Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Steven Wilson - Grace for Drowning
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSteven Wilson - Grace for Drowning

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 14>
Author
Message
The Monodrone View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4489
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 10:08
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Polo Polo wrote:

Sounds really good. I'd say it's better than Insurgentes, The Incident and Deadwing's best songs combined.

I like it, but it's not as good as any of those you listed. In PA terms, it's still a solid 4 star album, but IMO it lacks coherence and focus - again, compared to those you listed (especially The Incident).


No, Marco's right.
    
Back to Top
colorofmoney91 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 11:39
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by colorofmoney91 colorofmoney91 wrote:

My impression of this album is settled "meh".
Am I the only one who finds the over use of this expression very irritating?

meh
whatever Wink 
 
(thanks for the link!)

Ouch
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 12:33
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Polo Polo wrote:

Sounds really good. I'd say it's better than Insurgentes, The Incident and Deadwing's best songs combined.

I like it, but it's not as good as any of those you listed. In PA terms, it's still a solid 4 star album, but IMO it lacks coherence and focus - again, compared to those you listed (especially The Incident).


No, Marco's right.

No, I'm right. ;-)

There are two aspects involved here:

subjective
objective

Subjectively, we're both right. Marco prefers Grace for Drowning, I prefer The Incident. Objectively ... in order to assess music objectively, you must define some criteria and then compare the albums based on those criteria. I mentioned coherence and focus, but there are others (originality, production, musicianship etc). Marco may disagree when it comes to those criteria (for example he may say that GfD doesn't lack coherence and focus), or he may reject the criteria altogether and come up with a new list by which GfD wins according to his assessment. Or he may reject the whole concept of using objective criteria to compare music.
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 12:50
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Polo Polo wrote:

Sounds really good. I'd say it's better than Insurgentes, The Incident and Deadwing's best songs combined.

I like it, but it's not as good as any of those you listed. In PA terms, it's still a solid 4 star album, but IMO it lacks coherence and focus - again, compared to those you listed (especially The Incident).


No, Marco's right.

No, I'm right. ;-)

There are two aspects involved here:

subjective
objective

Subjectively, we're both right. Marco prefers Grace for Drowning, I prefer The Incident. Objectively ... in order to assess music objectively, you must define some criteria and then compare the albums based on those criteria. I mentioned coherence and focus, but there are others (originality, production, musicianship etc). Marco may disagree when it comes to those criteria (for example he may say that GfD doesn't lack coherence and focus), or he may reject the criteria altogether and come up with a new list by which GfD wins according to his assessment. Or he may reject the whole concept of using objective criteria to compare music.


Wow, subjective and objective.  I really learned something today.
Back to Top
Bonnek View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 12:53

For me it's simple. I prefer "Insurgentes" because I'm a Goth-troll disguised as a member of a Prog community.
But most proggers will prefer Grace.

And we're both right.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 13:02
^ I guess it's fair to say that Grace for Drowning is more accessible and less experimental than Insurgentes. But as far as prog is concerned: I'd even classify Grace for Drowning as prog-related (in fact I did over at PF). It has some prog songs, what with the 15/8 signature and all ... but especially the first couple of songs are not all that prog. Not that there's anything wrong with that (especially considering that Steven Wilson doesn't like the label "prog" at all) - I'm only mentioning that in response to you bringing it up. Wink
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 13:05
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:



Wow, subjective and objective.  I really learned something today.

Well, if you stopped reading my post at that point I can understand how it might appear to you like simply stating the obvious. However, truly progressive forum members work their way through the entire post - consider it an epic, if it helps. Wink
Back to Top
The Neck Romancer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 01 2010
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 10185
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 13:13
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:



Wow, subjective and objective.  I really learned something today.

Well, if you stopped reading my post at that point I can understand how it might appear to you like simply stating the obvious. However, truly progressive forum members work their way through the entire post - consider it an epic, if it helps. Wink

Yeah, but the truly avant forum members will actually read 2 words and reply based on them LOL
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:



There are two aspects involved here:

subjective
objective

Subjectively, we're both right. Marco prefers Grace for Drowning, I prefer The Incident. Objectively ... in order to assess music objectively, you must define some criteria and then compare the albums based on those criteria. I mentioned coherence and focus, but there are others (originality, production, musicianship etc). Marco may disagree when it comes to those criteria (for example he may say that GfD doesn't lack coherence and focus), or he may reject the criteria altogether and come up with a new list by which GfD wins according to his assessment. Or he may reject the whole concept of using objective criteria to compare music.

I'd rather spend the time I'd waste writing a nice thoughtful reply on listening to music.
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 13:15
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:



Wow, subjective and objective.  I really learned something today.

Well, if you stopped reading my post at that point I can understand how it might appear to you like simply stating the obvious. However, truly progressive forum members work their way through the entire post - consider it an epic, if it helps. Wink


I read the entire post.  It continued to state the obvious.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 13:58
^ So does GfD in fact *obviously* lack coherence and focus? That seems to be what you're saying here. 
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:01
I'm bored now Mike.  You win.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:02
LOL
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:20
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

I'm bored now Mike.  You win.

You made a condescending post that doesn't make sense ... if I "win", then because of that and not because you can't be bothered to respond. But let's postpone the decision ... if need be indefinitely, if you find no cure for this boredom.Clown
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:21
Mike, try not to take things so seriously.  Please.

I apologize for the condescending post.


Edited by Padraic - October 05 2011 at 14:28
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:42
Seriously? This is an internet forum. LOL 

Kidding aside, your reply to my subjective/objective post strikes me as tense and condescending - I'm not bothered by it at all, but I do think you have the emotions reversed here.

EDIT: Posted my reply to your unedited post - no need to apologize, thanks though. My posts in this thread so far have been polarizing to say the least - and if you think I'm wrong, I'll gladly accept that point of view. Ultimately each person coming across the thread will make up their own mind anyway.Smile


This is what it boils down to IMO: Each of us has their own set of criteria, both subjective and objective, to assess music. And I'm sure each of us had some moments when we came across a review and thought "hey, that's just *wrong*". In that situation we not only disagree with the review, but also think we're more qualified than the reviewer - and that's perfectly fine. Of course we're also often wrong (objectively) but simply fail to recognize the flaw in our reasoning. Some reviewers lack experience, some lack diversity (in genres), some don't make enough of an effort to recognize their own biases, some are too objective. In the end, as I did here, you can only arrive at an opinion and then defend it while remaining open to criticism or re-evaluation. I'll continue listening to both albums, and who knows - maybe someday I'll prefer GfD. I just don't think so now. Smile


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - October 05 2011 at 14:50
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:44
You're right, Mike, you're absolutely 100% correct.

We've derailed the thread enough.  If you have anything further to add, send me a PM.


Edited by Padraic - October 05 2011 at 14:47
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 14:52
^ Beat you to it (you're agreeing to my previous post, just in case anyone is confused now). But I agree, let's end this philosophical discussion.

Edited by Mr ProgFreak - October 05 2011 at 14:53
Back to Top
The Truth View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 16:06
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Polo Polo wrote:

Sounds really good. I'd say it's better than Insurgentes, The Incident and Deadwing's best songs combined.

I like it, but it's not as good as any of those you listed. In PA terms, it's still a solid 4 star album, but IMO it lacks coherence and focus - again, compared to those you listed (especially The Incident).


No, Marco's right.


All of the mentioned albums are coherent and focused IMO.
Back to Top
MillsLayne View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 2504
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 16:14
Finally ordered it off of Amazon this morning!  I got the media book (digibook) edition.  Can't wait!
Back to Top
Guls View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2011
Location: Brighton
Status: Offline
Points: 13
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2011 at 16:46
One can never accuse SW of sitting on his laurels - every album he does introduces something new to his oeuvre. I like most of what he did with PT - obvious exceptions being The Sky... and Voyage 34 - and I love Insurgentes. GfD is - thankfully - not much like any of those. Sectarian does kinda remind me of Tinto Brass, not bad but the least distinguished actual song. Grace For Drowning, Raider Prelude and Belle De Jour are nice little mood pieces - kinda like the bookends of Heritage - but again, not greatly distinguished. The rest though, is variously enjoyable. Deform..., No Part... and Track One are all beautiful, the latter two darkly so. Remainder... is brilliant, almost kicks ass in an obscure knda way. Raider II 'almost tilts as an unmanageable indulgence' to borrow a Morrisssey phrase but there's enough going on there to hold attention. Definitely very Crimsonesque, and slightly reminiscient of Judy Dyble's Harpsong, mostly due to Theo Travis' woodwind contributions.

Oh, and check out this link to antonio seijas blog. Seems SW may have been, ahem, inspired by his artwork for Harvest Shocked

http://antonioseijas.blogspot.com/2011/09/harvest-steve-wilson.html
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 14>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.