Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "Freedom" thread or something
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed"Freedom" thread or something

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5657585960 294>
Author
Message
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2012 at 23:19
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Let's put this in a purely economic setting.  Let's say you have 10 sellers in an area of bread.  Each of those sellers have different prices, offer different types of bread and everyone in town, through one store or another (although not all options may be available to them) can buy bread.  Now lets say one of two things happen.  Either one of the sellers of bread buys out all the others, or the 10 sellers get together to collude on price, product and who they will sell to.  They will exclude certain people from being able to buy bread at all, they will from now on only sell white wonder bread, and they will charge $15 a loaf on that bread.  Suddenly, people no longer have any choices as to what kind of bread they will buy, how much they will pay for it, and some will even lose the right to buy bread at all.  This is called a monopoly or oligopoly, I'm sure you know the term.  How does this not reduce the freedom of everyone in that town, with the exception of the bread sellers?  I'm afraid to some degree freedom is a zero sum game.  The more freedom you give to one group (in this case the bread sellers), the less another group (the bread buyers) has.  There is a balance there somewhere.  And that balance is not to give all the freedom to the sellers of bread for then you are limiting the freedom of everyone else.

The above should read:  10 sellers of bread in an area.  No the area is not made of bread. Tongue


But in your scenario, I just won't eat bread.  What is so f**king hard about that?

Your problem, Chester, is that all your models assume there is one product and one buyer.  That is never the case.  We have multiple buyers and multiple products.  Try again.




Oh wow.  You are so right.  How could I have been so blind?  You've convinced me Robert.  Thank you, oh thank you for showing me the only true and correct way to think.  I can now not wait to let corporate america have complete and total control over my life.  As long as we call it freedom. 


Edited by The Doctor - August 04 2012 at 23:20
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 04:59
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Let's put this in a purely economic setting.  Let's say you have 10 sellers in an area of bread.  Each of those sellers have different prices, offer different types of bread and everyone in town, through one store or another (although not all options may be available to them) can buy bread.  Now lets say one of two things happen.  Either one of the sellers of bread buys out all the others, or the 10 sellers get together to collude on price, product and who they will sell to.  They will exclude certain people from being able to buy bread at all, they will from now on only sell white wonder bread, and they will charge $15 a loaf on that bread.  Suddenly, people no longer have any choices as to what kind of bread they will buy, how much they will pay for it, and some will even lose the right to buy bread at all.  This is called a monopoly or oligopoly, I'm sure you know the term.  How does this not reduce the freedom of everyone in that town, with the exception of the bread sellers?  I'm afraid to some degree freedom is a zero sum game.  The more freedom you give to one group (in this case the bread sellers), the less another group (the bread buyers) has.  There is a balance there somewhere.  And that balance is not to give all the freedom to the sellers of bread for then you are limiting the freedom of everyone else.

The above should read:  10 sellers of bread in an area.  No the area is not made of bread. Tongue


But in your scenario, I just won't eat bread.  What is so f**king hard about that?

Your problem, Chester, is that all your models assume there is one product and one buyer.  That is never the case.  We have multiple buyers and multiple products.  Try again.




Oh wow.  You are so right.  How could I have been so blind?  You've convinced me Robert.  Thank you, oh thank you for showing me the only true and correct way to think.  I can now not wait to let corporate america have complete and total control over my life.  As long as we call it freedom. 
 
Yes, I do hope you have learnt your lesson well.  Next time you try something silly like using a model to put across a point make sure you make it realistic.  You should realise by now that producers are only interested in happy customers and that all the imperfections in the market are due to Government getting in the way of corporations stated aims of keeping us all in that happy state.
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 05:01

Oh and we can all eat brioche (Thanks Lemming LOL )

Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 07:15
Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:

Oh and we can all eat brioche (Thanks Lemming LOL )



Or lompeLOL
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 09:00
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:

Oh and we can all eat brioche (Thanks Lemming LOL )



Or lompeLOL
 
True But what kind of society is it that would force that on us?  Unhappy
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 11:04


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 13:26
That's because it's a Ponzi scheme, you nitwits. 

"Social Security is what's carrying me," said Neta Homier, a 79-year-old retired hospital worker from Toledo, Ohio. "There's no way I would have made it without it. The kids, they're on their own, now, and I'm not going to be a burden for them. That's what it would have been if I hadn't had Social Security."

Homier said she started receiving Social Security when she was 63 and now gets about $800 a month, after her Medicare premiums are deducted. She said her father died at 51, so he never received Social Security, and her mother died at 71 and collected benefits for only a few years.

"It's definitely worth it," she said.


What?  Confused


Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16805
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 19:09
^ Has anyone wondered where some of their social security money goes to? Wacko
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 19:27
Originally posted by King of Loss King of Loss wrote:

^ Has anyone wondered where some of their social security money goes to? Wacko


Congress takes it.

Even George W. Bush said so.

“A lot of people in America think there is a trust — that we take your money in payroll taxes and then we hold it for you and then when you retire, we give it back to you,” Bush said in a speech at the University of West Virginia at Parkersburg.

“But that’s not the way it works,” Bush said. “There is no trust ‘fund’ — just IOUs that I saw firsthand,” Bush said.


Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16805
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 19:59
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by King of Loss King of Loss wrote:

^ Has anyone wondered where some of their social security money goes to? Wacko


Congress takes it.

Even George W. Bush said so.

“A lot of people in America think there is a trust — that we take your money in payroll taxes and then we hold it for you and then when you retire, we give it back to you,” Bush said in a speech at the University of West Virginia at Parkersburg.

“But that’s not the way it works,” Bush said. “There is no trust ‘fund’ — just IOUs that I saw firsthand,” Bush said.



Typical uneducated masses. Many would prefer to live in cages if they were given enough bananas!Angry
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:07
The bombing of Hiroshima had its anniversary yesterday. It chills me that the event occurred and that I once supported it. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:11
Even worse, no mention of it anywhere in the media as an event worthy of remembrance for all the bad reasons. In fact, even I, a lover of history, totally forgot about it. Two days to Nagasaki.

At least I can say even in my most ridiculous times in terms of world view (and I have had quite a few), I never supported the quickest mass murder in history.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:13

Then let's remember Nagasaki 9th August 1945 as the last city ever to experience a nuclear attack.

What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:16
I hope so. Some people in the middle east and some idiot neo-cons around these areas might not want to agree with that "last" part.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:17
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Then let's remember Nagasaki 9th August 1945 as the last city ever to experience a nuclear attack.



Agreed. Hopefully this statement remains true.



Hiroshima before and after


"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:20
It's sad that none ever mentions Dresden as another example of mass murder.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:21
Because schools spent more time trying to ban Slaughterhouse V for its lewd scenes rather than digesting some of its message. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:28
Damn I have to confess some ignorance so I had to google more about that book

Edited by The T - August 07 2012 at 10:29
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:34
You've never read it Cry

I thought we were friends.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2012 at 10:44
Well, it's not a problem that can't be fixed.

Though first I have been forced to read all I can about the Peruvian Nazi Party of the other thread...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5657585960 294>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.695 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.