Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Matthew T
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 01 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5291
|
Posted: July 01 2012 at 18:17 |
I try not to judge due to the fact that everybody starts somewhere and it is more "Horses for Courses" for me. Just because I don't like it does not mean that everything I play would be thought highly of either by the persons taste I am judging. "Judge not least thee be judged" Sometimes I like the poppy trash (bubblegum). Poor musician is a another matter and usually they don't last anyway because they will be caught out.
Remember Milli Vanilli.............they were caught
|
Matt
|
|
Codera the Great
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 29 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 91
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 00:41 |
How about this delightful little trainwreck?
|
|
Codera the Great
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 29 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 91
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 00:51 |
crimson87 wrote:
I think that the biggest disgraces in musical industry are
1 Madonna. She has no real talent and infuenced loads of female pop singers that have nothing but good looks.
2 Punk Rock. They have no technical prowness whatsoever and also rely on image and attitude. They basically killed all the attempts of making something relatively complex with rock music.
3 Nirvana. While I liked the band when I was a teenager and I still do I realized that their influence was negative because they put the last nail in the coffin of rock music. |
I agree on all three counts. Thanks to Madonna, she has spawned a whole movement of pathetic female pop wannabes (i.e. Lady Gaga). I find Punk to be extremely repetitive, tedious, and lacking of substance (much like the Emo/Screamo movement they have helped spawn much later on), and thanks to Nirvana, I doubt there will be another revolutionary rock movement because everyone is too busy copying cheap alternative bands like Nickelback and Three Doors Down. I just can't believe that many people think that Madonna and many of the old punk bands were deemed Rock and Roll Hall of Fame worthy (even though there isn't much credibility to be gained with that "achievement" to begin with).
Edited by Codera the Great - July 02 2012 at 02:10
|
|
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 01:48 |
Oh my gosh...my ears are assaulted by this thread! I never want to lose this awesome badness!
|
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28041
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 01:51 |
crimson87 wrote:
I think that the biggest disgraces in musical industry are
1 Madonna. She has no real talent and infuenced loads of female pop singers that have nothing but good looks.
2 Punk Rock. They have no technical prowness whatsoever and also rely on image and attitude. They basically killed all the attempts of making something relatively complex with rock music.
3 Nirvana. While I liked the band when I was a teenager and I still do I realized that their influence was negative because they put the last nail in the coffin of rock music. |
Not sure about the punk rock one. The early bands such as The Stranglers and Sioixie and The Banshees were actually very good. Lack of technical prowess wasn't the issue it was more the destructove and simplistic attitude which was encouraged by the music press (that was the 'disgrace' in my view). Arguably though the best complex rock peices had already been created and by the time punk came prog was getting cliched and old hat. Punk and new wave forced a revaulation of musical approach which lead eventually to other things. ie Neo prog wouldn't have happened without it imo (although some would say that would not have been a bad thing )
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 13:22 |
crimson87 wrote:
I think that the biggest disgraces in musical industry are
2 Punk Rock. They have no technical prowness whatsoever and also rely on image and attitude. They basically killed all the attempts of making something relatively complex with rock music. |
Interesting music does not necessarily have to be technical.
|
|
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 13:49 |
richardh wrote:
crimson87 wrote:
I think that the biggest disgraces in musical industry are
1 Madonna. She has no real talent and infuenced loads of female pop singers that have nothing but good looks.
2 Punk Rock. They have no technical prowness whatsoever and also rely on image and attitude. They basically killed all the attempts of making something relatively complex with rock music.
3 Nirvana. While I liked the band when I was a teenager and I still do I realized that their influence was negative because they put the last nail in the coffin of rock music. |
Not sure about the punk rock one. The early bands such as The Stranglers and Sioixie and The Banshees were actually very good. Lack of technical prowess wasn't the issue it was more the destructove and simplistic attitude which was encouraged by the music press (that was the 'disgrace' in my view). Arguably though the best complex rock peices had already been created and by the time punk came prog was getting cliched and old hat. Punk and new wave forced a revaulation of musical approach which lead eventually to other things. ie Neo prog wouldn't have happened without it imo (although some would say that would not have been a bad thing ) |
1 Madonna I would say has talent by the bucket load, tis the kind of talent that kept her ahead in the pop world for over a decade. Ray of Light is excellent and I very much like a lot of her other singles for being great pop singles. She certainly influenced a lot of pop stars that have come after her.
2 Punk Rock: Even the Sex Pistols had some ability to play their instruments. Twas MM who put it about that they couldn't when he realised notority sells. Many (Stranglers, Blockheads, Clash) came from pub rock bands before Punk started. This is the usual you have to be a brilliant technician to make brilliant music. Luckily many disagree. Punk also begat Post Punk and even influenced Prog which had influenced Punk in the first place.
3 Nirvana So Rock music died with Kurt Cobain ? They were great and did no such thing.
4 Open your mind a little (Crimson87)
Edited by akamaisondufromage - July 02 2012 at 13:55
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 13:49 |
Madonna. Quite like her Punk. Added new vitality to music. Nirvana. ditto
|
|
|
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 13:53 |
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
|
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 13:55 |
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway- Not really a disgrace because I cant see a reason to hold her in high regard. I'm not expecting her to be great. I expect what the general public loves to be horrible.
Punk Rock- Sure a lot of punk sucks. (Cardiacs make most of those bands unlistenable to me- Would rather hear cardiacs) But the biggest disgrace? Naw. Just like EVERY other genre except prog, the most popular bands were pretty much the worst, and if you look into the genre deeply enough you can find some REAL fking awesome music.
Nirvana- Overrated? Sure. Disgrace? NO WAY
|
|
|
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:00 |
Here's 2 more
Glamorization of Drug Use, especially heroin
Chris Brown still being allowed to have a career
|
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:11 |
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion.
|
|
|
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:16 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion. |
Simple, catchy danceable music that promotes sexuality in our youth. (I think that covers all her genres)
|
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:24 |
Smurph wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion. |
Simple, catchy danceable music that promotes sexuality in our youth. (I think that covers all her genres) |
Are the "youth" into Madonna these days?
|
|
|
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:26 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion. |
Simple, catchy danceable music that promotes sexuality in our youth. (I think that covers all her genres) |
Are the "youth" into Madonna these days? |
Well, she's trying to get the "youth" into her by naming her album after Molly (the drug)
But then again I'm pretty sure the youth that already know what ecstasy/Molly is are probably already oversexualized
Edited by Smurph - July 02 2012 at 14:26
|
|
|
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:27 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion. |
Simple, catchy danceable music that promotes sexuality in our youth. (I think that covers all her genres) |
Are the "youth" into Madonna these days? |
Ninjad (I think our little blue friend is saying Madonna promoted 'sexuality' in his youth. )
Edited by akamaisondufromage - July 02 2012 at 14:28
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:32 |
akamaisondufromage wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Madonna - I mean, it's a crappy music style anyway-
|
Which style is crappy? She has had so many that you have to be more specific. Unless every style of music she has done is crappy. Either way I reject your assertion. |
Simple, catchy danceable music that promotes sexuality in our youth. (I think that covers all her genres) |
Are the "youth" into Madonna these days? |
Ninjad (I think our little blue friend is saying Madonna promoted 'sexuality' in his youth. ) |
Who doesn't? In fact it is worse now. I can think of far more unsuitable acts than Madonna.
|
|
|
Smurph
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:36 |
I'm only 24 and I grew up listening to pretty much Christian music only until we started going to our local pool, who played contemporary adult pop music.
You are only 10 years old, yet you find yourself singing disgusting, disturbing sexual songs and you have no idea what it means but those words stick in your brain and as you get older and realize what they mean, those words are already there and more acceptable to digest. Madonna was not a part of those groups being played at that point, but the "artists" she influenced were being played.
I just hate our culture is all.
|
|
|
Ambient Hurricanes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:49 |
Greg has a point; Madonna might not be an influence on today's youth, but she was an influence on their parents (who, whether you like it or not, are almost every child's biggest influence). She also influenced the sexualization of all pop music after her, which today's youth listen to. That's not to say that there were no sexually objectionable songs before Madonna, but she was key in popularizing such music. Pop music has such a profound effect on kids' minds; I was raised in a Christian home and taught ethics and morals and have strongly believed in them my entire life, and I still had individualistic and selfish ideas about romantic love in my early adolescent years, just from listening to 60's music!
|
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66264
|
Posted: July 02 2012 at 14:50 |
I couldn't stand Madonna when I was in high school and she was just about as popular as it gets at that point. She also grew up about 20 minutes away from me so she was a "hometown hero". That being said I wouldn't say that she is talentless or a disgrace (although I probably did say those exact things back then. ) I didn't like Prince or Michael Jackson or Whitney Houston back then either. Each of them had a song or two that I actually liked or more likely got trapped in my head after multiple repeated listens. Doesn't really make any of them talentless or a disgrace though, it just means that they made music that didn't agree with my tastes.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.