Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - list/discuss/rate - your recently watched movies
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

list/discuss/rate - your recently watched movies

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 979899100101 220>
Author
Message
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2012 at 15:23
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

A fitting ending that is not perfect but is perfectly enjoayble and provides perfect entertainment. 

How do these not constitute "perfect"?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65513
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2012 at 20:43
I remember Saturn 3, it was a sort of Alien ripoff

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Epignosis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 22:16
All right, we watched Inception for $1.99.  Thank God it was only $1.99.

What a predictable, train-wreck of a movie.  I like DiCaprio and Paige and Watanabe, but all of them were flat.

The plot was morally objectionable: Why is anyone rooting for the main characters here?  I was hoping they would fail. 

Oh how I wanted to like Inception.  But boo.  It is merely an excuse to use special effects whilst trying to be philosophical.  Boo.
Back to Top
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 00:09
^ That's what I thought. There are things that look cool (hence an Oscar or two), but other than that ... I don't get it. I like the landscapes, though. And I found the movie pretty intense.

Edited by Dayvenkirq - July 26 2012 at 00:13
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Quiet One Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 14:35
Coffee and Cigarretes by Jim Jarmusch

Incredible! Loved it, the black & white, the dialogues, the jokes, the different themes, the simplicity of it all. Excellent work.


Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65513
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 00:02
The Green Berets

One of the most blatant and outrageous pieces of propaganda to ever emerge from Hollywood, John Wayne's version of the Vietnam War is bizarre and shockingly dishonest as he and his special forces invade South Vietnam.  The attempt to mislead the audience and stir up support for one of the most insidious military actions in history is enough to make this relic from 1968 worth watching.

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 00:05
^I haven't yet seen that one but I just bought a bluray containing both the movie and The Searchers. Talk about a masterpiece paired with a mastersh*t . I have to see it. Its reputation demands it.
Back to Top
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 02:44
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

The Green Berets

One of the most blatant and outrageous pieces of propaganda to ever emerge from Hollywood, John Wayne's version of the Vietnam War is bizarre and shockingly dishonest as he and his special forces invade South Vietnam.  The attempt to mislead the audience and stir up support for one of the most insidious military actions in history is enough to make this relic from 1968 worth watching.


These hints sound like a reason NOT to watch it.
Back to Top
GaryB View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 451
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GaryB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 09:14
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

The Green Berets

One of the most blatant and outrageous pieces of propaganda to ever emerge from Hollywood, John Wayne's version of the Vietnam War is bizarre and shockingly dishonest as he and his special forces invade South Vietnam.  The attempt to mislead the audience and stir up support for one of the most insidious military actions in history is enough to make this relic from 1968 worth watching.

Using movies as propaganda is nothing new. Early on in WWII the government sent a man to Hollywood to oversee the making of "war movies". He told the studios how Washington wanted these movie to be made and how the American fighting men were to be portrayed.
This movie (not one of my favorite John Wayne films) was the only film about the war that was actually made during the war (1968). It was directed by Wayne and produced by his son Michael. Their intent was to counter the anti-war movement that was popular at the time.
The first part of the movie was to illustrate the U.S. involvement in the war. The second part about Wayne and a small group driving to a mansion somewhere to kidnap a high ranking officer and rescue the girl was pure Hollywood and totally unbelievable.
John Wayne was very patriotic and this project was his way of taking a stand against the anti-war movement, nothing more, nothing less.
Having said that, the Green Berets did not invade South Vietnam.
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bj-1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 09:17
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Coffee and Cigarretes by Jim Jarmusch

Incredible! Loved it, the black & white, the dialogues, the jokes, the different themes, the simplicity of it all. Excellent work.


 
 
Agree, loved that movie. Light one up yourself while drinking coffee when you watch it for the best effect. Big smile
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65513
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 20:41
Originally posted by GaryB GaryB wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

The Green Berets

One of the most blatant and outrageous pieces of propaganda to ever emerge from Hollywood, John Wayne's version of the Vietnam War is bizarre and shockingly dishonest as he and his special forces invade South Vietnam.  The attempt to mislead the audience and stir up support for one of the most insidious military actions in history is enough to make this relic from 1968 worth watching.
Using movies as propaganda is nothing new. Early on in WWII the government sent a man to Hollywood to oversee the making of "war movies". He told the studios how Washington wanted these movie to be made and how the American fighting men were to be portrayed.
This movie (not one of my favorite John Wayne films) was the only film about the war that was actually made during the war (1968). It was directed by Wayne and produced by his son Michael. Their intent was to counter the anti-war movement that was popular at the time.
The first part of the movie was to illustrate the U.S. involvement in the war. The second part about Wayne and a small group driving to a mansion somewhere to kidnap a high ranking officer and rescue the girl was pure Hollywood and totally unbelievable.
John Wayne was very patriotic and this project was his way of taking a stand against the anti-war movement, nothing more, nothing less.
Having said that, the Green Berets did not invade South Vietnam.
You're right about propaganda in film going as far back as the existence of moving pictures.  And you're also right that the movie is historically inaccurate and that Wayne was a jingoist at a bad time to be one.   But those facts do not create sympathy for or justify the movie.   It was also simply a bad film, interweaving brutal and racist portrayals of the Vietnamese with tacky scenes of bad humor and comic-relief.   It is a mockery of what happened and a stain on filmmaking.


Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2012 at 22:31
Jesus Camp


*


"Jesus Camp" is a so called documentary which at first glance seems to be focussing on a group of American fundamentalist extremists who set up a camp for kids 'Kids on Fire' where children are indoctrinated into the teachings of misogynist and bigamist Christian law. The film would have us believe that the loud obnoxious voice of condemnation comes from Becky Fischer, shown to be a nightmare of overweight loud mouth hypocritical nonsense, that causes kids to cry their eyes out when they admit they are sinners and going to hell. The kids are far too young to be thrown all this but the evangelicals in the film have no problem likening a little furry lion toy to SIN and swinging another older lion toy and state "you got yourself a tiger by the tail and you don't know which end is up".  Becky Fischer sets herself up for unbridled ridicule with idiotic flippant remarks that never paint her in a good light. At the beginning when she is preaching to the kids she says the problem with America is we are fat and lazy and would not want to fast for 7 days, yet the camera is on a low angle and emphasises how fat Becky is making her words seem ridiculous. She says "The devil goes after the young... warlocks are enemies of God, had it been in the Old Testament Harry Potter would have been put to death!" and all the kids clap making it all like a brainwashing session. She says come up here and get washed of all your sins and she washes all these kids hands with a bottle of Nestle water. As this is occurring a woman is wailing like a nutter, then the kids begin praying. It really is disturbing to watch. Parents are seen raising the hands of their children forcing their decisions, and there is even a drama taken out of context making the kids look like a tribe of soldiers with painted faces and weapons of warfare. 


The scene where Becky says "don't stop this is the greatest day of your life next to being saved" is totally off kilter. The music is bone chilling and we see close ups of kids raising hands, crying, speaking weird languages, and it all seems so programmed and sinister. If the filmmaker's intentions were to show that these kids are being brainwashed into a cult they have totally succeeded. It is a one sided affair and the intense camera angles brain wash us into really believing that this is just a cult. But is it? What are we really seeing and what has been omitted that the filmmakers did not want us to see. As long as we are made to fear evangelicals and all that Christians stand for, the filmmakers are content to show us. They are not content to show us anything that happens that is even remotely good. We see the ends of sessions with all the praying but not the sessions themselves, unless of course Fischer makes a radical statement; all of these statements are contained in the film to make sure she is depicted as a monster.

  

An interview with Levi, the child preacher with the long rats tail, reveals the film took out many parts of the dialogue that made things seem more positive. Also there are deleted scenes that showed some of the really nice things that happened. Instead the film focuses on the most radical weird events of the camp such as praying to a cardboard President Bush, smashing a cup, putting tape across their mouths stating 'life', strapping a fetus to their hands, passing around fetus models, and watching a video against Evolution. Of course these things will upset the viewing public and the movie is designed to shock. Plain and simple. The shock tactics of the film make me more disturbed than the actual things that occur at the camp. During the cup smashing scene for example the editing is so programmed it is sickening. We see jump cuts from the breaking cups with a hammer to a shot of the kids reaching out their hands (out of context just worshipping to a song) jump back to a hammer smashing a cup, close up of kid with hammer for a second, cup breaking for a second, back to kids praying and a boy yells Jesus! back to a young girls tear streaked face looking up in adoration, another profile scene of a kid looking up with sun streaming through making the shot seem odd, then a shot of a boy crying on the floor shaking and a little girl passes a tissue box as we hear "If you want something from God you will have to cook a little, you need to stay in the pot, let Him simmer you in the Holy Ghost". Anyone who has any media knowledge can see how manipulative this type of editing is. The filmmakers are making it seem worse than it would have been. It was just a symbolic action to make the kids understand more clearly, but the odd editing makes it look sinister and cult like weirdness. When the little girl cries out "we proclaim the lion of Judah" I broke down as she was in tears praying to God. Then Becky yells like a chant "This means war! This means war! Are you a part of it or not?" The music is nightmarish here, a low rumbling drone that might accompany a stalker creeping up on a victim, and there are reverberated echoes placed throughout that really have a disquieting effect. 


We also have to put up with that radio announcer who gets on my nerves more than Fischer, with his rantings about the problems of Christian fundamentalist attitudes; "Fundamentalists are tenacious and they elbow their way into positions of power in America, that is the ammo to building a government that they are comfortable with, there's this slow chipping away of the church and state". Oh please. Who is this nutter? 



The editing even shows things out of context throughout. At a bowling game young Rachael is shown reading a Christian tract and there is nothing wrong with that, but look at the picture they show in close up, of a baby in a grave and the words "so the blood in the baby's veins was not human it was God's blood". Also a pic of Jesus hand with a nail in it is seen, therefore out of the whole book the filmmakers make sure we see the more controversial bloodier pics. Then she prays for her bowling shot before taking it "Jesus make a good hit." When she throws the ball the edit is the ball going down in the middle of the lane, then it cuts to her walking away as the ball is now in the gutter, making her prayer look futile. Sure, we do not have to pray when we throw a bowling ball but why do the filmmakers want to show this at all? It makes me wonder what the hidden agenda is of the film itself. I wonder why I feel so angry at the content of the film, and I realise I too am being manipulated by clever selective editing, camera angles and manipulative music.


Fischer is always saying the wrong things behind the scenes making her look like a charlatan. She says before the camp even starts "I am so exhausted" and she has just sprayed her hair. She says as she makes a computer slideshow with the font for word 'Death' "I've got something dripping with blood here". Satisfied she has found the right font she says "Yes, that's better". Great witness! She is seen blowing up a balloon to show how sin inflates, and she shows a brain mould that would symbolise the mind, and sticky fingers to represent sin. We do not see any of these sessions which were perhaps great fun for the kids, but the camera is more devoted to only showing anything that happened that was bizarre in some way.  For example, Becky's cover girl comments when she is being photographed "It's almost like being on the cover of Rolling Stones". It is Rolling Stone really, Becky. She could have kept these personal things to herself instead of letting her mouth go into overdrive when the camera was on her but it just makes her intentions seem sinister. Anyone is bound to say weird things when a camera is turned on you, that is a natural thing, I saw it all the time when I used to film Christian events, but the film magnifies these normally quirky humorous things making them seem very sinister. No wonder Becky closed the camp location after the negative reaction of the film. 


It is quite a chilling film but I must profess that it really has a hidden agenda and the filmmakers use creepy music throughout especially in the scenes where kids are speaking in tongues or praying, and they show extreme close ups of their faces. These aspects give the film an unsettling quality. I have been to churches where people go down the front to receive healing and speak in tongues and it is always a beautiful thing. The filmmakers use really odd camera angles and disturbing music to make it all very unsettling. It is definitely disturbing to watch extreme close ups of a little girl looking up with tears pouring down. Or a kid convulsing on the floor, and others on their knees bowing down. It is a private thing that happens sometimes in churches when God moves in the Spirit, but watching these isolated things on the film magnifies them and makes it look like a cult. It may be borderline using kids like this but usually kids church is a wonderful fun time, and nobody mentions death, hell, or abortion.


Reactionists have hailed it as the most appalling horror movie they have seen, scary as hell, or 1 and a half hours of child abuse. Personally I just wept when I saw those kids crying out against abortion and smashing a cup as a symbol of smashing governmental control. They are far too young to be fed this adult stuff and surely kids praying to a cardboard lifesize George Bush and the leaders of the camp laying hands and praying over the microphones and audio equipment is just opening oneself up for ridicule. Also Pastor Ted Haggard is preaching away and he is so full of himself, he can't resist showing off. He sees the doco camera and leans into it pointing and saying in a creepy tone, "I think I know what you did last night....  If you send me $1000 I wont tell your wife!" Wild laughing and applause follows. He follows up with some flippant comment that if you use this I will sue you.  But it makes him look dang creepy and deranged. Haggard is not the ideal role model either as he fell from grace later professing to be a gay man, taking crystal meth and having a prostitute. So the hypocrite in all his glory is on show. The filmmakers make sure that the screen is absolutely littered with hypocrites.


It all paints Christianity as a horrendous thing and the filmmakers make sure that they use every chance they can get to make Christians look like buffoons. As a Christian myself I take exception to this and although the film attempts to show what happens at a kids camp it does so in such a contrived manipulative manner that it becomes in itself a form of brainwashing. More manipulative than the kids camp leaders are the filmmakers who want to make certain as most media outlets, that Christianity is given the worst possible coverage. People seeing the film may make the assumption that all Christian organised doctrines are this radical and extreme, and that we are being brainwashed and it is simply not true.  1 star for this atrocity.  
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 00:44

Watership Down

*** 

 

Watership Down is an unsettling exercise in glorifying death and violence disguised as a kids film. It is very disturbing thanks to some surreal imagery that is mindbending and chilling. It is hard to forget the overall disturbing atmosphere, that is bleak, morbid and dark throughout. 

Hell yeah Im a dog

The story revolves around bunny Fiver who sees visions of a black rabbit, death personified, and believes they must leave their warren before they are destroyed. He manages to convince a few and they escape. The rest of the warren are destroyed by man, the real enemy of the film, who digs up the warrens with excavators, made to look like carnivorous monsters raping the land. There are surreal scenes of bunnies trying to escape their holes but they are blocked by dead bunnies in the entrance, blue and red eyed, a most unsettling sequence.



Fiver leads the intrepid bunnies to the big big water where they meet an obnoxious seagull who swears and makes a lot of loud noise. They travel to a warren where there are a lot of other bunnies that seem strangely brainwashed, almost like a cult. They are being fed enormous amounts of food but Fiver senses they are going to be killed, "There's something unnatural and evil and twisted about this place", and realise the bunnies are being fattened up like trapped lambs led to the slaughter. He is right, and the rabbits escape but there is a nasty encounter with a snare that causes blood and foam to drool down the mouth of the victim. 


Dhrrrrrr Im a rabbit 

Big Wig caught in a snare trap 

They think he is dead and say a prayer to Frith. Death is the main theme of the film and embracing death is the penultimate ending, to allow the black rabbit to come and take them into the next life. They encounter one death struggle after another and everytime Fiver sees the black rabbit he knows one of them will be killed. We see bunny after bunny slaughtered, by car, by hawk, by train, and by ravenous dogs.

CANDY FIGHT

“There’s a dog in the woods” says Fiver ominously and a massive black dog mutilates one rabbit after another. It revels in the kill and has no mercy. It is the only animal that doesn’t talk giving it a more sinister appeal. A cat catches one bunny and says sardonically “Can you run, I think not, I think not.” General Wondwort's fate is never revealed but the narrator states  "General Woundwort's body was never found". 

The unremorseless slaughter of the innocent is horrifying but the theme of the film is that the bunnies will have many enemies as Frith (rabbit god) intended, as a form of punishment. But the rabbits are given gifts of enormous speed and agility so that it can survive “digger, runner, swift of foot, all the world will be your enemy, prince of a thousand enemies”. And the narration makes it perfectly obvious this will be clear in the first scene, “when they catch you they will kill you.”

The film is blessed with an amazing song “Bright Eyes” by Art Garfunkel that is haunting and beautiful. The film clip that went with this featured many of Fiver’s visions and it all made sense at the time. I saw this movie at the cinema and it certainly had an impact on my teenage mind. I thought about it often and my sister became obsessed with it, reading the novel, drawing the rabbits and buying a very lavishly illustrated book of the film.


Overall, this is an enjoyable adult animated film made back before political correctness and severe censorship. John Hurt's voice is wonderful here too as are all the other British tinged voice overs. The overall serious tone of the film is spellbinding. Along with ‘Felidae’ and ‘Plague Dogs’ it is hailed as one of the more disturbing animated ‘kids’ films. As such it is a real oddity that will entertain, but it is not really for kids. They can watch with parents of course but the nightmarish scenes may have a negative long lasting effect. 




The ominous trailer



Edited by AtomicCrimsonRush - July 28 2012 at 01:28
Back to Top
SaltyJon View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaltyJon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 00:50
Moonrise Kingdom: finally went to a theater in town and saw this with a friend of mine.  She and I agreed; the movie was full of laughs from one end to the other.  Wes Anderson makes some pretty amazing films, and this was definitely one of them.  The well-known members of the cast included Jason Schwartzman, Edward Norton, Bruce Willis and Bill freaking Murray.  None of the above, however, were the main stars of the film.  The main focus was the leading kids, who did a wonderful job.  The humor in the film was some of my favorite of recent years, and on multiple occasions my friend and I both burst out laughing in the theater.  
Back to Top
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 01:17
Originally posted by AtomicCrimsonRush AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:

Watership Down

***


Oh, my god ... LOL ... those pics are ... wow LOL ... that's just ... so not for kids. LOL This is horrid, man.
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 01:44
Plague Dogs

***



In my weird curious quest to see disturbing kids films I was draw to one of the most gruelling 'Plague Dogs'. This one begins in an animal lab where dogs are being experimented on and we are immediately greeted with a drowning dog meeting its maker, or does he? The film diverges into many compelling moments but it is very bizarre watching animated dogs talking in a cute way but with a bleak atmosphere. It all seems so unsettling and ominous with morbid music and gore throughout. 



The scenes are often nightmarish and at times far too strong for children. One of the strongest, and infamous scenes, shows a hunter going after an escaped dog and shooting himself in the face. The scene actually shows the blood pouring out of his face and subsequently dying. We cheer on the actions as the dogs are now free to escape, but the humans as usual are painted in a bad light as the real enemies. This has psychological ramifications that must impact a young child's mind. 

Here is the worst scene 


or if you prefer the actual frame grabs of the same scene

plague dogs

Not for kids? John Hurt voices one of the dogs, Snitter, and he seems to love these gory animations as he was also voicing a rabbit in Watership Down. Martin Rosen was the main mind behind the film as he was also with Watership Down so he also seems to revel in kids movies with tons of gore. Richard Adams was also responsible for the novle of both this and Watership Down so easily it can be seen that it is a specific type of film. An animation for teens or adults. It could be argued it is not a kids film but the animated talking animals would be a drawcard so how do you police this type of film? I wonder how many kids have been traumatised by these types of films. Now I only have to review Felidae and my journey is complete.




Edited by AtomicCrimsonRush - July 28 2012 at 01:51
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 05:01
Felidae

***



1994’s “Felidae” is another animation in the top 3 most disturbing 'kids' movies ever made. This one unlike Watership Down and Plague Dogs, is a German animation and it just has a no holds barred approach to the material. Nothing is restrained, the language is obscene, the violence is prominent and bloody, there is a serial killer, and worst of all the sexual undertones are horrendous. So in other words a night of wholesome family entertainment. 

 

When one looks at the origin of the movie it is easy to see how this became the most misunderstood movie in the unholy trilogy of disturbing kids films. Like the others this was never meant for kids to consume, it is a humorous adults film with dark satire and crime fiction parody. The fact that it is animated was its Achilles heel, but it is really an allegory of Nazi atrocities, racial purity and a Film Noir detective genre pastiche. The animation is not even cute but the characters are ragged and scrawny with the foulest mouths surely in an animated flick (though I refuse to watch pseudo porn-animation ‘Fritz the Cat’).

 

 

There are famous scenes in this that made youtubers conversing for pages such as the nightmare scene, so chilling and yet so compelling, and the rape sequence with the femme fatale, quite hard to watch. The feline cat offers herself a couple of times willingly though they have just met, so no more than a prostitute. The first nightmare scene is an evil scientist dragging Francis into hell by chain. In a house we see over and over again on the wall explicit paintings of 2 humans in a karma sutra position uncensored! The second nightmare is a pit of thousands of rotting cat corpses and the ground erupts and morphs into a Catholic priest. With a maniacal grin he uses his hands as marionette handles and the strings lift up the decaying corpses and they are torn in two in a putrescent shower of dark blood. Later we see a mutilated cat victim who is decapitated and another scene features a mad scientist human experimenting on many cats, cutting them open and inserting liquids. After the first few are turned to gory mulch he continues to drink alcohol to numb the feelings and even cuts one up and removes its bowels. Then there is the final cat fight that rivals even “Watership Down” for a scratching biting gore feast, complete with full disembowelment. I am not making this stuff up.

The story entails Francis the main cat detective who checks out the grisly murders in his neighbourhood, thinks it may be a “can-opener”, that’s human, and conducts an investigation. His findings show that each victim was sexually aroused at the time of their death; “the killer is obviously a sex machine that doesn’t like the competition of others so decided to wipe them out, or else he has a general exception to fornication.” Other cats aid him in the investigation and they come across Felicity, who sees hellish visions, and they encounter a suicidal cult the Claundandus sect, and a psychotic gang leader bully Kong. They also come across nut job scientist who conducts evil experiments, drilling into cats craniums with delight, and other unsavoury types.  Kong says when he meets Bluebeard and Francis and accusing them of being gay; “He sure is a juicy number, you gonna show us some of the tricks he taught you?” I like the dark humour in this such as when Francis sees the sect members willingly walking into a plasma electric bolt suiciding in the name of their false deity. Francis quips; “what I was watching was not exactly a scene out of The Aristocats!” The dialogue is as intelligent as any Film Noir, and it has some very innovative creative animation.   



The overall vision is a labyrinthine puzzle that often comes across as a gorefest with ominous atmospheres and some unforgettable traumatic scenes. The nightmare scenes in particular will stay with some viewers. It has some endearing characters and is nothing short of intriguing but for adults. There are some extraordinary references to Nazi experimental butchery like Auschwitz angel of death. The references to cult worship are also heavy handed even down to Jim Jones references and a vision of a deity who offers retribution by suicide; “one little journey, what will we find when we arrive?” The spectres utter “everything that we’ve lost Francis.” After the first scene I had already made up my mind on that matter. However, I can recommend this if you are after a dark animation because it doesn’t get much darker than this.




Edited by AtomicCrimsonRush - July 28 2012 at 05:12
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 05:16
Plague Dogs isn't a children's film to my knowledge. Certainly isn't a children's book.
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 05:27
Rocky Balboa

***

 
Otherwise known as Rocky VI, this Stallone driven drama is not too bad at all. Having milked the franchise over the years Stallone is still able to pull the heartstrings. This one focuses on Rocky’s comeback from retirement in an exhibition match with cocky prize fighter. You are on Rocky’s side all the way as this capitalises as the battler making it good against all the odds, in other words the same formula as Rocky’s I to V. Somehow it still works and this one is quite different than the others as Stallone really is getting too old so there is no denying where the agenda of the film lies.

 

The fight sequences are suped up with music video style jump cuts, slow mo, razor sharp edits and some chilling camera work. It again works fine. Rocky is reduced to a shell of what he used to be since his fighting days but the drawcard of the film is to see how he overcomes the odds to get back in the ring and make a contest of himself. The acting is top notch, Adrian is featured in dream sequences showing how Rocky focuses on the past. It is great to see old timer coach Burt in his reprised role again. I like the scenes where Rocky is making friends with a new girl and her son, he seems genuine and is very honourable in his intentions.



 

It is a likeable film, no swearing at all, and just a bit of blood when they get in the ring and slam each other into kingdom come. But that is expected. The final credits are fun showing many ordinary people making the famous run up the steps and, yes, Rocky music and the famous run up the steps happens from the big man himself, as well as thumping meat, downing raw eggs and running in the snow with his pet dog Punchy. It does not disappoint as a homage to the old Rocky’s and Stallone in a hat looks the same as ever; the no good bum who fights for his passion, and it is not all about winning. I was generally delighted with the pleasant tone of the film and the uplifting message of hope and courage. At the end Stallone waves goodbye to us as if to say farewell to this saga and it is a fitting end to a great series.

Rocky Balboa


Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2012 at 05:56
Blair Witch Project

***

I wanted to see this to see what all the fuss was about as it caused a major stir at the time. It is one of the first hand held camera film mockumentary flicks that resulted in a tirade of mockumentaries, the recovered footage genre, including District 9, Apollo 18, and [REC]. The hand held camera work is at first interesting and then nauseating and you wish they could keep it still. The ordinary production is all part of the set up to the famous ending that still makes me shudder. It is the creepy atmosphere and odd feel of the film that makes it scary, rather than what is said or the actual events. 


The fear in the eyes of the players is quite disturbing as they look genuinely terrified. This translates to the audience also and one never knows what to expect next. The dialogue is virtually improvised and even the actors do not know what is going on adding to the morbid fear. As such this is a curio that is worth seeing once and then perhaps forgetting. 

The realism of the content, as though someone left a camera running and now we are seeing it unfold, was an innovative idea but has since been flogged to death. The sequel 'Book of Shadows' is one of the worst films ever made as it completely removes the doco feel with hand held cam and suffers terribly as a result.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 979899100101 220>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.282 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.