Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report errors & omissions here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Jakszyk, Fripp, Collins
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedJakszyk, Fripp, Collins
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6442 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2011 at 02:24
The other ProjeKcts have the project nature mentioned in the album title, I'd really like this to be that way as well. People are being misled with the current title, a review just came up which talks about it as a legitimate KC album, which by all accounts it is not.
It's on PA!
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2011 at 07:12
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

In my opinion it's better leave it under KC. 
New entry "King Crimson ProjeKcts" will lead to new duplications. Believe me, one day somebody will add these ProjeKcts to KC discography. Smile

And you will be there to delete them. You really shouldn't avoid doing something because of the chance someone may idiotically screw it up later.

It seems logical to me that if it wasn't released as King Crimson it shouldn't be under King Crimson. I think it's unlikely that someone will add duplicates later because even the noobiest of n00bs would stop and think for a moment that our King Crimson discography is probably complete, but even if someone did, deleting them will not be a Sisyphean task. 


Edited by Henry Plainview - June 02 2011 at 07:14
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2011 at 10:34
Originally posted by Pekka Pekka wrote:

The other ProjeKcts have the project nature mentioned in the album title, I'd really like this to be that way as well. People are being misled with the current title, a review just came up which talks about it as a legitimate KC album, which by all accounts it is not.


Perfectly agreed. I edited the album to include the whole information.

RYM has the album under Jakko Jakszyk, Robert Fripp & Mel Collins, AllMusic under King Crimson and Wikipedia as "an album by Jakszyk, Fripp and Collins, as A King Crimson ProjeKct". Wacko


EDIT

Also, LOL @ Genesis being the #2 band on PA (there is no #1), and King Crimson being #191.


Edited by harmonium.ro - June 02 2011 at 10:36
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2011 at 17:49
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
And you will be there to delete them. You really shouldn't avoid doing something because of the chance someone may idiotically screw it up later.

It seems logical to me that if it wasn't released as King Crimson it shouldn't be under King Crimson. I think it's unlikely that someone will add duplicates later because even the noobiest of n00bs would stop and think for a moment that our King Crimson discography is probably complete, but even if someone did, deleting them will not be a Sisyphean task. 

I hope I'll be there, but my experience on this site tells me that duplications are almost guaranteed.
By the way, if duplications have reviews deleting them is like a Sisyphean task. Nobody, even mighty admins, can move reviews. 
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2011 at 02:44
 
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

 I hope I'll be there, but my experience on this site tells me that duplications are almost guaranteed.
By the way, if duplications have reviews deleting them is like a Sisyphean task. Nobody, even mighty admins, can move reviews.

Well I have to imagine that Max could move a review if he really wanted to ;-), but you can always just delete the review and PM them the text for reposting, since it is unlikely more than one or two reviews would get into the duplicate before someone noticed.

I'm not saying that I'm certain it will not inconvenience anyone in the future, but I think logic for everybody else is far more important than a few stupid people doing stupid things. 
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2011 at 04:42
It's what we usually do. Things get worse if the reviewer does not visit PA anymore.

I love logic, but those few people you've mentioned are always here. Wink If Projekcts will be a separate entry, be so.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2011 at 14:14
I'm in agreement with H.Ro.
 
There would be no problem moving the album, and the reviews would go with it OK.
 
What sub-genre would they be added to though?
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.124 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.