Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Posted: March 28 2012 at 23:20
Finnforest wrote:
True and good point. I need to think more about the privatized justice system too, I know its been discussed here but I haven't had time to read much about it.
I have a 10% off all misdemeanor charges, which is not valid at Brand X court. I motion the change to hold the case at Brand Z court. I will pay the $250 change of court fee, of course.
I do sincerely thank you Ric for giving so much info to mull over, guess I've just been lost to the dark side but the more I think about it just seems more and more like the Fed/banks are a self supporting system.
No Fed, Go Gold. It'll be my campaign slogan for 2014
As a bit advice since I find this to be the defining economic issue of our time, it's probably wise to read a serious treatise on the matter coming from the two major schools. I was (un)lucky enough to receive plenty of formal training in "real" economics since I minored in the subject and consider doing mathematical economics for a long time. The conflict between that and what I learned from the Austrians really gave way to my true opinion.
It's an issue important enough to almost try to convince yourself to take the opposite view continuously. Mises' Theory of Money and Credit should definitely be read. It's still the best book on the subject from an Austrian perspective. Had the nobel prize existed at the time, it surely would have netted him it. I can't think of an equally monumental and self-contained text that Bernanke would approve, but you could probably do well with a selection of journal articles since I assume you still have a nice subscription from Penn State's library.
Nah I've been cut off by now but there's always a way. I hear you, I know what we're always taught and the difference between that and the basic Austrian stuff certainly made me think. Also Keynesian and Neo Classical (or Chicago I don't know) have both been tried neither with huge success and I've never heard of the Austrian School before. Figured it's worth looking into on that alone.
I know it's never concrete but is Austrian what you more or less adhere to?
Oh, also the Rothbard work you suggested I quite enjoyed.
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Posted: March 28 2012 at 23:33
I'm more or less in Rothbard's camp of Austrian theory. I have my differences. I'm not as anti-positivism as most austrians. No point in going through all of it really though.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Posted: March 29 2012 at 11:02
Actually, that's subliminal propaganda of the worst Goebbelsian kind Brian. Just when the healthcare reform is about to be thrown out, you make Obama look like the anti-cancer.
Guess it would've better to say I can escape people trying to force white guilt on me f**k yeah
Well as you know/can guess I'm A OK with Obamacare being repealed. Especially since apparently the lawyer defending it was god awful. More proof these Dems just can't do anything right!
Of course all the GOP will be happy with maintaining the status quo. (sad face)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.387 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.