Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is The GOP Race Over?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs The GOP Race Over?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 49>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Dudemanguy View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 14 2011
Location: In the closet
Status: Offline
Points: 89 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2011 at 12:52

Gringrich doesn't want any of those disgusting gay people voting for him. Wacko 

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/gingrich-gay-republicans-dont-vote-for-me-vote-for-obama/politics/2011/12/21/32260
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2011 at 13:14
^That's okay the true hardcore republican gays still have Santorum.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2011 at 15:04
I wonder what he would say to a Muslim. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2011 at 19:04
^Now a gay muslim would probably present a dilemma for good Rick...
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17309 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2011 at 12:14
Originally posted by Dudemanguy Dudemanguy wrote:

Gringrich doesn't want any of those disgusting gay people voting for him. Wacko 

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/gingrich-gay-republicans-dont-vote-for-me-vote-for-obama/politics/2011/12/21/32260

 
 
Hilarious that this is some big headline.  We're always complaining around here that politicians spin, and will say anything to anyone if it means begging a vote.  So when this guy confronts Gingrich, possibly looking for a good gotcha moment, Gingrich is honest and basically says, paraphrasing....hey, if gay marriage is your biggest issue, and my other issues aren't compelling to you, then I'm probably not your guy.......and that is turned into some big deal 
 
I heard the full exchange, Gingrich was polite and frank, and the slant of the article (as well as you putting the word "disgusting"  into his mouth) is unfair. 
 
There's plenty to hit the guy on, but this "scandal"  says more about the people freaking out than about Gingrich.  I may not agree with him on the issue, but I appreciate his honesty and loathe this kind of "journalism."
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13795 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2011 at 12:46
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by Dudemanguy Dudemanguy wrote:

Gringrich doesn't want any of those disgusting gay people voting for him. Wacko 

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/gingrich-gay-republicans-dont-vote-for-me-vote-for-obama/politics/2011/12/21/32260

 
 
Hilarious that this is some big headline.  We're always complaining around here that politicians spin, and will say anything to anyone if it means begging a vote.  So when this guy confronts Gingrich, possibly looking for a good gotcha moment, Gingrich is honest and basically says, paraphrasing....hey, if gay marriage is your biggest issue, and my other issues aren't compelling to you, then I'm probably not your guy.......and that is turned into some big deal 
 
I heard the full exchange, Gingrich was polite and frank, and the slant of the article (as well as you putting the word "disgusting"  into his mouth) is unfair. 
 
There's plenty to hit the guy on, but this "scandal"  says more about the people freaking out than about Gingrich.  I may not agree with him on the issue, but I appreciate his honesty and loathe this kind of "journalism."

I agree Jim. It's one of the biggest conundrums in modern society. We keep (rightly) asking our politicians to be honest and avoid meaningless spinned up drivel, and then, when they do, we give them a pasting.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Dudemanguy View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 14 2011
Location: In the closet
Status: Offline
Points: 89 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2011 at 19:06
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by Dudemanguy Dudemanguy wrote:

Gringrich doesn't want any of those disgusting gay people voting for him. Wacko 

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/gingrich-gay-republicans-dont-vote-for-me-vote-for-obama/politics/2011/12/21/32260

 
 
Hilarious that this is some big headline.  We're always complaining around here that politicians spin, and will say anything to anyone if it means begging a vote.  So when this guy confronts Gingrich, possibly looking for a good gotcha moment, Gingrich is honest and basically says, paraphrasing....hey, if gay marriage is your biggest issue, and my other issues aren't compelling to you, then I'm probably not your guy.......and that is turned into some big deal 
 
I heard the full exchange, Gingrich was polite and frank, and the slant of the article (as well as you putting the word "disgusting"  into his mouth) is unfair. 
 
There's plenty to hit the guy on, but this "scandal"  says more about the people freaking out than about Gingrich.  I may not agree with him on the issue, but I appreciate his honesty and loathe this kind of "journalism."

I just went off of this one article, and assumed it was true given the character of Gringrich. But it seems you are right, so yeah sorry Gringrich if you ever happen to read these forums. (lol) There's a better article.  

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/gay-republican-establishment-gives-newt-a-pass-on-marriage-views.php



Edited by Dudemanguy - December 22 2011 at 19:06
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2011 at 20:04
Kent Sorenson defects from Bachman to Paul, woo hoo!!! Tongue
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2011 at 21:22
Had to look up who that was.  I suppose that's somewhat important, in Iowa, especially with the establishment seemingly rallying around Mitt and the media trying their damndest to push the ungodly idea of a Santorum surgeDead.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2011 at 23:51
RICK SANTORUM THIRD IN IOWA.

Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 07:46
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

RICK SANTORUM THIRD IN IOWA.



I just saw that.  But it's actually not too surprising; I believe the majority of Iowa GOP caucus-goers are social conservatives.  When the field shifts to New Hampshire and beyond, the type of rhetoric that plays well to those folks often falls flat.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 07:55
Iowa and New Hampstershire are a bit too full of themselves.  Iowa gets bonus points for allowing gay marriage. LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 08:12
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Iowa and New Hampstershire are a bit too full of themselves. 


They can't help it when the media declares OMG IT'S OVER when a candidate wins in those places.  I just hate the importance placed on them just because they go first.  I would totally support having a national primary day.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 08:42
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Iowa and New Hampstershire are a bit too full of themselves. 


They can't help it when the media declares OMG IT'S OVER when a candidate wins in those places.  I just hate the importance placed on them just because they go first.  I would totally support having a national primary day.
If not that I'd like to see them randomly rotated.  No stupid super groupings.Angry  Why shouldn't other less populous states get a shot at going first?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 09:21
Not being from the US I'm intrigued by this gay marriage legislation that differs between states.
Imagine a gay couple (no, say a lesbian couple, I think that's much nicer) goes from one state to the next that doesn't allow gay marriages: Does that then make them divorced? Single again? Criminals? Tolerated? What?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 17:50
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Not being from the US I'm intrigued by this gay marriage legislation that differs between states.
Imagine a gay couple (no, say a lesbian couple, I think that's much nicer) goes from one state to the next that doesn't allow gay marriages: Does that then make them divorced? Single again? Criminals? Tolerated? What?
Basically states where they don't honor the rights, privileges, and obligations of marriage for gay people just don't honor it.  I am firmly of the position that the government should either extend those things to all people in a secular fashion or stay out of it all together.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2011 at 19:24
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Not being from the US I'm intrigued by this gay marriage legislation that differs between states.
Imagine a gay couple (no, say a lesbian couple, I think that's much nicer) goes from one state to the next that doesn't allow gay marriages: Does that then make them divorced? Single again? Criminals? Tolerated? What?


It's not much different than going between countries.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
cannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 03 2010
Location: Coho Country
Status: Offline
Points: 1302 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2011 at 03:05
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Iowa and New Hampstershire are a bit too full of themselves. 


They can't help it when the media declares OMG IT'S OVER when a candidate wins in those places.  I just hate the importance placed on them just because they go first.  I would totally support having a national primary day.
 
How does 150,000 people in Iowa have so much influence? Ridiculous.
 
It's ironic that in some states (the Red states) they are making it harder to vote, especially for the lower income but the US raves about other voting discrepancies in other countries. Soon it will be people with an income over $250,000 that will be only eligible to vote.
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2011 at 09:06
"Republican voters may not want to ever admit it, but the stance of voting for "anyone but Obama" regardless of that candidate's history or policy views is as narrow-minded and stubborn as the Democrat Party voters who have had their heads in the sand about President Obama and the fact that his spending sprees and foreign policy have made George W. Bush look judicious."
 
Also, everyone knows Iowa is only important if the establishment likes the winner:
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson
Don't think I'd be out of place saying that could be applied to watching television news shows.


Edited by manofmystery - December 30 2011 at 09:07


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17309 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2011 at 09:46
Originally posted by cannon cannon wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Iowa and New Hampstershire are a bit too full of themselves. 


They can't help it when the media declares OMG IT'S OVER when a candidate wins in those places.  I just hate the importance placed on them just because they go first.  I would totally support having a national primary day.
 
How does 150,000 people in Iowa have so much influence? Ridiculous.
 
It's ironic that in some states (the Red states) they are making it harder to vote, especially for the lower income but the US raves about other voting discrepancies in other countries. Soon it will be people with an income over $250,000 that will be only eligible to vote.
 
 
That's a stretch.  Do you think everyone with a US driver's license is making over $250? 
Pretty easy to get a license or ID, which most people need for other stuff anyway.  Showing an ID seems pretty common sense to most people.  Except those who think non-citizens should be able to vote.  If you do, fine, but the $250 thing is pretty silly. 
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 49>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.