Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Deep Purple I or II ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDeep Purple I or II ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: Choose one.
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
15 [36.59%]
26 [63.41%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Weirdamigo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 08:07
I'd probably choose DP II over DP I 

DP II is rather hard rock than prog yet the albums "Fireball" and "Machine head" are a must have for hard rock fans and,in fact, for all fans of good music

DP I is more on the prog side but I have never liked "Shades of deep purple" for some unknown reason.
On the other hand the self-titled album is excellent, especially the song "April" .





Edited by Weirdamigo - July 28 2010 at 08:28
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 08:22
I've read all the posts here and I'm not convinced by the Mk II argument.

I vote Mk I




Edited by Snow Dog - February 07 2012 at 09:09
Back to Top
ole-the-first View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2012 at 21:55
Vote for Mark I. All three albums with Rod Evans are very imaginative and fascinating.

And Mark II did at least two albums which I don't find excellent — Fireball and Who Do We Think We Are.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 02:53
Who Do We Think We Are might suck a bit but that doesn't change the fact that as a raw performance unit, Mark II eats Mark I for breakfast. I have a rare live recording of Mark II performing Mandrake Root in Germany- Ian G doesn't open his mouth- and it's absolutely astonishing. Mark I were a good band but they never reached those heights.
Back to Top
RedSheep View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 08:24
Are we Talking dp 1 mark 1,2,3,4 or 5?

Definately a Deep purple 1 fan, I learned smoke on the water's solo with a broken arm and I've never forgotten it since!  Child in time was mind blowing
"Leaders or not we're part of a flock to follow till death, or Glory..."

Music and Lyric Writing Prog Blog
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 10:09
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I've read all the posts here and I'm not convinced by the Mk II argument.

I vote Mk I



Yeah me too. Their sole full-blown prog album is the s/t one (and the live Concerto). I'm a bigger fan of Mk II unsurprisingly, but I think it had more to do with the development of metal than prog.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:02
Originally posted by Weirdamigo Weirdamigo wrote:

I'd probably choose DP II over DP I 

DP II is rather hard rock than prog yet the albums "Fireball" and "Machine head" are a must have for hard rock fans and,in fact, for all fans of good music

DP I is more on the prog side but I have never liked "Shades of deep purple" for some unknown reason.
On the other hand the self-titled album is excellent, especially the song "April" .



Yeah something like that.

I'm a huge Purple fan, and like most eras, MK II over I.
Mind you, Mk I did release some killer rockin' tunes: The Painter, Bird Has Flown, Why Didn't Rosemary, Wring that Neck, etc.
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:14
Like both, but like Mk II slightly more.
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:26
Deep Purple II
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 13:26
Mark II.

Not that Mark I was anything to sneeze at, but I think when Gillan and Glover joined, the band's songwriting was starting to reach its peak.
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2012 at 00:13

Deep Purple II

Back to Top
dr prog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2010
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 2516
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2012 at 14:49
Mark 1 is fairly prog,
Mark 2 is mild prog, similar to Sabbath
 
When you have Lords classical influence, Blackmores jazz influence and Paices jazz/classical influence, you're usually going to get prog related music when it's recorded in the late 60s and early 70s. The closest they got to hard rock was Smoke on the water, Demons eye and Black Night, while Lazy and Why didn't Rosemary are blues rock. But almost everything else up to 1976 was heavy rock which is heavy prog
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2012 at 15:04
I feel people are voting for their favourite rather than addressing  the poll question.Confused

Shame.
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2012 at 13:22
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I feel people are voting for their favourite rather than addressing  the poll question.Confused

Shame.
 
I feel that Mk I are progressive, but kinda went along with the late 60's sound and spirit (bands like iron butterfly, the doors & love doesn't sound THAT diffrent from them), while Mk II would influence many later more or less PROGRESSIVE bands in the heavier,or even metal vein. I voted for MK II, too.
Not that Mk I wasn't influential, but Mk II was wider known, and able to reach out to and influence more people and bands.
Back to Top
Sagichim View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:29
The album deep purple is rooted in my heart and is my favourite DP album
I also adore Mk2 i decide not to decide between them

Edited by sagichim - April 03 2012 at 13:12
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:45
Originally posted by RedSheep RedSheep wrote:

Are we Talking dp 1 mark 1,2,3,4 or 5?

Definately a Deep purple 1 fan, I learned smoke on the water's solo with a broken arm and I've never forgotten it since!  Child in time was mind blowing

You say you are a Mark 1 fan but then go on about Mark 2 Purple as if you prefered that!
Back to Top
Sagichim View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:55

I just have to say that MK3  and even MK4 are superb.

Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2012 at 13:45
I actually think mark one had more influence on the prog scene than the 2. Firstly because they incorporated that symphonic and slightly proto-heavy prog flavour into their sound before that was mainstream and "normal". Few acts of the time could pull a track like April off, and I think it had infinitely more to say on the Brit part of the equation than Child in Time ever did. By the time of In Rock the rock scene had shifted immensely, and what Deep Purple were doing was not really that game-changing. They just did it with style and pomp, and nobody can really take that away from them.

Just so you know, mark one is also my fave - so I am completely biasedBig smile


Edited by Guldbamsen - March 31 2012 at 13:47
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2012 at 19:43
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

I actually think mark one had more influence on the prog scene than the 2. Firstly because they incorporated that symphonic and slightly proto-heavy prog flavour into their sound before that was mainstream and "normal". Few acts of the time could pull a track like April off, and I think it had infinitely more to say on the Brit part of the equation than Child in Time ever did. By the time of In Rock the rock scene had shifted immensely, and what Deep Purple were doing was not really that game-changing. They just did it with style and pomp, and nobody can really take that away from them.

Just so you know, mark one is also my fave - so I am completely biasedBig smile


Well, a lot of the musical elements of the first line-up were inspired by other groups like the Moody Blues, The Nice and Vanilla Fudge, all of which at one significant album to them (Days Of Future Passed, The Thoughts Of Emerlist Davjack and Vanilla Fudge), by the time Deep Purple Mk 1 released their first album.

As for In Rock not being game-changing, a lot of the metal groups that emerged in the second half of the 1970s like Judas Priest and Schenker-era UFO show a lot of influence in that album. To be fair though, in Priest's case, Purple was by no means their only influence.

On the other hand, you can hear a lot of Mk 1 in groups like Andromeda and Uriah Heep, not to mention that Purple's Mk 2 lineup was simply a logical extension of the previous one - this is especially apparent with Fireball.

Yeah, it's kind of complicated. There's just as many arguments to go with that analysis as there are that go against it. About the only thing I can safely say is that both had something to them that contributed to the scene, not to mention are quite enjoyable.
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
PyramidMeetsTheEye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 02 2012
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 118
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2012 at 12:49
deep purple 1 will do just fine
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.