Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
The Stygian Heresy
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 26 2009
Location: Rocklin, Ca US
Status: Offline
Points: 37
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 11:24 |
I'll readily admit that I don't do growling, or anything close to it. The first time I heard it, it was amusing, even novel; but for an entire genre and it's spinoffs to still think gargling gravel is way cool, it is way not. I'm tempted to say, "Grow up." But that's not it. It's like having fuzz on your stylus (records...vinyl, ya know...hello?), in which only the vocalist is thus afflicted; but the other instruments come through with clarity. There's an inconsistency in that inconsonance, and the melodicism suffers. It's why I haven't played any of the good Mr. Doctor's Devil Doll LPs in years; it's why I hesitate to spin another Opeth disc. At the expense of sounding old, the death growl is clowning and I expect singers thus sonically accoutered to wear big shoes, sport bright wigs and act like they're in an audition for Killer Klowns From Outer Space. But that at least had the sense to be artistic: their corn was cool. Phlegm-spitters posing as singers, are not.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 11:36 |
^^^ Consider that deathgrowls are not usually accompanied by melodic music. Even the actual music in extreme metal, which uses this technique the most, is hardly consonant. It is usually a harsh, dissonant wall of distortion, the exact settings where growls work best. The beauty-and-the-beast approach used in some symphonic metal like Epica doesn't work for my tastes, it's a bit distracting. I can handle the switch from clean to growled vocals, but I feel the music should overall remain at least somewhat dissonant to make the transition seamless. When highly consonant sections are followed by a sudden battery of distortion and growls, it breaks the rhythm.
|
|
The Stygian Heresy
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 26 2009
Location: Rocklin, Ca US
Status: Offline
Points: 37
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 13:24 |
In earlier days of such vocal unintelligibility, melodicism was, absolutely, shunned, late 80s, early 90s. But I thought about the fact that a lot of those death metal bands evolved in the guitar and production departments, so you get neat, clean, technicalities wrought from the guitars, far more clearly than previously, and there's...stuff, amidst the glop, that wants to be evolved, to be progressive in its rocking--and many magazine reviewers have tried to put them out as such. Yet, in contrast, those vocals are now up against much less dissonance than in years past (generally--and the death metal that wants to remain ever raw and underproduced, I hope never to hear again). I agree with you on the distraction in Epica, same as the Opeth problem for me. I don't think I could ever find a transition from the melodious to the harsh seamless even given some distorted grinding in the mix, but your point is well-made. If a band wants to present pretties followed by a rockfall, it's like a poem where the fourth line never rhymes, when it easily could've, and we all know it should've.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 13:50 |
^ what? 4th line rhymes are the stuff of angst-ridden teenage bedrooms and smutty limericks - just because you can doesn't mean you should.
|
What?
|
|
theadolescentprogger
Forum Groupie
Joined: March 23 2012
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 88
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 15:28 |
Clean, any day of the week.
|
|
Ambient Hurricanes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 16:45 |
theadolescentprogger wrote:
Clean, any day of the week. |
Sunday: clean Monday: growls Tuesday: gritty vocals Wednesday: screams Thursday: falsetto Friday: rapping Saturday: auto-tune
|
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 16:46 |
I like something in between the best.
(or between the breast)
Edited by Snow Dog - August 11 2012 at 16:48
|
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 21:10 |
The Stygian Heresy wrote:
In earlier days of such vocal unintelligibility, melodicism was, absolutely, shunned, late 80s, early 90s. But I thought about the fact that a lot of those death metal bands evolved in the guitar and production departments, so you get neat, clean, technicalities wrought from the guitars, far more clearly than previously, and there's...stuff, amidst the glop, that wants to be evolved, to be progressive in its rocking--and many magazine reviewers have tried to put them out as such. |
Very good points. Somewhere along the line, death metal became this uber technical olympic quest and the gore and grime which was at its core in the late 80s and early 90s was watered down. I hardly listen to death metal or any extreme metal for that matter anymore because their priorities have changed too much for me. I wanted to hear fury and madness, not a gigantic showboat fest with some 'growls' to make it sound more 'manly' than their power metal counterparts like Dragonforce. Speaking of which, in prog (pre-metal), growls or some technique that resembled them at any rate, were used in very dark music like Magma or Univers Zero.
P.S: I can see that you seem to consider the improved production values a plus point, which is basically the exact opposite of my view, but I agree with the point that it's much less dissonant or harsh than before.
Edited by rogerthat - August 11 2012 at 21:12
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 21:23 |
^I'm not exactly sure to understand these previous posts, but, for some reason, I have the feeling that these two opinions about the evolution of death metal are wrong.
But I can be wrong.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: August 11 2012 at 23:19 |
^^^^ Elaborate? That death metal has become more technical and polished is less of a subjective opinion and more of an objective observation. Whether it is a good or a bad thing is entirely up to your taste...and I don't think I was talking about anything other than my taste, so there's no question of my being right or wrong about it.
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: August 12 2012 at 06:47 |
rogerthat wrote:
^^^^ Elaborate? That death metal has become more technical and polished is less of a subjective opinion and more of an objective observation. Whether it is a good or a bad thing is entirely up to your taste...and I don't think I was talking about anything other than my taste, so there's no question of my being right or wrong about it.
|
Ah, okay. Now, I understand what you meant. But if I can agree that the genre has globally shown an evolution towards technical achievements, I'm not sure about the "polished" side: it can be true for established bands such as Death, Carcass, maybe Morbid Angel or Nile, but the persistence of the "Brutal Death Metal" tag on some new coming bands lead me to think that things are a little bit more complicated.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: August 12 2012 at 06:53 |
CPicard wrote:
But if I can agree that the genre has globally shown an evolution towards technical achievements, I'm not sure about the "polished" side: it can be true for established bands such as Death, Carcass, maybe Morbid Angel or Nile, but the persistence of the "Brutal Death Metal" tag on some new coming bands lead me to think that things are a little bit more complicated.
|
I mean polished from the perspective of production values, not melody or distortion proportions. BDM is as brutal as in its early days but the way it is produced is much more precise and polished. I can't personally relate to death metal produced like that. I loved the dirty, raw sound on Carcass or Cannibal Corpse albums. If I had to listen to something 'well produced' that is also fast and technical, I would much rather fusion which is more harmonically interesting by and large.
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: August 12 2012 at 07:14 |
Ah, okay, "polished production". Oh yeah, I totally agree: nowadays, musicians and sound engineers know how they want the records to sound and how to make them sound the right way. I like the songs on Napalm Death's "Harmony Corruption", but the production is a shame!
|
|
Terra Australis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 03 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 809
|
Posted: August 17 2012 at 07:58 |
Growling is ok if it lifts the emotion at an appropriate time and for a particular effect. Prefer cleans powerful vocals generally.
|
|
|
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7849
|
Posted: August 17 2012 at 09:39 |
Clean!!
Death growl does nothing for me. It just sounds like one long ugly burp into a microphone, although Mikael Akerfelt (Opeth) and Max Cavalera (Soulfly) do a pretty good job. I like them both. I have to be honest I'd rather hear octave 8 coming out of James LaBrie and Freddy Mercury. The grace behind their voices with the powerful music that is with them, my vote is for clean!!
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
|
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: August 17 2012 at 10:26 |
Kate Bush had both on The Dreaming ! so she may have pioneered in cookie monster growls ?
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: August 17 2012 at 12:05 |
lucas wrote:
Kate Bush had both on The Dreaming ! so she may have pioneered in cookie monster growls ? | Wrong, my young friend! Mike Oldfield did it 10 years before, with his famous "Piltdown Man" vocals on the second part of Tubular Bells. By the way, had anyone managed to decipher what he's singing? I only understand something like "Shodonowa dowanogo"...
|
|
Prog Sothoth
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 03 2011
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Points: 1940
|
Posted: August 18 2012 at 06:24 |
Generally I like growls and screeches if they're ferocious and fit with the music (Immolation, Fen), but I also really dig clean female singing in metal regardless of tone (as long as she's got talent), whether it's Madder Mortem, Edenbridge or Krypteria. At the same time, I'm not big on combining the two as much for that 'Beauty and the Beast' effect. I don't mind some of it, but the contrast comes across as silly sounding much of the time.
Edited by Prog Sothoth - August 18 2012 at 06:24
|
|
Sympathy Orchestra
Forum Newbie
Joined: August 02 2012
Location: Detroit
Status: Offline
Points: 25
|
Posted: August 18 2012 at 10:38 |
I can't stand the cookie monster vocals at all. I love Opeth's Damnation, but I can't listen to Blackwater Park etc. The music is fantastic, but the vocals just ruin it for me.
|
www.thesympathyorchestra.com
|
|
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator
Errors & Omissions Team
Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7861
|
Posted: August 18 2012 at 11:46 |
I think future belongs to growls. Who wants to spend best years of their lives for studying singing? It's too boring. Growl, fart and roll - and the whole world's at your feet.
|
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.