Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Topic: "Queen" vs "Rush" Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:28 |
Of these two debuts which do you think is stronger. Both wear their Led Zeppelin admiration on their sleeves and both of these albums were released in (somewhat) close proximity to each other. In my opinion Queen's debut reveals a personality and shows more promise in transcending their influences, while Rush seems to still be "finding their way" on their debut. Plus, song for song, "Queen" is a more exciting record, IMO. What do you think?
Edited by catfood03 - October 12 2011 at 21:29
|
|
twosteves
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4091
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:41 |
one thing they have in common is equally bad album covers lol
|
|
Horizons
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:43 |
Queen's cover is good i think, but i haven't heard their debut yet. So no vote.
|
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
|
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:45 |
Horizons wrote:
Queen's cover is good i think, but i haven't heard their debut yet. So no vote. |
Queen's album cover actually improves when shrunk to CD size, as an LP it's becomes more glaring how boring it really is
Edited by catfood03 - October 12 2011 at 21:46
|
|
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:50 |
Rush's debut looks like a Batman TV show caption, and Queen's debut is just a big dump of purple with some guy standing there.
|
|
Wanorak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4574
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 00:34 |
Queen for miles for me.
|
A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7272
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 00:40 |
Queen for me as well. Queen II is a remarkable album that seems forgotten by many.
And, don't forget, "no synthesizers"!!
|
|
gents
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 30 2010
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 89
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 03:53 |
Rush doesn't stand a chance. Queen is way way better.
|
|
criticdrummer94
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 431
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 04:39 |
Queen's debut is a little better and more proggy than Rush is. Why you all making the cover art such a big deal
|
MY IDOLS
|
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 07:05 |
criticdrummer94 wrote:
Why you all making the cover art such a big deal |
I guess because I put the art in my OP. I like talking about album covers, so I don't mind, but the ratings are intended for the music.
|
|
Rutgers Joe
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 103
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 14:40 |
Queen's first album is terrific. Rush's...eehhh...not so much.
|
The original (and very creepy) cover of THE STEVE HOWE ALBUM...hint...look in the water...
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 15:56 |
The Queen debut is much stronger in my opinion.
The Rush debut is fun, but hardly original. The Queen debut is also 'fun' but doesn't really sound like anything that had gone before.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
KingCrInuYasha
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 23:29 |
Never heard Rush's debut, but I've heard Queen's and I must say, it's an underrated masterpiece.
|
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 23:47 |
Two of my very favorite bands, although I haven't heard Rush's debut, so I can't vote. I would bet that Queen's is better though, based upon what I've heard about Rush.
|
|
|
Fox On The Rocks
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 10 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 5012
|
Posted: October 14 2011 at 15:06 |
Have'nt heard Queen's debut so I can't really vote but Rush's tunes on the first album are just pretty straighforward, standard rock tunes and are'nt Prog at all, but there great tunes for what they are.
Edited by Fox On The Rocks - October 14 2011 at 15:07
|
|
|
progistoomainstream
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 07 2011
Location: Willow Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: October 14 2011 at 22:19 |
This is an apples and oranges comparason.
|
|
|
Prog Geo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 09 2010
Location: Athens (Greece)
Status: Offline
Points: 2555
|
Posted: October 15 2011 at 08:00 |
Rush!
|
Sonorous Meal show every Sunday at 20:00 (greek time) on http://www.justincaseradio.com
|
|
clarkpegasus4001
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2011
Location: Nottingham
Status: Offline
Points: 635
|
Posted: October 15 2011 at 08:01 |
Rush for me, I prefer Queen 2 to the 1st
|
Tony C.
|
|
wjohnd
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 16 2011
Location: Scotland, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 327
|
Posted: October 16 2011 at 06:25 |
Rush. by a country mile. It's straight up rock, and lacks the edge that Peart brought to the band both lyrically and technically, but equally it's lack of whimsy means it has aged so much better than Queen's debut.
|
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: October 16 2011 at 06:41 |
I prefer Rush by a considerable margin.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.