at urban population densities I would imagine they are comparable and some EU member states have lower population densities than the USA. It seems to me that neither healthcare nor gun control are limited by population or multiculturalism.
However, the European "model" does seem to be what Libertarians are aiming for - smaller Federal Government along the lines of our European Parliament and giving individual States more responsibility for managing themselves along the lines of our individual national governments. Obviously that system will not be immune from States getting into financial difficulties like Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain but knowing that it can go tits-up means you should be able to plan contingency measures.
Epignosis wrote:
Except the Hellenic Republic. I don't think it is working there.
|
The problem there perhaps is that it's working too well, their universal healthcare is one of the best in the World and it costs them less as a percentage of GDP than many European nations (and considerably less than the USA). As it is financed by National Insurance rather than income tax it is not something that the average Greek can avoid paying. I'm not fully conversant with their economic problems (I'm not sure any one is), but healthcare and strict gun control do not appear to be the root or contributary cause.
Epignosis wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
But we have a Constitution, and that should direct or dismiss any laws Congress puts up. Unfortunately, we have lawmakers who are ignorant of the Constitution.
|
Dean wrote:
Isn't that what your supreme court is supposed to do under judicial review?
While I suport the general principle of our constitution (Magna Carta etc. etc) I'm not so sure that a 800 year old document is capable of dealing with every situation that the 21st Century can throw up. |
Our Supreme Court is crafted by the two other branches of government, which makes it a conflict of interest, does it not?
As for whether or not a document is capable of dealing with new situations, the solution is quite simple: Amend it. We've amended ours about two dozen times. But my opinion is this: While it stands, that is the law of the land and should not be breached.
All this said, I'm sure I would have been a bootlegger in 1921, so accuse me of hypocrisy this one time if you must.
|
As I understand it yours is not one single legal system but a mix of constitutional, statutory and common law with the latter two being equally as "legal" as long as they do not contravene provisions in constitutional law. As an outsider (with only curiosity interest) it does appear to work adequately though occasionally the Constitution is an excuse to complain about statute laws that some people don't like very much (less so common law).
Edited by Dean - September 08 2012 at 05:25
|
What?
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 08:14 |
manofmystery wrote:
I like western Pennsylvania. |
I've read sovietic things about PA.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 11:02 |
Dean wrote:
I'm not so sure that size or ethnic diversity plays that big a role, though if you think that the reason we have strict gun control is because we are less multicultural or you need unrestricted access to small arms because you are more multicultural then that's the poorest argument I've ever read on the issue. The USA is a large land mass with a proportionally smaller overall population density than Europe. Europe is 50 countries covering more or less the same land area as the USA with 2.3 times the population, but if you looked at urban population densities I would imagine they are comparable and some EU member states have lower population densities than the USA. It seems to me that neither healthcare nor gun control are limited by population or multiculturalism.
|
Violence has been a tangent of my career. In
this county, we have a (pathetic) feud between blacks and American
Indians. In Florida, the thuggery was more organized and
sophisticated. Our neighborhood here is rife with break-ins. The police even advise residents to arm themselves.
(The blacks that fight the Indians call themselves the S.O.D. I wish I could sit them
all down an explain what a sod is.)
Then again, wasn't what happened in Norway culturally motivated?
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 11:38 |
But in the US all these cultures have to coexist under a single system. In Europe, yes, if you at it as the European Union, of course you have multiculturalism rampant. But when you look countries just as countries (which is how they operate in many levels) you see more homogeneous results. Yes, there is multiculturalism in Spain, Switzerland, etc, but even there you see a sort of territorial division on pair to the cultural one (current waves of migration notwithstanding). The two world wars had a lot to owe to ethnic chaos and their results are basically territories more or less homogeneous (more or less). In the US things are different. You are trying to apply a big gigantic government to a fully heterogeneous population. It's different from the European Union, a somewhat economical but never cultural union really. Or am I terribly wrong? (as always)
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 11:39 |
Epignosis wrote:
See, that's why I am not really critical of England's laws. That people here use the NHS for evidence the US should adopt such a thing moves me none. Ditto gun laws. The English are a different culture from us. What works for them, let them have it. It'll be useless here.
But we have a Constitution, and that should direct or dismiss any laws Congress puts up. Unfortunately, we have lawmakers who are ignorant of the Constitution.
|
While i agree different things work for different cultures and not others, this opinion seems remarkable to me. I've gathered all of you regular libertarians here hold that ideology to be the best way to conduct government (which is to say, in the extreme, not really have one). And a lot of that is built off the ethical notion of not being coerced into taxation. True the US is different from England, but if this argument is made for Americans as being the ultimate political philosophy, English are not different enough that it should not apply to them. In fact, why should there be an exception for any country or people? All should apparently be striving for libertarianism, based on the inherent goodness of it's foundation: liberty.
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 11:41 |
Epignosis wrote:
Violence has been a tangent of my career. In this county, we have a (pathetic) feud between blacks and American Indians. In Florida, the thuggery was more organized and sophisticated. Our neighborhood here is rife with break-ins. The police even advise residents to arm themselves.
(The blacks that fight the Indians call themselves the S.O.D. I wish I could sit them all down an explain what a sod is.)
Then again, wasn't what happened in Norway culturally motivated?
|
Right, so nowhere is immune from racially motivated hate crime. Nowhere is immune from any crime. That changes nothing. I'm making no claims of cause and effect, just making the observation that what works for us is not limited by any of the justifications you've presented - we are not so different in terms of multiculturalism, urban population density or total land area, we're not that different culturally, socially or economically, the difference is gun control and gun violence. The question then is not whether gun control does or can work, but what causes the marked difference in gun related violence statistics when we're not so different.
|
What?
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
|
Posted: September 08 2012 at 11:45 |
Dean wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Violence has been a tangent of my career. In this county, we have a (pathetic) feud between blacks and American Indians. In Florida, the thuggery was more organized and sophisticated. Our neighborhood here is rife with break-ins. The police even advise residents to arm themselves.
(The blacks that fight the Indians call themselves the S.O.D. I wish I could sit them all down an explain what a sod is.)
Then again, wasn't what happened in Norway culturally motivated?
|
Right, so nowhere is immune from racially motivated hate crime. Nowhere is immune from any crime. That changes nothing. I'm making no claims of cause and effect, just making the observation that what works for us is not limited by any of the justifications you've presented - we are not so different in terms of multiculturalism, urban population density or total land area, we're not that different culturally, socially or economically, the difference is gun control and gun violence. The question then is not whether gun control does or can work, but what causes the marked difference in gun related violence statistics when we're not so different. |
What is the rate of youth getting in trouble in your schools?
|
|
|