Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Deep Purple I or II ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDeep Purple I or II ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: Choose one.
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
15 [36.59%]
26 [63.41%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:02
Originally posted by Weirdamigo Weirdamigo wrote:

I'd probably choose DP II over DP I 

DP II is rather hard rock than prog yet the albums "Fireball" and "Machine head" are a must have for hard rock fans and,in fact, for all fans of good music

DP I is more on the prog side but I have never liked "Shades of deep purple" for some unknown reason.
On the other hand the self-titled album is excellent, especially the song "April" .



Yeah something like that.

I'm a huge Purple fan, and like most eras, MK II over I.
Mind you, Mk I did release some killer rockin' tunes: The Painter, Bird Has Flown, Why Didn't Rosemary, Wring that Neck, etc.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 10:09
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I've read all the posts here and I'm not convinced by the Mk II argument.

I vote Mk I



Yeah me too. Their sole full-blown prog album is the s/t one (and the live Concerto). I'm a bigger fan of Mk II unsurprisingly, but I think it had more to do with the development of metal than prog.
Back to Top
RedSheep View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 08:24
Are we Talking dp 1 mark 1,2,3,4 or 5?

Definately a Deep purple 1 fan, I learned smoke on the water's solo with a broken arm and I've never forgotten it since!  Child in time was mind blowing
"Leaders or not we're part of a flock to follow till death, or Glory..."

Music and Lyric Writing Prog Blog
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2012 at 02:53
Who Do We Think We Are might suck a bit but that doesn't change the fact that as a raw performance unit, Mark II eats Mark I for breakfast. I have a rare live recording of Mark II performing Mandrake Root in Germany- Ian G doesn't open his mouth- and it's absolutely astonishing. Mark I were a good band but they never reached those heights.
Back to Top
ole-the-first View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2012 at 21:55
Vote for Mark I. All three albums with Rod Evans are very imaginative and fascinating.

And Mark II did at least two albums which I don't find excellent — Fireball and Who Do We Think We Are.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 08:22
I've read all the posts here and I'm not convinced by the Mk II argument.

I vote Mk I




Edited by Snow Dog - February 07 2012 at 09:09
Back to Top
Weirdamigo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 08:07
I'd probably choose DP II over DP I 

DP II is rather hard rock than prog yet the albums "Fireball" and "Machine head" are a must have for hard rock fans and,in fact, for all fans of good music

DP I is more on the prog side but I have never liked "Shades of deep purple" for some unknown reason.
On the other hand the self-titled album is excellent, especially the song "April" .





Edited by Weirdamigo - July 28 2010 at 08:28
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 08:07
Mark II because it influenced musicians to combine more,...stylistically, a classical approach to hard rock. I suppose Fireball, In Rock, and Machine Head reached more musicians worldwide. One example I could give regarding DP'S influence on prog would be the following:  Influential? or accidental?......you be the judge.  When Peter Bardens solos on organ. The early Camel titles have organ jams. Long running lines of classical/jazz improv along with Andy Ward's style of drumming sounds quite like Deep Purple for about a whole of 8 minutes.

Omega....200 Years After the Last War is very reminiscent of the Deep Purple Mark II sound. There are various other underground European prog band's with an influence of D.P. Goblin has produced many instrumental tracks which provide interplay between guitar and organ. A host of others like Gracious, Early Lucifer's Friend, .......I don't know,..you must observe closely the jam sections and connect it buy sampling some instrumental sections of Purple's music.

I often get the impression that Deep Purple were influenced by Keith Emerson's The Nice. Ritchie Blackmore filled in for Davy O' List one night and the event was recorded. I've seen it listed twice and it may be a bootleg. I can see Blackmore fitting in with The Nice. Blackmore had already been working with classical musician Jon Lord. They seemed to have ties with the prog world due to their idea of combining Classical modes to hard rock. Proggers took the idea and combined it with a softer melodic approach however, they couldn't hide that Deep Purple sound. If you've been a listener for decades it's pretty easy to spot.  
Back to Top
akin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2010 at 07:03
I don't think DP Mark II was very much influential to prog, more to hard rock. As DP Mark I wasn't influential either because, although prog, was pretty obscure, it is hard to vote based on influence to prog. On preference, I'd go with Mark I, because the three first albums are a mix of psychedelia and early prog rock,


Back to Top
yanch View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2010
Location: Lowell, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2010 at 06:53
Mark II as that's considered the "classic" line up and produced most of the songs that Seep Purple are known for.
Back to Top
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2010 at 12:21
Shades of Deep Purple is more far out and progressive than any other albums they ever did so I'm going with that.
Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2010 at 00:48
Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:

Went with DP II. I got to see them live and not version 1.0 
 
That's not the point Dead
Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2010 at 00:44
Went with DP II. I got to see them live and not version 1.0 
Back to Top
otto pankrock View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2009
Location: canada
Status: Offline
Points: 330
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 18:48
MK.II Although MK.I dabbled in prog. especially on the 3rd album, no one bought it. Stuff like Child in Time and The Mule had much more impact.
Back to Top
Cactus Choir View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 10:18
I think the Mark II band was more influential on both prog and hard rock largely by dint of it being more successful. Mark I was only really known for having the Hush hit single so probably thought of as a pop band(!) The psych/proto-prog material on the albums was quite good but to me it gives the impression of following trends rather than setting them, and Purple didn't really establish their own identity until In Rock.

Mark II was hard rock/heavy metal, but quite proggy live (eg the extended arrangements for Mandrake Root and Space Truckin) and sometimes in the studio with tracks like Child in Time and Fools.


Edited by Cactus Choir - July 23 2010 at 10:19
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"

"He's up the pub"
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 09:47
OK, it's about Deep Purple Mark I and Deep Purple Mark II. I thought it was about their first 2 LPS.
I voted for DP MII, for I think that, in spite of all, the younger generation of progressive bands have started to know DP by "Smoke on the Water" and LP like Machine Head or Made In Japan.

Plus, from what I read, it seems that DP was first seen as a second rate Vanilla Fudge or Iron Butterfly. The critics were harsh when talking about Concerto for Band and Orchestra. In Rock is still appreciated as their "jailbreak" album.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Online
Points: 20298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 04:17
I like both eras.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
CinemaZebra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2010
Location: Ancient Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 6795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 00:13
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Originally posted by CinemaZebra CinemaZebra wrote:

I'll vote for Deep Purple 1 because no one else will. You know, unless they're like me.
 
Read the question in the post of his Wink
Whoops. Oh well, the post still fits for ME anyway. LOL
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7872
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 00:02
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

Mark I, even if it was proggier, was not famous enough to be influental.
 
ConfusedThat means you voted for Mark II, right?
Right.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Alitare View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 22:18
Mark 1 was closer to prog, mark 2 was more influential to prog. Anyone who thinks book is mor einfluential than in rock....well they aren't too bright.

Influential isn't synonymous with good, though.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.