Flower Kings Appreciation Thread |
Post Reply | Page <1 190191192193194 487> |
Author | ||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Anglagard: I really love their two albums, think they are very good. Not as good as my favorite Flower Kings albums, but then, not much is. However, if ever a band was to be considered overrated on the archives, Anglagard is it. I will say that I don't find them derivative, but they do have a strong "retro" sound because of the instrumentation and production. Having said all that, I didn't give either album 5 stars, but both are solid 4 star efforts to me.
Tom, Van der Graaf Generator is easily one of my top 10 favorite bands of all time. Love all their albums from the 70's, though the new stuff doesn't do a lot for me (but is quite good for guy their age). Prog metal is generally not my thing, but I like a few Pain Of Salvation albums (mainly Remedy Lane and BE) and I have a similar love/hate relationship with DT. I actually don't care for their early albums at all, but love 6 Degrees, Octavarium, and most of Black Clouds. The new one has grown on me, but it really feels like a band on autopilot. The best thing about it is that they seem to have gotten rid of all the things that annoyed me about them (it is quite a relief that the psudo growls of Portnoy are gone), but at the same time feels like they are playing it totally safe. When I'm in the mood though, DT (and Liquid Tension) fill my need for insane shredding. Riverside I saw at Nearfest and thought the performance was outstanding. Most of their studio stuff leaves me kind of cold, but I haven't heard much. It's not really a priority for me though. The new Opeth is wonderful, but their other stuff doesn't do much for me. I'll have to try the more recent albums though, as after hearing Blackwater Park, Damnation, and Deliverance I just wasn't interested at all. Someone sent me the new one to sample, and I really like it a lot. As someone who usually prefers darker lyrics and music, it is interesting that the Flower Kings are my favorite band. Of course, back in the 90's Yes was my favorite band who I listened to every day, so I guess I do have an appreciation for happier and more upbeat stuff too. Of course, both The Flower Kings and Yes delve into darker material as well, though I find neither ever really get as dark as Porcupine Tree or Van der Graaf Generator or other "dark" bands. What I love about the Flower Kings is that they fill so many musical needs, usually all on one album (or even, like with Garden Of Dreams, one song........though that song is pretty much album length). In any case, I will never understand their relatively low ratings here. All I can figure is that they are just popular enough to bring out the haters, but not quite popular enough to have that off set by the huge fans (unlike, for instance, Dream Theater, who also have their fair share of one and two star rating and reviews). |
||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Guys, I'm thinking if we keep up this pace, we have a good chance of hitting 200 pages before the album gets released
|
||||
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
200 here we come!
concerning dark lyrics, roine has mentioned that the new one will have some darkness to it. totally agree infandous, TFK fulfill many musical needs at once. riifs, solos, harmony, synth, good songs, interesting segues, memorable melodies, adequate production, cool themes and artwork. great point there. i just think its probably very uncool to like the popular prog bands of our day...SB, TFK...and like the less popular buzz bands, like Anglagard, i just find them boring as hell.
|
||||
darkshade
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^ Well Ive noticed that many members of this forum have, over the years, fallen for the old "the more obscure, the better it is" trend.
|
||||
M27Barney
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 09 2006 Location: Swinton M27 Status: Offline Points: 3136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
To Be Fair - I've not heard any PoS - but have all the DT and RS Cd's - Riverside has a sort of ambience that a lot of bands lack - their simplistic ambience is a change from frenetic complexity that is the norm for progressive metal - I have to be in a certain mood to listen to Opeth...Anyway I'm currently very occupied with Anima Mundi and Nexus - I'm sure that I'll go through another metal phase before xmas....
I find experimental prog and math rock very hard to comprehend - VdGG and King Crimson being two bands that have been given enormous credence for very little in way of truly epic prog.....it's just taste though, still not sure why anybody thinks that DSoTM is one of the best prog albums ever when it has 1 ok track (Any colour you like) and is far inferior to WYWH, Animals and Meddle..... TTFN
|
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^ Oh good, it's the Dark Side of the Moon Bomb . . . this should get us to page 200 real quick.
|
||||
M27Barney
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 09 2006 Location: Swinton M27 Status: Offline Points: 3136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
You know it makes sense.....Is DSOTM prog? or a crossover effort
|
||||
M27Barney
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 09 2006 Location: Swinton M27 Status: Offline Points: 3136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Anyway - what is the REAL turkey in terms of the worst CD/Album produced by a certified Prog rock giant....
I go for any of Rick Wakemans - god bothering CD's...really truly fookin awful......
|
||||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13767 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Not all of them were bad. A lot of them, granted, but not all of them. Criminal Record was excellent, as were King Arthur, Journey, Henry, and No Earthly Connection. I also enjoyed the last one - very proggy.
|
||||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Actually, I never really thought of Floyd as a prog band at all. More experimental space rock or something, though I guess they mix in other things like pastoral folk, so maybe so. Where I see them as progressive is in their use of the studio and effects to create interesting atmospheres. I suppose though, it has to be said, that they did "progress" from album to album; getting more sophisticated and better at their instruments as they went along (and more cohesive with their lyrics and concepts as well).
Dark Side had a big impression on me in my late teens and early 20's, so I consider it a masterpiece no matter what genre you wan to put it in. I just have heard it so many times I don't think I can ever really enjoy it like I did back then ever again. I agree that Meddle, WYWH and Animals are all better albums though. Meddle is still my favorite Floyd album by far. |
||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I've been afraid to try Wakeman's solo stuff. I have Six Wives, and it's a cool 70's instrumental work with some great solos, but I haven't had the urge to try anything else. I have heard King Aurthur and remember disliking the vocals intensely but thinking the music was pretty good. |
||||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13767 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
For a lot of us of a certain age (), the 70's solo output by Wakeman is remembered with great affection, and more than a little humour.
|
||||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
||||
infandous
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
You're only 5 years older than me I never heard any Wakeman (other than on Yes song played on commercial radio) until well into my late teens. First thing was Journey (forgot to mention that above), and it was another, "loved the music, hated the vocals" thing. It was introduced to me by a friend who was 16 at the time, and he thought it was great! He also introduced me to ELP via Brain Salad Surgery, and Gentle Giant via a cassette of Playing the Fool (which he didn't like, but I grew to love over time). |
||||
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
what i find interesting about all the dinosaurs is that they have been putting out mediocre to sh*t music 3 times longer than they put out good music. every few years i cycle through trying to find bright spots in the big names post 70s output. it's futile effort.
anyway, no doubt wish you were here is more prog than dark side as far as crimson goes, they are definitely the litmus test for 'true' prog fans i've experienced. robert fripp is so academic and arrogant. if i ever met him, i'd say...'but you play rock and roll dude'. most of their stuff is noise anyway. i randomly was on a train with a bunch of guitar craft students and they were like a cult of fripp. okay, i don't care for any of wakeman's solo stuff. does anyone really listen to his stuff from the 80s and 90s? he has put out piles and piles of sh*t! another thing that amazes me is how much energy is wasted in producing horrible art! ramble over.
|
||||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
What you mean by mediocre to sh*t music? You mean it's pop music and not prog? As far as crimson goes... "most of their stuff is noise anyway"? Ok, now that's... hmm.. misleading. I just think that some of you think that PROG is playing +15 minute epics with blasting synth solos, lots of time changes, and resembling a bit the 70s. (no, not clones) You should check the whole spectrum of what prog is and was in the late 60s and 70s, and listen to what can it be now. (math rock, post rock, some electronica, avant-garde, jazzy stuff, minimalism, etc) No offense intended, just a sum-up of my thoughts of reading the last posts.
Edited by The Quiet One - May 02 2012 at 17:08 |
||||
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
i mean that the big 70s prog bands (and pretty much all the great 70s bands) put out subpar post, at times horrible, music in the 80s, 90s, 00s. this had as much to do with the production as with lack of inspiration, zietgiest, etc. that's what i mean by mediocre. some was pop, like genesis. some was just plain bad. the 70s was such an anomoly in time. the best analog production, meeting the new music (unjaded) music business and rock's early age. oh man, to have been 17 in 1971! i know i've written some sweaping opinions above. i usually don't say negative things on the interwebs. however, at times i just get so frustrated with music not being exactly how i want it to be i'm familiar and have explored all the genres and subgenres except extreme metal. i guess the cool thing about prog is that it's so diverse and what came in the past has been built on by the future bands. there definitely wouldn't be math rock with out KC. prog is a mindset, lots of ideas put together, a type of instrumentation and arranging, and/or something totally progressive and new in the truest sense of the word.
Edited by zumacraig - May 02 2012 at 20:02 |
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Yeah, I still don't 'get' most of King Crimson.
|
||||
darkshade
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
You guys are crazy. The only King Crimson albums I don't "get" are THRAK and Construktion of Light, and at least the latter has a couple songs I like. Everything else they've done is very good.
I'm a little surprised at the lack of KC appreciation here. The first 2 TFK albums are highly influenced by Bruford-era KC, at least in the vocal delivery by Roine; who thankfully developed his own sound by the time of Stardust and Flower Power. |
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^ I've heard that before, the crazy bit that is.
That 'I don't get them' is an over simplification. Red, I absolutely love, I really like 'In the Court . . . ' as well, "The Power to Believe" has some great points as well and there's a song or two on Thrak that I like. On the other hand, I don't understand why 'Lark's Tongue . . . ' is so revered, to me it's mostly noise. Also, I had the unfortunate 'luck' of finding 'Thrakattak' which was awful. I also have 'Discipline' which is mildly compelling though if I'm in a David Byrne mood, I'll just listen to him.
|
||||
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
good points on KC. i definitely appreciate them and can see how folks can get into them. however, the are not the epitome of prog as i've heard friends say. they do have some good tunes...Larks II, Easy Money, Red, Discipline. unfortunately, there's always some aspect of each album that i just can't get into. i forced myself to get into power to believe. it's pretty good, but the production is just so lifeless. and i'm not a fan of songs that end in avant jazz violin
i do have the say, in the right mood, i do love some frippy guitar lines. i think DT need to incorporate some of that in their new record..kind of like they did with the obvious nod to Rush on BC&SL. sidenote about KC. i was in a self proclaimed jam band in the mid 90s. we had several folks tell us we sounded like KC mixed with Santana. go figure, none of us even listened to KC.
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 190191192193194 487> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |