Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - queen. prog or not?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedqueen. prog or not?
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
frippertronik View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 173 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: queen. prog or not?
    Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:02

i think that the first 4 albums of queen are really prog, songs like march of the black queen or bohemian rhapsody are very complex and the vocals arrangements are incredibles.

 
a plague of lighthouse keepers
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:03
Don't forget to mention Hot Space, very symphonic also
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
AfanSpur View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 03 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 204 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:12

Early Queen definitely progressive.

There are many bands who have had patches of Progressive rock but generally are not considered as such?

Radiohead? Porcupine Tree? The Smiths? Muse? Asia? ELO ? Super Furry Animals? Architecture in Helsinki? Bjork? Massive attack? The Orb?

Most of these have had moments of being either progressive in setting new standards or have recorded tracks that have had elements of progressive rock in them.

Good examples are In Absentia P. T., The Queen is dead by the Smiths, Vespertine by Bjork, Mwng by SFA,OK computer,Mezzanine by Massive Attack
There stands Olias to outward to build a ship
Holding within all we hope to retain
The frame will be so built to challenge the universe
Clasped with the skins of the fish of the plain

Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:47

All:

This discussion has been had ad nauseam.  The webmasters have made the decision that Queen is not prog, and thus will not be included on the site.

So chat away, but you're fighting an uphill battle...

Peace.
Back to Top
frippertronik View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 173 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:54
hey maani it doesn't matters to me, i can't understand the reasons for tell me that queen is not prog and groups like radiohead yes, just give me one reason 
a plague of lighthouse keepers
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2005 at 23:24

Originally posted by frippertronik frippertronik wrote:

hey maani it doesn't matters to me, i can't understand the reasons for tell me that queen is not prog and groups like radiohead yes, just give me one reason 

Uh oh.....the red-faced icon!!!!
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 12 2005 at 10:00

Queen II is a progressive masterpiece ... but IMHO Queen decided after that that they would continue as a popular rock/pop act with an unique twist. I love them, they're extraordinary.

They're not prog, they're ... QUEEN.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 13 2005 at 20:35
I really think the Queen albums should be archived, a lot of people don't want them here because they're very known, and not necessarily known as such for being prog giants, but there's no doubting it in my opinion, they're a very unique type of prog, but it's DEFINITELY prog.  There are bands here that are less prog than Queen...
Back to Top
protec View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 20 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 12 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2005 at 03:04
I think they have prog elements but I wouldn't really consider them a prog band, more like pop or statdium rock :) 
Back to Top
ldlanberg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 249 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2005 at 22:36
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

All:

This discussion has been had ad nauseam.  The webmasters have made the decision that Queen is not prog, and thus will not be included on the site.

So chat away, but you're fighting an uphill battle...

Peace.

Love that willingness to compromise.

 



Edited by ldlanberg
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.